The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread
Comments
-
Yes- it was Heston-- but a while earlier I mentioned dementia as one of many possible reasons that McCain kept confusing Al Qaeda and Iran-- when Leiberman had to correct him.
-
And Grace, yes, she was referring to Charlton Heston and making fun of his Alzheimers.
-
Obama4President:
Do you find it ironic that you entitled this "The Brand New Respectful Campaign Thread"?
"This is the peaceful political discussion thread- not one where we bait each other."
"BTW-- can we try to remember that this is the respectful campaign thread?"
"I can definitely see why she assumes that...isn't well read on race by her comments and refusal to even see comments in context. Her rigid thinking is typical of someone views Wright's comments without historical context. I doubt she ever heard of Tuskegee before or knows how it is possible that anyone could believe that AIDS was created. It's apparent she passed judgment w/o hearing or reading th entire speech. None of that means she has to agree with Wright, just to come to an intelligent decision based on the totality of information."
"...-- it's sometimes hard to know how you mean things, since you often sling snide remarks and generalize from specific examples to think I mean things that I didn't say. If I misinterpretted what you said, I apologize, although from the tone of your response I believe that there was no misinterpretation and it was a sarcastic, not a genuine remark."
"You are one of the most judgmental people on here. I never said that you were worse than a skinhead, what I said is the type of racial bias like yours, that is covert and sometimes not even known to the individual can be worse than the type of racism from a skin head, because that type racism is so overt and in your face you can't miss it. Covert bias can easily be given an excuses like-- I'm not prejudice against muslims, I just wouldn't sit next to them on an airplane. I'm not prejudice against blacks, I just wouldn't want my child marrying one of them. Again, your concrete thinking goes isn't seeing the nuances of the discussion."
"...you are ignorant if you thought I meant that having a cultural identity means no one else can partake and enjoy in such foods or activities. I think you're purposely finding reasons to be angry and take things personally, unless this is just how you are offline as well. I never said I couldn't be sarcastic-- I know I can be. I often feel like I'm talking to an 8 year old when trying to discuss things with you-- like you hold your hands over your ears and say, 'i can't hear you....'"
"Or he started getting alzheimer's sooner than anyone realized
I've seen people joking about a lot of things on these political threads, including slavery which I find abhorrent. I'm the first one to tell and laugh at breast cancer jokes."
"that was you who made the slavery joke-- although you didn't consider it a joke."
You have continually bashed another poster (and the other one you call "mean"), labeling her not well-read, ignorant, and "insinuated" REPEATEDLY that she is a racist. I personally do not find this thread respectful in the least. I see it as an elitist attempt to bully a few people who do not agree with your beliefs. I'm saying this as someone who actually does agree with much of your politics. However, I have to admit that you have managed to turn me off of some of it with the heavy-handed, intolerant and disrespectful ways you have treated others on this thread and on the "less respectful one". I thought you were supposed to be some sort of psychologist. Wouldn't someone with those qualifications be a little more empathetic and sensitive, (not to mention manage to have better communication skills?) Everyone here has respectfully listened to you; I don't understand why you can't do the same.
Just my opinion.
Anna
-
I disagree. I don't think many here have listend respectfully; and your description of Amy again provide negative descriptors attached to her. I see almost everybody here making personal comments about others, often negative and totally said to incite further negative comments in return. Why this tit for tat? Why this I can do one better than you? Why can't a group of women discuss issues, and refrain from any personal descriptors of a person they disagree with? And we have all done it at sometime or another. AND if someone, no matter who it is on this thread or the other thread says something personal about your character, could we just politely ask them not to do that, and stick to the issues?
I enjoy this thread, but I'm tired of the personal attacks on others. We all have our own opinions, no one is more right or wrong. No one is better or less. No one is going to change our minds. We are sharing what we know through our own experiences and situations. We are each who we are as an individual. I may not agree with you, but I will agree that you have the right to your opinion and I will validate your experience. It may not be my experience, but it is just as valid as mine or any others.
