Presidential debates on ABC right now-both parties

Options
191012141555

Comments

  • Blundin2005
    Blundin2005 Member Posts: 1,167
    edited February 2008

    Right again Joan.  I couldn't find anything that you said to disagree with....especially the baby puke, baking cookies and house full of rug rats.

    I've gotten the McCain itch too. 

    Jon Stewart said on his show that the country's interest in both McCain and Obama says that finally we are on the way to (I forget the word he used for it....cleaver and all) but we are ready as a country to clean up the mess....and move away from mechanic politics.  I agree.

    I'm not yet decided...I want to hear more....but I surprised myself that I even thought to McCain.  I thought he was suppressed too much by the machine before...maybe it took him to live through these last seven years of The World According to Bush/Cheney to find his own voice.

    I want to know, though, that it is more than a stump speech voice. 

    Last August my DH had surgery on his eye.  Back in his room (with five other men) he recovered and spent the night.  The man across from him worked here in Rome for the government...the budget issues.  We were talking about the election (he wanted to practice his English).  I told him then that I didn't like Hillary and didn't trust her....never did.  I told him that if she got elected it wouldn't be any different than when Bush was elected...the populace making a knee jerk reaction instead of careful, critical thinking.

    I told him that America was more than that and that I wanted to see it rise to the occasion.  I couldn't stand to have my heart broken twice in such a short time. 

    We mused about Obama...I said that he had interesting backers that caught my attention (pre Oprah) and that I'd look at his record...didn't know much about him....I told him that I like Biden...experience...seasoned.  He said, Biden didn't have the personality...yeh unfortunately that is what sells an election too.  

    It was nice to talk to someone from another country who was interested in our country getting back to "normal".  How many americans know as much about the world beyond themselves I thought.  We lived a sheltered life in the US.  

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Gosh I have been away so long, this topic has reached way above my head.  I know at this point Im tired of all the politics.  It was fun at first watching the debates - but Im tired now.  Here in Illinois we vote in the primaries Tuesday, like so many other states will be.  Sad that I still dont know who I like.  Who I think will actually do the best job for our country and the people living here.

    I like McCain, the only thing that bothers me is he will proliferate the war in Iraq even more.  He has said openly he will find Obama.  I dont know if its a good thing or bad thing to end the war from a political standpoint.  But my heart wants our children home.

    I love reading all of your comments.  Each one makes sense to me.

    Nicki

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Ann Coulter campaigning for Hillary--- if that happens we will know the apocolypse is upon us and the world as we know it is coming to an end-- rofl. The very idea is the makings of a saturday night live skit, were the writers not on strike.

    Allowing tax cuts for the rich to expire is the only responsible thing the government can do-- Bush was (even more) moronic (than usual) by thinking cutting taxes during a war was a good idea. I thought republicans were supposed to be the ones who were fiscally conservative, yet they're the ones who unbalanced the budget. I believe that the deficiet is  one of the reasons we're in a recession, at some point it catches up.

    I agree that if Hillary wins there will be more polarization, she tried to polarize the democratic party until she got her hands slapped and realized it wasn't working. If not for her personality, I think she could be an effective president, but as commander in chief she has to be able to work with others in this country and abroad by not alienating them with passive aggressive insults.

    NNN-- McCain will find oSama not oBama-- hehe. Why do you keep changing your name, it's confusing me Kiss?

    While there are things I like about MCain, his recent support of antigay lesgislation and the fact that he's using this in push ads makes me so irate. It's a deal breaker for me.

    I'm nervous about Tuesday- nervous but excited.

    Does anyone think it's possible the republicans who are not satisfied with McCain would launch a 3rd party candidate like when Buchanan ran years back?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    OMG Amy:  Obama vs Osama!! My goodness Im laughing so hard right now.  You will never know how much I needed that laugh this morning.

    To everyone - sorry that I keep changing names.  I promised.  This is the last change.  Guess Im having a hard time finding me!

    Nicki (aka chemosabi)

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited February 2008

    That took a doubletake--also ROTFWL--thanks gals!

  • TenderIsOurMight
    TenderIsOurMight Member Posts: 4,493
    edited March 2008





    Those "tax cuts for the rich" which Obama and Clinton acknowledged, their heads bobbing in unison at the last debate, have benefitted not just the rich, but many of we middle class families. Looking at the numbers, the tax rates were lowered significantly downward across the tax spectrums. My family benefitted directly, allowing our fairly fixed income to go farther to pay for my medical care costs, my children's educational needs, and the never ending increase in taxes which occurred on our local level.



