The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread

Options
1212224262761

Comments

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited April 2008

    Bren,

    Oh my dear, how many times must I tell  you I don't imbibe in your common beer swill. If you are interested in having a glass of an exquisite vintage wine, I'll give some thought to sharing it with you. One must be careful of the company one keeps, as I am sure you understand. Do RSVP me by tomorrow evening if you are interesting in moving up socially in the world of drink.

    Cherryl

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    HAHA.............you ladies are just too funny..........great day of posting........very interesting...........Shirley if Hillary doesn't get the nomination we very well may see who or is it whom is the real Obama.......Hillary will make sure of that................(not sure but I don't think I made much sense).........anyway hopefully you get my drift............Shokk

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited April 2008

    Shokk,

    You made sense. I'm still not sure who I want to be the Dem nominee. I change, depending on  the day of the week or the time of day. They both can inspire me and they both have pissed me off. But you know that as a liberal, left leaning Democrat, I'll fight like hell for whoever gets the nod.

    By the way, glad you had a good trip to the farmer's market. Can't wait for the thaw here in the godforsakenfrozentundra so we can have some fresh produce also.

    Cherryl

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    Cheryl........got fresh raspberries, beefsteak tomatoes, fresh honey, fresh sunflower seeds and a big watermelon.......oh yeah........not sure how the dems are going to play out but I was listening to npr today and they had democrat talking head on and he made an interesting statement.......he was talking about how democrats have tendency to "fall in love" with their candidates without really knowing too much about them and was voicing concern about Obama's history.....that it probably will not play well in middle American even with middle American Democrats..........so we will have to see............and I do find it a bit amusing that some think McCain will be a "third term" Bush.........uh not........McCain is no conservative and I have my doubts that he is even a Republican.........but we will see now won't we chica..........but I am excited about see all of this play out in the summer and fall............it's going to be so exciting.........Shokk

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited April 2008

    Shokk,

    I find it equally amusing that you aren't sure that McCain is a Republican or that he is a conservative. We have no doubt that he is both! Ah, perspectives, how they differ! Back to you.

    Cherryl

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Bin, you can swill beer with me anytime.... and wear cut-offs and flip flops.  Hey beer even comes in cans!  

    Cherryl, .....  have you ever been to Trader Joe's?  They have what we call Two Buck Chuck.  It's won awards if you can believe that!  Chardonnay, Merlot and even a Cab. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Actually, Cherryl, I thought Shokk was drunk on Bren's cheap beer.  I think you need to educate them on WHAT to drink.

    Shokk is correct.  Haven't you heard the conservatives put down poor McCain?  I believe the conservative repubs think he's a "U"...UNDECIDED!  Laughing

    Shirley

  • CherrylH
    CherrylH Member Posts: 1,077
    edited April 2008

    RM, Not only have I heard of two buck chuck, I have indulged in it quite a bit. I was giving Bren a hard time. Although I am basically a card carrying wino, on hot days, after working in the garden, nothing taste better than a cold beer. I fancy myself a beverage snob based on the "motto" of the Episcopal Church (unofficial) "Wherever three or four are gathered, there is always a fifth...of something!"

    Shirley, I really find it interesting that Republicans are down on McCain. To us Dems, he's all Republican, All conservative. Isn't it interesting how we have such different perspectives.

    Off to pour myself another glass of Australian Chardonnay, although there are two bottles of Sam Adams light in the refrig!!!

    Cherryl

  • AlaskaDeb
    AlaskaDeb Member Posts: 2,601
    edited April 2008

    You know, up here in Alaska there is a big group of folks that want to break away from the good old US of A and form their own country.  They figure we have the oil, we have the room and we really don't care "How they do it Down There" in Washington DC.  

    I have always thought they were a bunch of crack-pots until I looked at the 3 most likely choices for president for the next 4 years.  None of them represent what I want in a president.  The "Country" of Alaska isn't sounding half bad....LOL    

    Maybe I'll vote for "none of the above".

    Someone pass the 2-buck-chuck....

    Deb C

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008
  • Naniam
    Naniam Member Posts: 1,766
    edited April 2008

    Cherryl -

    To Republicians, McCain is more Democrat than Republican.  Hey, even Kerry sent out feelers him about being a running mate and switching parties. That is why Republicans don't think he is a true Republican.    He is definitely not the "conserative" that Republicans wanted.  Many are NOT happy with him.  Going to be interesting to see who he chooses as a running mate.   

