CD47 Research at Stanford

Options

Does anyone have latest information on the CD47 Phase 1 trial at Stanford ? Is it going well ? Are they accepting patients and when is it supposed to move to Phase 2 ?

«13

Comments

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2017

    Good questions. First, lets explain how this Immunotherapy (Anti-CD47) works.
    One way cancer cells avoid being killed by the immune system is by over-expressing the CD47 "don't eat me" signal. All cancers use this trick to hide from the immune system. Scientists created an antibody that interferes with this signal and in the process, alerts immune system cells (Macrophages and Dendritic cells) to destroy the tumor cells.

    Anti-CD47 is a Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) / immune checkpoint inhibitor that has the potential to benefit ALL cancers, not just breast cancer. What makes this treatment novel is that it targets cancer stem cells (which are theorized, by some, to be the root of all evil), and it also targets the heterogeneous bulk of bad cells that make up a tumor. The CD47 protein is over-expressed in nearly all cancers, making it a unique target.

    Stanford University is pursuing anti-CD47 therapies through a non-commercial entity (CIRM grant... i.e. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, essentially a publicly funded Stem Cell research). The success of this effort has resulted in clinical trials as well as a new company called "Forty Seven, Inc", which raised $75 million dollars to commercialize this Immunotherapy approach.

    Here's a couple links describing the project:
    CIRM Grant info: Clinical Investigation of a Humanized Anti-CD47 Antibody in Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors

    Development of Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells

    In addition to Stanford, here's other companies pursuing Anti-CD47 Immunotherapies:
    1. ** Celgene (the Anti-CD47 drug is licensed from Inhibrx).
    Pipeline: INBRX-103 CD47 mAb
    Phase 1 Trial: Dose Finding Study of CC-90002,in Subjects With Advanced Solid and Hematologic Cancers
    Trial started Q1 2015 and ends Q4 2017 and it is recruiting breast cancer patients!
    2. ** Novimmune - Based in Switzerland. [bispecific anti-cd47 / anti-cd19 antibody]. Here's a June 2015 ASCO abstract. Pipeline: NI-1701
    3. ** Trillium Therapeutics (Ticker: TRIL), Toronto Canada. Pipeline: TTI-621.
    Phase 1 trial is called: "A Phase 1a/1b Dose Escalation and Expansion Trial of Single-agent TTI-621, a Novel Biologic Targeting CD47, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies" The trial started Jan 2016 and focuses on advanced Lymphoma. They previously indicated AML (Leukemia) & MDS (bone marrow). Preclinical data additional indications include Breast Cancer, among many other solid and liquid tumors.
    4. Vasculox - A startup in St. Louis, Missouri - Working on Novel Anti-CD47 Therapeutics. Honestly, this company doesn't look very impressive. Weak funding, weak management team; although one of the early pioneers of CD47 is associated with the company. They've been around since 2006 and still don't appear to have a drug pipeline.
    5. Paradigm Shift Therapeutics in Rockville, Maryland. PSTx was launched in Jan 2014 by Teresa Burgess, PhD and Kate Farrell, PhD through an ongoing collaboration with Dr. David Roberts at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) focused on developing CD47-targeting inhibitors-a novel immune-checkpoint target with the potential to radically change treatment for cancer patients.
    PSTx is unique since they are focused on Metastatic Breast Cancer using a drug called "PSTx-23".
    6. Alexo Therapeutics - A startup near San Francisco, California. Alexo closed Series A funding of $36M in May 2015, which was led by venBio and joined by Lightstone Ventures, the Longevity Fund, and Stanford University.
    7. Forty Seven, Inc. - This is the official Stanford "spin-out" startup based in Palo Alto, California. In Feb 2016, they completed Series A financing of $75 million, which was led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and Sutter Hill Ventures with participation from Clarus Ventures and GV (formerly Google Ventures). The lead program Hu5F9-G4 (Anti-CD47) is a monoclonal antibody against the CD47 receptor, a "don't eat me" signal that cancer cells commandeer to avoid being ingested by the immune system. The founders include: Irv Weissman, Ravi Majeti, Mark Chao and Jens Volkmer, all have been involved with CD47 since its discovery at Stanford many years ago.

