I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

Options
111121416171828

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    Yes, I know no ne here said that Palin shot anyone.  However, to say that ad advocated the shooting OF anyone is absolutely ridiculous.  We do not promote violence in this country.  We promote VOTING!  And that's exactly what Palin was doing and no one even knows if the nut case even saw the graphic.  This is really, really silly!

    As far as the sheriff...not a good thing for him to say.  But, for me it was not surprising. 

    My question...does any other country have violence or threats made to policitians?  You will find ALL politicians have threats made against them.  It's horrible..not one condones it.  I can guarantee you that if there was no tempers flaring during elections or votes, threats would still be out there.  Some violence as well.  Freedom of speech is not responsible for killing people...PERIOD. 

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    ALPAL

    Good idea! 

    Shirley,

    Right on! 

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011

    Shirley, we did have a pie thrown in the face of one of our prime ministers.  And one actually fought off an intruder with a wooden loon carving.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011
    Just an example. Westboro Baptist Church, the Topeka church known for its inflammatory anti-gay protests, plans to picket the funerals of the six peoplegunned down in Arizona on Saturday.In a flier posted on its web site, the controversial church writes, "THANK GOD FOR THE SHOOTER -- 6 DEAD!" The message continues:God appointed this rod for your sins! God sent the shooter! This hateful nation unleashed violent veterans on the servants of God at WBC--hoping to silence our kind warning to obey God and flee the wrath to come.The flier claims that the shooting of both a House member and a federal judge -- the latter of whom was killed -- is god's punishment for judicial and Congressional action against the WBC. "God sent the shooter to shoot you! And He's sitting in Heaven laughing at you!" the announcement reads.In graphic language, it continues:Your federal judge is dead and your (fag-promoting, baby-killing, proud-sinner) Congresswoman fights for her life. God is avenging Himself on this rebellious house! WBC prays for your destruction--more shooters, more dead carcasses piling up, young, old, leader and commoner--all. Your doom is upon you!In December, Westboro Baptist Church picketed the funeral of Elizabeth Edwards. The group is known to display signs that say "God Hates Fags" and "Thank God For Dead Soldiers."
  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited January 2011

    Shirley -- I haven't been reading ANY leftwing blogs.  The news I got was from CNN, NBC, CBC and my local Toronto newspaper this morning. 

    Perhaps you should read my post again.  I wasn't accusing anyone, merely pointing out that assassins (you may not like that word, but CNN used it and it's appropriate regarding a political figure) behave either alone or at the behest of another party.  WHY this person did so is not for those of us who are not mental health experts to conclude.

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    Pink, 

    I find it completely crazy that these people use the word Church. Maybe it's just my interpretation of the word "church" but a more descriptive label might be "mob of idiots". I said earlier that I had not read or seen anything that would cause me to go "postal" but this might be my breaking point (not really, but if reading something could cause a nut job to go off on someone, I hope they pin a target on this bunch of fruit cakes).

    to add:

    It makes me sick to think these people actually use the word GOD.  

  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011
  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    Like I posted earlier, I think all sides(including right and left wing extremists) are guilty of dumb crap.

  • worldwatcher
    worldwatcher Member Posts: 205
    edited January 2011

    http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253055&kaid=127&subid=171

    A comment from the above linked article which contains the map I posted above:

    DLC | Blueprint Magazine | December 13, 2004

    "Just as Republicans pursued a Southern strategy in the late 1960s, Democrats should craft a heartland strategy that targets winnable states in the South, the lower Midwest, and the Rocky Mountain West. At the very least, a heartland strategy would wreak havoc behind enemy lines. Done right, it could help end the Democrats' cultural estrangement from their natural constituency -- the working middle class -- and start bringing them back home.

    IMO, the actions of the democratic congress in the past two years has driven a wedge between them and the "working middle class" deeper than ever.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2011

    Worldwatcher - can you tell me where you got that picture?  I'm curious to read the webpage/site.

    Thanks lots,

    Bren

    PS ...Kadeeb .. I agree with you, this type of ad should not be used by either the right or left.

    EDITED:  Thanks Worldwatcher .. we were posting at the same time.

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited January 2011

    We all are products of the culture within which we live. It's unavoidable - unless a person is capable of sophisitcated critical thinking.

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited January 2011

    I do think it's disingenuous for anyone to say that crosshairs and admonitions to "reload" are anything other than a firearms reference.  (One doesn't generally "reload" one's vote.)  Of course it was offered as a metaphor, not actual instructions to pick up a gun and fire at the individuals in the crosshairs . . . but in an overheated atmosphere, in which legislators were already receiving death threats, it was irresponsible.  Inexcusably irresponsible, IMO.

    And don't forget that the Republican candidate for Senate in a state neighboring Arizona talked openly about a "second amendment solution" to political issues.