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    What I do like about McCain is he SEEMS to be honest.  I hope he doesn't disappoint me. 

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    First of all McCain is concerned about the environment.........pleezzzzz........any open minded liberal Democrat knows that a true conservative could give a rat's a$$ about the environment.........hey Deb you do know that Texas is the only state that has an agreement with the Federal gov't per our state constitution that we can succeed from the union anytime we want and not only do we have oil and gas but we have the gas processing plants and factories............and plenty of farm land, a coast, plenty of guns...........don't mess with Texas.......ha..................Shokk

  • AlaskaDeb
    AlaskaDeb Member Posts: 2,601
    edited April 2008

    LOL Shokk -

    You know what happens if we cut Alaska in half don't you?  We turn Texas into the 3rd largest state in the USA....LOL

    If the price of oil gets much higher even the liberals will be standing in line to open up ANWAR and drill for some oil.  It kind of cracks me up when people talk about the "unspoiled beauty" of the area....Get gas up to 5 bucks a gallon and I doubt as many folks will care....

    Deb C

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited April 2008

    Shirley, I was never a partier. In High School I was usually working or baby sitting on the weekends and during the summers and in college I was usually working. I've never been a drinker and I loathe being around drunk people. I've always been a much better small group/one on one socializer. I love my own space-- I always say if I meet the right woman and get married we're going to have to get two houses next door to each other so we can have our own space. IJL, you are probably right that dorming would have been a great experience. I longed to go to boarding school when I was in high school. In college I was ambitious and driven to get that degree and move away from my parents to escape the abuse, which is why I graduated a year early, that the social experience was secondary. The dorm kids and the commuters usually socialized separately so I didn't know them well.

    Justanna, do you realize that I only talked about my degree because shirley asked me what my degrees are? Having a doctorate isn't the be all to end all, like you said it just means I went to a ton of school and read a ton of things. One of the benefits of this education that might not be apparent to those who haven't had advanced studies is the importance of distinguishing fact from commentary and  I'm sorry that my grammar is bothersome to you. It was also bothersome to my friend who helped me edit my dissertation. I'm much better at technical writing. I'm curious to think you're humbler than me. I wouldn't have known that from your post so I'm glad you told me.

    Shirley-- do you have any transcripts from the funeral where Wright reportedly railed during a funeral or a you tube link?  I'd hold off judgment until I knew more. Did you happen to catch the faith and compassion forum on CNN? The audience was made up of religous leaders and they and the moderators asked questions, first of Hillary for 45 minutes and then Obama. You know religion is not my thing, but it was interesting. One of the things Obama said that struck me is about forgiveness and what his christianity says about that and how some who purport to be "good christians" aren't very good at the judgment and forgiveness part of christianity. I liked what he said about that and how he lives his religion by doing so in his actions. I also thought it was interesting how Hillary, who won the coin toss and chose to go first, when questioned about Obama said, "well, I'll let him speak for himself... but here's (all the negative things) I think (and why I am so much better of a christian and human being than he is)."  Obama said not one word negative about Hillary. I think that he tries very hard to live what he believes and that is evident the way he tries to avoid the personal attacks and getting down in the mud to attack Hillary.  If you get a chance to watch it,I think it would be interesting to you-- not from a political point of view but from a personal one.

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    Amy,

    I'm listening to CNN right now.  Where did Hillary say she is a better Christian then Obama????? and a better human being???  I would think comments like that would be headline news. 

    Http://www.cnn.com/video

    She said she'd let him talk for himself. 

  • Naniam
    Naniam Member Posts: 1,766
    edited April 2008

    Obama got in his digs - he is was not all Mr. Nice, Clean cut, above it all guy.

    He has Kennedy charm/charisma - but he isn't a John Kennedy.  Kennedy was never this liberal.  I'm sick of his talk about new programs - then talks about government spending.  It is not my government's job of taking care of every citizen - what happened to the good old work ethic?  Our parents sure had to take jobs they didn't like, didn't pay much and let me tell you for the cost of things at that time - it was a bad situation to be in; just like now but they didn't expect government to keep them up...  We are one nation - the color of skin doesn't matter.  If we don't start thinking in terms of us as a nation vs color the division that causes is going to destroy us.  