    I shudder to think of 2010, and have seen the tax numbers (which escape me this morning) to which we may be returning. Federal increases, superimposed in tough times upon state and local increases, will take a whopping bite out of families income. We're just middle class people, trying to educate our children, save some for our future, and have some left over to give to charity and breast cancer fundraising, to help find cures for this dastard disease. Breast cancer funding relies on people like us.



    This war...well it's a long story. And the funds to finance it, well that's going to be a long future story. But dropping the tax rates years ago was wise in my opinion, to give to the middle class and lower and upper middle class too (hate those terms), what it allowed by the drop. And raising the tax rates in 2010 will just squeeze us at a time we may well be in a drawn out economic recession.



    The Iraq war funds and it's payments will dramatically impact our children's' future. Our congress-people did not honor our constitution, which wisely separated the "purse" for war from the "leadership" to war. Congress has done little over the last eight years but bicker partisanly. It reminds me of Rome burning while the fiddler fiddled. I hope deeply Congress will use some tax restraint in 2010, but it appears the die is cast, especially with the two heads bobbing, as minds made up unison.



    Just my opinion,

    Tender

  • FEB
    FEB Member Posts: 552
    edited February 2008

    I have been following McCain since he ran against Bush, the first time. I thought he got a bad deal then, but the way our primaries work, the dems put up someone very liberal, the repubs put up someone very conservative and the independents elect the president. That is why I am so excited this year that all the states who will vote next week will finally get their input. Usually, everything is decided by now, and our votes don't really count. This year they do. I am glad to see so many of you looking in all directions. The worst thing we can do is vote for one issue. I know too many people who only vote pro-choice or vice versa. Roe V Wade will not be overturned because no one really wants to fight that again, so we need to look at the bigger issues. Yes, Bush screwed up this war with terrible lack of foresight, but I still think he did the right thing for this reason: I saw a women's forum on CSPan right after the invasion with Iraqi women and American women in Washington. I was so moved by the Iraqi women talking about how much their had been oppressed under Sadam, were not allowed to educate their daughters, were not allowed to have their own dreams. One of the woman, a doctor who was not allowed to practice, was later murdered because she was working so hard to make life better for women in her country. These brave woman were willing to lay down their lives so that their daughters might have a chance to realize their dreams. To me, this is just like what happened during our civil war. Most peope hated Lincoln, so much so that he was murdered and many cheered. The numbers of men who died every day was horrendous, but he really felt that he was doing the right thing for the future of the US. It took many years for people to appreciate what he did. He kept our country together and freed us from that horrible cancer of slavery. I know people will be furious to hear me say this, but I think Bush will eventually be looked upon as someone who changed the middle east for the better. Yes, it is horrible how many have died, but once people have a taste of freedom, there is no going back. The women of the middle east will continue to fight for their freedom. Look at how we have always left a place better off after a war. What other country can encourage a Japan or Germany to put violence aside and become a world power? I am so proud of our young people, who today, are putting their lives out their to make this world a better place. My uncles came back from VietNam to a screwed up world who spit on them, and ended up dead by age 30 because they could not deal with it. Our soldiers today have made a difference. We all want them home as soon as possible, but they are doing a great job, and they need to finish it so they will feel like the heroes they truly are.

    The day we pull out our troops with a stable Iraq will be a defining day in US history. The middle east will look upon us as a country who is willing to give up our treasure and our young people to make the world a better place. People can say all they want that this is about oil, but think of this:

    if we have a democratic middle east, where the people there actually prosper from oil profits instead of just their despotic leaders, wouldn't that be great?

    Sorry to ramble, but my point is, McCain will not pull out until we get the job done there, and it is so important that we do not look like cowards as we did in Nam. Not only will our country look better, our military families will not suffer the way mine did when my uncles came home, but never came back to us. 

  • nosurrender
    nosurrender Member Posts: 2,019
    edited February 2008

    The way the system works now, just a few states are able to change the course of the electorate before the bulk of the country gets to be heard. With no offense to those of you who live in New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina and Florida... how is it that those four states got to winnow down our choices the way they did? I would have preferred a true Super Tuesday deciding who will be the candidates.

