I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1108810891091109310941828

Comments

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012

    Lassie -- My next-door neighbour purchased two Papa John's franchises here.  Healthcare was a top reason why he came here instead of staying in Indiana!

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    Not needing to note here...out of the mouth of stupid politicians......Rice is somehow tainted when the other Rice plus Sarah Palin were souls of proprietary behaviors --- it is you politicians who seem to think we will overlook what you said and thought before---watch out ---- lest your "good" deeds follow you a little too closely.  Lots of eyes and ears are keeping tabs.

    Jackie

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    Angus King (I) slaps down McCain for petty, premature attacks on Susan Rice. 

    Maine Sen.-elect Angus King questioned the judgment of two longtime GOP senators on Thursday, arguing that their opposition to promoting U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to secretary of state was “premature.”
    “I don’t really like starting out my Senate career — I’m not even sworn in yet — getting crosswise with some of the leaders of the other party,” King said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “But I thought it was a bit premature. There was a statement that she was up to her eyeballs or something in the policy, and I think there needs to be a little more of a factual basis for that. If all she did was provide that briefing based on the intelligence she was given, then it strikes me that taking a hardline position against a pretty distinguished diplomat was a bit premature. I’ll leave it at that.”

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83900.html#ixzz2CIeOKszr

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    This pretty much represents my view of all the gloom and doom predictions, excuses, finger pointing and cluelessness coming from Republican circles after the election.  Let them have their little snit fits.  The news cycle will pass them by shortly.

    Photo

    If they let the tax cuts for the middle class expire it will make it perfectly clear that the only ones they care about are their wealthy donors.  Protect them at all costs and the h*ll with everybody else?  We've all figured out by now their 12 years of tax cuts did NOT result in these so called 'job creators' creating jobs.  Now we see if Boehner, McConnell, etc. have figured out that it is voters who can take away their jobs.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    Re: Obsessive Regressive denial over losing the election - DH waggishly said this morning that he expects by next week that Regressives will be saying that they REALLY won the election but there was massive voter fraud and they don't want to put the country through a protracted legal battle. The sad part of it is that I can totally see them saying that, especially the dwellers in alternate realities.



    Re Jindal, Christie and Haley Barbour being the voices of reason (makes me throw up in my mouth a little to use reason in connection with those names). At least they have some brain cells to rub together and make a spark so that they understand that the Regressives lost on IDEAS, not on "gifts." I bet they want a bunch of superglue to glue Nit's flapping jaws together. How unseemly for a 60+ year-old man to act like a baby!



    But they cannot fix the image of the Regressives without taking care of Orange Boner and Turtle McConnell. And there is really no-one to rein them in on their insane quest to push the country over the cliff and continue to block everything the President wants to do.



    McCain and Lindsey Graham should be ashamed of themselves. McCain brought us Sparklemoose, arguably the most vacuous twit to ever aspire to any public office. He was prepared to foist that empty head of hair on us as fit to be one heartbeat away from the Presidency! He has no standing whatsoever to complain about ANY appointment that the President wants to make. Neither does Lindsay Graham, famous for lamenting that there aren't enough angry old white guys to stock the Republican party. Dogwhistle hell - he uses a BULLHORN!



    And Lyin Ryan gave an interview in which he said he lost Janesville because the people there just now realized he was a Republican! So, basically, he just said that his constituents were too stupid to know what party he represented until he was Robme's running mate. It couldn't POSSIBLY have been a repudiation of his ideas and his character, could it? Delusional. Maybe they spiked the water at the Republican National Convention.



    L

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    The Republican House members who are smart enough to see the writing on the wall and step away from the crazy can rein them in.  Boehner is going to have to decide if he wants to let the crazies destroy his party or not.  He knows better IMO.  He has the power to 'allow' his saner members in safe districts to vote reasonably. 

    McConnell has spent too much time in his shell and is suffering from lack of oxygen to his brain cells.  But the Dems have a majority in the Senate anyway and for him to filibuster against a middle class tax cut would be totally self destructive.  These guys like their cushy jobs a whole lot better than they like McConnell. 

