I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

19939949969989991828

Comments

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    More fun with binders - courtesy of a FB friend. Coffee warning - move back from the screen and keyboard if you are drinking!



    http://www.amazon.com/Avery-Durable-Binder-EZ-Turn-17032/product-reviews/B001B0CTMU



    Enjoy your morning!



    L

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    The only thing worse than looking at Dumbya is hearing him! Thank gawd that is a very infrequent event now!

    Rosemary, what a beatiful cat! So much better looking at her than Dimson! Smile

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited October 2012

    Beesie - I'm sorry but so many of your facts are just wrong. Romney does NOT have a detailed plan. Just because a policy works in Canada, in your view, doesn't mean the same thing is being floated here.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Beesie, I love reading your perspective and am soooooooooooooo glad I live in Canada.  We have enough shemonitos here, but Romney takes the cake.  He will say anything to win and then probably start many more wars to get that mongering machine working.  That will affect us and the whole world and for that reason I hope he loses.  However I do feel sorry for Obama.  He, his wife and children have been used and abused for the last 4 years and have been called every name in the book, by the "lovely" ladies on the other thread. It all stinks of racism to me as an outsider and makes me sick to my stomach. I thought and hoped the US was beyond this but sadly they are not.  If they had someone else on their team who wasn't so disingenuous, I might take a different stance, but as things stand, he acts like a clown and so do his followers.

    I hate to say this but if he is elected, it will affect the whole world in a negative way with foreign relations and environmental issues.  I don't like it, but you are welcome to your observations.  Maybe if the repubs had been a little more respectful to Obama, the dems might have reciprocated.  They attacked him from Day 1 and have not stopped.  They are very childish.

    And as far as those death threats, they are coming from repubs to make the dems look bad.  Geez, how much more obvious can they be.  The language used is definitely pointing to dems......or at least the dems they fantasize about.  Racism, pure and simple.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    I want a kitty cat!

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Sunflowers, Beesie is a good sport.  She is respectful in her posts.

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited October 2012

    Beesie, what's with the scolding? I believe we all are PAINFULLY aware of what is at stake in this election! It's not just healthcare, it's not just women, it's not just jobs. To me, it's all wrapped up in the Supreme Court. THAT is what will be effecting us for the rest of our lives, long after this next president is gone. Romney as leader of the world? That bully who doesn't have a diplomatic bone in his body? Who European leaders already cannot stand? Who has Bush's team of warmongers on his side?

    Please don't lecture us for having a little fun and levity.

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited October 2012

    I don't see much respect in Beesie's last post, Blue.



    Beesie - how did Romney become the lying devil he's portrayed to be? Probably because he fucking LIES. His position on every important issue changes daily. Literally. He doesn't support equal pay for equal women (or if he does he refuses to come right out and say it). He wants to take women's basic reproductive rights away...or at least he did. Maybe he changed his position again. He arrogantly says that nearly half of the country won't take personal responsibility for their lives, then tries to put a different spin on it - "oh, I didn't use the right words, " or "that's not what I meant." Did you watch the fundraiser video? He was positively dripping with contempt for half of our citizens. And you come here to ask how we can mock him?



    I don't care if his family loves him. I'm sure that monsters throughout history had someone or perhaps a pet who loved them. That doesn't make them presidential material.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    Hillary supporters who dislike the President on her behalf may be overlooking some important points. After the rough-and-tumble of the election, the Democratic party came together to work for the common good of this country. (Too bad the Republicans refused - just think how much further along our recovery would be had they not blocked it at every turn.)



    President Obama asked Hillary to take on one of the most difficult and one of the most important jobs in his administration -- and she accepted. That says a lot about her spirit of public service, her dedication to her country, and her willingness to let bygones be bygones. It also says a lot about the respect that President Obama has for her -- professionally as well as personally. And there is no cutting her out or sidelining her in this administration. She is a key player, of equal stature with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Treasury -- three critical cabinet departments that were and are essential to the repair of the devastation wrought by the Bush Administration both at home and abroad. Secretary Clinton had to mend fences around the world, repairing America's tarnished public image as well as our tattered diplomatic relations with allies, neutrals and potential enemies. She has done so with the full support of the President and the White House, and has done a brilliant job. The President refused in the debate to let her take the fall for Libya, even though she tried -- and even though she was correct in her characterization that the kinds of decisions that are made on security issues never make it to the White House (what do you think, people -- that the President sits down and plays "Embassyville" at his computer?). The Benghazi tragedy is a completely manufactured controversy, manufactured by desperate Republicans who will endanger other Americans, trash the State Department, smear the dead and use their bodies as flagpoles, all to unseat the black guy in the White House (and yes, I do believe that racism is a large factor in this ... No other president EVER has been portrayed in such a racist manner or talked about in terms of racial slurs. Nobody ever portrayed Bush or Reagan in racist pictures or talked about that "honky" or "white trash").