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited April 2008

    I was paraphrasing Rosemary-- I didn't have the exact words but that was certainly the insinusation in the beginning of her discussion period.

    What digs did you perceive Obama to have said Naniam? I'm curious.

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited April 2008

    Deb--Being from Alaska maybe either here or on the Republican thread you can tell us a little About Gov Sarah Palin --her name has come up on the short list for VP consideration by McCain.  How is she as a Governor?

    Can you tell us a little about her?

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited April 2008

    deleted - posted twice

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited April 2008

    Okay .. just a quick side note .. can we please move on from the grammar and spelling issue.  My son is in a graduate math/physics program and can barely spell his own name. I can barely do math at a 6th grade level. Grammar and spelling, or typos, have nothing to do with content.  Let's skip it, okay?

    Good point Naniam. My dad, who was born dirt poor and became a millionare later in life, scoffed at formal education.  My mom was the same, but she wanted that education.  It took her 10 years to earn an Associates Degree and certs in drug counseling, while we were growing up.  (BTW - dad's dirt poor once again.  But happy raising avocados in So. Cal.)  I had to go on welfare once for three months when I was 20 and six months pregnant.  My dad wouldn't speak to me.  When my son was born, I took whatever job I could and just kept working my way up.  

    I agree with Shirley .. in those days we didn't need a higher degree to attain certain levels of accomplishment in our careers.  I would need a higher degree now to have the position I previously held in Human Resources.  The same with my son.  He's got to have a masters at a minimum in his field.  (Just wish I could understand what it was ... something to do with quarks.)

    I'll have to check out the CNN feature.  Should Christianity really be an issue in who leads this country?  The Islams, Jews and Christians all started with the same God. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited April 2008

    I'll have to check out the CNN feature.  Should Christianity really be an issue in who leads this country?  The Islams, Jews and Christians all started with the same God. 

    I agree with you--  I wasn't even sure how much of the forum I was going to watch,because I'm atheist. I appreciated that Obama brought up that atheists are people too. I do not believe for one minute that christianity should be an issue with who leads the country and it upsets me to think that many of the pundits say that an atheist will never be elected president because to me that is discrimination. An atheist can be just as good or of a person as a christian or other religious person. My governor, Ed Rendell, who happens to be Jewish said that there will be a black president before there will be a Jew... this had to be 10-15 years years ago when the idea of a black or a woman seemed to be an idea rather than a possible reality.

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited April 2008

    Amy,

    It's interesting that you mention that one of the obvious benefits of getting an advanced degree is that requires tons of reading and therefore sharpens one's comprehension and research skills. But when I asked you to name ONE SINGLE bill authored or coauthored by Obama, you gave me a list of bills that you pulled out off some Obama site without actually researching them. I went to that list and looked up the first two and immediately saw that all that Obama contributed was his vote.

    BTW I am still waiting for the answer to my question. Surely with your Phd experience, ou should be able quickly go through the list and find at least ONE

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Amy, you will be happy to know that I am a VERY, VERY forgiving person.  My girls think too forgiving.

    Let me tell you just a little about one situation.  I became friends with my brother's SO.  I had talked to her over the phone before going to San Antonio to take care of my mom for a couple of months and take care of "stuff."  His SO, Roni, picked me up at the Houston airport.  We never met so we told each other what we were wearing.  I knew she was pregnant.  She's the age of my middle child and my brother is two years older than me. 

    Rone never had good friends.  She was in trouble from the time she was at least 13 yo.  Her adoptive mom her in at least three places to help straighten her out.  One was the Rebecca Home which was run by a very strick Baptist church.  She told me about this place and I thought it was HORRID!  Abusive!  And I'm a Baptist.  She also was sent to Outer Bounds (is that the name of it?). Anyway, they lived in the "wilderness."  She said she learned more there.  But the Rebecca Home was the hardest for her to get over.

    Okay, fast forward.  She had a baby while I was still in San Antonio which lead me to stay a bit longer.  Roni was always a mess.  I could only TRY to help this poor soul.  I did not judge her nor do I judge her to this day.

    Fast forward again.  She started doing heroine.  And on God knows what else.  She found out she was pregnant and was trying to kick it by doing different drugs such as sedatives, anti-deps, etc.  I told her she HAD to get on Methadone.  She said no that she was pregnant and I told her that's what's used when one is pregnant, not the other drugs.  She was afraid they'd take away her first child and I assured her they wouldn't.