    That said, it has benefited Obama, and I hope that trend continues. I truly believe that the more Americans see of Hillary, the more they will recoil. Her claims of 35 years of experience still irk me. When asked DIRECTLY by Wolf Blitzer what did she do during her 8 years of being First Lady that qualified her to be president, she rambled on about her start in public service beginning with the Brownies,(practically.) She glossed over her years as the co-president by throwing in how she negotiated talks and peace deals from Kosovo to Northern Ireland and won over world leaders like no one else has ever done. Sounds nice. It would have sounded nicer if Wolf Blitzer had asked her for specifics. According to a scathing account of her "experience" in the White House by the New York Times, she had no security clearance, was left out of the decision making process, and her "work" in Kosovo was a glorified photo-op. According to Hill, in an earlier interview, she said her trip to Kosovo involved being sent to save the day, as only she could, in the most dangerous part of the country during the height of the violence. So dangerous it was that she was forced to a bullet proof section of Air Force One while they had to perform a corkscrew landing because of incoming fire. This was completely and totally debunked, once again by the New York Times. In fact, she went a year after the violence was over. Her mission was one of good will because she not only had Chelsea with her, but the comic Sinbad and Sheryl Crow. It is still unclear whether Sinbad and Sheryl Crow were also sequestered into the bullet proof section of the plane.

    It is stories - or lies - like these that the public is SICK TO DEATH OF. I truly think the country has had ENOUGH of Clintons and Bushes for a lifetime. She is treating this as a coronation. She is acting like she is owed this. I don't owe Hillary Clinton anything. In fact, I think she owes the people of New York quite a few explanations.

    Obama and McCain, if those are our choices,  would be like choosing two new pair of shoes- something fresh with the new smell of leather and a shine on them.

    I don't want to go to the thrift store discount bin and buy an old pair of keds that have been worn for the last 20 years.... i don't want a President who has a husband who will assume power as well and possibly throw everything out of order while he tries to glom the spot light. It is old, it is in the past, it is done.

    NEW BROOM SWEEP CLEAN.

    I think we all could use a breath of fresh air. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Get the job done???? Who's job? Who's responsibility? I strongly reject the idea that pulling out is surrending or "abandoning the mission" as McCain likes to say. As far as I'm concerned that's total BS.  The USA is a citizen of the world, not the ruler or keeper of the world. One of the reasons so many other countries hate our government is because we're always sticking our nose in the governments of others-- particularly when it seems politically to our advantage. The bush administration concocted this whole idea of a "war on terror" as an excuse to act like bullies. If anything we brought al quaeda to Iraq and caused more hatred and put our country more at risk for future terrorism.

    I believe by FINALLY pulling out of Nam we cut our losses. I'm not saying there should never be war or that some people in Iraq might be better off now. That's really not the issue to me. There are a lot of areas in the world like Darfur where people could use the help.

    I was in favor of going into Afghanistan to go after Osama (Cool NNN hehe). The idea of diplomacy is to make more allies, not fewer and our next president is going to have to extend a lot of olive branches over the damage the shrub did to our respect in the international community.

    The people of the USA have an opportunity to exercise their constitutional rights and bring the country toward a new direction. When the democrats took over congress it was a start, but there wasn't enough of a majority to override Bush. While I do think that a mix of democrats and republician control can be really positive, we don't know that the dems are going to keep control of the senate with the third who are up for reelection and all of the house is up so we don't know what that will bring about either. I would like to see a democratic president and house of representatives and would deal with a republican senate if it happened that way.

    I wish the democrats and independents who are leaning toward McCain would keep in mind the appointment of new justices to the supreme court because there are several justices of retirement age. McCain said that Sandra Day O'Conner was NOT a good appointment because she wasn't antichoice and she was too liberal. Our rights as women might be further limited by McCain's appointment of justices who usually stick around for a long time because it's a lifetime appointment. I know not many people care about gay issues the way I do or aren't personally touched by them-- but a McCain presidency will push our rights even further backward, not forward.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    NS--- why not just a national primary?

    I agree that the more people see of Hillary, the less they're going to like her. I also think the more people see of Obama, the more they like him. The 35 years of experience irks me too- why doesn't she just say she has 60 years of experience starting at birth?

    I like your shoe analogy.

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited February 2008

    McCain made it clear how much respect he had for Sandra Day O'Conner.

    It would have been political suicide to answer any other way during that debate.  It was a litmus test.

    JMHO I really doubt he shares that view privately especially for someone that can present joint legislation with Ted Kennedy and works with Lieberman.

