Breaking Research News from sources other than Breastcancer.org

Options
19899101103104

Comments

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited March 2022

    "HER2-positive breast cancer progressively turned from the most feared to the most curable subtype. Currently, more than 9 out of 10 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who are treated with chemotherapy and HER2-blockade are free from recurrence 6 years after surgery."

    Woot woot!!! What great advancements!! Let's hope this becomes the norm for all subtypes asap!

    More Tolerable Cures for Patients With Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Halfway to Precision

    https://dailynews.ascopubs.org/do/10.1200/ADN.22.2...


  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited March 2022

    "overall survival data from MONALEESA-2, breaking the 5-year mOS barrier for patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer"

    https://t.co/L5xeOZADVf

    image

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited March 2022

    Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation using External-Beam or Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy: 5 year oncological outcomes of a prospective cohort study

    this is for rads post lumpectomy for IDC or DCIS

    " Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences and locoregional recurrence rates were unexpectedly high in patients treated with IOERT" 10.6% recurrence in the IORT group v 3.7% in accelerated partial breast rads

    https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(22)00243-7/fulltext

  • SarahMaude
    SarahMaude Member Posts: 287
    edited March 2022

    Treatment and Survivorship Interventions to Prevent Poor Body Image Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors

    https://www.dovepress.com/treatment-and-survivorship-interventions-to-prevent-poor-body-image-ou-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BCTT

    This might have already been posted, but I read it in detail yesterday. I think it's crucial that the BC medical community really spends time realizing that taking care of the whole person overrides what I still have seen as the knee jerk reaction to just annihilate the cancer with secondary regard to the aftermath of a woman who must live with decisions that can be made without us being prepared with the right questions or coming to an agreement with the best possible treatment.

    Here are the major sections:

    We Shared Decision-Making

    Local Therapy De-Escalation

    Axillary Downstaging

    Radiation

    Systemic Therapy

    Lymphedema Risk Mitigation

    Preventing and Managing Weight Gain During Treatment

    Prehabilitation

    Addressing Menopausal and Sexual Sequelae of Treatment

    Psychological Interventions During Treatment

    I feel strongly that these subjects need to be incorporated into the care of every newly diagnosed BC patient. I've gotten so much of this support and preparation from being here, but not everyone knows about options until they have made permanent decisions with what still seems to be a traditional approach that is a decade behind current best practices. As a person living in a city without a major breast care integrated care system, I still prefer to piece the right solution for me into what we have here. I may still end up traveling. But knowing that treating my cancer has options that require shared decisions is both empowering and unnerving for me. My BCS is in line with my approach, but for now, we may lack oncoplastic expertise that can keep be here.


  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited March 2022

    [trial in mice] World first: drug prevents human breast cancer recurrence and metastasis (article headline)

    From the actual paper's abstract:

    "We previously provided in vitro evidence that these features are collectively enforced by mitochondrial superoxide in a paradigm where mitochondria act as metabolic sensors of the tumor microenvironment and produce subcytotoxic levels of superoxide to prime metastatic progenitor cells. We also showed that these metastatic traits can be collectively countered by MitoQ, a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant that selectively deactivates mitochondrial superoxide. Here, we further establish that MitoQ prevents primary tumor recurrence after surgery, tumor take and metastasis as a whole, notably in a model of human breast cancer in mice. Since MitoQ already successfully passed Phase I clinical trials, our findings support the development of this drug as a preventive treatment against breast cancer metastasis."

    This patented substance (MitoQ), which is available OTC as a supplement, was selected for trial based on their theorized mechanism of action (suppressing subcytotoxic mitochondrial superoxide) by researchers with no connection to the company -- in part because MitoQ had already gone through Phase I trials (rather than mitoTEMPO which is public domain but also showed good results with it in melanoma). FWIW, I found the paper clearer than the EurekaAlert article.

    https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/946433

    DOI 10.3390/cancers14061488

    https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/6/1488/htm

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited March 2022

    Research done in Montreal could lead to treatment for [TNBC]

    [Using CRISPR to knock out genes systematically, researchers identified two signalling pathways or gene networks of significance in TNBC.]