    So hating the President on Hillary's behalf is something she herself would abhor. She has given her support and her friendship to the President. She is not holding a grudge -- she is holding a vastly important position in his administration and has made exceptional contributions to the security of our country in a very difficult and changing world, with the President's full confidence and support.



    And as far as the choice between Romney and the President is concerned, there is no choice. On the one hand you have a pair of conservatives who would destroy everything that the Obama Administration has repaired or built over the last four years. President Obama became president of a country teetering on the verge of ruin. The economy was in shambles because of the rapacious policies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and their cohorts of greedy Wall Street cronies (and yes, I am disappointed that they haven't been prosecuted and stronger reforms instituted, but I can't have everything I want). In the last four years, he has withdrawn us from Iraq (a war that we were lied into with a country that never did anything to us), killed the man who was responsible for September 11 (for whom we went to war with Afghanistan more than a decade ago), enacted economic policies in the face of unrelenting, unyielding opposition from the Republican party that have brought the stock market back to near-record highs (and made up for nearly all the losses that investors suffered during the economic free-fall brought about by Bush), and begun whittling away at the massive unemployment caused by those same policies of said former president. And he managed, in the few working days of the supermajority in the Senate, to pull off a healthcare reform package that -- while it didn't do all we had hoped -- ensures that our sisters (among other deserving people) who cannot now be insured because of pre-existing conditions will be able to be insured and without lifetime caps on benefits, young adult children who may be struggling in this economy can stay on their parents' insurance, and more affordable insurance will be available to most. The massive damage done to the economy could not be undone overnight, and in the face of the appallingly selfish opposition from the Republicans, he has done an outstanding job.



    The Republicans would destroy all that. Romney's advisors are the very architects of the last downfall. Romney's 47% remarks were not an aberration -- they were his truth. Paul Ryan has never known a day of want in his life, and he would take away the very medical care that seniors depend on. Voucher? A windfall for his cronies who own insurance companies and hospitals. Massive tax cuts for the wealthy, who already own most of the wealth in this country? If trickle-down economics worked, we should be awash in jobs. The massive wealth transfer that has taken place over the last decade and more, according to trickle-down, should have created so many jobs that we never should have had a recession, let alone a second Great Depression. The rich have almost all the money now -- the Republicans simply want to complete the transfer. And foreign policy? Since we're out of Iraq, Romney wants to pick a fight with Iran (I guess because the defense industry needs more money). George Bush destabilized the entire Middle East by removing Iraq as a counterweight to Iran's regional ambitions. We are now reaping what he sowed -- and Romney wants to bring back the neocons (including that madman John Bolton!) who will sow even more destruction and pick a fight with a country on the verge of attaining nuclear weapons? There are so many more nightmare scenarios to a Romney win that I can't put them all here -- but they are out there in longer and more detailed analyses than I can perform here (this is too long already).



    Everyone is entitled to their own opinions and their own grudges agains whoever they want. Even people who don't directly have a dog in this fight. But other people expressing their countervailing opinions isn't beating up, piling on or being mean -- it is taking advantage of the same right to express our opinion as everyone has.



    This is my opinion, based on my observations and life experiences.



    L

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Very well said HL. 

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    The binder reviews are in! Send this link to your DH or SO to make sure he gets you the perfect gift binder!

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/cr/B001B0CTMU/ref=aw_d_cr_office-products

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited October 2012

    Great words, HL!

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    HL, thank you for those spot on words!

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    One more thing re: the binders. The binder funnies are just that -- amusing. The visual is hilarious. Amusement in a tense time, in a tense election.



