I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

1107510761078108010811828

Comments

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    RR, that's so on point. A clear representation of the stupidity of this young woman's world and the ignorant adults who are guiding her. This is what the "conservative" right wing nuts are pinning their hopes for the future on. Ugh!

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited November 2012

    Next year we will have a Catholic male prime minister - the man who was responsible for getting herceptin added to the list of free drugs.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Suzie - I think you would fall under the liberal umbrella if you were in the US (sorry to say - Tongue Out). I happen to think it's great that Herceptin is a free drug in Aussieland - anyone championing that logical policy here, though, would be branded a "socialist" by the GOP.

    It's often hard for people in other countries - even those who define themselves as conservatives - to grasp just how far, far right the right wing is in this country. Millions here - including people with BC -- do not believe and vehemently oppose ANY free access to medical care.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited November 2012
  • kayfh
    kayfh Member Posts: 790
    edited November 2012

    Suzie, or not. My youngest brother is a citizen of your fair country. He is gay. He is a loving responsible partner to a loving responsible partner of the same sex. He would love to be married. He s a 53 year old hopeless romantic. Julia Gillard, your PM, took the piss out of the misogynistic leader of the opposition for his sexist, stupid, assinine remarks in the (here we would call it the House of Commons) parliament. And I was proud of her. Abbott, is the same guy you think will be PM. But she does not represent the needs of many of her constituents, she voted against same sex marriage, she does not understand that when one group of people is oppressed, all are oppressed. Australians are known for expecting that all should have a "fair go". All.

    Don't even get me started on the big big problems in this wealthy country I live in. Our behaviour as a people towards our First Nations is a case in point.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited November 2012
  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    Awwww Blue, your making my puppy meter go off the chart.

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    I just saw this:

     In February 2004, in the 13th District of Florida Case No 2D01-529, Fox News won a legal appeal that declared the entity has no legal obligation to be truthful in its reporting. The court agreed that Fox News had indeed been untruthful, but ultimately agreed with Fox's argument that the FCC's POLICY against the intentional falsification of the news is not a LEGAL mandate, requirement or regulation, and that Fox News may falsify news reports.

    and wonder if anyone knows if it is accurate?

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    GG, yes it is.  It involved Monsanto and the bovine growth hormone.  Steve Wilson who worked for Fox at the time and his wife can't remember her name right now were involved in bringing the suit.  Steve Wilson then moved on to the ABC outlet in Detroit and was a wonderful reporter.  I don't know if he's still there.

    http://www.foxbghsuit.com

    Edited to add: Jane Akre was married to Steve Wilson and was the other party.

    Edited to add one more thing:  This is why my family has bought organic milk and yogurt since then.  Organic cheese is something I have more trouble finding though.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    Video of the above for anybody who is interested:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0AL4yml3bw

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    I remember how angry I was when a Washington State court upheld that a politician didn't have to tell the truth because of freedom of speech - but this is even worse.  I always knew the people at FOX NEWS were liars, but - oh I dunno, somehow it seems even worse that they went to court and the court upheld their right to lie.

    We always buy organic milk and yoghurt as well - and when possible, cheese.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    GG, if you watch the video at the end you will see that other networks supported Fox in the suit, so it's not just them.  Others wanted to protect their right to lie too.

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    Thanks, River.  I watched the piece.  It's just bloody sad that corporations have such a hold, and that the news organizations that are supposed to be the watchdogs, are just helping the foxes (no pun intended) raid the henhouse.

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited November 2012

    Loved the piece on t.v. today.  I also am heavily and hoplessly in love with the puppies.  You'd think having 6 rescues of my own would cure me of this affliction.  Not so.....ditto with the kitties.  Figured the doggie and kitty God knew who to tap and these little gems are my snuggly pals for all their life.  It is nothing but love around here.

    I saw that Fox lawsuit some time back.  They have no idea what they have wrought.  Well, I have some hope that once the Repug party falls on  its face a couple more times ( if it can exist at all in any semblace afterwards ) I hope the few who may still be around will GET it and be then oh so tired of being the pawn in the game.  Just a reminder....there is life on the other side of Fox news. 

    Jackie

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    This country needs stronger privacy and libel laws and has to stop making free speech into a right that tramples over every other (or so it seems).

    I am fairly libertarian on the concept of free speech - I would die defending the right of the KKK or the American Nazi Party to stage a march or an event. I am proud of that. I, an atheist, was moved to tears over pride at being American when I learned that we had given Bin Laden a Muslim burial. That is what makes us great -when we show magnanimity and tolerance towards those we despise.

    But I protest when Facebook is allowed to violate my sanctity based on free speech arguments, or when Fixed Noise is allowed to be Fixed Noise - as stated above.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    Sad to see Petraeus resign because of an affair. I understand and appreciate his military sense of honor (and his wife is free to throw him off a building, as far as I am concerned), but, really, I wish we were more European about these things. Affairs really are personal matters and NOT professional ones. Protestations about how you can't trust someone who cheats on his wife to protect national security don't pass the smell test - partly because they fail to understand the nature of men.