So. Those of you who feel Amy has "attacked" you, okay you said it, you retaliated, now drop it. Stop this childish you did this to me on another thread. Can we please stop repeating what was said 17 pages back and discuss the issues? I for one have had it with the attacks, and won't be responding to any of those again if addressed to me. Hope all of you will do the same.
And Amy's intention was not to make fun of Alzheimers. She has stated that in a previous response and apologized for it. Next. -
-
Of course, Amy, I only read this comment and HAD, HAD HAD TO STOP! Here Amy rants again. That's why I've stopped coming here so much. Decided it wasn't worth exchanging "words" with our "PRO debater," Amy. Amy, I've posted on another board and I'm used to your kind! Sometimes it gets really ugly!
"Shirley-- that was you who made the slavery joke-- although you didn't consider it a joke."
Please, Amy, go find that joke that I posted. I need a laugh!
Shirley
-
Amy gracefully TRIES to explain herself.
"Inna- I didn't joke about McCain having alzheimers, I
wondered whether the slips in his memory were merely slips, or a sign of something more-- because Reagan had alzheimers before he left office. I didn't say I thought he had alzheimers, but that having some sort of dimensia at 72 would not be out of the realm of possibilities. I don't even think he does have dimensia, it was only one of the list of possibilities for why he made several "misstatements" while in Iraq."
Too funny, Amy. Good joke!
McCain obviously has good genes. Look at his old mom!
So, I guess we could say Obama lost his senses SINCE he cannot remember Wright's (his FORMER minister and spiritual leader who had to step down from his part in the campaign and who was disinvited to be on the stage with Obama when he announced his run for prez because Wright was "spirited" (controversial or something like that. And Obama lost his senses when he said he was a PROFESSOR instead of a lecturer and more...) sermons. I could name more senseless gaffes however, I digress.
PS..no, Amy, you never joke. You do not know how.
-
bygrace:
"Well,
2 wrongs don't make a right--so I say instead of tit for tat, that we keep all this above board and stop the character assassinations of those posting on this board. From any of us. Why are some of you so hostile to Amy? Many of her comments are right on. She isn't calling any of you mean or disturbing. If Amy feels that Shirley joked about slavery (it really isn't about whether she did or not) then she is entitled to her opinion. She doesn't have to agree with everything anyone says here, and shouldn't be attacked because she puts up a different comment."I TOTALLY disagree with you, Grace. Not that it matters. But I think saying I joked about slavery is a bit too much. That's almost character assassination. If someone reads her comment and doesn't know me what do you think they would think? And, yes, I do care what someone thinks about how I feel about slavery!
I want to see the "joke."
Shirley
-
Amy, a wink!? Yep, you were joking or making fun of McCain's age.
Or he started getting alzheimer's sooner than anyone realized
-
Grace,
I want to respond to your posting about "attacking Amy". I personally do not feel attacked by Amy at all. And I would definitely welcome discussion here. But here is a quick example from a few days ago.
I challenged Amy to name ONE SINGLE bill authored or coauthored by Obama. In response she stated that I would never voted for him since I don't understand or share democratic values. You see how the question about Obama became a critique of me.
I understand she is a bit embarassed about her candidate having no leadership skills and nothing much besides a nice smile and good speaking skills to recommend him. But still I would appreciate her answering this very appropriate question honestly instead .
-
Well, and Clinton won't bring up Wright, because there are pictures of her and Bill shaking Wright's hands at some function. So, everyone forgets, and some remember wrong. Will she slip up and make another mistake about what is real and what is not?
I did not say that you were feeling attacked by Amy, Inna. I said all of you were attacking her. Yes, I'm familiar with your example. You seem to be posting it on all the threads. And guess what, it looks like Amy has decided to ignore your post. Guess you'll have to ask someone else.
Oh wait, I do believe she gave you a whole list Obama worked on. Perhaps you should check more than the first two to get an answer.
She wasn't "critiquing you," and I didn't see her say you don't understand democratic values. I think you are misunderstanding what she said. She is merely pointing out that you have stated you would not vote for him and that you lean more towards republicans. That's not a negative. She did answer your question, that you consider appropriate, honestly. Gave you a nice long list of work he did.