    What isn't funny, however, is the fact that Mitt Romney, who had been in the private sector for DECADES by the time he became governor (as he loves reminding everyone at every opportunity) DIDN'T KNOW ANY QUALIFIED WOMEN. None. And this was 2003, not 1963. Or 1973. Or 1983. In the twenty-first century, he didn't know any qualified women. None from Bain. None from other companies he bought and dismantled. None from his church. None from networking. None from meetings, associations, golfing, country clubbing. None from his wife's circle of friends. None from HIS circle of friends. None of his colleagues' wives. NONE. THAT is the serious and scary part of the binder story. He was so blindered, so insulated, so hermetically sealed in his man's world that he didn't even SEE qualified women .... Like today he doesn't even SEE the poor, the disadvantaged, the 99%. That speaks volumes to me about his character, his vision, his empathy, his intelligence, his openness, his creativity, his empathy, his respect for women in general and professional women in particular .... Qualities I value in a leader. Qualities he does not possess.



    That is what the REAL "binder" story means to me. And I am appalled.



    L

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Yep, he takes the cake, pie, cupcakes and muffins, not to mention the chocolate cookies!  hehehe!

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited October 2012

    The Moderators want us to keep this civil, so I won't post here after this. 

    My apologies if it sounded like I was "talking trash" about Obama or lecturing anyone here.  I tried very carefully in my choice of words to be clear that I was simply stating my opinion, offering my perspective, my assessment, my thoughts. I tried to be respectful of Obama. Saying that I see him to be temperamentally unsuited to the job, and describing why I feel that way is not being disrespectful.  I wasn't making fun of him or calling him names or showing him with horns on his head. I think that he is well intentioned, and I actually agree with some of his intentions (universal healthcare, for one) but I simply don't think that he's temperamentally capable of getting the job done.

    I was not suggesting that anyone here should share my feelings or assessment; I understand that you don't.  But I am entitled to my opinion, aren't I?  And keep in mind that while I may be the only person speaking out here, we are seeing more and more people come out publicly to say that they voted for Obama in 2008 but they will not be voting for him in 2012.  I thought that it might be interesting to some here to discuss why this is, to talk about what needs to change in a second Obama term, if there is one. Guess I was wrong.

    I do think that both sides should be more respectful... after all, one of these men is going to president. I'm certainly not the only person who is concerned about the lack of civility in this campaign.

    AnneW, I share your concern about the Supreme Court.  In my posts I've been explaining why I think (my opinion only) Romney would be a better leader and president than Obama has shown himself to be.  But if I could vote in this election, would I vote for him?  As much as I think that voting is a privilege and that everyone should exercise their right to vote, on this one, I don't know that I'd have it in me to vote for either of these parties/candidates. Romney, because of the party. Obama, because of the individual. I would probably stay home or spoil my ballot or vote for everyone but the president.  I don't know.    

    Waving goodbye!

  • River_Rat
    River_Rat Member Posts: 1,724
    edited October 2012

    Sure Romney has a plan, it's to do the same things Bush did only more so...yeah that'll help. His economic advisors are the Bush advisors, his foreign policy advisors are the Bush foreign policy advisors. So if you liked the Bush years you'll love the Romney years. 

    BTW late term abortions are illegal except under the conditions you mentioned, Beesie. This is from 2003:

    Of the 1.6 million abortions performed in the U.S. each year, 91 percent are performed during the first trimester (12 or fewer weeks' gestation); 9 percent are performed in the second trimester (24 or fewer weeks' gestation); and only about 100 are performed in the third trimester (more than 24 weeks' gestation), approximately .01 percent of all abortions performed. 

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,880,00.html#ixzz29epYQLmn

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012
  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    It's my cancerversary today. Not sure if I should celebrate or mourn. Undecided

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2012

    My take on the BOW comments seems to be quite different than most.  I gasped when he said it and asked my dh for verification.

    In my mind, (Sealed)I thought it was a freudian moment.  He was blathering on and on just to keep the stage and let his mouth take over from his brain.  He 'should' have said 'binders full of women's resumes' or women's names or qualified women.  

    I don't think his male centered brain would have said "a binder full of men."  So, for me, it was just a disrespectful statement (regardless of how true it was) that demonstrated his view of women.  His later comment about women having to get home to make dinner, etc, seemed to back up my thoughts.

    Edited to add: Waving to Beesie. I, for one, do value your opinions even if they differ from my own.Smile

  • GatorGal
    GatorGal Member Posts: 2,550
    edited October 2012

    I say we celebrate every day!!

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    I'm going with that Glenna! At the very least it's an excuse to be taken out to dinner tonight! Wink

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Yes Glenna.  Every day!  It's my cancerversary as well.  6 years.