    "One of them was an oncogenic pathway. Those are genes that normally promote cell proliferation on tumours and this one was hyperactivated in those breast cancer patients," Lebrun said.

    The second group of genes, which normally act as tumour suppressors by preventing cells to multiply, were found to be inactive or asleep.

    This combination, Lebrun believes, could explain why TNBC tumours are so "aggressive and metastatic."

    Understanding which genetic mechanisms were involved allowed the team to then uncover existing drugs that targeted those networks.

    One of the drugs they tested, Verteporfin, surprisingly had nothing to do with cancer.

    "It's actually a drug that is used for disease of the degeneration of the retina. It's an eye disease," Lebrun said... In all, the team evaluated around 10 different drugs, with Verteporfin being one of two standouts... Individually, each [of those two] drug[s] had around a 20 per cent decrease in tumour growth... "But [together] we got something more like 80 per cent," he said. "That's what we call a synergistic effect."

    Efforts have been underway since the summer to get Phase 1 clinical trials off the ground... [but] Lebrun said he couldn't give a timeline of when the trial would start and when patients could begin enrolling.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/8702026/montreal-mcgill...

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited April 2022

    Warmer Climate Tied to Favorable Breast Cancer Outcomes

    Higher environmental temperatures are associated with better outcomes (significant improvements in pCR as well as OS) among patients with stage I-III breast cancer, according to research presented in a poster at the NCCN 2022 Annual Conference.

    https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/news/con...

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited April 2022

    onmagosh... debbew.... your post made my day. Is this an excuse to spend the winter in a warm climate? (Access to care issues aside) :) I am such a wimp about the cold and by this time of year, I am ready to petition for no more winter! Now I have a therapeutic excuse. Love it!

  • NorCalS
    NorCalS Member Posts: 288
    edited April 2022

    Lumpie, debbew, & moth:

    Thanks for keeping this thread active and informing the community on all the research that's out there. This is such a helpful thread

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited April 2022

    Lumpie, I was quite surprised to see that article, too! I wondered if it had anything to do with vitamin D, but that doesn't seem to be what they are thinking.

    Norcals, thanks for the nod! Lumpie has led the way but I'm always interested to see what all the other posters have uncovered.

  • HomeMom
    HomeMom Member Posts: 1,198
    edited April 2022

    debbew That's great news! I went through all my treatments, surgery during the hottest Florida months May - September

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited April 2022

    timing of chemo - as in morning or afternoon- may affect outcomes

    "patients who received most treatments after noon required fewer dose reductions and were less likely to stop treatment.

    In addition, recurrence rates were highest among patients who received at least 70% of treatments before noon."

    https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/news/con...


  • bgross144
    bgross144 Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2022
  • bgross144
    bgross144 Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2022
  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited April 2022

    Cardamonin shows promise for treating aggressive breast cancer

    Study shows that compound from cardamom spice can kill triple-negative breast cancer cells

    https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/947459

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited April 2022

    Hepatic Resection for Breast Cancer–Related Liver Metastases

    Published in Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Journal Scan / Research · April 11, 2022

    • This retrospective study from a single institution described the outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for breast cancer–related liver metastases and identified any clinicopathological variables associated with recurrence or survival. The findings showed that among 20 patients with breast cancer–associated liver metastases, hepatic resection was associated with a median disease-free survival of 50 months and a 5-year OS of 65%.
    • {A} Few patients may benefit from hepatic resection for breast cancer–related liver metastases and this approach appears to be feasible and safe.
    • CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that liver resection for breast cancer-related liver metastases is feasible, safe and associated with prolonged disease free and overall survival in selected patients. It is likely that this option will be offered to more patients going forward, however, the difficulty lies in selecting out those who will benefit from liver resection particularly given the increasing number of systemic treatments and local ablative methods available that offer good long-term results.
    {Summary, abstract and full article all appear to be free of charge.}
  • Karenfizedbo15
    Karenfizedbo15 Member Posts: 717
    edited April 2022

    Hi All, been a while since the crash and just catching up.
    I've had some progression and my MO is suggesting Vinorelbine as next step. However I can't find ANYTHING positive about this drug…apart from it being effective in a mouse trial ina combo to tackle brain mets. It's old, it doesn't seem to be particularly effective and has been 'relegated' to later stage treatment. Does anyone have anything positive on this drug to share?