    ** The first three have started Phase 1 clinical trials (last updated Feb 2016).

    In terms of Stanford, here's a 15 minute video presentation, released in April 2015, titled:
    "The Promise of Immunotherapy: Anti-CD47. Monoclonal Antibody Treatment on the Cusp of Revolutionizing Cancer Care".
    Dr. Samuel Cheshier, MD PhD, Assistant Professor of Pediatric Neuroseurgery at Stanford, discusses his work on immunotherapy as a possible cure for cancer. It's focused on pediatrics, but the illustrations in the video are helpful for those who don't understand the science.

    Finally, Dr. Irv Weissman, who runs the Weissman Lab at Stanford is a juggernaut behind Anti-CD47 therapy.
    Here's a June 2015 video discussing Stem Cells and CD47.

    ** As of June 2017, here are the "Anti-CD47" immunotherapy Clinical Trials:

    1. Phase I Trial of Hu5F9-G4 (Hematologic Malignancies or Solid Tumors)
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02216409
    This trial is still accepting breast cancer patients. Phase II trials may start in late 2017, depending on the success of the Phase I study.
    Sponsor: Forty Seven, Inc. (Stanford University spinoff)
    Drug: Hu5F9-G4
    Estimated Enrollment: 96
    Study Start Date: August 2014
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: August 2017
    Location: California

    2. CAMELLIA: Anti-CD47 Antibody Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02678338
    Sponsor: Forty Seven, Inc. (Stanford University spinoff)
    Drug: Hu5F9-G4
    Estimated Enrollment: 30
    Study Start Date: November 2015
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: January 2018
    Location: United Kingdom (UK)

    3. Trial of TTI-621 for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02663518
    Sponsor: Trillium Therapeutics
    Drug: TTI-621
    Estimated Enrollment: 270
    Study Start Date: January 2016
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: June 2019
    Locations: California, Colorado, Minnesota, New York, Tennessee

    4. Phase 1, Dose Finding Study of CC-90002 in Subjects With Advanced Solid and Hematologic Cancers
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02367196
    This trial accepts breast cancer patients.
    Sponsor: Celgene
    Drug: INBRX-103 (CC-90002)
    Enrollment: 100
    Study Start Date: March 2015
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: January 2018
    Locations: Arizona (Scottsdale Healthcare Research Institute), California (University of California San Francisco: Lead researcher is Dr. Pamela Munster), Texas (South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics)

    5. Study of CC-90002 in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02641002
    Sponsor: Celgene
    Drug: INBRX-103 (CC-90002)
    Enrollment: 78
    Study Start Date: February 2016
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: July 2019
    Locations: Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York

    6. Trial of Intratumoral Injections of TTI-621 in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Solid Tumors
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02890368
    This trial accepts breast cancer patients.
    Sponsor: Trillium Therapeutics
    Drug: TTI-621
    Enrollment: 54
    Study Start Date: October 2016
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2018
    Locations: California (City of Hope National Medical Center), Oregon (Oregon Health & Science University), Pennsylvania (University of Pittsburgh), Washington (University of Washington Seattle Cancer Care Alliance)
    This is for patients with: Solid Tumors, Breast cancer, Mycosis Fungoides, Melanoma, Merkel-cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Human Papillomavirus-Related Malignant Neoplasm, Soft Tissue Sarcoma

    7. Study of ALX148 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Lymphoma
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03013218
    Sponsor: Alexo Therapeutics
    Drug: ALX148
    Enrollment: 110
    Study Start Date: January 2017
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2019
    Locations: Colorado (University of Colorado Denver), Connecticut (Yale University), Michigan (START-Midwest, Grand Rapids)
    This is for patients with: Solid Tumors.

    8. Trial of Hu5F9-G4 in Combination With Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02953509
    Sponsor: Forty Seven, Inc. (Stanford University spinoff)
    Drug: Hu5F9-G4
    Estimated: 72
    Study Start Date: November 2016
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2019
    Locations: California (Stanford University), California (City of Hope National Medical Center), Illinois (University of Chicago), Missouri (Washington University School of Medicine), Tennessee (Sarah Cannon Research Institute)

    9. Trial of Hu5F9-G4 in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Solid Tumors and Advanced Colorectal Cancer
    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02953782
    This trial accepts breast cancer patients.
    Sponsor: Forty Seven, Inc. (Stanford University spinoff)
    Drug: Hu5F9-G4
    Estimated: 112
    Study Start Date: November 2016
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 2018
    Locations: Michigan (START Midwest), Texas (START Center for Cancer Care), Tennessee (Sarah Cannon Research Institute)

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    JS, Thank you for all of the info and bringing us up to date with what is going on with this.  I continue to pray that this is all that they hope it is and that it is available sooner then later. 