    Again, referring to my earlier post with this exerpt from the NYT:

     

    ---------------------------------------------------------

    Many on the right, though, say Mr. McCain has a lot of explaining to do. Not only did he vote against President Bush’s tax cuts and a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, Mr. McCain has also supported embryonic stem cell research and stricter environmental regulation. He fought for looser immigration rules. He championed campaign finance rules that many on the right consider a violation of free speech. And he made a deal with Democrats to break a deadlock on judicial nominations that many on the right considered near treasonous.

    Anger over that deal flared up again this week when a Wall Street Journal columnist, John Fund, reported that Mr. McCain had privately criticized Mr. Bush’s Supreme Court nominee Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. because “he wore his conservatism on his sleeve.”

    The McCain campaign quickly denied that he held such a view, noting that the senator voted for Mr. Alito’s confirmation and routinely praises his selection on the stump. But conservative activists say the charges nonetheless reminded them of their doubts.

    -------------------------------------------

    Do you really think as a president he would have put a name like Alito into

    nomination????   I firmly believe he wouldn't.  That's where you and I differ.

    He has to "walk the walk" and a really fine line in the next few months or loose the Republican base entirely.  He is a loose cannon that they can't control and if he gets into office they will have even less.----but he is going to have to tow the line for now.  And Amy you'll probably like it even less when they put a conservative running-mate alongside.  

    Normally, I'd be voting healthcare, but unless there is bipartisanship nothing will get done.

    Its the gut with me.  Here is a guy that went to a war;   Where only where

    your name fell in the alphabet got you a reprieve.  Having been in the "Hanoi Hilton" five years this guy knows what it is to be separated from your family.  How it feels to have or not have your countries support and what it realistically takes to get out of a war.  In my heart I know more than anyone he wants those kids home.

    Lest anyone forget--it may have been the Eisenhower administration that got us into Vietnam but it really escalated with the Kennedy Administration.

     --never-mind almost getting into a war with Nikita Krushchev.

    Getting into war is easy.  Getting out is not going to be logistically easy no matter what party gets in.

      Sometimes McCain gets his  foot in mouth trying to make a point

    -The hundred year thing I think is one of them-

    Heck, I remember the A-bomb commercials run against Barry Goldwater----Made him look like a lunatic----Sad, but scared everyone into voting the other way.

    Anyone remember the movie Dr. Strangelove?

      You can skew things any way you want to get the desired effect.  Heck --had I known what I know today I may have even given him a second look---but you couldn't have told me that decades ago.

    He was not satin in disguise.

    In the end I'm going with my gut.  I know in my gut that McCain is one of the good guys.  I'll have to learn more about some of the others between now and the election.

    As I said ---In the end I'm just going with my gut.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Was it Romney who said she was a bad nominee??? I really thought it was McCain, but maybe it was Romney-- my mistake.

    Do I really think McCain will but in justices who are antichoice and antigay? He's done nothing to convince me otherwise.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    I've heard there are some vets against McCain.  I haven't done any research into that yet.  But I've often heard how he turned down the chance to come home while being a POW in Nam. 

    No one can tell me that this man wouldn't do everything he could possibly do for the men in Iraq or Afghanistan.  Perhaps he knows WE SHOULD HAVE WON the war in Nam.  All that he suffered, and for what.  All the the vets suffered in Nam, for what.  Our government couldn't even take care of these men.  I know McCain will.

    And, of course, Amy, I cannot understand your so needing someone in office that will give you the rights you so want because I am not gay.  However, I do have some priorities I would like to see done, but for now the security of this nation is the most important thing to me. 

    The cowards, as many of you know, are now putting bombs on mentally retarded women.  I believe they said the women had Downs Syndrome.  What do you think will happen to these people if we leave them now?  Even if you were not in favor of this war, how can we leave these people?  I hate that our men and women have died over there.  I hate the billions we have sunk into this war.  But I would hate even worse the visions in my mind of the horrible torture many would go through by our country backing out of a war that we started.  Do you really think the rest of the world would think highly of us?  Hell no.   

