I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1153115321534153615371828

Comments

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited August 2013

    I'm a Liberal Democrat!  Surprise, surprise!  On the other one I got 14 out of 15.

  • 208sandy
    208sandy Member Posts: 2,610
    edited August 2013

    Big surprise - I am a Liberal (apparently VERY liberal)...

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited August 2013

    I love quizzes.

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited August 2013

    Here is a quiz on general science knowledge.  I was a science major so I got them all correct. Your results may vary.

    http://www.pewresearch.org/quiz/science-knowledge/

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

    I am a Liberal Democrat......made much more liberal since my huge awareness of the hard-liner Rt. Wingnuts and others.  Used to hesitate before.....I don't now. 

    Jackie

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

    I scored 41 % ---- sounded like somewhere in the middle to me.

    Jackie

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013
  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013
  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited August 2013

    I got 12 correct, missed the atom/electron one.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited August 2013

    I got 12. Missed the oxygen/nitrogen atmosphere one. Not bad for a HS degree from 44 years ago.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited August 2013

    I am also VERY liberal and I, too, missed the nitrogen/hydrogen one!



    L

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

    Elizabeth....always ready to tell it like it is.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited August 2013

    Well, I'm very liberal (surprise, surprise!) and I scored 11/13 on the science quiz-- which I consider not bad since science was NOT ever my best subject!

    Blue -- So glad you enjoyed the FanExpo, and I do love the sandals -- great colourKiss.

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited August 2013

    12/13 - I, too, missed the hydrogen/nitrogen question.

    I'm middle of the road Liberal.  Odd, since I answered most of the fiscal questions conservatively.

    @! trailer, but borrowed a horse from my trainer.  We had a great time!

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited August 2013

    Me and my temporary partner in crime, Hollywood ("Woody").

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited August 2013

    Looking good E!!!

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited August 2013

    Beautiful woman, E!  Hope you get your boy to load into the trailer soon ... he's missing out on a lot of fun!

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited August 2013

    And your cup of morning liberal from Robert Reich:

    Aug.  23, 2013

    Business Insider

    Here's Why America Stopped Caring About The Public Good




    Robert Reich, Contributor

     






    Congress is in recess, but you’d hardly know it. This has been the most  do-nothing, gridlocked Congress in decades. But the recess at least offers a  pause in the ongoing partisan fighting that’s sure to resume in a few weeks.






    It also offers an opportunity to step back and ask ourselves what’s really at  stake.

    A society — any society —- is defined as a set of mutual benefits and duties  embodied most visibly in public institutions: public schools, public libraries,  public transportation, public hospitals, public parks, public museums, public  recreation, public universities, and so on.

    Public institutions are supported by all taxpayers, and are available to all.  If the tax  system is progressive, those who are better off (and who, presumably, have benefitted  from many of these same public institutions) help pay for everyone else.

    "Privatize" means "Pay for it yourself." The practical consequence of this in  an economy whose wealth and income are now more concentrated than at any time in  the past 90 years is to make high-quality public goods available to fewer and  fewer.

    In fact, much of what’s called “public” is increasingly a private good paid  for by users — ever-higher tolls on public highways and public bridges, higher  tuitions at so-called public universities, higher admission fees at public parks  and public museums.

    Much of the rest of what’s considered “public” has become so shoddy that  those who can afford to do so find private alternatives. As public schools  deteriorate, the upper-middle class and wealthy send their kids to private ones.  As public pools and playgrounds decay, the better-off buy memberships in private  tennis and swimming clubs. As public hospitals decline, the well-off pay premium  rates for private care.

    Gated communities and office parks now come with their own manicured lawns  and walkways, security guards and backup power systems.

    Why the decline of public institutions? The financial squeeze on government  at all levels since 2008 explains only part of it.

    The slide really started more than three decades ago with so-called “tax  revolts” by a middle class whose earnings had stopped advancing even though the  economy continued to grow. Most families still wanted good public services and  institutions but could no longer afford the tab.

    Since the late 1970s, almost all the gains from growth have gone to the top.  But as the upper-middle class and the rich began shifting to private  institutions, they withdrew political support for public ones.

    In consequence, their marginal  tax  rates dropped — setting off a vicious cycle of diminishing revenues and deteriorating  quality, spurring more flight from public institutions.

    Tax revenues from corporations also dropped as big companies went global —  keeping their profits overseas and their tax bills to a minimum.

    But that’s not the whole story. America no longer values public goods as we  did decades ago.

    The great expansion of public institutions in America began in the early  years of 20th century, when progressive reformers championed the idea that we  all benefit from public goods. Excellent schools, roads, parks, playgrounds and  transit systems would knit the new industrial society together, create better  citizens and generate widespread prosperity.

    Education, for example, was less a personal investment than a public good —  improving the entire community and ultimately the nation.

    In subsequent decades — through the Great Depression, World War II and the  Cold War — this logic was expanded upon. Strong public institutions were seen as  bulwarks against, in turn, mass poverty, fascism and then Soviet communism.

    The public good was palpable: We were very much a society bound together by  mutual needs and common threats. It was no coincidence that the greatest  extensions of higher education after World War II were the GI Bill and the  National Defense Education Act, or that the largest public works project in  history was called the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act.