    Fast forward.  She had a little boy who was addicted at birth.  He is now 4 yo and smart, but I believe he'll have some behavioral problems.

    She was stopped for a traffic violation and used my name.  I was sent this thing in the mail from Bexar County that I had to appear in court.  Well, I was furious.  My dd is an attorney and she talked to the DA there.  DD also sent Roni a letter telling her if she tried this again we would file charges for identity theft.  I did not talk to her for a long time.

    Fast forward.  She left my brother and the two children.  My brother and she fought constantly.  It's a long, long, long story that I will not go into.  However, it was not all her fault.  But, she is still on drugs and alcohol.

    Fast forward almost two years.  I received a phone call from her about a month ago and called her back.  We talked for at least two hours.  I told her I was not her judge.  But that I would love to see her get her life together for those children.  She with a guy that's also a drug addict and alcoholic.  She called again less than a week ago.  I called her back.  We talked for almost an hour. 

    Amy, I was her only friend who happened to be female.  She never really had friends.  She has lived on the streets with other guys before I ever knew her.  She told me stories about jumping into dumpsters to get food.  Her mother went to court to give up parental rights (what's the legal term for this?) because she could not longer control Roni.  So, Roni has been on her own since she was 16.

    When we talked the other night she cried.  She told her now boy friend that I never judged her.  That her family will have nothing to do with her (or her children).  I told Roni that she will ALWAYS have a place in my heart.  I sit here now and cry thinking about her.  But, I can't help her.  I can only encourage her.  I have often told her she had choices to make.  Some people just don't want to make the right choice.  And I know she loves her children, but heroine has her.

    I'm not patting myself on the back.  I couldn't have her live with me.  I know what it's like to be around her for a lengthy time and I would lose any sanity I have left. 

    As far as religion and what Obama was saying about forgiveness...I try to do that.  I try not to judge ANYONE.  I'm not perfect.  God is the judge.  Forgiveness is important.

    "For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses." -- Matthew 6:14-15

    Forgiveness is also important for us if we want to "move one."  If we hold bitterness in our hearts we'll stay stuck.  Being stuck is a horrible place to be in one's life.  Look what Oprah had to overcome, and what she has made of her life.  One can forgive, but one doesn't have to "entertain" the one they forgive.  Memories are forever.

    Amy, from what you have said about your life, I wonder if you've been slighted the opportunity of being a "child." I know what that's like.  That's why I wanted my children to be kids.  I didn't want them working while in high school.  Perhaps dumb of me, but that's how I felt due to my life experience growing up as a teen.  I said they'd be working the rest of their lives.  I wanted them to have fun and be care free.  I'm not talking about being irresponsible, but just being a kid.  And I'm very proud of who they have become, and look forward to seeing them grow further.

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/13/jeremiah-wright-sounds-off-at-eulogogy-for-chicago-judge/

    Jeremiah Wright Sounds Off At Eulogy for Chicago Judge   by FOXNews.com Sunday, April 13, 2008

    Rev. Jeremiah Wright told a congregation in Norfolk, Va., on Sunday that reporters sneaked into a private funeral service a day before, in which he blasted America's founding fathers for slavery and white supremacy and received standing ovations for attacking FOX News for covering his anti-American sermons.

    Barack Obama's retiring pastor delivered a sermon at Bank Street Memorial Baptist Church, where his late uncle had been the pastor, about overcoming trouble. The public appearance was his first since news broke that the Democratic presidential candidate's pastor frequently rails on the United States.

    "Some troubles that come up in your life come up out of nowhere," Wright said. At the end of the two-hour-plus service, about two dozen ministers gathered around Wright and his daughter to pray for them. One of the ministers asked God to give Wright courage as "the world tries to demonize him."

    Though Wright said nothing about Obama or the uproar itself, he alluded to the controversy while briefly back in the pulpit Saturday to deliver a eulogy for a late congregant of Trinity United Church of Christ - former appellate judge R. Eugene Pincham.

    Wright, who is on sabbatical before retiring from Trinity United, said America's mistreatment of blacks is the result of the founding fathers, who "planted slavery and white supremacy in the DNA of this republic."

    First reported by The Chicago Sun Times, Wright told mourners at the funeral that Thomas Jefferson, who partook in "pedophilia," would also be considered unpatriotic these days because he wrote, "God would punish America for the sin of slavery." He also quoted Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who said that the U.S. has a "congenital birth defect."