    We have to finish the job and leave Iraq with some sense of freedom, and more than anything else, a safe place to live.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain#Vietnam_operations

    On October 26, 1967, McCain was flying as part of a 20-plane attack against a thermal power plant in central Hanoi, a heavily defended target area that had previously been off-limits to U.S. raids.[37][38] McCain's A-4 Skyhawk was shot down by a Soviet-made SA-2 anti-aircraft missile[38] while pulling up after dropping its bombs.[39] McCain fractured both arms and a leg in being hit and ejecting from his plane.[40] He nearly drowned after he parachuted into Truc Bach Lake in Hanoi.[37] After he regained consciousness, a mob gathered around him, spat on him, kicked him and stripped him of his clothing.[41] Others crushed his shoulder with the butt of a rifle and bayoneted him in his left foot and abdominal area; he was then transported to Hanoi's main prison.[41] Although McCain was badly wounded, his captors refused to put him in the hospital, deciding he would soon die anyway. They beat and interrogated him, but McCain only offered his name, rank, serial number, and date of birth.[41] Only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral did they give him medical care[41] and announce his capture. At this point, two days after McCain's plane went down, that event and his status as a POW made the front page of The New York Times.[34]

    McCain spent six weeks in a hospital, receiving marginal care, was interviewed by a French television reporter whose report was carried on CBS, and was observed by a variety of North Vietnamese, including the famous General Vo Nguyen Giap. Many of the North Vietnamese observers assumed that he must be part of America's political-military-economic elite.[41] Now having lost 50 pounds, in a chest cast, and with his hair turned white,[37] McCain was sent to a prisoner-of-war camp in Hanoi in December 1967, into a cell with two other Americans who did not expect him to live a week (one was Bud Day, a future Medal of Honor recipient); they nursed McCain and kept him alive.[42] In March 1968, McCain was put into solitary confinement, where he would be for two years.[41] In July 1968, McCain's father was named Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command (CINCPAC), stationed in Honolulu and commander of all U.S. forces in the Vietnam theater.[4] McCain was immediately offered a chance to return home early:[37]the North Vietnamese wanted a mercy-showing propaganda coup for the outside world, and a message that only privilege mattered that they could use against the other POWs.[41] McCain turned down the offer of repatriation due to the Code of Conduct of "first in, first out": he would only accept the offer if every man taken in before him was released as well.[43] McCain's refusal to be released was even remarked upon by North Vietnamese officials to U.S. envoy Averell Harriman at the ongoing Paris Peace Talks.[37]

    In August 1968, a program of vigorous torture methods began on McCain, using rope bindings into painful positions and beatings every two hours, at the same time as he was suffering from dysentery.[41][37] Teeth and bones were broken again as was McCain's spirit; the beginnings of a suicide attempt was stopped by guards.[37] After four days of this, McCain signed an anti-American propaganda "confession" that said he was a "black criminal" and an "air pirate",[37] although he used stilted Communist jargon and ungrammatical language to signal the statement was forced.[44] He would later write, "I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine."[41] His injuries to this day have left him incapable of raising his arms above his head.[12] His captors tried to force him to sign a second statement, and this time he refused. He received two to three beatings per week because of his continued refusal.[45]Other American POWs were similarly tortured and maltreated in order to extract "confessions".[41] On one occasion when McCain was physically coerced to give the names of members of his squadron, he supplied them the names of the Green Bay Packers' offensive line.[44] On another occasion, a guard surreptitiously loosened McCain's painful rope bindings for a night; when he later saw McCain on Christmas Day, he stood next to McCain and silently drew a cross in the dirt with his foot[46] (decades later, McCain would relate this Good Samaritan story during his presidential campaigns, as a testament to faith and humanity[47][48]). McCain refused to meet with various anti-war peace groups coming to Hanoi, such as those led by David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, and Rennie Davis, not wanting to give either them or the North Vietnamese a propaganda victory based on his connection to his father.[41]

    In October 1969, treatment of McCain and the other POWs suddenly improved, after a badly beaten and weakened POW who had been released that summer disclosed to the world press the conditions to which they were being subjected.[41]In December 1969, McCain was transferred to Hoa Loa Prison, which later became famous via its POW nickname of the "Hanoi Hilton".[41] McCain continued to refuse to see anti-war groups or journalists sympathetic to the North Vietnamese regime;[41] to one visitor who did speak with him, McCain later wrote, "I told him I had no remorse about what I did, and that I would do it over again if the same opportunity presented itself."[41] McCain and other prisoners were moved around to different camps at times, but conditions over the next several years were generally more tolerable than they had been before.[41]

    Altogether McCain was held as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for five and a half years. The Paris Peace Accords were signed on January 27, 1973, ending direct U.S. involvement in the war, but the Operation Homecomingarrangements for POWs took longer; McCain was finally released from captivity on March 15, 1973,[49] having been a POW for almost an extra five years due to his refusal to accept the out-of-sequence repatriation offer.[50

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    Amy--Here is why you should vote for Obama, plain and simple:

    http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2008/02/01/obama-more-likely-to-beat-mccain/?ncid=NWS00010000000001

    Marilyn, I have European friends who are also holding their collective breath that we can finally get a decent president in, start getting USA back to normal.