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2015

    ML, I'm not sure my post really helps. If anything, it's "information overload" for most people.

    It sounds to me like you're a step ahead of anyone with this research, since you've had email exchanges with Stanford.

    If it's not too soon, ping Stanford again and ask for an update. At some point in the future, I'll fire off an email as well.


  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    You definitely provided a lot of information.  They are most concerned with pediatrics currently as per the last email that I received, I felt a little awkward even asking about breast cancer after he sent me that reply. But that doesn't mean that they didn't use any adults in the phase I clinical trial, I am almost certain that they did. This is a safety trial, so I think all we gain at this point is to find out when it will be completed and when/if they will begin phase II. I don't think that they would be continuing to put out new information on this if it wasn't going well enough to continue, correct? I think I'lI just wait until the end of the summer, that should be 12 months, before I send any thing else to him.  He is very nice and I don't think he would mind if you did send him an email, especially from someone as well versed as you are.

    Dr. Weissman is very smart indeed but he also is honest because he is giving credit to the student who made this discovery, of course, under his supervision. (At least, I think that is the scenario).

    So per what you have included here, there are 3 companies doing testing on this in addition to Stanford.  Is that right?

    What are your personal feelings about it?

    Also, did you see that someone posted about another cancer cure?  I forget that name of it but they are beginning clinical trials on it in Italy.  It uses nanoparticles that will attach to the cancer cells and then they put you in a machine which heats up the nanoparticles there by killing the cancer.  (I think I explained it properly).  I read that it will be very expensive but only time will tell if it works or not. 

  • letmywifelive
    letmywifelive Member Posts: 360
    edited June 2015

    Musiclover, how did you contact Stanford about CD47 research ? Did you just reached out to a doctor ?

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited October 2015

    @letmywifelive. Stanford's webpage dedicated to CD47 provides a few email links for the "Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine".
    That page can be found here. I imagine ML used one of those emails.
    Emailing doctors and researchers directly is always wise. Whether they reply is a different story.

    @ML. I just discovered CD47 last week. I discovered it while researching Toronto-based Trillium Therapeutics.
    Trillium is getting attention for its immunotherapy treatment for hematological malignancies (blood), such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML). SIRPαFc, the company's lead program, is an antibody-like fusion protein that blocks the activity of CD47, thereby blocking a "do-not-eat" signal that is expressed on several cancers, including AML.
    CD47 would normally spare cancer cells from phagocytic (engulf and absorb) attack from the immune system. However, by blocking CD47 activity, SIRPαFc can prime the immune system response against cancer cells. Preclinical models have shown good activity, thus paving the way to human trials. What is particularly exciting about CD47 is that it has been expressed on a number of liquid and solid tumor types, including other leukemias, multiple myeloma, glioblastoma, ovarian, breast cancer, etc.
    A Phase 1 study in blood cancer is planned to start in Q4 of 2015. Trillium recently raised $55M, which should provide it with sufficient funding to complete a Phase 2 study and/or fund its internal operations into 2019.
    Celgene Corp. (CELG:NASDAQ) has started a Phase 1 study on its own monoclonal antibody targeting CD47. With Celgene and Stanford also going after the CD47 target, Trillium's Anti-CD47 approach is further validated.