    It won't have to be played like a poker game if they would step up to the plate and be reasonable.  If not, Obama has the winning hand.

    I'm torn.  On the one hand if they keep up the stupid we may well be able to get rid of the worst of them in 2014 and put a stop to this sh*t and restore a sane and functional two party system.   But a lot of people are going to get hurt if they keep this up for 2 years so I hope it does not come to that.      

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    I think it's McCain who is "not very bright" - not Susan Rice. I think he is channelling his inner 2008 sore loser. Grow up, John. Stop being such a baby.

    As for the awful miscarriage story in Ireland - we could spread it far and wide. It wouldn't convince these people. They don't care that the mother died! They probably think she deserves it for allowing herself to get raped or something.

    Good for Erik Erickson and the RedState team!

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012

    Some wag has called McCain "Grampa McGrumpypants".  Fits, don't you think?

    I've read that the insults thrown at Susan Rice is because McGrumpypants and Graham want the President to nominate Senator Kerry so that Brown can run for his Mass seat.  Well, it's all politics, all the time.....what's new?

    ETA:  Oops, Yorkie got ahead of me there!

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012

    So...McGrumpypants FAILS again!  He has definitely passed his "best before" date:

    On Thursday morning, CNN’s Dana Bash reported that McCain chose to hold a joint press conference with Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) rather than attend a closed-door briefing about the attacks: 

    I have to tell you something that just happened on Capitol Hill, and that is our senate producer Ted Barrett just ran into John McCain and asked about something that we’re hearing from Democrats, which is John McCain is calling for more information to Congress, but he had a press conference yesterday instead of going to a closed briefing where administration officials were giving more information.Well, Ted Barrett asked John McCain about that, and it was apparently an intense very angry exchange and McCain simply would not comment on it at all.

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited November 2012

    I really think McCain lost most of his mind quite a while ago.  He is twisting in the wind trying to remain in the game but he really needs to retire before he makes an even bigger fool of himself.  Never mind ... history will never forget Palin anyway.

    What happened in Ireland was murder.  They stood around and watched her suffer and get sicker and sicker past the point of no return.  That woman did not have to die and there was no viable fetus to protect.  That is what happens when you let religious dogma and politicians get involved in medical decisions.  A friend of my daughter found herself in roughly the same circumstances a few years ago.  She desperately wanted that baby but the only 'choice' was whether they both died.  In the Ryan, etc. world with no exceptions she would have been dead at the age of 28.  There is nothing pro-life about that.

        

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited November 2012

    I for one would like to see us go over this silly fiscal cliff.  Then Congress can vote for those programs that should be funded one at a time.  This means that the Repubs would have to vote down a middle class tax cut. They would have to vote down restoring Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.  They would have to justify the need for additional weapons systems that are not designed to handle any wars that we are currently fighting or expect to fight in the future.  They would have to justify why the military now has more Generals and Admirals than it needs. We actually have more Admirals than we do ships! They would have to justify tax reductions for the very rich.

    Yes, let's all go over the fiscal cliff.

  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited November 2012

    Athena: I'm not worried about the nuts who support Ryan's no exception to abortion.  You're right.  They'll never change. It's the more moderate people who don't see the danger from these nut jobs, who don't realize that women will die if the Repugs have their way on abortion.  I am worried that some moderates will be fooled by the smoke and mirror tricks and let this happen.  It's going on in Ohio now.  How many women will not have their cancer caught because Planned Parenthood is being deprived of funding?  This is absolutely a war on women.  I agree with WR that this was murder, and I condemn not only the hospital but the political idiots who force their religious dogma on others.  This woman wasn't even a Christian, but she had to die for Catholic beliefs.  It makes me crazy.

  • Alyson
    Alyson Member Posts: 4,308
    edited November 2012

    Reading all your post either makes me want to laugh or cry. Laugh at the stupidity of politicians, don't worry we have them here.