    Speaking of the seven lessons Pincham taught him, Wright said the judge's faith "was not the jingoistic, chauvinistic ‘you're either with us or against us' demonizing kind of faith."

    "FOX News can't understand that," Wright said to rousing cheers and applause. "[Bill] O'Reilly will never get that. Sean Hannity's stupid fantasy will keep him forever stuck on stupid when it comes to comprehending how you can love a brother who does not believe what you believe. [Pincham's] faith was a faith in a God who loved the whole world not just one country or one creed."

    Click here to hear Rev. Wright's sermon.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

  • justanna
    justanna Member Posts: 90
    edited April 2008

    Shirley:  Your post about forgiveness was beautiful and full of wisdom and empathy.

    O4P:  I think I am humbler about my education because I've never insinuated that anyone who disagrees with me about an issue just isn't educated enough to understand.  I'll move on from that.

    BinVA:  I suck at math too.

    What does everyone think the fall-out will be from Obama's gaffe?  It feels like it could really hurt him even though his comments afterwards put it in perspective.  Shirley, I don't know much about McCain, but of the three still running, I always though Obama was the most honest.  Has anyone here still not decided who they are going to vote for?  For me, it depends a lot on whether Hilary or Obama get the nomination; then I'll have to do a lot of research on McCain.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited April 2008

    Thanks for the article Shirley.  I'm a very forgiving person too under most situations,and always when the person has asked for forgiveness. I don't expect people to be perfect. I wasn't referring to you when I talked about lack of forgiveness for Wright and for Obama for going to  his church, I was referring to those who are hypocrites, those who preach one thing and then act differently who seem to want to crucify Wright for those awful statements and assume that his entire ministry, those who interpret snippets from his words the other day and those who blame Obama for Wright's words years after they were spoken.  To me there has been very little forgiveness from a lot of people who espouse their religion to be the backbone of their lives and it seems incongruous to me that they are picking and choosing who and what to forgive.

    Let me give you an example of something I found to be hypocritical. There was a car parked in the only handicapped space in my chiropracter's parking lot with no tags and I had to park far away (I use a cane and have difficulty parking). The car had several jesus bumper stickers. I was waiting outside for my appt (it was a sunny day) and the woman who owned the car put something inside, she worked in one of the offices). I said to her, "Did you realize that's a disabled parking space." She said, "hardly any handicapped people come here, I like to watch my car from my window." No, it wasn't some mercedes or bwm, or even a new car and it was a very good, quiet neighborhood. I said that I had to park far away and she said,"Well, you won't be here long." That pissed me off, so I wrote a note and stuck it on her car, "How do you think Jesus would like it if he knew you were taking away the parking space of a disabled person."Tongue out

    Maybe my expectations were too high, just because she had the bumper stickers, but I thought, jeez, practice what you preach.

    My chiro got a real kick out of the note.

    Some may think that being religious makes them better than others but I don't agree.

    Your question about being a child is an interesting one. In many ways I didn't get to be one, but in some ways I did. I had friends in my neighborhood and hung out with them during the summers when I was too young to work. A lot of the time I preferred reading or doing things inside. I always wanted to take summer school classes to get ahead (and to get out of the house) so I had to study a lot. I'd get really involved in projects. One summer when I was 8 or 9, I had this idea to become ambidextrous. I developed an experiment to do exercises with my right hand like writing my name and playing Jacks to try to get my right hand to catch up to my left one. I kept charts and graphs. Don't ask me where that idea came from or how at that age I thought of doing it. Most kids that age wouldn't think that was a fun way-- the typical childhood things, I marched to the beat of my own drummer and found my own fun. 

    Ijl, the reason I haven't given you more than the list I pulled is because I don't feel like doing your research, since you're not going to even consider voting for Obama.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited April 2008

    Oh, I'll vote for the democratic candidate, no matter who that is. I would never, ever vote for a republican. The republican presidents who have held that post have never done anything for the less fortunate than them. They are, in my opinion, the elitists in this country--those in office, not the people who vote republican--I want to make that clear.