    I remember once being given a polygraph test as part of a top secret security clearance. I had to tell the agent that if he didn't understand why I would never tell anther woman the truth about her wedding dress if I found it ugly - it was because he wasn't a woman. No female human being of humanity tells a woman that her wedding dress isn't pretty. (No man's honor and sense of duty to country can be judged by his penis.) I passed! Smile

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    I agree wholeheartedly.  I truly wish that Mr. Obama had refused to accept his resignation.  People (even the best among us) make mistakes.  IMO making a mistake, owning that mistake, recovering and going on makes a better (and more trustworthy) human than someone who skates so far from danger that they never falter, or worse yet, someone who makes a mistake and then expends all their energy in attempting to cover it up.

  • QuinnCat
    QuinnCat Member Posts: 3,456
    edited November 2012

    Athena - I agree with you.  In this case, if it is his biographer, Paula Broadwell, she is contemperaneously being investigated for having access to classified Patreous emails.  Ofcourse, no one has been convicted of anything.

    What I find more interesting about this was Gren Greenwald's review of her biography as propoganda (long before this) and the whole issue of embed journalism.

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited November 2012

    I would usually agree about affairs being private business.  But I just feel that head of the CIA is different.  I don't want somebody with something to be bribed about as head of the CIA.  Also I haven't verified this but I read elsewhere that she had access to his emails.  That would be beyond the pale for me.

    Edited to add:  I see that Kam mentioned the emails.  I somehow missed that when I read, but noticed after I posted.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    Given his position in the CIA this is not something that can pass. He's compromised and can be bribed, extorted, etc. In addition he can't ask his subordinates to behave at a different level than he practices. Anyone in a position of national security as he is and others are have to operate at the highest level of integrity either in their work life or private life. We just have to ask that of our leaders.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited November 2012

    If he were in any other position other than the head of the CIA, I would agree. But having an affair did make him vulnerable to blackmail, and having an affair with his biographer made him a security risk. His wife has a clearance, you can be sure. His mistress does not, and may have had access (however inadvertent on his part) to classified materials. If the FBI is conducting an investigation of her and possible access to his emails, there is much more to the story. As DH said, if the FBI is investigating his mistress, there is more going on than him "boinking some girl he met on the helicopter." I do think he did the right thing, as much as it pains me to say so.


    ETA: Chickadee, we crossposted! I wholeheartedly agree with you!


    L

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    Oh, Chick, he is just so, so adorable!! I totally adore Pugs! Kiss

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    HL, Kam and Chick - that's the same thing my husband said to me.  I know you have a point, but if he came out about the affair, then there's nothing to blackmail/extort him on - it's already known.  However, in regards to her having access to secret information - well, if he allowed that to happen - OK, then you're right.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    Consider the loss of respect from his subordinates. It's a no win all around.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited November 2012

    I do not think someone like Petraeus would allow himself to be blackmailed - he would admit to the affair first.

    I also think plenty of European (and Middle Eastern) intelligence agencies have functioned very well without this Puritanism.

    Human beings are complex. A person will have an affair who would never allow himself to be blackmailed.

    I think it's a shame that we can't make that distinction in this society. I am not apologizing for bad behavior, just noting that human beings compartmentalize. Unless I hear more, this was a waste of a resignation.

    ETA: I LOVE these discussions we have - you just never know where we will fall on a given issue.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    I don't presume to know what he might or might not do. In his position it's a deal breaker for me.

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    From what I've seen I don't think that people who engage in extra-marital affairs have that much loss of respect from either their subordinates or their peers.  Just saying.

    He made the affair public knowledge, so the chance of extortion/blackmail seems pretty small - but it would not be possible for him to remain if he knowingly or unknowlingly permitted unauthorized access to classified documents of any nature.

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited November 2012

    Kay - Julia Gillard once said that married women were prostitutes - she is a member of the Fabian scoiety (a communist). When she had that temper tantrum in Parliament she was actually speaking to defend another member who is being sued for sexual harassment who likened female genitalia to a particular shellfish in a text message. She and her other members actually voted against this creepy man being stood down as speaker.

    Tony Abbott is a wonderful catholic family man who does not hate women - his family are a testament to that. He does a lot of work volunteering as a fire fighter, a surf lifesaver and in Aboriginal communities. 

    Gillard hates men and has in her past broken up several marriages as well as trying out being a lesbian in her youth. She also, it appears to have been involved in a scheme to rip off union money when she was a lawyer while living with a union member.

    This is what she said about married women:

    "Prostitution in marriage is the transaction of sex in return for love, security and housekeeping"

    She is the worst prime minister this country has ever had and an embarrasment to us all.

  • Chickadee
    Chickadee Member Posts: 4,467
    edited November 2012

    Who the heck voted her in? I don't know much of Australian politics.

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited November 2012

    She sounds like a real charmer.

Categories