    All of this CD47 research led me back to Stanford University, Dr. Irving Weissman, his lab, etc.
    In my opinion, the only way you can beat ANY cancer is to kill the stem cells. That's what makes this so interesting. Anti-CD47 can theoretically mobilize the immune system to attack bulk cancer cells and cancer stem cells (CSCs).
    The CSC concept postulates that the growth of tumors is driven by a small nest of dedicated cells that have stem cell-like properties, including self-renewal. While the bulk of a tumor consists of rapidly proliferating cells and differentiated cells, neither of which is capable of self-renewal, a small population of CSCs provides for long-term maintenance of the cancer. Although the CSC concept was first postulated decades ago, it wasn't until 1994 that proof of their existence was demonstrated, when Dr. John Dick (wiki here and Bio here) and colleagues in Toronto isolated leukemic stem cells (LSCs) from bulk acute myeloid leukemia cells. [Ironically, Dr. John Dick is a Scientific Advisor for Trillium. He and Dr. Weissman, among others, have collaborated together on stem cell research for years]. Obviously, CSCs have been identified in many other human malignancies, including solid tumors such as bladder, brain, breast, colon, ovarian and prostate cancers. With accumulating evidence that CSCs are resistant to chemo and rads, it's thought that CSCs are responsible for relapse.
    Simply put, to cure cancer, CSCs need to be destroyed. Aided by immunotherapies like Anti-CD47, can the immune system achieve this? Time will tell.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    JS, Thank you. I understand the premise with anti-CD47, I just wonder if there is a real possibility for a cancer cure and I stay hopeful that there is.  But some times when I listen to or read things about this it sounds like they are so positive and then they say something like this treatment will work well with other treatments as the gentleman mentioned on one of the videos that you attached. It makes me wonder if this is supposed to be one and done or is this another treatment that will be offered to stage IV patients? and then how long will it work?  That would be ok but it crushes my hopes for it being curative. Like you said only time will tell.  I contacted the following gentleman via email:

    Christopher Vaughan

    Communications Officer

    E-mail: 

    vaughan1@stanford.edu


     

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2015

    Here's another CD47 abstract.
    It was published last week by bone cancer researchers at Zhejiang University in China, further validating this novel immunotherapeutic approach.
    CD47 Blockade inhibits tumor progression human osteosarcoma in xenograft models

    ** Due to link errors, here's the abstract:
    "CD47 Blockade inhibits tumor progression human osteosarcoma in xenograft models"

    Ji-Feng Xu1, Xiao-Hong Pan2, Shui-Jun Zhang1, Chen Zhao1, Bin-Song Qiu1, Hai-Feng Gu1, Jian-Fei Hong1, Li Cao1, Yu Chen1, Bing Xia1, Qin Bi1, Ya-Ping Wang2

    1. Department of Orthopedics and Joint Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, PR China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, PR China

    Correspondence to:
    Ji-Feng Xu, : xu_jifeng AT hotmail.com
    Ya-Ping Wang, : wangypzju AT 163.com

    Keywords: osteosarcoma, CD47, antibody, immunotherapy

    Received: April 21, 2015
    Accepted: May 26, 2015
    Published: June 08, 2015

    ABSTRACT: Osteosarcoma is the most common bone tumors in children and adolescents. Despite intensive chemotherapy, patients with advanced disease still have a poor prognosis, illustrating the need for alternative therapies. In this study, we explored the use of antibodies that block CD47 with a tumor growth suppressive effect on osteosarcoma. We first found that up-regulation of CD47 mRNA levels in the tumorous tissues from eight patients with osteosarcoma when compared with that in adjacent non-tumorous tissues. Further western-blot (WB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated that CD47 protein level was highly expressed in osteosarcoma compared to normal osteoblastic cells and adjacent non-tumorous tissues. Osteosarcoma cancer stem cell markers staining shown that the majority of CD44+ cells expressed CD47 albeit with different percentages (ranging from 80% to 99%). Furthermore, high CD47 mRNA expression levels were associated with a decreased probability of progression-free and overall survival. In addition, blockade of CD47 by specific Abs suppresses the invasive ability of osteosarcoma tumor cells and further inhibits spontaneous pulmonary metastasis of KRIB osteosarcoma cells in vivo. Finally, CD47 blockade increases macrophage phagocytosis of osteosarcoma tumor cells.In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that CD47 is a critical regulator in the metastasis of osteosarcoma and suggest that targeted inhibition of this antigen by anti-CD47 may be a novel immunotherapeutic approach in the management of this tumor.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    JS, From that link to Oncotarget I needed to search on CD47 to find the abstract that you described they also had an abstract involving breast cancer and CD47 but I can't manage to make much sense of what they are saying or I'm just too tired right now to even try.

    Thank you again.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2015

    Sorry about the link issue. I edited my post and simply added the abstract info.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2015

    To answer the OP's question: Stanford University should be done with the Phase I trial within the next 12 months. They are not accepting new patients.

    In terms of Anti-CD47 antibody programs at Celgene and Novimmune...

    Celgene initiated their CD47 Phase 1 Trail: "Dose Finding Study of CC-90002,in Subjects With Advanced Solid and Hematologic Cancers".
    It started Q1 2015 and ends Q4 2017.