    I was in the same situation 35 years ago, 28 with a lovely little girl of two, pregnant with my second baby. A planned pregnacy, then at 10 weeks an ovarian cyst ruptures, they operate and are delighted to save  me and the pregnacy. Then things go wrong, bleeding etc and I was very ill. They could stop that but told us that the pregnacy could continue for a while but there was little hope and oh yes with what had happened it endangered my health further. So that was that. Thank God because I wouldn't be here, have two other beautiful children and now grandchildren. I didn't really make any decision the doctors just said this is what we have to do. I am just so pleased we didn't have any stupid laws like that here even that long ago. Hope this makes sense because I don't tell the story often though I did to some young friends recently.

    Can here a little voice at my door

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Yes, those doctors should be had up on manslaughter charges.

    There are things that are best not put up for debate - the right wing nuts will go on to justify them and since the media loves covering extremists (the ignore the moderates) the wingnuts will get all of the air time - just like those PIGS who justified rape and blamed the woman and ran for congressional seats. They lost their elections but boy, did they every make a splash with the gullible press.

    It's also why I don't want to go off the fiscal cliff. The extremists would happily vote down programs for the poor - they would just lie and say they were doing something else. It's what they've always done - call a spade a club.

    If a major candidate can lose and help to spread the falsehood that his opponent's supporters got gifts - and if that news can spread like wildfire and people can believe it, then anything is possible.

    Polls show that most voters support choice in abortion. I am not worried about them. I am worried about some nutcase taking up the Ireland story, changing the facts, repackaging and telling a completely different tale. Knowledge is NOT safe in the hands of these people. They've never seen a fact they didn't want to twist.

    Sadly, we have always been a nation of gullible information consumers who don't use their judgement. We've let all the information out there for nuts to twist. Now is the time to tell them to shut up and let mature people with a brain govern. I also think some liberals on television need to stop sensationalizing these whackos and concentrating more on the moderate thinkers. From watching TV, one would think these extremists were the norm. Luckily, they are not, otherwise Obama would never have won. 

    I believe in free speech, so those extremists can continue to cry like babies if they wish. Just not on C-Span's or taxpayer's time.:-)

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Notself: I can easily see some members of congress very happily standing up and saying that we live in an entitlement society and that if there is a program to, say, provide food for the hungry, then hell, those lazy hungry mofos should forage for their own food, gosh durnit! After all, there is plenty of government waste, so they can go to government pantris or som'in....

    I'm telling you, these people have no shame. The less they get to speak their mind, the better for my ears. I may as well sit through a reading of Mein Kampf - no thank yee!

    ETA: I omitted the most dangerous part: what happens when you hear extremist views expressed over and over again and repeated obsessively in the media is that they stop being exotic and novel. They lose their shock value. We become acclimatized to hearing them even if we never agree. Then what happened in Germany and Italy can more eaily happen here.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    Alyson, thank you for sharing your story with us. I am so glad that you are here with us, and so glad that even decades ago, the doctors, the medical system and the culture were all supportive and sensible about the right thing to do in such a tragic snd dangereous circumstance. The fact is, medical procedures should only be a matter between a patient and her (or his) doctor -- period. Not up for public debate or comment, not a part of societal norms or enforced religious strictures, but between a doctor and patient, whatever is in the patient's best interest.



    People are free to believe whatever they want, but should not be free to impose it on others. Me doing something lawful of which someone else disapproves because of their religion is not infringing on their rights -- but someone trying to prevent me from doing something lawful because it is against their religious beliefs is religious bullying. Believe whatever you want, but don't try to make me. And the murder of that young woman in Ireland was indeed just that -- murder.



    L

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Alyson - we crossposted - so sorry for what happened to you. Thank goodness it ocurred in a civilized place, though!