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited April 2022

    karenfizedbo15, I am so sorry to hear about your progression and concern over drugs. I have taken Vinorelbine. I was on the Aviator trial and got Group B: Trastuzumab + Vinorelbine + Avelumab. It did not help me and I "progressed" off of it really quickly. Sorry that is probably not very encouraging. It looks to me like the trial is still recruiting (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03414658) so it must be working for some people. You might check out the trial. Looks like you are triple + so IDK if that fits with their recruitment. I don't recall it being particularly hard to tolerate. I do think I lost my hair, but that sort of goes with the territory at this point. Next I was on Kadcyla, as part of the DS-8201 clinical trial (control arm), and it did not work for long for me and had some ugly side effects. Then we irradiated my brain and liver (Cyberknife) and I went on DS-8201/Enhertu. The combo has kept things under control thus far. Sure hope you find some thing that is tolerable and works well for you!

  • Karenfizedbo15
    Karenfizedbo15 Member Posts: 717
    edited April 2022

    Thanks Lumpie! I’m ER+ and HER2+. You story seems to be the norm, that I can find. Checked the trial link but it’s showing an error. It is encouraging that you’ve managed to find SOMETHING to keep you stable though!

  • Lumpie
    Lumpie Member Posts: 1,650
    edited April 2022

    Thanks, karenfizedbo15. In case you or any others readers are searching, the Aviator trial is: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03414658. Yes, anything to keep us stable. Thankfully, lots of people having luck on Enhertu. It has some challenging SE's, but for a lot of people, it works. Good luck!


  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited April 2022

    I see this thread is a bit quieter... let's revive it! Some very good news on TDX-D for her2low (IHC +1/+2): https://www.onclive.com/view/fda-grants-breakthrou...

    Saulius

  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited April 2022

    Interesting in-animal study for cyclophosphamide+CSF1R-inhibitor in mTNBC. Some macrophages inhibition mechanisms... Hope such things come into clinical trials sooner than later: https://scienmag.com/a-promising-combination-thera...

    Saulius

  • HomeMom
    HomeMom Member Posts: 1,198
    edited April 2022

    With some of these articles, I need Cliff Notes For Dummies, if there is such a thing!

  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited May 2022

    Dear Homemom, Cliff Notes for Dummies would be useful for me too:)D I also sometimes feel they write these articles only for a few selected people - nothing has changed since times of Socrates:)

    Saulius

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited May 2022

    NUS scientists develop painless way to shrink breast cancer using magnetic fields

    https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/nus-...


  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited May 2022

    The most detailed photograph of a cell inner: https://angstrom3d.com/cst-molecular-landscapes

    Man... how complicated life really is:/

    Saulius

  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited May 2022

    Observing ESMO: extremely interesting results in mTNBC BEGONIA clinical trial: 1st line Durvalumab+Dato_DXd = 74% ORR irrespective of PD-L1 status. Amazing!

    image

  • XfitMama2
    XfitMama2 Member Posts: 13
    edited May 2022

    I’m wondering if anyone has an article or info on the efficacy of full axillary node removal vs radiation of nodes after a positive frozen section of the Sentinal node in surgery, but specifically for those with tumors over 5cm treated with neoadjuvent chemo. I can’t find info on this subset, most articles talk about small tumors and/or don’t mention neoadjuvent chemo.

    Thanks in advance

  • BSandra
    BSandra Member Posts: 836
    edited May 2022

    Dear xfitmama2, can you highlight your diagnosis/histologies/history as decisions are made depending on them? Standard of care could be easily found in ESMO guidelines but I believe you are familiar with them. The discussion in this sphere (LN removal, Sentinel removal, radiation vs removal, mastectomy/lumpectomy&nod removal) is still going on, you can find come comparison studies but I'd be surprised if you found such a comparison for that exact subset.

    Saulius

  • debbew
    debbew Member Posts: 226
    edited May 2022

    Researchers reveal a possible biological mechanism connecting breast cancer and type 2 diabetes

    https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220530/Researc...


Categories