    Novimmune is based in Switzerland.
    Here's their CD47 abstract from a couple weeks ago from the 2015 ASCO meeting in Chicago. I assume they are further behind. It's Switzerland, so no clue of how that translates to the US and the FDA.

    Bottom line: Stanford is ahead of Celgene in the CD47 life-cycle.
    Stanford's Phase 1 should be done between Q2 & Q3 2016 vs. Q4 2017 for Celgene's Phase 1.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited June 2015
    JS and others, thanks for all of the above links and discussion. Like ML I am cautious of getting my hopes up but it is fascinating.
  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2015

    For future reference, instead of "CD47", Stanford University is using the term "Hu5F9-G4" for their clinical trial. I believe that's the name for the specific antibody they created. If you try & search "Stanford & CD47", for example, you won't find anything new or relevant (most likely).
    Anyway, here's a link to the actual trial: Phase I Trial of Hu5F9-G4 which should be done within 12 months.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited June 2015

    Thank you. That's going to be much more difficult but ok. Originally, they told me 18 months is standard amount of time give or take a few months - this states completion of August 2017, that's 3 years for just phase I. 

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited July 2015

    I don't imagine we have many European members, but this news just hit my radar.

    The Ukrainian Cancer Centre of Monoclonal Therapy is conducting a multi-location
    Phase 1 trial of Anti-CD47 for Breast Cancer.

    It's called: Phase I, Dose-escalating, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Humanized Сhimeric Anti-CD47 Antibody in Patients With Verified Diagnosis of Breast Cancer ( ASSIST-II )

    Estimated Enrollment: 99
    Estimated Study Completion Date: September 2016

    As far as I know, the trials at Stanford, Celgene and Trillium Therapeutics don't include any breast cancer patients,
    so this is unique.

    Current locations include centers in: Ukraine, Russian Federation, Romania, Poland, Germany & Czech Republic.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited July 2015

    petrov, perhaps you would like to explain a bit more about these studies that you have posted about? Thank you.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited July 2015

    CD47 / TNBC research done at the NIH (National Institutes of Health) in April 2015.
    "Role of CD47 in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)"

    It essentially says that this novel mechanism makes CD47 blocking antibodies (Anti-CD47) an attractive therapeutic candidate for treating triple negative breast cancer.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited September 2015

    News continues to ripple out regarding the potential of Anti-CD47 therapies for all cancers, including breast cancer.
    Below is an excerpt from the U.S. Government publishing office, with NCI cancer researchers discussing CD47 and cancer stems cells.
    This August 2015 publication reinforces the existing pre-clinical data that Anti-CD47 Immunotherapy is an approach that warrants more attention.

    48545 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 156 / Thursday, August 13, 2015 / Notices

    Anti-CD47 Antibodies for the Treatment of Cancer

    Summary: Researchers at the National Cancer Institute found that CD47 enhances renewal of breast cancer stem cells, and antibody targeting of CD47 forces these stem cells to differentiate.

    Description of Technology: High expression of CD47, a cell surface receptor on several types of cancer cells, has been identified as a 'don't eat me signal' that inhibits their killing by macrophages, cytotoxic T cells, and NK cells. Conversely, the CD47 antibody B6H12 that blocks SIRPa binding enhances macrophage-dependent clearance of tumors in several mouse models, although others have shown that such clearance can be independent of SIRPa signaling.

    Cancer stems cells (CSCs) are tumorigenic cells that are difficult to target with conventional chemotherapies due to their undifferentiated state. Stem cells also play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer. CSCs have been reported to express elevated CD47 levels, but the role of CD47 in directly regulating cancer stem cell function has not been examined.

    Researchers at the National Cancer Institute's Laboratory of Pathology found in nonmalignant cells and tissues that the absence of CD47 enhances stem cell renewal in vitro and in vivo by increasing expression of four stem cell transcription factors (see related technologies below). Conversely, cancer stem cells often express high levels of CD47, and decreasing CD47 is associated with loss of stem cell characteristics. More recently, they discovered methods to force differentiation of breast cancer stem cells by targeting the receptor CD47. These methods disrupt EGF receptor signaling and up-regulate tumor suppressor gene expression in breast cancer stem cells from triple negative breast cancers, but have no effect on normal mammary epithelial cells.

    Potential Commercial Applications
    • Treatment for breast cancer and other cancers.
    • Antibodies for biomedical research.