    They are not used to despising us!It makes them feel sad, and insecure.Although my friends always say "bush", not USA. It is true, but  it is so appreciated that people in other lands (who used to be our ALLIES)actually realize this regime of idiocy was NOT of our choosing.(Then how did it get in, and manage to escalate into this hell???)

    Thank you, Gina for the hillary sequestered into a bulletproof part of AF1  to land in Kosova 2 years later for a photo op.

    We need this?An opportunist,a total egotist and a big liar?I dont think so!We are just getting rid of one.

    (hillary's Kosovo war story reminds me of bush, showing up at Ground Zero  in some kind of Air Force uniform,TWO f$cking days after the bombing.Tongue outBy thenRudy had the situation WELL in control....)Speaking of this, I read hillary lie that SHE was instrumental in getting gas masks for the workers, because  Kristi Whitman would not.TOTAL LIE!!

    Well to hear her tell it, she was Jackie Kennedy in the White House.But it SO aint true!I was there when Jackie was the First Lady.She gave a tour of the redecorated White House to the prez of France, speaking in perfect idiomatic French.She was lovely, bright, gracious, charming.She invited all the cultural stars to the White House-musicians, artists, writers, mixed up with very brilliant pols like Kissinger.

    (OMG if SHE ran for prez she would SO be landslide elected!)

    Anyway, this poor imitation doesnt have it at all.

    (And why is Chelsea appalled?Well I can GUESS why.But not very good campaigning matter.Newspapers talking about Billary camaigning  accompanied by "the mute Chelsea".Poor thing.)

    And those MISGUIDED women who support her as " first woman president" fodder, better think again.I have no idea what sex she is, but she is NOT a good example of a woman.Think Margaret Thatcher.Think Golda Meir.Think Indira Ghandi.Things they all had in common:dignity, truthfulness, intelligence.AND they were not bullied in to office by their ex-prez husband.

    Ahem.

    Gina, I just read in NYT that Americans HAVE seen too much of Billary and ARE recoilng.And Bill has gentled  way down and is turning on the charm.

    But too late.People arent forgetting.

    It's too bad that Obama (do you know he was called Barry, growing up in Hawaii?) is such a gent.He will not stir Billary into another rage and get them going again.It would be so easy.But that is him-a gentleman.

    This is why, Amy, the Dem debate was so mannerly.Wild Bill has been muzzled and hillary's advisers have ADVISED her to stop the roughstuff.

    Why??How can a person DARE to run for prez who needs to be TOLD it is hurting her campaign to bully????I just dont get it!

    (And for Bill, a compleat politition, to not know he was acting wrongly with his pit bull act?I dont believe it!He isnt called Slick Willy for nothing!

    WHY did he act that way??)

    BTW, the NYT has run a VERY uncomplimentary story about hill today, complete with a REALLY unattractive picture of her in college.NOT the one released when Bill was Prez, of when they were dating.(Laughing)

    She must be FURIOUS!!

    Oh what a pity.

  • TenderIsOurMight
    TenderIsOurMight Member Posts: 4,493
    edited March 2008



    Shirley,



    Your signature so befits the end reading of this clip on Senator McCain.



    I thank you for posting this, as I have never taken the time to find the true McCain I have long heard of.



    Tender

  • laureniris
    laureniris Member Posts: 36
    edited February 2008

    I'm a leftie at heart, and haven't made up my mind between Obama and Hillary.   I don't FEEL connected to either of them, and I have always felt a bit turned off by Hill's personality ( but NOT by her stance on most issues, except her initial take on Iraq). 

    I would really like to hear how people are distinguishing between the two of them on policy issues.  I want to vote on substance, not just style. Thanks.

  • BethNY
    BethNY Member Posts: 2,710
    edited March 2008

    I can't believe that I torture myself every day and continue to read this thread.  I'm so addicted, I'm disgusted with myself.

