Hi ladies. So the garden house didn't work out because of me. As part of the inspection we spent an hour in the house, and I got sick sick sick. I'm the canary in our coal mine, so we knew that there was SOMETHING in the house (probably mold) that was not good, so we walked away. As we speak hubby is talking to a builder. He got sick and tired of getting sick and tired, so it's possible that he's just going to go with new construction a bit further south. (Olympia to be exact). Too far to commute - but that'll make for certain that I retire and don't chicken out. We actually have 3 options at this moment in time. I like two of them (the third would be OK if they dropped the price significantly, but the immediate area is a bit scrungy, so I don't think the re-sale would be decent), I sincerely doubt a drop in price, so it's off the board at the moment. The other two are the new construction and a short sale. It would take a fair bit of work (interpreted to also mean money and time) for the short sale home - and because it's a short sale, hubby is a bit worried that I'd need to continue working until it closed - so nothing got hung up due to changes on our end. The location is really good, but the exposure for the back yard is north and east, and we wanted southern as much as possible. The new construction appears to be quite nice. We'd be the very first house in the development which has its pluses and minuses, but it's close to a ton of stuff. Nothing that I'm used to, as we never really go to Olympia, but it's a nice town and a nice area in the town. I probably like that one the best - but I've left it up to hubby to make the final decision.
Remember I said that I found a condo we liked? well, hubby and his brother together made an offer on it - we haven't heard back yet, and it's a "short" sale, so maybe we're going to be set for both "vacation" living and "regular".
GG - options. Yeah, options. I'm already voting for the NEW house - as a fellow allergy sufferer, I have found MOLD in alomsot every older home I've walked into...and so much of the insulation used years ago, isn't as hypoallergenic as what is available today...MORE GOOD LUCK.
(Intellectual copyright belonging to a cousin who is known for his crummy jokes. So wish I coud catch up on reading. Slow recovery, and very few nice hings to say about pain meds.)
Athena..sure wish your pain meds were doing decent things for you.
Blue..pics are as pretty as ever.
I thought about not putting this in here......against the odds, I have continued to hope the GOP would find some way to stop being the party of no, along with not being the party of glaringly stupid. It just doesn't seem to let up.
Republicans learned a number of lessons from the 2012 elections. They learned they need to reach out to Latinos. They learned that younger Americans aren't too fond of them. And they learned a lesson that was summed up in three words: "No more Akins." That would be Todd Akin, the Missouri Senate candidate whose bid was torpedoed when he shared with the voters his colorful views on the likelihood of rape resulting in pregnancy (almost non-existent, he said, if in fact it's a "legitimate rape," because "the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down"). There was also, don't forget, the equally gynecologically insightful Richard Mourdock, who opined that if you're raped and become pregnant, "that is something that God intended to happen." One party strategist after another whispered frantically, "Ix-nay on the ape-ray!" to no avail.
But they just can't help themselves. Today, the House Judiciary Committee was debating a bill to make all abortions illegal after 20 weeks, and when Democrats tried to amend the bill to include exceptions for rape and incest, the bill's sponsor, Arizona Congressman Trent Franks said it wasn't necessary, because "the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low." Over at Republican party headquarters, faces were immediately planted in palms. Franks went on: "But when you make that exception, there's usually a requirement to report the rape within 48 hours. And in this case that's impossible because this is in the sixth month of gestation. And that's what completely negates and vitiates the purpose for such an amendment." Try to figure out what that's supposed to mean. That once you've reported a rape, you can't then become pregnant and later need to seek an abortion? It's hard to argue with Gabriel Gomez, the Republican candidate in the race to fill John Kerry's Senate seat, who when asked about Franks' comments, said, "I think that he's a moron."
But the GOP has a seemingly endless supply of not just morons, but morons who think they know a great deal about how ladyparts work and can't wait to share their knowledge with the rest of us, all while working hard to take away women's reproductive rights. And then they act terribly insulted when they're accused of waging a "war on women." Fortunately, the public has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
For some time I have purposely not watched the news, nor read more than our daily paper here. I have though skimmed a few of my subscriptions....such as the above one. I really hoped that someone would wise up and thought taking a break would do me good.
To that end ( though I hadn't been anyway ) I don't read next door or anywhere else. Keeping as much influence away as I can has not done much either. The GOP light bulbs just will not turn on I guess.
Anyway.....other than that, I am enjoying the respite.
When they say they aren't racist, it's stories like these that reveal the truth and why I do not believe them. This is a US Senator's son! Apples fall right under their trees, so to speak. Children don't grow up with these ideas unless learned from their parents.
Athena - is it your neck/back that is hurting? Did the surgery help you at all? Are you trying to work while going through this? Miss you so much, but nice to see anytime you post.
GG - Definitely sounds like a seller's market. There are advantages to a new house, if it is a good builder. I hope you find what you want and what you need. I hope that you atleast like looking?
What a magnificent tree...I'd have a lovely hand made of twigs ladder up to the lowest branch, so I cold sit and read up there, or maybe paint - we should be able to identify the type by the limb structure, but I can't. Alas, it is wonderful. That's the kinda tree I'd love to hug....smiles to Blue...
this is getting boring - rain - hope all in the mid west are safe & warmand DRY...definitely time to consider ark building.
LIONESS - so sorry to hear you're having trouble with the pain meds - hope you can work out a workable solution. SO difficult to balance medications, seems especially difficult with pain meds
Breaking news: Supreme Court rules human genes cannot be patented:
By Associated Press,
Associated Press
Jun 13, 2013 02:42 PM EDT
AP
Updated: Thursday, June 13, 10:42 AM
From the Washington Post:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court says companies cannot patent human genes, a decision that could profoundly affect the medical and biotechnology industries.