    But in a post-Cold War America distended by global capital, distorted by  concentrated income and wealth, undermined by unlimited campaign donations, and  rocked by a wave of new immigrants easily cast by demagogues as “them,” the  notion of the public good has faded.

    Not even Democrats still use the phrase “the public good.” Public goods are  now, at best, “public investments.” Public institutions have morphed into  “public-private partnerships” or, for Republicans, simply “vouchers.”

    Outside of defense, domestic discretionary spending is down sharply as a  percent of the economy. Add in declines in state and local spending, and total  public spending on education, infrastructure and basic research has dropped  dramatically over the past five years as a portion of GDP.

    America has, though, created a whopping entitlement for the biggest Wall  Street banks and their top  executives — who, unlike most of the rest of us, are no longer allowed to fail. They can  also borrow from the Fed at almost no cost, then lend out the money at 3 percent  to 6 percent.

    All told, Wall Street’s entitlement is the biggest offered by the federal  government, even though it doesn’t show up in the budget. And it’s not even a  public good. It’s just private gain.

    We’re losing public goods available to all, supported by the tax payments of  all and especially the better-off. In its place we have private goods available  to the very rich, supported by the rest of us.



    Read more:  http://robertreich.org/post/59021478207#ixzz2d4um2sjl

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Very sad and very true.  And so very many people snookered by the rich.

    L

  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited August 2013

    Waving hi from Vermont.  It's nuts here.  One week, one day until the wedding, and we may have to change the venue.

    So - what did I do?  I took a break and took all three quizzes.

    Came out very liberal.  15 out of 15 on religion.  12 out of 13 on science.  Missed nitrogen as well.

    OK back to the madness.  Will report at length (hopefully with great pictures) after the event.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited August 2013

    E, my daughter's show horse was a pig to load.  One day some random guy came by and got him on the trailer on his first try.  So I figured it must be us, not the horse.  He showed us his method and it worked!  Maybe a professional trailer guy could help.

  • 208sandy
    208sandy Member Posts: 2,610
    edited August 2013

    E - you look wonderful!  As for Sampson - Ativan???Wink

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited August 2013

    Great picture, E!  I came out liberal Democrat which makes me think the test is rigged.  :)  On the science quiz I got 13 of 13, and thought it was really sad that of the 13 questions, men outperform women in 12 of them. 

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013
  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013
  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited August 2013
  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited August 2013

    gardengumby,

    Do you really think the political quiz was rigged or are you kidding? 

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited August 2013
  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

    HL....Robert Reich is always has an un-commonly common sense approach and generally never fails to have me shaking my head in agreement.  Just seems to me that many don't question what is going to happen when they finally get their air completely rarefied.  Even there someone has to be on the bottom and where are you going to find enough little people to keep supplying YOUR entitilements.  Too many questions....not nearly enough answers that will work.

    Jackie

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

    Blue.....adoring the pictures as always.....I've never met an ugly cat or dog and one of the nicest parts about them is they are EXACTLY who they are.

    E --- glad you were in the show....even is Samson wouldn't go. 

    Jackie

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited August 2013

     


    Colin Powell: Voter ID Laws Will 'Backfire' For Republicans

    Posted: 08/25/2013 10:05 am EDT  |  Updated: 08/25/2013 11:09 am EDT




     

    WASHINGTON -- Former Secretary of State Colin Powell warned Republicans on Sunday that the strict voter identification laws they're pursuing around the country will damage the party's standing with growing blocs of voters.

    "[H]ere's what I say to my Republican friends: The country is becoming more diverse," Powell told Bob Schieffer on CBS' "Face the Nation." "You say you want to reach out, you say you want to have a new message. You say you want to see if you can bring some of these voters to the Republican side. This is not the way to do it."

    "The way to do it is to make it easier for them to vote and then give them something to vote for that they can believe in," Powell added.

    In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling that struck down a key portion of the Voting Rights Act, Republicans in states like North Carolina, Florida and Texas have sought voter restrictions that critics, including Powell, say will disproportionately hurt minorities at the polls. North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) signed legislation earlier this month that requires voter identification, rolls back early voting hours and ends a state-supported voter registration drive. Powell condemned that particular law at an event in Raleigh last week.

    Powell pointed out that there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud, the very premise of the identification statutes.

    "You need a photo ID. Well, you didn't need a photo ID for decades before," Powell said. "Is it really necessary now? And they claim that there's widespread abuse and voter fraud, but nothing documents, nothing substantiates that. There isn't widespread abuse."

    Powell predicted that such measures will blow up in Republicans' faces.

    "These kind of procedures that are being put in place to slow the process down and make it likely that fewer Hispanics and African Americans might vote, I think, are going to backfire, because these people are going to come out and do what they have to do in order to vote, and I encourage that," he said.

    During the interview, Powell also reflected on the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, recalling times when he couldn't eat in certain places due to the color of his skin, even though he'd just served his country.

    "In my lifetime, over a long career in public life, you know, I've been refused access to restaurants where I couldn't eat, even though I just came back from Vietnam: 'We can't give you a hamburger, come back some other time,'" Powell recalled. "And I did, right after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, I went right back to that same place and got my hamburger, and they were more than happy to serve me now. It removed a cross from their back, but we're not there yet. We're not there yet. And so we've got to keep working on it."





Categories