Privacy compromised

Options
124»

Comments

  • leggo
    leggo Member Posts: 3,293
    edited April 2012

    changed my mind, sorry. 

  • Shrek4
    Shrek4 Member Posts: 1,822
    edited April 2013
  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

    We just enabled the topic to be in the active topics again, hoping everyone can stay respectful and supportive. 

    Thanks again for sharing your advice.

    Just re-posting this:

    We agree and ask that you help keep our community safe by not submitting personally identifiable information in Posts and Topics. Other tips include: 1- Do no use your real name, recognizable nickname, addresses, phone number or kids names 2- All posts and screen names are searchable by Google or other internet search engines. 3- Don't use your photo as your avatar if you don't want to be recognized.

  • Marple
    Marple Member Posts: 19,143
    edited April 2012

    Thank you mods.

  • susan_02143
    susan_02143 Member Posts: 7,209
    edited April 2012

    I have just spent some time over the past two days pinging bco.org looking for a way to hack the private messages and haven't been able to do so. I used some general SQL, PHP, Ruby, and spoof URL's. Generally, I can hack a site if I want to and there is a back-door.

    If I wasn't keeping my cancer status private I would ask a couple of friends who are far more creative hackers than I to give it a shot.

    I am perfectly aware that this is a public site, but someone could spend hours and hours on here without figuring out who I am. I was all well aware of the TOS. Somehow, and for this I confess my naivete, I didn't expect threads from forums to be posted on Facebook as a recruiting tool. As you can see, I have changed my avitar so that a match can't be made visually.

    I applaud the mods for changing their approach to Facebook. Facebook is far more public, in my opinion, than this niche site. Once again, I am reminded that "if you didn't pay for the product, you are the product."

    *susan* 

  • Marple
    Marple Member Posts: 19,143
    edited April 2012

    Susan~I'm pleased to hear that you were unable to get in to PMs.  I think as you stated, I also didn't expect threads to be posted on FB.  If I understand correctly that approach has been changed.

    I am grateful for BCO for providing a place with so much information and support. 

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

    I forgot to add that we are not going to post anymore on FB. Sincerely, we did not just do this for 'publicity', rather as a means of bringing all the women who are in discussions on our FB pages over here. We decided we would make Wednesdays our "Community Day" and feature a topic to hopefully help women find us, who need us. 

    Our sincerest apologies that we upset some of you.

    The Mods 

  • Marple
    Marple Member Posts: 19,143
    edited April 2012

    Perhaps on Wednesday's you could feature a specific forum rather than a topic on a forum.  Would that be an idea worth entertaining? 

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited April 2012

    I always saddens me when we have to be reminded about respect and name calling. You can be a straight shooter without resorting to that. We are all adults and and don't deserve to subjected to to disrespectful behavior and name calling. We should all be above that by now. Caryn 

  • Racy
    Racy Member Posts: 2,651
    edited April 2012

    Thank you for responding to the concerns, Mods.

  • itsjustme10
    itsjustme10 Member Posts: 796
    edited April 2012

    Mods, If I nay make a suggestion...Maybe if you create a thread in the welcome forum or somewhere else, and sticky a notice regarding the public nature of the forums, and the difference between posting vs. PM's, etc, and maybe stick a label on there to "read before creating a screen name, or making your first post", it might help the random fearfulness from overwhelmed people who may be too trusting or unaware of how these boards work?

    That way, if and when the questions arise, you can just link to it, and CYA on the topic... :) 

     I can see where it could be easy for someone to get carried away and reveal too much private information to the world.  It's always best to have a disclaimer if possible.

  • itsjustme10
    itsjustme10 Member Posts: 796
    edited April 2012

    Mods, If I nay make a suggestion...Maybe if you create a thread in the welcome forum or somewhere else, and sticky a notice regarding the public nature of the forums, and the difference between posting vs. PM's, etc, and maybe stick a label on there to "read before creating a screen name, or making your first post", it might help the random fearfulness from overwhelmed people who may be too trusting or unaware of how these boards work?

    That way, if and when the questions arise, you can just link to it, and CYA on the topic... :) 

     I can see where it could be easy for someone to get carried away and reveal too much private information to the world.  It's always best to have a disclaimer if possible.