In a unanimous decision, the court struck down patents held by Myriad Genetics Inc. on two genes linked to increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Opponents say patent protection shouldn’t be given to something that can be found inside the human body.
But lower courts approved, saying Myriad’s genes could be patented because the DNA it isolated and took from the body has a “markedly different chemical structure” from DNA found naturally within the body.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the DNA is a product of nature and not eligible for a patent merely because it has been isolated.
That IS good news, RL! However, I was also thinking that Myriad was more concerned with patenting the "process" or technology they used to isolate the DNA, rather than the DNA itself??? Should have taken more science classes....
Now here is something that I find quite scary, because these idiots' "friends" have made their way across your northern border....
At a congressional hearing Wednesday, Rep. Trent Franks, a Republican from Arizona, argued against an exception for rape and incest victims from a ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. He said, “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject—because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low.” He is of course following in the footsteps of former Rep. Todd Akin of Missouri, who said that women can stave off pregnancy after a “legitimate rape.” (He apologized but that didn’t save him from losing his next election.)
In the aftermath of Akin’s statement, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported on a 1972 essay by an obstetrician named Fred Mecklenburg, who cited a Nazi experiment in which women were told they were on their way to die in the gas chambers—and then were allowed to live, so that doctors could check whether they would still ovulate. Since few did, Mecklenburg claimed that women exposed to the emotional trauma of rape wouldn’t be able to become pregnant, either. (He also argued that rapists are infertile because they masturbate a lot.) The essay was published in a book financed by A.U.L.”
A.U.L. is Americans United for Life, a pro-life advocacy group with increasing clout because of its success in drafting model state laws to restrict abortion. The line from the Nazis to Mecklenberg to Akin and Frank runs through Jack Wilke, a doctor who is the former head of the National Right to Life Committee. He said, "What is certainly one of the most important reasons why a rape victim rarely gets pregnant, and that's physical trauma."
So.......what is it about ovulation and the timing of fertilization do these dipshidiots not understand? And why aren't they treating rape as an act of violence, instead of just a woman (oh yes, probably a slut) getting laid by someone she doesn't like? Hmmmmm?
HL - thanks for sharing the link. I read the article and it went on to say that their process (isolating the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene) could be patented - which seems fair to me, but what do I know....
Blue - gorgeous, gorgeous pictures as always.
Athena - so good to see/hear/read you, and so very sorry that you are experiencing difficulties with the pain meds. I can't take those things as they make me go off kilter - hate 'em - but when you're in pain, well, you're in pain, and you've got to have something!! Do try the acupuncture. I've also experienced a small measure of relief with arnica, so you might give it a go - but it is small.
Kam - I enjoyed looking for about 1 day - since then it's been sheer drudgery. Hoping it's over soon!!
I think this SCOTUS will blow open the door to research on BRCA genes. Will it inspire other scientists to find other gene mutations that cause cancer??? Don't know and this might be the downside. I am brca2+, so do appreciate this and when I heard the news, I gasped a little bit in happiness. That was my gut speaking, not any part of me that is actually informed on the ins and outs of this ruling and it's implications, but...
My Gynecologist Oncologist does brca research (within her overall "ovarian cancer" reserach) and has a registry of her patients and any family member of her known brca+ patient who chooses to donate their blood...doesn't matter if they are brca positive or not. I asked about the fact she would take "unknowns" and her lab assistant told me they had some indicators they could use from the blood to determine if the family member was also brca positive, without violating the patent, I assume. <<---I suspect there are a lot of lawyer issues involved here. My ultimate point was that it was mentioned to me, if they can study the biological pathways of this known breast/ovarian cancer caused by the BRCA mutation, it will help them understand other breast cancers as well, so I would think this is a good ruling for all BC women (and men), in this sense.
While there are a few foundations that give awards for service to the cause of liberalism, most of the cash prizes top out in the four figures. Which is why we might be just a tad jealous that our conservative friends, if they play their cards right, might grab themselves a Bradley Prize, given to those who have gone above and beyond the call of conservative duty; it comes with a check for a cool $1 million. This year's awards were given out last night, and one went to Roger Ailes, the CEO of Fox News, who certainly deserves it. Ailes did say he'd be giving the money to charity, which is nice, and given that his total compensation last year
In his speech blasting the Obama administration and liberals in general, the head of the "fair and balanced" news network took time to repeat one of the most oddly persistent conspiracy theories about the Affordable Care Act. "The federal government is about to hire 16,000 more IRS agents to enforce health care," Ailes www.politifact.com/rhode-islan...>this explanation. As you can gather, one fact-checker after another has debunked the idea. And yet it persists, not just in the fever swamps, but among people like Ailes, whom you could argue is the most influential Republican in America.
So we'd say to those conservative friends of ours: This is why we liberals charge that you're more dishonest than we are. It isn't that you can't find examples of prominent Democratic politicians saying things that are untrue. You can. But this kind of thing—when someone on the right makes up a phony number or a phony claim or simply an outright lie, and then one Republican after another picks it up and repeats it again and again and again—sure seems to happen a lot more on the right. But maybe we're wrong. Maybe there are lots of examples of provably false claims running around in elite circles on the left, getting passed on to the public by important politicians and people with big media megaphones. But it's awfully difficult to think of any.
I'll probably get the dreaded marks as well.
Jackie
Edited by Mods to fix the post's formatting effect on the board