I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange
Comments
-
It works GG!

-
-
Well just off the top of my head.....this man THINKS ( means to me he hasn't investigated it fully ) that his wife won't get the care she needs with Obamacare. Second....technically he didn't say HE was going to shoot Pres. Obama, but putting totally inflamatory comments on the Internet or anywhere else for that matter such as he made are just asking for trouble.
And last but not least.....the page is now gone. Is he not standing behind what he wrote.........if not, then perhaps before he said such cruel, deragotory, inflamatory remarks....perhaps he should have done some investigation and found out just where things REALLY stand. We all get mad, upset, frustrated....but to put such hateful, disgusting remarks out there for the world to see,ones which dirrectly reference the President.......he should hang his head in shame. Compelety un-called for imho.
Jackie
-
-
I think FB took it down.
-
YEAH GG - and the effect is CUMULATIVE - you'll keep feeling better & better.
This comes under the heading of IT'S ABOUT TIME
I.R.S. to Recognize All Gay Marriages, Regardless of State New York Times
Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesA supporter of same sex-marriage outside the Supreme Court in Washington in 2012. The Treasury Department's ruling applies to all legal marriages made in the United States or foreign countries.
By ANNIE LOWREY
Published: August 29, 2013
WASHINGTON — All legally married same-sex couples will be recognized for federal tax purposes, regardless of whether the state where they live recognizes the marriage, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service said Thursday.
The federal rules change is one of many stemming from the landmark Supreme Court decision in June that struck down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. That ruling found that same-sex couples were entitled to federal benefits, but left open the question of how the federal government would actually administer those benefits.
“Imagine a pair of women who marry in Albany and then move to Alabama,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote at the time of the decision. “May they file a joint federal income tax return? Does the answer turn on where they were married or where they live?”
As of the 2013 tax year, same-sex spouses cannot file federal tax returns as if they were single. Instead, they will have to opt for filing as “married filing jointly” or “married filing separately.” The location of their marriage — as long as it is legal — or residence does not matter: a same-sex couple who marry in Albany and move to Alabama will be treated the same as a same-sex couple who marry and live in Massachusetts.
“Today’s ruling provides certainty and clear, coherent tax-filing guidance for all legally married same-sex couples nationwide,” Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew said in a statement. “This ruling also assures legally married same-sex couples that they can move freely throughout the country knowing that their federal filing status will not change.”
The Treasury said that the ruling applies to “all federal tax provisions where marriage is a factor, including filing status, claiming personal and dependency exemptions, taking the standard deduction, employee benefits, contributing to an I.R.A., and claiming the earned income tax credit or child tax credit.”
The ruling applies to all legal marriages made in the United States or foreign countries. But it does not extend to civil unions, registered domestic partnerships or other legal relationships, the Treasury said. Same-sex spouses will be able to file as married couples for the 2013 tax year, the Treasury said, and will also be able to file amended returns for certain prior tax years, meaning that many couples might be eligible for refunds.
-
It's so terribly unfortunate that so many people actually believe the drivel that comes out of the mouths of the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Sean Hannity, etc. I've read reams of statements complaining the Mr. Obama is a liar - yet at the same time believing every blessed thing that is ever stated by someone on Faux News. Both FOX and MSNBC should be taken off the air. Then maybe - maybe - eventually some type of sanity might begin to take a toe hold.
It used to be that journalists actually researched a story. They were held to a high standard. But no more. The most insane person in the world can sit down in front of their computer and become a "professional" blogger. And people will read and believe what they want to read and believe. The two channels mentioned above do nothing to calm things down, they both (and yes, I do think that one of them is worse than the other, but they are both highly partisan and repeat "stuff" that is not necessarily true) fan the flames rather than attempting to bring people together.
-
GG...some good truths in what your saying.
I love the new avatar......which I hope is really new but I admit I could have been preoccupied and missing it for awhile.....if so, pardon my blunder.
Jackie
-
Thanks, Jackie. Yes, it is new. Someone said my old one looked like a fuzzy nipple, so I figured it was time for the dandelion to go.
-
I'm friends with Paris Jackson on FB and she wrote a really insightful post today. So much pain at such a young age. Just breaks my heart!
-
Living on the edge!

-
-
Today's funny!

-
The racist wingnut who wrote that revolting post about President was a former cop and should have known better. Local law enforcement actually alerted the Secret Service to the post. Marsters was called to the local police station and interviewed by the Secret Service as well as the local PD. The Secret Service also reportedly searched his house, which means they went before a Federal judge and asked for a Federal search warrant - which the judge granted based on credible evidence that this guy represented a threat to the President ( Marsters is an avowed gun nut). The Secret Service will present the information they gathered to the local U.S. Attorney, who will determine if there is enough evidence to charge him. Moral of the story - threatening the life of the President of the United States IS a Federal case. And I don't give a rat's patootie if he is allegedly "afraid" his health care or his wife's health car will go away - curiously, he never said that until the Secret Service came calling. It is pretty clear he is simply a loudmouthed, unashamed, unabashed racist. I hope the USA charges him.
L -
RL....thanks for the fill in on the yo-yo retired ( feelings it seems of not only entitlement but grandeur ) retired law officer. I was searching for info but the Bing ( something I think I accidentally invited ) that is now a part of my Internet searches was giving me some fits. I did not get as far as you though I did see a couple of "news" interviews.
I'm like you....I think the Obamacare issue is just a smokescreen for being a bad-ass. May he get as good as he was attempting to give....only I hope his REALLY works out.
Jackie
-
-
-
-
-
Faux Noise "medical expert" says women should pay more for their healthcare because they have breasts and ovaries. Good grief!
-
I read that C4C! Nuts I tell ya!
My heroes!

-
-
-
Well, women are a tad more likely to get pregnant than men are, and pregnancy costs money. Women are more likely to use healthcare when they're ill than men are, but of course by the time men go to the doctor they probably end up costing more because they waited too long.
On the other hand, men are more likely (1 in 6) to contract prostate cancer than women are to contract breast cancer. But testicular cancer is rare, only 1 in 270 while ovarian cancer is 1 in 72.
But smokers are more likely to get cancer, so should they pay more? Or how about people who rely on fast food? Or those who engage in dangerous activities? Or older vs younger people? If "they" want to sort people out by health risks, they need to consider everything, not just something as crude as gender.
-
Enjoyful, BENGHAZI!
-
Crap! How do I keep forgetting about that??
-
In our universal health system, every once in a while an issue comes up -- most often, the smoking and lung cancer issue -- and whether or not those who supposedly abuse their bodies and subsequently get sick and require healthcare should be entitled to receive it. Canadians are essentially egalitarian and the issue is shot down, only to rise again when a few folks -- who are the "screw you, I've got mine" types -- make a fuss.
Healthcare costs are continually rising, and there is a great deal of research and effort going into how these costs can be controlled. Preventive care (which is included in your ACA) has proven to be one effective way. Catch a little problem before it becomes a big, expensive problem. Teach patients how to properly care for themselves and their children. Of course nutrition plays a major role in this, but when your healthiest foods are also your most expensive, and certain of your congresscritters either reject upping the minimum wage, or else want to get rid of it altogether, then Houston, you've got a problem.
There is loads of research which prove beyond a doubt that poverty is the biggest factor in poor health. It's also the biggest factor in the tendency towards criminal behaviour, but that's an issue for another day.......
-
-
About the health care thing:

Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team