    Hey Joan, Ill be thinking of you when I vote for Hillary this Tuesday.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Awwww, Beth, we can all agree to disagree, right?  It would be so boring if we all thought alike on politics are anything else regarding life.  Each of us have issues that differ (like Amy, but I can respect how she feels).  Just like breast cancer, some want reconstruction, some don't.  Some choose to do alternative, some choose to do conventional.  Some choose HT treatments, some choose not.  And there's umpteen more differences we each have.  So, please join us.  We need your input.  Wink

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    The statement made by McCain about staying in Iraq for another hundred years was just that..a statment..he didn't mean fighting for another hundred years.  We still have troops in Germany and in Japan and in Korea and other countries in the world.

    We have fought for other countries, our men have died, my father was in WWII.  I say how dare they snub their noses at us.  They may not enjoy the freedom they have today if not for the U.S.  War is never popular.  War is never pretty.  War is costly.  People lose their lives including our troops. 

    Shirley

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Thanks, Tender.  There's more to read on that link.  It's quite lengthy. 

    Shirley

  • JoanofArdmore
    JoanofArdmore Member Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2008

    You're gonna do that?Fer real?

    Well, free country!

    (Sorry! I thought Beth's comment was the last, and I was talking to her.)

  • iodine
    iodine Member Posts: 4,289
    edited February 2008

    Interesting trivia I learned in history class last week: Jackie spent $68,000 per week on flowers (in the 60's) and ordered that the sheets be changed twice a day whether she was there or not.

    Interesting how others live, isn't it?

    Of course Oprah has her sheets changed every two days. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Must be nice to have someone come in and change your sheets.  Must be nice to be so rich....wouldn't know what to do with Oprah's money..LOL  I wonder how many thread count she uses...the max for sure.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2008/01/for-some-conser.html 

    McCain 'robo-call' dials up the anti-gay prejudice in Florida

    January 29, 2008
    Chris Johnson

    For some conservatives, there's apparently never a bad time to resort to using gay people as a political piñata. Senator McCain (R-AZ) must have been feeling that itch when his campaign struck out against the GLBT community in a gay-baiting 'robocall' to Florida voters - just in time for primary day that will likely determine the GOP presidential nominee. Here's the text of the automated message that was reported by the Politico and picked up by Pam Spaulding, John Aravosis, Joe.My.God and other prominent gay bloggers:

    "I'm calling with an urgent Mitt Romney [unintelligible]

    "We care deeply about traditional values and protecting families. And we need someone who will not waver in the White House: Ending abortion, preserving the sanctity of marriage, stopping the trash on the airwaves and attempts to ban God from every corner of society. These issues are core to our being.

    "Mitt Romney thinks he can fool us. He supported abortion on demand, even allowed a law mandating taxpayer-funding for abortion. He says he changed his mind, but he still hasn't changed the law. He told gay organizers in Massachusetts he would be a stronger advocate for special rights than even Ted Kennedy.  Now, it's something different.

    "Unfortunately, on issue after issue Mitt Romney has treated social issues voters as fools, thinking we won't catch on. Sorry, Mitt, we know you aren't trustworthy on the most important issue and you aren't a conservative.

    "Paid for by John McCain 2008."

    Oh really? Joe Solmonese had this to say in response:

    It's ironic that Sen. John McCain is using the same tactics that George Bush used against him in 2000; surreptiously trying to exploit anti-gay prejudice for voters....So much for John McCain being above that.

     

    Posted at 05:00 PM in Elections | Permalink

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    Saluki-- here's McCain on supreme court justices--

    Atlanta, Ga. - Sen. John McCain assumed the Republican nominee's mantle Saturday as he crossed the South from Nashville to Birmingham to Atlanta, touting his high-profile endorsements and talking about how he will unify the Republican Party following Tuesday's de facto national primary day.

    "I assume that I will get the nomination of the party," McCain told reporters in Nashville, adding that he hoped everything would be decided on Tuesday.

    Nationally, McCain is leading his chief competitor in the polls, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who took much of the day away from campaigning to attend the Utah funeral of the Mormon Church's president, Gordon Hinckley. The latest Gallup Poll shows McCain leading Romney 44 to 24 percent. And a new Washington Post-ABC News poll gives McCain a 48 to 24 percent advantage over Romney.

    McCain courted conservatives in the South, reminding voters of his anti-abortion credentials, as well as his fealty to "strict constructionist" judges such as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito.

    "I will try to find clones of Alito and Roberts!" McCain told the cheering crowd in Atlanta. "We will have judges serving on the federal bench who do not legislate from the bench!"

