The Budwig FOCC

Options
245

Comments

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    You might want to seriously research actual flax studies rather than rely on your impressions.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited July 2011

    I have and I have spoken to my doctors as well.  I am not saying I have the right answer, only that the "right" answer doesn't exist at this point and we all have to make our own way here.  Some folks here avoid phytoestrogens altogether, some take them as supplements.  I've decided for myself to pursue a middle ground.  I just think we have to be wary of assuming we have the definitive answer.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Thanks a lot Molly, have to go back to hospital soon :( and will show both studies to the pharmacist and see what she says. I agree that they can,t be as updated as we are LoL

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    You have to be careful not to assume your assumptions match the actual published evidence which is easily available in the medical literature search.

    What "some folks" here do is rely on chat and their opinions when the answer can easily found in the medical literature database.

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited July 2011

    My Onc. is very conservative. As he says he wants to do no harm. Until the answers are there which they aren't at this time his feeling is best to avoid. In the past I used soy products as well. I have chosen to avoid them as well. I'm not going to go nuts about it, but feel there are enough products that have soy in them.

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    Luan,

    You make a good point that pharmacists and oncologists don't have the time to research this stuff in a definitive manner or keep up with all the research literature. They just have too much to do.

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    Kira,

    Your onc may think he is doing no harm by avoiding flax. But he may do more harm by discouraging you--if you actually look the flax information up.

    Am I the only one who looks information up in the medical literature?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    I agree that flax is not soya...the budwig protocol is extremely compelling and the little flax in it can,t do that much harm in comparison to cooking food in plastic containers in the microwave...

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited July 2011

    Molly, your onc may not be familiar with medical studies, but mine is and he's not the only person I've asked.  I'm glad you are confident in your conclusions but you aren't the only one with the magic google.  There are plenty of women -- inluding women who are as skeptical of mainstream medicine as you are -- who drawn different conclusions.

    All of us who had er+ cancers have to draw our own conclusions based on our comfort levels with the science that is available. 

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited July 2011

    I would add that the studies to which you refer were done in the lab.  I heard a few years ago that they were going to conduct an actual study on the diet of real women, but I haven't read anything further.  There have been studies of women who come from Japan where there is more soy in the diet that seem to suggest it is beneficial but then there is controversy about whether adding soy to your diet later in life is the same as growing up with it.  As well as the questions about thediscrepancies between a diet rich in soy and supplements.

     So i stick with my decision to avoid supplements but include phytoestrogens in my diet.  You can take your supplements and I'm not prepared to say you are wrong.  they just don't know. 

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    If you noticed from my previous posts, I've said I would never rely on what you call the "magic google."

    I was taught to research everything at The National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health online.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

    If you are truly interested in "the science available" you might want to check it out rather than use the "magic google."

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Molly, that is the unquestionable source. I have to dig up the very compelling anti-soy research i,ve found, most complicated subject, if ever there was one

  • kira1234
    kira1234 Member Posts: 3,091
    edited July 2011

    It sure is a compelling subject. I do know with the studying I've done what I've found is natural soy seems safe in limited quantities. Where we really need to be concerned is the processed soy such as in soy burgers, and soy shakes. These were  things I was using in large quantities before I got BC.

     Luan, I agree plastic is a known carcinogen when heated in the microwave. I wish I had known years ago, used them for years. I also avoid plastic water bottles now.

  • Melizzard
    Melizzard Member Posts: 121
    edited July 2011

    The online Budwig forum is a Yahoo group called FlaxSeedOil2.

     xxoo

    Melissa

  • Melizzard
    Melizzard Member Posts: 121
    edited July 2011

    Thank you for these studies, Molly Ann.  Hopefully the gals here will get what you're putting out there.  Breast cancer is just one of the cancers that allegedly respond to BP.  If the majority of breast cancers are ER+, then why would breast cancer respond to BP if the flax seed/oil were harmful?  The phytoestrogens in the flax are too weak to cause cancer to grow and, on the risk vs benefits scale, I would say the flax benefits way outweigh the risks.  :)

    xxoo

    Melissa

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    That,s exactly my thinking Melissa. We have an expression in French which says "Can,t be more catholic than the Pope" Lol

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited July 2011

     Here's what the American Cancer Society has to say about  FLAXSEED 

    "More research in humans is needed to determine the usefulness of flaxseed in cancer treatment and prevention. While animal and laboratory studies show promise, further studies are needed to determine whether the results apply to humans. "

    It's really important to note that the studies referred to earlier in this thread were done in mice, in the laboratory.  Historically, mouse or other animal studies have often been found to apply very differently or not at all to human applications.  

    Does anyone have any credible sources to share regarding the Budwig Protocol / FOCC? I've searched and not been able to find a single one, but I'm definitely interested if anyone can share.  I know about the Yahoo group, but I'm looking for credible, evidence-based information.