  • Layla2525
    Layla2525 Member Posts: 827
    edited April 2012

    I used facebook occasionally to see what my friends are doing but I told them all privately not to post anything on facebook indicating that I could have cancer.  That was because when I went to the bank for a loan to get money to pay my 15% of the insur,the bank form asked if I had ever been diagnosed with cancer or aids/hiv. If you answer yes,that bank wont give you a loan. Its a sad state of affairs when you cant be discriminated against for your race or religion but you can be discriminated against for your health!!

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

    Thanks for all of your suggestions! 

    I think featuring a forum may be a very good solution. Would love to hear what others think.

    Also, we are indeed working on a privacy document! Thanks for the idea!!!!

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2012

    PLEASE NO MORE FORUMS OR STICKY THREADS!! Too many already.



    I do have a comment about your TOS - in them you retain the right to reuse our material including for promotional purposes. If you really do intend to stop posting our threads elsewhere you should change that language - otherwise all we have is a gentleman's agreement and only for FB. With due respect you certainly have the right to expansive copyright but given this conversation it would be ethical to adjust the TOS accordingly.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2012

    To whit in your TOS you discuss BCOs "perpetual" and "irrevocable" right to amongst other things "adapt" "relicense" and "sell" our communications. Bit my tongue when I read that but IMO this move of yours calls your TOS into question. If you won't do FB what will you do? I appreciate the mods' sensitivity to our privacy concerns. I think you TOS wouldn't survive consumer scrutiny on the privacy issue.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

    Hi Athena, 

    I understand your concern. We could certainly go over this with our lawyer again. We really have never used your threads/comments, except to show the value of the community (e.g. to board members, etc.). If we have taken a quote, we have never, ever used it without the consent of the individual.

    Secondly, we are trying to reduce our sticky threads, slowly but surely. Every week we receive a request for either another sticky or new forum. Typically, we now need to apolgize and say "no", as we are on overload.

    Again, we appreciate your constructive feedback. 

    Your Mods 

  • KittyKitty
    KittyKitty Member Posts: 150
    edited April 2012

    To: Moderators, and all:

    Yesterday there was an article in the Wall Street Journal concerning information mining of cancer discussion boards, by third parties, with one risk issue mentioned  of posters using identifying names, addresses, personal information.

    I am not going to repost the article because paid subscription links are not translatable to message boards.

    I am going to once again suggest to the moderators that they make this  risk of posting personally identifying information loud and clear to people, with reminders on the BC org sign up page, on the page where photos are requested by BC org, and so forth, and not just as one post mentioned in this thread. I do not think that one reminder in this thread is enough to alert people to the risk they are taking with posting their personally identifying photos, names, etc, in this space, especially when BC org requests that information to sign up. People may NOT realize they have a choice in opting out of providing personal information.

      The article mentioned, and I agree, that many people do not realize the personal risk they are taking by posting such personal details on a public message board. Some third party data miners might scrub out the personal information, but then again, some may not.

    "Kitty" 

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited April 2012

    We could all probably help with this too ... a heads up PM to somebody we see posting something that could personally identify them would be a nice thing to do.  I did it once when somebody posted a phone number. 

    But I also believe that some people really don't care if they can be found on here either.  It's not like having breast cancer is something that has to be hidden from the world ... so it's all a matter of personal preference whether you want to display a real picture or pictures of yourself and family for instance.   

  • TheLadyGrey
    TheLadyGrey Member Posts: 231
    edited April 2012

    Kitty, did the WSJ article explain why anyone would be interested enough to data mine?



    I can't imagine why anyone would be interested unless it was for marketing. Even then, marketing what? Mirulax and Imodium?



    I only discovered the existence of forums a couple of years ago so I'm still mystified by a lot of stuff that happens.

  • KittyKitty
    KittyKitty Member Posts: 150
    edited April 2012

    Lady,

    the sense I got was that it was talking about " researchers" for different products and treatments mining the data, and following the conversations to see what issues were coming up in conversations, and how the issues were coming up in conversations.

    data mining internet chats occurs on a variety of topics not just bc, and many of the players are willing to pay to get the information they want about how many times x subject comes up in conversation, and in what context. measuring internet chat on specific products is very important to manufacturers and marketers, but the gist of this article was on data mining internet chat boards for treatments for cancers, and specifically bc was mentioned.