    I was disappointed in Obama's comments the other day. I believe his comments were not thought through before he said them. I do not think he is an intellectual elitist. I do think that McCain is though. Even though he attempts to distance himself from Bush, he still remains connected. He did not participate in the compassion/faith open forum even though he was invited. I think it was a mistake that McCain chose not to take part. I think it will be another "strike" against him in the election. He is out of touch with the people in this country. He is a war hero, no doubt, but he is certainly not presidential material in my opinion.



    I missed all this back and forth business about race. Took a break from the board and spent it with my darling granddaughter, daughter and husband. It was a great peaceful weekend.



    I can see that if you didn't watch the conversation on race, along with the 90 minute discussion group, you would misinterpret what Amy was saying. The commentator and the panel members, as well as the President of Howard University, stated (in their own words that I will not try to remember and put in quotes--so is my opinion of what they said) that it was unfortunate that the conversation and panel discussion was held at Howard University as the people who needed to see this and continue the conversation on race were not present. They said that the audience was made up of students, professional educators, and people who had participated in race conversations in an academic environment. They hoped that the american people would be able to watch this documentary and panel discussion and take the conversation of race forward into their own communities.



    I think jumping all over each other about who said what, and who verbally abused others on this site, is not a productive way of dealing with "intellectual elitism" and race. My opinion was that the comment about "intellectual elitism" had more to do with a negative as to who was present, and not a negative to who was not. It was more a statement that academics often appear to be "loftier" in their talk about race. That they sometimes are elitist because they speak academically rather than in a way that all can understand. It does not mean that those that are not academic are less smart or less educated. Those of us with college degrees, no matter when or where they were, should be able to relate to the term "academic jargon." Much of what we read in college was written for publication, particularly those in private or public universities. The books and articles are filled with jargon, sometimes even made up words that have evolved in the intellectual atmosphere of a white tower elitist. I remember reading an article from a book written by a well-known full professor in feminist studies, and having to look up every 5 words in the dictionary (and at least 1 in each paragraph didn't exist) to the point that I was so frustrated I went to my professor and asked that we have a full discussion of the article in the next class. Turned out that every student in that class did not understand most of what was written, and it was only by the professor dissecting the article paragraph by paragraph that we got the gist of what the author was trying to convey. And some of the students were graduate students!



    In short, I found the panel discussion to be very down to earth. It was a discussion about what needed to happen in communities to change race and provide opportunities for disenfranchised minorities in this country. I was particularly moved by the comments made by the white chief of police of Washington DC. She saw and experienced the lack of opportunities for blacks in her city. She believes that the city community--not the African American community--as a whole needs to come together and provide opportunities. Not money, not welfare, not handouts--but real opportunities. Community centers for children to go after school. Teen centers with tutors and coaches. Parks in inner city areas. Improving the looks of the neighborhoods. Setting up grants and scholarships for disenfranchised groups. She believes that she herself could not survive AND thrive in the conditions she sees other women of color live day after day. AND she said, they could really be successful if given just one opportunity. Just one. Just one step up that those of us who are white have been given time and time again without even asking. Those lovely privileges that allow us to just keep moving on!



    So, I hope that those who want to will watch the documentary and panel discussion, and determine for yourselves what was said or not said. Amy is entitled to her opinion, just as I am, and just as each of you are. It's important to all of us to see this program if we can. I don't think we can have a positive discussion about this until it is seen by all of us. It is hard to talk about what is said and get our personal point across.



    I just don't believe that we need to demean or punish each other, or call someone condescending, or mean. I don't believe that any of us want to be called those descriptors. There is enough going on in this country that we should be talking about the candidates and their platform, or lack of one.

    I want to hear what others think about each of the candidates. I may be leaning more toward one or the other, but I still want to hear what we all have to say.



    And if this posts more than once, I apologize, but I seems to be having a real lag time or proxy error comes up when I try to move from one thread to the next. :((

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited April 2008

    Oh, I'll vote for the democratic candidate, no matter who that is. I would never, ever vote for a republican. The republican presidents who have held that post have never done anything for the less fortunate than them. They are, in my opinion, the elitists in this country--those in office, not the people who vote republican--I want to make that clear.



    I was disappointed in Obama's comments the other day. I believe his comments were not thought through before he said them. I do not think he is an intellectual elitist. I do think that McCain is though. Even though he attempts to distance himself from Bush, he still remains connected. He did not participate in the compassion/faith open forum even though he was invited. I think it was a mistake that McCain chose not to take part. I think it will be another "strike" against him in the election. He is out of touch with the people in this country. He is a war hero, no doubt, but he is certainly not presidential material in my opinion.