    Everywhere he went, McCain was sure to mention his endorsements from governors of the three largest states, California, Texas and Florida. And he bagged an endorsement from a former Massachusetts governor, Paul Cellucci, who has repeatedly chosen not to endorse Romney.

    In a sign of supreme confidence, McCain will venture into Boston - Romney's home turf - Sunday to watch the Super Bowl and then campaign Monday morning.

    He is already looking ahead to what will happen after he wins the nomination, reaching out to conservatives and promising them results in the general election against either Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Barack Obama.

    "I believe that the majority of the Republican Party conservatives are convinced that I'm best equipped to lead this country, unify our party and take on the challenge of radical Islamic extremism," he told reporters in Nashville. In Birmingham, he flatly declared: "I'm the most electable."

    McCain, who lost the Republican nomination to then Texas-Gov. George W. Bush in 2000, is superstitious, and he did try to dial back a bit of the enthusiasm at one point.

    "I hope I'm not too confident about Tuesday," he said, when asked about his words. "I'm guardedly optimistic. I think we're doing well and feeling a sense of momentum. We're not taking anything for granted."

    Still, McCain has repeatedly talked in the last couple of days about the importance of uniting the GOP in order to win in November.

    "I've got to work hard to get as much of the party as I can, because we have an uphill battle for November," he said. "Look at the numbers of people who say Democrats do a better job at a, b, c, d, and e."

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited February 2008

    I try to take campaign rhetoric for what it is and that whole supreme court business wreaks of it to me.  And I know that I will be holding my nose through much of this election.

    How long do you think before those fisticuffs are off between Hillary and Obama and the mud again starts flying probably through surrogates?  Not long after super Tuesday I assure you.

    I know that and trust that this guy knows how to handle back-room politics.

    I hate robo-calls and hang up as soon as an automated voice comes on.

    From what I can see as soon as McCain found out about it--It was stopped.

    I agree with these sentiments from a blogger over at theatlantic.com
    said better than I could say them
    -----------------------
    "Everyone flips out over robo-calls and the like, but with each election cycle a few things become clearer: 1) that every campaign employs them, and 2) that all sorts of things are done without the upper echelons of the campaign necessarily signing off on them.

    So, every election cycle, we have to hear about how McCain did this, or Romney said that, when in reality they're only directly responsible for a fraction of the offenses. Supporters (and even campaign management) always get overzealous at some point. All we can do is ask the candidates directly what they believe about this or that."

    Posted by Punditish | January 29, 2008 12:06 PM 

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    What really concerns me with McCain is who is likely to be his running-mate.  That would be very important to me.

    It should be important with any candidate--but could be the deal breaker for me. I like to think age doesn't matter-but it does.---I'd need to feel comfortable with the VP candidate as well.

    On a different issue; Can any of you political junkies enlighten me?

    What happened in Maine yesterday?  Why did Romney run away with the delegates?

    Why does Maine love Romney?  Am I missing something here?

    I still can't figure out how Michigan could possibly have swallowed that line about bringing the automotive jobs back to the state and voted for him.

    Can someone explain?Surprised

     

  • PuppyFive
    PuppyFive Member Posts: 2,808
    edited February 2008

    Surprised I'll wait too!!!!!

    Puppy

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2008

    Does anyone REALLY believe EVERYTHING a candidate's saying.  I don't.

    I don't believe Roe vs Wade is ever going to be overturned.  Nobody needs to worry about that.  Legal abortion is here to stay.  Even for those who are 12, 13, 14, 15 which I think is horrible.  But that's another who subject.  I'd dare someone to touch my teenager!

    Shirley

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited February 2008

    I'm glad you never had to worry about your 12 - 13 or 14 year old becomming pregnant-- possibly by rape or incest. No child (or adult) should be forced to carry her abuser's child. Even "consentual" sex at that age is way way to young. I had a friend who was pregnant at 11 from her mother's boyfriend and gave birth. The girl never even knew she was pregnant until she was in labor--a 36 hr labor. The baby, given up for adoption would be about 20 today and his birthmother hopes he never tries to find her. She wishes she had an abortion.

    Shirley, pro-choice people aren't lurking around, trying to give abortions or force people into having them. Choice means just that-- to stay pregnant or not, to keep the baby or not. Nobody wants abortions to happen-- it's just the lesser of two bad options sometimes.

  • PuppyFive
    PuppyFive Member Posts: 2,808
    edited February 2008

    Sure looks like McCain will be the Rep. runner!

    Amy, who asks the Baby????

    Puppy

Categories