Shirley,
Don't know where the joke is. Guess it would mean reading back over the past 18 pages on this thread, and the 40something on the other to come up with it. For me, reading once and answering posts is as much as I have time to do.
And yes, over and over we have heard about Wright, and the professor vs lecturer. It's old news, and by the time the convention is over, it will be very old news. -
Grace, "everyone" is not attacking Amy, we are asking her to stop bashing and ridiculing, everyone who disagrees with her. She is condescending to others as one would do to children. As you can see no one is making fun of her beliefs, sexuality, political views, religion or lack of, race or the people she wants in office.
-
Geez, I may as well go back to the Wagon Circle thread.
Grace, I'm going back to something you wrote a few paragraphs ago. You asked if the article you posted was too long. Well, for my ADD brain, I could only chunk-in a paragraph or two at a time. So, for me, it's much easier to hone in on a paragraph or two to really appreciate what is being written. But the others don't seem to have a problem, so I'll do my best and respond to the parts that sink in.
Thanks for the info on Hillary's campaign. Now, I better go see what she's up to. I hate NAFTA.
Gotta run,
Bren
Edited: deleted para on dementia.
-
Perhaps if some of you --not everyone--as Roctobermom says, would stop bashing and ridiculing her, then it could work both ways. I have seen some pretty condescending remarks from others also.
I think all of us at one time or another get caught up in the heat of the moment, and write with a little more "poison" than we should. For me, I have to step back, and take a deep breath, sometimes even leave the thread and then come back and reply later. It's all a question of thinking before we write.
And there have been some who have made fun of who she wants in office. I mean, we have all done it to each other. But the personal attacks just need to stop, from all who are doing it. I think some of the responses Amy has gotten to remarks she has made, have been a little strong. We are good at making assumptions about what someone else has written. I know I've mistaken comments on here as something personal to me. I then post, and realize that a response to me tells me I jumped up too quickly and assumed a different meaning than the poster truly meant.
So, perhaps we can ask for clarification from each other, before we attack remarks that are made and make negative assumptions about them.
I don't necessarily agree with everything Amy or others say here, but I would like to be as respectful to all as I would want others to be respectful to me. Guess the old saying is true, the personal is political, and the political is personal. A great feminist line from the 60s! -
Hi Bren,
Thanks for answering my question. I often have the same problem so end up reading posts twice before responding. My problem is "medicine brain," as my mom calls it. On 4-5 pain meds daily, so sometimes takes me a while to catch up. and typing is a real fun thing when they kick in. And to think I could type 90 wpm w/0 mistakes in the good old days before bc (and I don't mean before Christ). LOL -
Grace said: I said all of you were attacking her.
That's why I put the word "everyone" in quotes since you said ALL OF US.
------
it would be nice to have the ignore button so those that are inclined to, can use that feature. I know I'd use it and am sure Amy would find it useful as well!
-
Grace,
I want to thank you for your post of a few days ago. I was down for the count with a nasty bug over the weekend.
No, you are not responsible or to be held accountable for the views of your friends. That's not a realistic position to put anyone in (even presidential candidates). The heart of my question was,since it's agreed that wanting the best for one's family and working hard to get ahead is universal, what do your friends consider "selling out?" I'm not trying to be flippant, I'm truly serious. This is a phrase I've heard thrown aboout for nearly 40 years with no clear definition. It seems that if I don't agree with a position taken by another black person, I can denigrate them by calling them an "oreo," rather than just disagreeing with them. What's the point??
I had never heard of Tim Wise until you started posting his writings. I am very interested in other things he wrote and will pay closer attention to his writing.
I agree with Bren that the brief respite the food talk gave this thread was needed. I won't say anything else foodwise, except to Sheri: I promise not to hold it against you, but I can't believe you ruined one of the most perfect foods (grits) with cream and sugar!!!! I still like you, Sheri, honestly!!
Cherryl
-
Grace,
I did my homework and showed that the list of Obama's so called accomplishments is just the list of bills he voted "for". In fact I provided links to a few of them to show who were actual authors.