    I missed all this back and forth business about race. Took a break from the board and spent it with my darling granddaughter, daughter and husband. It was a great peaceful weekend.



    I can see that if you didn't watch the conversation on race, along with the 90 minute discussion group, you would misinterpret what Amy was saying. The commentator and the panel members, as well as the President of Howard University, stated (in their own words that I will not try to remember and put in quotes--so is my opinion of what they said) that it was unfortunate that the conversation and panel discussion was held at Howard University as the people who needed to see this and continue the conversation on race were not present. They said that the audience was made up of students, professional educators, and people who had participated in race conversations in an academic environment. They hoped that the american people would be able to watch this documentary and panel discussion and take the conversation of race forward into their own communities.



    I think jumping all over each other about who said what, and who verbally abused others on this site, is not a productive way of dealing with "intellectual elitism" and race. My opinion was that the comment about "intellectual elitism" had more to do with a negative as to who was present, and not a negative to who was not. It was more a statement that academics often appear to be "loftier" in their talk about race. That they sometimes are elitist because they speak academically rather than in a way that all can understand. It does not mean that those that are not academic are less smart or less educated. Those of us with college degrees, no matter when or where they were, should be able to relate to the term "academic jargon." Much of what we read in college was written for publication, particularly those in private or public universities. The books and articles are filled with jargon, sometimes even made up words that have evolved in the intellectual atmosphere of a white tower elitist. I remember reading an article from a book written by a well-known full professor in feminist studies, and having to look up every 5 words in the dictionary (and at least 1 in each paragraph didn't exist) to the point that I was so frustrated I went to my professor and asked that we have a full discussion of the article in the next class. Turned out that every student in that class did not understand most of what was written, and it was only by the professor dissecting the article paragraph by paragraph that we got the gist of what the author was trying to convey. And some of the students were graduate students!



    In short, I found the panel discussion to be very down to earth. It was a discussion about what needed to happen in communities to change race and provide opportunities for disenfranchised minorities in this country. I was particularly moved by the comments made by the white chief of police of Washington DC. She saw and experienced the lack of opportunities for blacks in her city. She believes that the city community--not the African American community--as a whole needs to come together and provide opportunities. Not money, not welfare, not handouts--but real opportunities. Community centers for children to go after school. Teen centers with tutors and coaches. Parks in inner city areas. Improving the looks of the neighborhoods. Setting up grants and scholarships for disenfranchised groups. She believes that she herself could not survive AND thrive in the conditions she sees other women of color live day after day. AND she said, they could really be successful if given just one opportunity. Just one. Just one step up that those of us who are white have been given time and time again without even asking. Those lovely privileges that allow us to just keep moving on!



    So, I hope that those who want to will watch the documentary and panel discussion, and determine for yourselves what was said or not said. Amy is entitled to her opinion, just as I am, and just as each of you are. It's important to all of us to see this program if we can. I don't think we can have a positive discussion about this until it is seen by all of us. It is hard to talk about what is said and get our personal point across.



    I just don't believe that we need to demean or punish each other, or call someone condescending, or mean. I don't believe that any of us want to be called those descriptors. There is enough going on in this country that we should be talking about the candidates and their platform, or lack of one.

    I want to hear what others think about each of the candidates. I may be leaning more toward one or the other, but I still want to hear what we all have to say.



    And if this posts more than once, I apologize, but I seems to be having a real lag time or proxy error comes up when I try to move from one thread to the next. :((

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited April 2008

    Amy,

    Ijl, the reason I haven't given you more than the list I pulled is because I don't feel like doing your research, since you're not going to even consider voting for Obama.

    You are missing the whole point here. You should not do the research for my sake, you should do it for your own sake. Don't you want to know whether your candidate has leadership skills necessary for the office of presidency ? And what could be a better predictor of his success as a president than his track record in Senate ?

    You once again proved my point that you are not for Obama because of his accomplishments but because he is for change whatever it might be.

    I will not vote for Obama precisely because he accomplished absolutelty NOTHING in Senate and is an empty suit all around. And the fact that his campaign staff that is paid to do it could not find A SINGLE bill to boast about speaks volumes.  We might as well elect his speech writer as this is the most remarkable thing about Obama.

    "Hope is change and change is hope" - Barak Obama

Categories