    I suspect data mining is a big business. the chat information is social feedback, and is valuable to people willing to pay money for it.

  • susan_02143
    susan_02143 Member Posts: 7,209
    edited April 2012

    At the risk of stating the obvious, this has been going on since at least 1985 using data posted online. I don't think this should surprise anyone. It isn't just big business; it is huge! But anonymous data mining isn't really scary since it doesn't identify individuals but instead is used in the aggregate.

    An example might be diarrhea. Data mining could tell manufacturers or researchers what the most common ten fears of this side effect are. Then that information could be used to create marketing campaigns that include those fears or develop a new drug that specifically targets the top two.

    To be honest, when you use your affinity card at your local grocery store you are giving away far more information than anything you post on this website. They know your name, address, age, and all of your buying habits.

    Hope this allays some concerns.

    *susan* 

  • KittyKitty
    KittyKitty Member Posts: 150
    edited April 2012

    People certainly have the right to share  personal information on the internet. But if messages on discussion boards contain personal details such as photos, name, and medical history, people should not assume that third parties can not find that information, such as prospective employers, and insurance companies. It is all about choice and awareness.

    People tend to get a false sense of security when the think that "data mining" by third parties is all about protecting their personal privacy.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

     KittyKitty thanks for highlighting the recent Wall Street Journal Article "Researchers Tune In to the Internet Buzz."  We are aware of this issue and sensitive to our members concerns.  We keep trying to safeguard the site, as much as is possible.  Recently, we revised our community rules to include the following:
     
    You agree not to collect or store users' content or information, or otherwise access this Website, using automated means (such as harvesting bots, robots, spiders, or scrapers), without our permission. 
     
     
  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2012

    Mods - this is not a comment against you but aimed to the attention of BOs your legal team:

    That bit of language you offer above is useless and impossible to take seriously. I can't see a justification for the organization to even spend good dollars trying to enforce the unenforceable. You are almost saying "don't hack without our permission" - almost. It's like saying "don't enter my house and take my belongings without my permission." Doesn't pass the smell test.

    Most importantly, it does nothing to address the concerns about BCOs control of our information. I still see the following language on your TOS (my bold) (Everyone else, go to where it says "Breastcancer.org Rules"):

    "By using the Discussion Boards or Chat Rooms, you are granting Breastcancer.org a perpetual, exclusive, royalty-free and irrevocable right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, create derivative works from, transfer, and sell any such messages, files or communications."

    This language is still there, so I repeat my query: Given your decision to bow to concerns and withdraw our posts from Facebook, and given your concern over the uproar that ensued when this thread was created, how can the organization justify such expansive language?

    Again, it's your right, but not ethical based on the discussion in this thread which, if you remember, was pretty explosive at times.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited April 2012

    1Athena1, as you requested, we'll bring your comments to the attention of the legal team.

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited April 2012

    I cant believe where this conversation is going.  BCO is a public site.  When you post information on it, its PUBLIC.  BCO is responding by editing some of its privacy information details and members are assisting by offering to PM those who may be offering more information than may be safe.  Perfect combination.  Unfortunately, you cant save people from themselves.  Anything on the internet is PUBLIC.  Think of it this way, anything you post on a public site is similar to spray painting it on the Brooklyn Bridge.  If you not comfortable with your info on the Brooklyn Bridge, then dont post it!

  • SelenaWolf
    SelenaWolf Member Posts: 1,724
    edited May 2012
    Every time you use the internet, there is an exchange of data between your computer and any site you access.  If you use the internet and internet-based sites (i.e., discussion forums), your information is out there and the sites you've accessed can, then, access your computer anytime they want if you don't have a security package (and, sometimes, even if you do).  Anybody with the proper knowledge- and skills can find you.  Even "data secure" websites can be mined if you know what you are doing.

    If you wouldn't discuss certain information with the person who sits next to you at work (on the bus, in the coffee shop, at the store, etc...), then you shouldn't discuss it over the internet.  You must be careful.  Even ordering on-line using a credit card on a "data secure" site is taking a chance.  I'm always yelling at my nephews- and nieces about the stuff they post on Facebook!  Once it's out there, it's OUT THERE...  There's no such thing as privacy- or anonymity on the internet... or anywhere else for that matter.  Not anymore.

Categories