I was looking for the bills he co-authored and found none. I thought I gave a very relevant analogy from my working experience. If I were voting to approve someone's design should I put my name a coauthor?
It seems to me this is a very issue oriented discussion. But since neither you or Amy could provide Obama's accomplishments you attacked me instead and said that I should ask someone else. I would like to do this but no one has the answer since there are no bills.
It seems such a black and white issue (no pun intended): has Obama coauthored any bill - yes or no. If it is "yes" , pleae provide the link to congress records showing this. It's a simple request and the fact that even Obama's site cannot provide such reference speaks volumes.
There is no need to crticize me for questioning Obama's leadership skills considering that he is running for president.
-
Cheryl,
Thank you for responding to my post. I understand what you are saying. I agree that "oreo" is not a good descriptor for anybody. I too used to eat them until I realized they were made of so many non-organic, chemical stuff I gave them up. Sometimes I still miss them. And the food stuff, is fine, I was just being crabby I think (I'm on prednisone right now, so my sense of humor is diminished some). In fact, I had just about the best southern meal I can remember a few years ago when I went with the director (African American woman) of my department to St. Louis MO. We went to what she called the "ghetto," and found a little mom/pop take out place to eat. The food was fabulous. It was called "Marion's" and I stuffed myself. Interesting side note. My friend kept getting dirty looks from all the customers who came in(they were all African American). She said, oh, they don't mean much by it, there just mad cuz I brought this white woman here! And her experience in St. Louis was this: I wanted to go to some antique shops and she went with me. We decided to get some lunch and a shopkeeper recommended a house that had been converted to a luncheon place--"A lovely spot for you ladies to have lunch here in St. Louis." So we went. My friend was the only African American in the place. The waitress never told us about the specials, although she did to the tables around us. She never asked how our food was, or if we wanted coffee or dessert; but she did ask those around us. She cleared the plates off the other tables, but not ours. She finally brought us the check. I paid the bill, but didn't leave a tip. It was covert, but it was racism. I am mad at myself that I didn't tell her off. But I was raised to be a lady, and to make a fuss or speak up was not how my mom taught me to behave. Today I would have no trouble flippin' that lady the bird.
I'm going to try and answer your question about selling out. How do I explain this. An example would be Ward Connorly (a regent at the UC system and African American), who joined the group that wanted to end Affirmative Action. His claim was that what needed to be done, for African Americans and other groups, had been accomplished. The view my friends have is that he benefitted from AA, and he should see that others like him benefitted from AA in the years to come. In other words, he moved into a privileged position, but wasn't willing to use his privilege to help others. My friends see this as selling out to your community.
Colin Powell, would be another example. He attained a position of privilege also. My friends believe that he was in a position to make things better for others. When he lied to the UN, they were not surprised because they believed that he had to do that to remain in the position he was in. The privileged postion was "granted" to him by a white man, Bush. When Powell realized he had made a huge mistake, and saw this as an act against his countrymen, he owned up to it, and lost his position of power. He did not sell out, but in the process lost the protection by the white man of his position. However I have the greatest respect for Colin Powell for owning his mistake and I feel badly that he took the fall for some white guy.
So, I think what all this means, is that when there is privilege involved, we need to use that privilege to help others.
As a white woman, I have privileges that I did not have to earn or ask for. I was given them, simply by the color of my skin. While I stand next to white men in order of privilege, they are the ones that grant those privileges to me in a sense. I have a lot of freedom, more than many people of color. I didn't have to do anything to get them and I most likely won't get them taken away. So, I need to use those privileges to help others get privileges and benefits. When I first heard this, I said I wanted to just give them away. That it wasn't fair I had more than others. I was told that I can't give them away. I need to use them. Okay, so how do I do that?
Well, what I learned is that I have a voice. I can speak. At work I would sit on committees where I could speak up about an issue that was affecting people of color on the campus. I was listened to. I was heard. If a person of color on the committee brought up the same issue before I did, they were often ignored or passed over. At one meeting, the director in my department wanted to address a comment another colleague had made, and the president of the group (a white man) called on someone else who had raised his hand after the director. Rather than the director calling the president on it, I did. She got to speak, and I got the nasty look from some of the whites. That's okay. The whole point was to use my privilege.