  • IllinoisLady
    IllinoisLady Member Posts: 29,082
    edited October 2012

    Wow !!!!That's almost all I can say.  I do hope Beesie can get to understand.  I feel ( most of the time anyway ) so blessed to be a citizen of the United States of American.  However: and this is not something I would think overmuch about, nor bring up because it is what it is.  Beesie, it is this way for me.  I am still working at the age of 67 with no end in sight.  Part of that is due to staying home to raise children, some years of medical factors, and lastly when I did work I did not have high paying jobs.  Therefore, my SS ( social security ) payment is $483.00 per month.  Surely you can see when Romney proposes that he needs that more than I do, it tends to make me just a bit testy.  When he says he is also going to screw around with my Medicare --- that I have paid into for over two years and never used yet, it tends to upset me greatly.  I am MOST definitely one of the 47 per centers. 

    I am not bitter and un-happy for my life.  In fact, all things equal, I do all right, but mind you it is just all right.  I am quite willing to work as long as I have too or as long as I possibly can, which ever comes first.  I have had a standing joke -- not always funny, that the way I figure it, I'll be able to retire about two weeks before I die.  I'm only asking in life to give back what I've put in as the 47 per center Romney thinks I am.  By the way, I like Romney do not smoke or drink much either...that costs money I don't have, but I am here, doing the best I know how, and VERY willing to help my fellow man as much as I can, when I can.  If I feel that I don't deserve a possible President who tells me to my face that I'm worthless and a drag on society ( his society anyway ) surely you can understand my having a total lack of empathy and  enthusiasm for him.  In addition I am totally insulted by lies from any side or any person.  Not to be mean, just a fact....I've run into a whole raft of snake oil salesmen and every time I listen to Mr. Romney, he sounds as awful lot like them.  I'd like to be a lot more articulate and orderly about what I am saying and again, none of this is put here to have anyone "feel" for me, but the sad facts are, there are people in this world far worse off than I am.  I consider myself fortunate.  I have a home ( not a mansion ) in the woods by a lake, 37 yr. old marriage with a man who still enjoys ( by the way he is 73 and still working ) my company and who indulges right along with me caring for a slight few of the dumped and rejected animals that no one seems to want.  Some days I feel like I have MORE than Romney ever will have....strange role reversal, but just maybe you will understand.  I don't mind my life, but if Romney becomes President, all I have worked for will more than likely vanish.  Pretty pitiful if you ask me that I can't be, do and have what I have right now.  So you'll excuse ( though I don't actually believe in hell ) if I wish to see Romney there in his plush hand basket.  He is offering me nothing.

    ETA:  I as well find every day a gift and reason to  celebrate.  Someone is going to smile at me and make my day and you can bet I'll be trying to make their's. 

    Jackie

  • GatorGal
    GatorGal Member Posts: 2,550
    edited October 2012

    Okay, I had decided to stay in bed today and keep my feet elevated but have decided I can't waste the day. I'm going to celebrate being able to get up and go out. Going to my al-anon meeting, then perhaps out to lunch, or perhaps back to bed! But I am going to celebrate your cancerversaries with you!!

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2012

    And here is why Romney scares me.  Is it arrogance?  He really says these things...out loud.  

    'I HOPE' BUSINESS OWNERS INFLUENCE THEIR EMPLOYEES' VOTES

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/?country=US

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited October 2012

    Thank you (((Glenna)))! Hope you have a wonderful day! I may just hit the sack later myself.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited October 2012

    Me too.  My pups had me up at 6:45 when papa left for work.  Me too tired.  ttyl!

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    You know, PiP, that sort of talk is (sadly) legal in the United States. It is illegal to offer someone something of value in exchange for their vote (money, a job, lunch, a coca-cola), but it is NOT illegal to threaten their jobs unless they vote the "correct" way. Pretty sickening. Not everyone can just leave a company whose CEO threatens you like that ... Sadly. We don't hear anything from the right on how terrible that is -- but you can bet, if Bill Gates or George Soros (who is the devil according to the right) were to suggest that voting for the progressive candidate would be good for the company, the screams from the right-wing would make our ears bleed.



    He should scare you, PiP. He scares the crap out of me.



    L

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited October 2012

    Glenna, it is good day to celebrate in the mid-Atlantic! Sunny, clear, no storms until after dark -- go out, get some sunshine and have a good time! And have whipped cream and sprinkles on your dessert, too!



    L

Categories