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited November 2012

    This is from the New York Times.  It appears that the Republicans are so busy demanding an inquiry regarding Benghazi, that they don't have the time to attend the inquiry into Benghazi.  You can't make this stuff up.  http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/15/john-mccains-scheduling-error/?hp

    -----

    Mr. McCain has said he wants to get to the bottom of what he seems absolutely certain was a catastrophic bungling of the Libyan situation by Mr. Obama and his team. He is proposing holding “Watergate-style” hearings on the matter, with lots of witnesses and of course, lots of television cameras.

    But yesterday, when the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee received a classified briefing on the Benghazi issue, Mr. McCain was absent. His spokesman Brian Rogers blamed a “scheduling error.”...

    Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky also missed the closed meeting on Benghazi, but managed to find the time for a TV interview in which he said he had big questions about what happened. “I don’t know enough of the details,” he said.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    LOL - Reminds me of 2008, when McCain ostensibly "suspended his campaign" to deal with the financial crisis, then just sat around and did nothing and went out to dinner with Joe Lieberman and his wife at the Mandarin Oriental hotel.

    What puffery.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    Puffery...that is the perfect word.

  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited November 2012

    Alyson,

    Thanks for sharing your story!!

    I remember reading this article less than a month ago.  I truly shudder when I realize how close Romney came to being elected.  Thank goodness, the tea party wackos couldn't get it done.

    "Slowly but surely, a Romney presidency would lay the groundwork to ban abortion:

    How the right plans to overturn Roe v. Wade"

    http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/how_the_right_plans_to_overturn_roe_v_wade/

    And thank goodness, wise and sane people in Ireland are waking up and protesting the horrific death of that young woman!

  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited November 2012
  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited November 2012
  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited November 2012
  • alexandria58
    alexandria58 Member Posts: 1,588
    edited November 2012
  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    I hope this comes out right....so much I put in here has the crazy marks....but it is about Karl Rove the possible law breaker.

    Karl Rove was ambitious this past election. He spent hundreds of millions of dollars in an attempt to sway people into thinking Mitt Romney was going to win. He was so confident in his ability he eventhrew a tantrumon air. And now he isunder attackby his own party, being thrown under the bus in a blame game. And now it turns out, Karl may have broken the law in his eagerness.

    Think Progresshas uncovered that Rove’s Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (GPS) is, for lack of a better term, not-legal. Not saying that they’re illegal, but they failed to file the necessary legal paperwork to even exist in the first place.


    Crossroads GPS was filed with the IRS as a 501(c)(4) “social welfare organization” located in Virginia. This kind of corporate structure is commonly called a dark money group due to its design to shield donors from any fallout associated with the donations. However, when you check with the state of Virginia, no such organization exists in theirdatabase. Per the law in Virginia, any such organization which is to collect $1 million or more in donations must file the proper paperwork and fees before starting operation with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Office of Charitable and Regulatory Programs. Crossroads GPS did neither.

    As a result, the shield which Crossroads GPS was to provide their donors may not apply at all. Failure by Karl Rove to cross his Ts and dot his Is might open him, and all of his donors, up to a legal nightmare scenario. He may have to return all of the money, and even then all the donors would become public knowledge, and he may be facing jail time for illegal solicitation of millions of dollars of donor money. People have gone to jail for far less severe a crime.

    Karl Rove appears to have been so assured of victory that trivialities like legal paperwork appear to have not registered with him. Without a Romney presidency, Rove now may be facing an IRS auditor in his future, along with numerous complaints and other legal filings. The story of Karl Rove may make a good movie one day, discussing the hubris of greed and the failings of Objectivism. For now, it is clear that Rove is finished.

  • riley702
    riley702 Member Posts: 1,600
    edited November 2012

    Hahahaha! Thanks, Jackie, it couldn't happen to a nicer piece of slime.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Very interesting.....I am sure the VA attorney general Cuccinelli, a Tea Party apparatchik of the worst kind, will do what he can to protect Rove. Maybe his succesor won't though.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    Is this a federal crime? If so the Justice Dept. should investigate. 

  • Belinda44
    Belinda44 Member Posts: 718
    edited November 2012

    Thanks for the article, Jackie.

Categories