It doesn't always work out that way. So those of us who chose to use our privilege to help others (and when I say help others, I mean to do what they say they need to be done by me) it can get ugly and lonely. People who you thought were your friends, suddenly don't really want to sit next to you or be seen with you. Because now I'm standing in a different space, I'm not standing next to that white guy over there.
I often sat on hiring committees. As a white woman, I was seen as someone who would maintain the status quo. There was a lot of racially charged incidents going on when I first started working as an AA rep on hiring committees. Much of it was covert. When the whites thought I was with them, they would say whatever they felt like saying. I was like the fly on the wall. I managed to stop a number of committees from going forward by listening to this covert racism and reporting it to employment services. One director was fired for his comments to not only committee members, but comments to applicants. Now, I could have sat and done nothing at all, and nothing would have happened to me. But to me that would also be a sell out.
I agree with you, that it is flippant to call someone a name, rather than just disagreeing with them. I don't like name calling, or putting people in boxes with labels. But we seem to be good at doing that in this country.
I think that Bill Cosby and Larry Elder, and others that come across as conservative have lost something in the process. I think it's fine to suggest ways to solve problems, but to me personally they seem removed from the communities they came from. It's like they are separate now, and not like the others.
My friends believe that whatever color you are, and no matter who it is, they are in your group. And you have to recognize they are in your group. We just get caught up in the right and wrong of things. I try to look at the big picture. I haven't read a lot of Larry Elder, but what I do know mostly comes from TV appearances. So, my impression is that he is "better than the others." And to me, we need to remember to be humble and kind. We need to remember how we want to be treated, and treat others that way. And we aren't real good at doing that in this country, or around the world.
I don't know if selling out is a good term. Maybe turning one's back on the members of your communities is better. Turning away. Closing your eyes to what's real and what needs to be helped.
Condi Rice will go back to Stanford Univ. to teach. What will she teach? Will she use her privilege to make life better for others in her group? Maybe she doesn't believe she has to do that. Maybe some of us don't believe she has to do that. But if everyone who makes it, turns away, who will be there to help the others in the community make it also? After all, don't many of our cultures believe that everyone in the community is responsible for bringing everyone else in the community up--so all are equal?
That's what I learned from a professor who visited my university and spoke about community. She had made it. She was a full professor at a northwestern university. She said those words, and I've never forgotten them.
I hope this answers your question. Not sure I was able to convey what I learned from my friends, and visiting professors.
grace -
WOW!! I have read some of these posts, and... well, I thought we were not supposed to attack one another... see, I guess that is why I never come to this thread!!!
Only had ONE thing to say, and that is that I believe this country is in BIG trouble if either OBAMA or HILARY wins this election... I am not a strict republican, either...
Did ya'll hear the latest from Hilary?Hilary Clinton just told the American Public that when she gets elected, she will find a cure for bc...
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard! to make a campaign promise like that... It would be GREAT if someone could come up with a cure for bc, but unless Hilary is a dr. or researcher of some sort, I don't see it happening.
Harley
-
Would we call it "selling out" if Hillary doesn't use her power for the benefit of women? What if she does what's best for the state of New York (her current job)?
Let's say, like here in So Cal, women are not on the SWAT team. There is talk to lower the standards. Should the women Senators get involved and push for it just because it would give women a place on SWAT? Or should they stay out of it and let the LAPD decide?
-
Hi Grace,
Thanks for your reply.
I can very much relate to your luncheons with your friend, at both places. I remember going out to a nice restaurant in Chicago alone and ordering dinner. The wait staff was not the friendliest, but I chose to overlook that. What I did not allow was their giving me the check before I requested. I didn't want anything else, but I ordered more because I was not going to be forced out of there.
I understand the outrage with Ward Connorley. I have always thought of him and described him as an indiot ,removed from realilty. As far as Colin Powell. When he first took office as Sec of State I begrudgingly admitted that Bush may have had a brain. But the UN speech about the uramium did him in. I didn't think of him as a traitor to the black community, but a traitor to the country. He perpetuated the Bush lie. I wouldn't vote for him for dog catcher after that. He is a non person in my opinion.