    Linda

  • otter
    otter Member Posts: 6,099
    edited January 2011

    PIP, you said this:  "There are a lot of people out there on the edge of insanity. If we knew what eventually pushed some of them over the edge, we would not be having incidences like this. Is it so wrong to expect civility and facts be used to voice our opinions instead of hate and fear?"

    I agree that we do have the right to expect civil behavior, and to expect that facts be used to support opinions, instead of hate and fear.  I despise the vitriol and divisiveness of today's political debate.  It seems to us nowdays that the viciousness of the debate, and the thoughtlessness of the comments and actions, surpass any historical precedent.  But that's not true.

    We might expect civility and rationality, but the history of human behavior on both sides of the border -- and both sides of the pond -- have shown that we are bound to be disappointed.  (FWIW, I think the preacher from Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas went over the "edge" a long time ago.)

    lassie11 wrote:  "There is a cultural setting that made it possible and predictable for this particular madman do what he did.  The culture reveres guns, the divisive politics promotes seeing opposition as enemy, the advertising of putting specific politicians in a clearly gun like crosshairs encourages people only slightly on the edge to fall over the edge; this particular madman is a product of that culture."

    If that is true, then how do we account for the following?  What "cultural setting" made these tragedies possible?:

    “At least 12 killed in U.K. shootings”
    Published: June 2, 2010 (http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/06/02/At-least-12-killed-in-UK-shootings/UPI-29431275498826/)
    WHITEHAVEN, England, June 2 (UPI) -- A taxi driver suspected in a rampage that left at least 12 people dead and 25 others wounded in West Cumbria, England, killed himself Wednesday, police said.  The Times of London reported police said three of the 25 wounded were in critical condition.  The newspaper said it was Britain's worst mass killing since the Dunblane Primary School massacre in Scotland in 1996 left 13 dead.

    “Dawson College shooting”
    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawson_College_shooting)
    The Dawson College shooting occurred on September 13, 2006 at Dawson College, a CEGEP in Westmount near downtown Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The perpetrator, Kimveer Gill, began shooting outside the de Maisonneuve Boulevard entrance to the school, and moved towards the atrium by the cafeteria on the main floor. One victim died at the scene, while another 19 were injured, eight of whom were listed in critical condition with six requiring surgery. The shooter later committed suicide by shooting himself in the head, after being shot in the arm by police.

    “Canadian pig farmer denies mass murder allegations”
    Posted 1/23/2007 (http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-01-23-canada-murder_x.htm)
    NEW WESTMINSTER, British Columbia (AP) — A Canadian pig farmer whom prosecutors said confessed to killing 49 women told police in a videotaped interview shown to jurors Tuesday that the allegations against him were "hogwash," yet concedes he's "a bad dude."

    Robert Pickton, 56, is charged with killing 26 women, mostly prostitutes and drug addicts who vanished from a drug-ridden Vancouver neighborhood in the 1990s. He has pleaded not guilty to the first six counts. A separate trial will be held for the other 20 murder charges.  If convicted, Pickton faces life in prison. Canada abolished the death penalty in 1976.  The jurors in the most sensational murder trial Canada has ever faced began watching 11 hours of videotaped interviews Tuesday. A day earlier, prosecutors said the interviews would go on to show Pickton telling an undercover police officer that he had killed 49 women and intended to make it "an even 50" before he got sloppy and was caught.

    And, finally:  “List of multiple or mass murder cases in Canada”
    Date: Apr. 8, 2006 (http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TorontoHome/20060408/mass_murder_list_060408/)
    Below is a listing of many mass or multiple murder cases in Canada, compiled by The Canadian Press…

    It seems there are more than enough lunatics to go around.  The tragedy in Arizona sickens me.  As a closet Libertarian and voting moderate, I especially appreciate Blue Dog Democrats; but that's beside the point. No political official should have to plan his/her day around the possibility of an assault by an insane person with murderous intent. As usual, though, we cannot create a zero-risk environment without losing the things our politicians were elected to support and defend.

    otter

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    I do not believe these adds set off crazies but if the dialog on this event can influence people of any opinion, party, or wing to tone it down and act like civilized adults who love and care about their fellow man then this may be the ray of sunshine in an otherwise very dark sky. Passion is not an ugly or negative thing, but it is also not an excuse to berate or attack others.

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011

    Excellent post, Kadeeb. Thank you.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

     Obama: ‘If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun'

    (OBAMA DURING HIS PRES CAMPAIGN)

    June 14, 2008

    Mobster wisdom tells us never to bring a knife to a gun fight. But what does political wisdom say about bringing a gun to a knife fight?

    That's exactly what Barack Obama said he would do to counter Republican attacks "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," Obama said at a Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. "Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I've seen Eagles fans."

    The comment drew some laughs and applause. But it also struck a chord with his Republican rival. John McCain's campaign immediately accused the Democratic candidate of playing the politics of fear. They also mentioned that Obama said he would use a gun that would be illegal under Obama's plans to cut down on illegal firearms.