    Competitive Advantages: Monoclonal antibodies that directly target CD47- expressing cancers.

    Development Stage: Pre-clinical (in vivo).

    Inventors: David D. Roberts and Sukhbir Kaur (NCI).

    Publication:
    Kaur S, et al. "Role of CD47 in triple negative breast cancer." FASEB J. 2015 April;29 (1 Supplement);
    Abstract 890.5.
    [http://www.fasebj.org/content/29/1_Supplement/890.5]

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited September 2015

    I just learned that Stanford has one breast cancer patient participating in their Phase 1 trial. I'm not surprised since Anti-CD47 therapies have broad applicability among all cancers. While this is good news, here's better news.
    There is an independent Phase 1 trial sponsored by the big pharma company "Celgene" which is testing its Anti-CD47 mAb (licensed from Inhibrx). That trial is called "Dose Finding Study of CC-90002,in Subjects With Advanced Solid and Hematologic Cancers" and found here.
    One of the participating trial locations includes the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF).
    Dr. Pamela Munster, a UCSF breast cancer specialist, is the lead researcher for this trial site.
    It's possible that numerous breast cancer patients can enroll in the San Francisco-based Celgene trial.

    Considering that CD47 is one of the most compelling immunotherapies, it may be wise for Stage 4 folks to explore this option.

  • letmywifelive
    letmywifelive Member Posts: 360
    edited September 2015

    This is simply awesome news JohnSmith. For people in San Francisco this is even better news as now there is Stanford and UCSF both doing trials. All I am wanting to hear now is the news of a cure from CD47 therapy.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited September 2015

    JS, Thank you.

    lmwl, Me too! Cure!!!

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited September 2015

    These are phase I clinical trial but I wonder if there is anyone on BCO that is considering participating because they may be running out of options? If anyone has more knowledge about these clinical trials I hope that they post about their experiences.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited October 2015

    Thank you for posting this. Did you see the thread that John Smith created a few days ago which gave a 3 part update to this?

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited November 2015

    The following Abstract elucidates a molecular mechanism of CD47 in breast cancer.

    HIF-1 regulates CD47 expression in breast cancer cells to promote evasion of phagocytosis and maintenance of cancer stem cells.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015 Oct 28. pii: 201520032. [Epub ahead of print]

    Authors: Zhang H 1, Lu H 2, Xiang L 2, Bullen JW 2, Zhang C 2, Samanta D 2, Gilkes DM 3, He J 4, Semenza Gregg L 5.

    Author info:
    1 Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205;
    2 Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205;
    3 Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205;
    4 Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China;
    5 Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Biological Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 gsemenza AT jhmi DOT edu.

    Abstract: Increased expression of CD47 has been reported to enable cancer cells to evade phagocytosis by macrophages and to promote the cancer stem cell phenotype, but the molecular mechanisms regulating CD47 expression have not been determined. Here we report that hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) directly activates transcription of the CD47 gene in hypoxic breast cancer cells. Knockdown of HIF activity or CD47 expression increased the phagocytosis of breast cancer cells by bone marrow-derived macrophages. CD47 expression was increased in mammosphere cultures, which are enriched for cancer stem cells, and CD47 deficiency led to cancer stem cell depletion. Analysis of datasets derived from thousands of patients with breast cancer revealed that CD47 expression was correlated with HIF target gene expression and with patient mortality. Thus, CD47 expression contributes to the lethal breast cancer phenotype that is mediated by HIF-1.

    KEYWORDS: antitumor immunity; immune evasion; tumor microenvironment; tumor-initiating cells; "don't eat me" signal (CD47), HIF-1

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited November 2015

    JS, You are much smarter then I am. Can you interpret what your recent post means? Thank you.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited November 2015

    The Abstract title sums it up pretty well.
    In this breast cancer study, HIF1A controls the expression of CD47. Over-expression is bad.

    HIF1A is implicated in promoting tumor growth and metastasis in most human cancers.
    I don't think science has had any success in targeting HIF1A. Perhaps Anti-CD47 therapies are a solution to the HIF1A problem. They'd do this by interfering with the "do not eat me" signal, allowing the Immune system scavengers (macrophages) to do their job and gobble up (phagocytosis) tumor cells. Think Pacman.

  • MusicLover
    MusicLover Member Posts: 4,225
    edited November 2015

    They have proved that it works?

Categories