I tend to agree with Bill Cosby and his challenge to the black community at large. I worked for six years as a social worker in a supportive housing program. This was subsidized housing for people in recovery from substance abuse and homeless. There were some residents with children and others attempting to regain custody of children. We offered GED classes, literacy training, job training and counseling as well as parenting classes, AA/NA groups and one on one counseling. I burned out eventually and one of my constan battles was around priority setting. My clients were second/third generation welfare clients. An inordinate amount of their income was spent around conspicuous consumption --designer clothes for infants when they couldn't pay their utility bills. I had one client tell me, when I tried to get her into a job training program, that she didn't know anyone who worked. I yelled at her, I couldn't help myself, "you know me, I work everyday that you see me here." Parents need to set priorities for their families. The kids can't do this. Parents have to set the standards, set the rules, whatever they may be. Racial discrimination is alive and well, but parents have to be the first line of defense in paving the way for a better life for their children. This comes from my experience. My parents were always out there fighting for us. There was never a question in my mind,nor my siblings, that our parents wanted more for us than they had for themselves.
And one last thought for tonight. Going back into community and giving back. I grew up in a farming community. I am not a farmer, nor do I know what I could offer people in that community by moving back there. I think I have achieved a good life and because my mother believes in talking about every single thing I've done, that community knows of my life since I left it. I think, that if anything, I have given by example of accomplishment, more than I ever could have by moving back and being frustrated because I was unable to find the type of employment I had been trained for. People give back in many ways.
Cherryl
-
Well Grace Dr. Rice just may go back to Stanford and teach one of the seven languages she is fluent in or maybe Russian history but my bet is she will be the first woman to become Commissioner of the NFL.........Shokk
-
NFL = National Feminist's League?
-
Bren,
Shouldn't you be watching the game and supporting Memphis!!!!!!
Cherryl
-
Harley,
I have it on good authority Hillary didn't say she'd find the cure for cancer. She instead said, she was going to propose a $300 million yearly fund to NIH and 2 other research places named, to find the cure for breast cancer in 10 years. She was on Ellen's show today.
Whether or not they can pull it off in 10 years is an unknown, but now we have a breast cancer advocate in the Senate. If we can pay for war, we can pay for breast cancer research.
-
I think each of us may have a calling. We may work in the "white" ghetto. Or we may work for the both races in soup kitchens or volunteer at a homeless shelter. So, we the privileged, can also give back to everyone who needs help no matter what race or religion or no religion.
I find it insulting to say that Larry Elder and Bill Cosby has done anything to "sell out" because of their high standard. They, men of color, want others to have the same privilege they have. No, not everyone will reach the wealth of these men, but that's not the point. They want young people of their color to learn to speak well. To get a good education. To make a decent living for their families. Just as I would want whites to do the same. I want that for all races. It THRILLS me to see one succeed especially those who are the underprivileged NO MATTER what race.
We have privileges in this country for which we can grasp if we want it or if someone's there to give you a nudge. That's one reason I think the home is so important. And sad as it is not everyone, White or Black or Hispanic, has someone to "nudge" them. Same is true with other races.
Why not encourage young African Americans to go after the best education? And why not teach African Americans to stop using slurs against their own people? And yeah, whites do it too.
Watch the below. Don't click it off just because this is from Fox News. Listen. And then tell me what's wrong with this conversation. Juan Williams is not a conservative if my memory
serves me correctly. He is an educated man just as Larry Elder is. And just as Bill Cosby is. I believe they want the best for their youth.
Juan Williams slams CNN and MSNBC for their O'Reilly Smear.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJhe00QSlBI
Juan Williams reacts to being called "The Happy Negro" on CNN
-
Cherryl, you make me smile. You have so much wisdom.
Shirley
-
Shirley, thank you for your kind words. I don't know how much wisdom I have, just what is in my heart. I look forward to seeing these links. I adore Juan Williams.
Cherryl
-
Read some of the comments on that link regarding Juan. Sad.
Shirley
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team