    "Barack Obama's call for ‘new politics' is officially over. In just 24 hours, Barack Obama attacked one of America's pioneering women CEOs, rejected a series of joint bipartisan town halls, and said that if there's a political knife fight, he'd bring a gun," McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said in a statement.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/06/14/obama-if-they-bring-a-knife-to-the-fight-we-bring-a-gun/

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited January 2011
  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    Representative Giffords might need to amend her comments to include BC survivors. We seem to be pretty good at it too. She sounds like a very unique and confident woman.  I hope she pulls through with flying colors. I think she could provide a positive influence on our nation and political system.

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    Laura 

    Sounds like BO says one thing then says something else. Bet he would like those words back now.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    Hmmmm....so other countries have horrible crimes too!!!!????????  My question WAS answered.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    Aren't these just lovely.  Any outrage from any country?  

    Assassination of President Bush (this one even has his funeral)  

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wvwyx8Ai14U  

    Produced by Channel 4 (UK). In other words: this video was not produced by the liberals; it is just a fictional British video.

    Clip from Bush Assassination Film  

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojWOWyHWj6M  

    This is the video that's outraged America, showing the moment of George Bush's violent assassination.  

    Another comment from another link that showed the video:  

    This is a clip from the movie Death of a President, it was just shown in toronto it depicts george bush being assasinated, movie came from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live... (this link doesn't work)

    Very good explanation about movie from another link on UTube.  I know, these are irrelevant..dated just like the posters I C&Ped on the now deleted thread.  You see, this is just a simple little old movie about a killing of a sitting president. Ya know, something that's done every day.

    Winner of the International CriticsÕ Prize at the Toronto Film Festival, DEATH OF A PRESIDENT is conceived as a fictional TV documentary broadcast in 2008, reflecting on a monstrous and cataclysmic event: the assassination of President George W. Bush on October 19th, 2007. The ÒdocumentaryÓ artfully combines archival footage and carefully composed interviews presented in a respectful and dignified manner. The film doesnÕt advocate violence; rather, it shows itsÕ pernicious effects. It is exciting and questioning, and it offers viewers a riveting story -- creating a provocative political thriller that reveals larger truths.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5h55k3wzOY&feature=channel

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited January 2011

    Yep, pretty stupid thing for Obama to say 2.5 years ago.  Care to tally up the violent language among the three parties over the past 3 years and see who 'wins'?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    Yes, good article Laura.  There's two sides to politics.  Seems like some people only see one....  peripheral vision?

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2011

    What are you saying Shirley?  We all agree that violent rhetoric does not belong in political ads.

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011
    Maybe I'm missing something but I just don't see this as a "your guy said something worse" contest. Do those of you on the right agree that all public figures need to be more civil? This includes politicians, radio and TV personalities, coaches, athletes, etc. If you don't agree, please speak up and explain why you think this uncivil screaming hatelful talk is helping us.
  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2011

    It is perhaps an easy conclusion to draw, as Palin targeted Giffords specifically, along with others.  The dem ad targeted districts and no mention was made of specific candidates.  There is a difference between the two.  I heard a right ring talking head on CNN this a.m. who said her first thought was, "Oh no some right wing nut shot them."  That was her first thought.  Of course she became more rational after the shock started to wear off, and she stated as much.

    Bren

  • kadeeb
    kadeeb Member Posts: 305
    edited January 2011

    enjoyful, If we do a tally, count me out. I never liked math and I'm afraid the count would go beyond my fingers and toes.

    BinVA, I think her comments are exactly the reason it needs to be dialed down a notch. This political environment leads to conclusions and not facts. 

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited January 2011

    But wait!  There's more...

    You also have to include the lies designed to instill fear and hatred into people - the death panels, the "government takeover" of your health care, the brown-shirted child army that Obama is training to take over the country, mean Obama plans to take away your guns, Obama's plan to institute Sharia law, and on and on and on and on.  All of those lies are designed to hit people right in the solar plexus and lead them to believe that their very lives are threatened.  What did you expect to happen?  "Oh gee, everyone I listen to says Obama is a Nazi and I'm really scared but oh well, sucks to be me."  No, you get terrified people committing vandalism, grabbing their guns, bibles, sheets, and hoods and joining militia groups in record numbers. 

  • lassie11
    lassie11 Member Posts: 1,500
    edited January 2011

    Of course it is possible to find examples of other unspeakable acts - yes, in countries outside the US. They too happened within a cultural context. Everything happens within a cultural context. We are not apart from the here and now of our culture.  And it is possible to find examples of misdeeds by other sources. So what?!

    It is certainly possible to find examples of how unhinged the young man is. That does not advance the argument.

    None of this erases the reality that in this case, this young man lived in a culture where guns are revered and accessible, where politics has become vicious. He soaked that up, twisted it (because, clearly he is twisted) and we see the results.

  • Alpal
    Alpal Member Posts: 1,785
    edited January 2011

    Can we all agree that nut jobs shouldn't have legal access to guns? I'm not even going into illegal access to guns ....

Categories