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited July 2011

    melizzard,

    but didn't your cancer grow?  and that is why you needed to do chemo? not being bitchy, i swear, just trying to figure out how effective this is for BC.  i'm very impressed by Luan's sister's story, but still...hard to suss out what to do.  and it is so restrictive.  

    leia, how long did your sister do the BP?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Personally, i don,t give a hoot whether it prevents cancer or not, i just know it,s good for me

  • mollyann
    mollyann Member Posts: 472
    edited July 2011

    Third party organizations like the American Cancer Society are not credible. I don't know why anybody accepts third party interpretation when they can review the studies themselves.

    If you are looking for authoritative sources don't settle for hearsay--learn to read primary sources.

    Don't ask others to provide a research service for you.

  • Member_of_the_Club
    Member_of_the_Club Member Posts: 3,646
    edited July 2011

    Yeah but the third party is accurate, these are lab studies, not studies of actual women.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited July 2011

    Does anyone have any credible sources to share regarding the Budwig Protocol / FOCC?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Incredible, requiring to see a scientific double blind study before eating a bowl of cereal, i thought i had seen it all, lol The rats wouldn,t even have your corn flakes....

  • Leia
    Leia Member Posts: 265
    edited July 2011

    sweetbean, my sister with the stage 3 ovarian cancer is still on the Budwig to this day.She says she'll be on it for the rest of her life. And she is doing well. Thriving, even. 

    Others on this thread have said they are waiting for the "studies" to prove out the Budwig. Or the FOCC. Before they feel comfortable, doing it. But there will be no "studies." No one will finance a study proving that flax seed oil and cottage cheese, and then, throw in some sauerkraut et al cures cancer.  There is no $$$ to be made, from that. 

    Again we just have to all decide for ourselves. What choice makes sense, for our individual lives.

    I have chosen the FOCC. With my two stage 1 cancers. If, by chance, I still get a stage 3-4 cancer, my response would be the entire Budwig Protocol. Not chemo or radiation.  

  • Leia
    Leia Member Posts: 265
    edited July 2011

    Luan, you said "Personally, i don,t give a hoot whether it prevents cancer or not, i just know it,s good for me"

    I could not agree MORE.

    The FOCC changed my life. As I said, before, I'm just calmer. Nothing bothers me, anymore. And it is the Omega 3s, what the FOCC gives you. Oxygen in your cells.

    I don't need a "study" to tell me this. I just did it and felt better. And the D3. And I just feel great. And negative mammos from 2006. With none of the recommended "treatments." 

    Although, if you read Dr. Budwig's books, there is science behind this. Her books are available, on Amazon. Read them, and decide what is right for you. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2011

    Actually Leia, I would like to rephrase: I don,t give a hoot if IT'S "PROVEN" to prevent cancer or not, i just know it,s good for me ;)

  • apple
    apple Member Posts: 7,799
    edited July 2011

    it's very nice and very sad to read threads with half the members blocked.  I can easily guess what they are saying.  It's sad to me that some posters are so aggressively Anti - ANTI that there good points are lost to the 'ignore in the sky' function (for which actually, I am very grateful).

    Anyway, as to studies on diet threads..

    Diets are great for many things.. improving a body's health and ability to withstand the ravages of disease and discomfort of cancer treatments.  A healthy body can heal readily (Personally I think the Budwig Protocol is way too restrictive.. so many important nutrients are unavailable for ingestion.)  Seems to kick ass tho.  For some types of cancers certain nutrients should be avoided and not mindlessly ingested because of internet lore.

    There are many diets which claim to fight and cure cancer.  just google 'cancer diet cures'.

  • Melizzard
    Melizzard Member Posts: 121
    edited July 2011

    Sweetbean, yes my cancer did grow.  The Budwig protocol did not stop it.  I have heard of those for whom it is effective, but it was not for me.

     xxoo

    Melissa

  • Melizzard
    Melizzard Member Posts: 121
    edited July 2011

    Any true alternative seeker will never put any credence in anything the American Cancer Society says.  If they're not a front for chemo and radiation, I don't know who is. 

    xxoo

    Melissa

  • sweetbean
    sweetbean Member Posts: 1,931
    edited July 2011

    I'm not a fan of the ACS, either.  But I trust Dr. Block when he says soy and flax are ok for breast cancer.   However, my naturopath said to stay away from the oil and stick to the lignans.  But anyway, the BP just seems so restrictive and it goes against the grain of what most alternative practioners recommend.  I don't understand how the FOCC can oxygenate blood, anyway.  And anecdotal evidence is, well, anecdotal.  There are a zillion anecdotes about the Gerson therapy but the only actual study I saw involved a naturopathy who followed 24 of his patients for 5 years.  After the 5 year, only one of them was still alive and that person STILL wasn't cancer-free.  So you have be careful when utilizing anecdotes to decide treatment.  Glad your sister is doing well, Leia. That's very cool.

Categories