I say yes, you say no, OR People are Strange

Options
165666870711828

Comments

  • ananda8
    ananda8 Member Posts: 2,755
    edited January 2011

    How strange that the entire law was ruled unconstitutional.  I wonder what grounds the judge used to support his ruling.  The requirement that people buy health insurance may be unconstitutional, or may not be, but the other aspects of the bill fall clearly under the power of the Congress to pass regulations.  Very strange.  Since Federal courts in two other states have found the law to be Constitutional, the next step should be the SCOTUS.

    My husband who is a disabled Veteran just received this email from the VFW.  It appears the Veterans of our nations wars are a bit upset with Congresswoman Bachmann.

    VFW Will Defeat Bachmann Plan

      

    WASHINGTON (January 28, 2011) - America's oldest and largest major combat veterans' organization announced it will do everything within its power to defeat a plan introduced by Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) to cut $4.5 billion from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    "No way, no how, will we let this proposal get any traction in Congress," said Richard L. Eubank, the national commander of the 2.1 million-member Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. and its Auxiliaries.

    On her website, the three-term congresswoman lists more than $400 billion in suggestions to cut federal spending. The VA suggestion would cap increases to VA healthcare spending, and reduce disability compensation to account for Social Security Disability Insurance payments - in other words, an offset. She says her plan is intended to generate discussion.

    "The only discussion the VFW wants is to tell the congresswoman that her plan is totally out of step with America's commitment to our veterans," said Eubank, a retired Marine and Vietnam combat veteran from Eugene, Ore.

    "There are certain things you do not do when our nation is at war, and at the top of that list is not caring for our wounded and disabled servicemen and women when they return home," he said. "I want the congresswoman to join us in a tour of the Minneapolis VA Medical Center and Poly Trauma Center the next time she's in her home district to witness firsthand the great work the VA does every day to heal their wounds and ease their pain. Then I want her to look those disabled veterans in the eye and tell them their service and sacrifice is too expensive for the nation to bear.

    "The day this nation can't afford to take care of her veterans is the day this nation should quit creating them," said Eubank.

  • IHOP
    IHOP Member Posts: 79
    edited January 2011

    I'm sorry to intrude and don't want to get political but this annoys me to no end.  Why not just get rid of the part they don't like.  And why the heck does the pre-existing part have to wait until 2014?  Why can't they kick that part of the law in NOW to stop insurance companies from exluding people with pre's or charging us exorbitant amounts?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2011

    Because this way the insurance companies can start collecting larger premiums now to cover that pre-existing coverage in the future.  That is part of the slight of hand for making the bill not appear to cost as much as it will.  Collect money for years before the coverage kicks in and you make it look like costs are much lower than they actually are. 

  • IronJawedBCAngel
    IronJawedBCAngel Member Posts: 470
    edited January 2011

    Do not forget that this is the same Supreme Court that sold our election process to corporations.  It will be interesting to watch all of this play out.

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    Also do not forget that INSURANCE companies supported this bill. They saw the HUGE profits to be made, knowing how Washington works, and knew our government could never administer it. Duh!

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited January 2011
    Barbara:  Thank you so much for putting those gorgeous photos on photobucket so we could see them!  They are all fantastic!  You seem to have a suite!  Is your wonderful guy Donald Trump's brother?Wink  Just kidding because when we took our cruise to Alaska years ago, we just had a tiny room.  Nothing like what you have.  Then again I don't celebrate my birthday.  Too bad for me!  What memories you must have from that cruise.  You and hubby look great and seem so happy.  He sure knows how to make his gal feel special.  What a great guy!  I love your outfits too, especially the green dress.  Those are all great photos and I am so happy to have been able to  enjoy them.  Thank you sooooo much for sharing with us!   Happy, happy, late birthday!
  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited January 2011

    Folks, as for the latest on the Healthcare Bill, it's just what I feared.   I wrote several letters to my rep McConnell and to the Republicans because I feared they would mess everything up now.  I really fear it's not going to be good for us unless someone takes control of it and make sure we get to keep the good and badly needed parts.  We'll see!

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    Thanks, Medigal. This cruise was my bucketlist cruise and price be damned. This was my "I DON'T HAVE CANCER ANYMORE" cruise and I just spent the $ because. The suite was lovely and everything else was, too. My real BDay is today but I wanted to get the special dessrt I knew they would do so I chose Thursday to be my BDay. It was Chocolate, chocolate, chocolate. OMG.

  • Ang7
    Ang7 Member Posts: 1,261
    edited January 2011

    Barbara~

    Great photos!

    Gosh, all I did for my "I DON'T HAVE CANCER ANYMORE" was go to Disney...

    It was done by voting but 4 kids out rule mom/dad.

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited January 2011

    Tupelo, I'd suggest you check your math on that statement.  I've seen that same assertion elsewhere,  with numbers.  Although that 40% figure was thrown aound there, too, the numbers themselves did not even come close to approaching 40% of union workers.  (There are 14.7 million union members in the U.S.)

    Also, it's not true that union members (or anyone) have been "exempted from the law."  The exemptions are for one specific provision (relating to the phase-out of annual limits on benefits), and they are temporary.

    L

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    lewing is correct about the waivers.

    The waivers bypass new rules that phase out annual limits on coverage for limited-benefit plans, also known as "mini-meds."

    Applicants said their premiums would increase significantly, in some cases doubling or more.

    Above from http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5886312/waivers_point_to_flaws_in_health_reform.html

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited January 2011

    Just a little reminder, the less we reference the "other" site, etc, the better. This could cause an us/them phenomenon. Also, let's not reference others posting there, if possible. I just don't want any tension. 

    Thanks! 

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited January 2011

    Thanks, BarbaraA.  Also, Tupelo - I did go to your link, and it stated that *a total* of 2.1 million individuals were covered by plans that received waivers.  So as you can see, even the total is far, far less than 40% of union members. 

    Could you please correct your misstatement now?

    Edited to add: Melissa, I wasn't aware of this policy but will edit my post to remove the reference.

    L

  • IronJawedBCAngel
    IronJawedBCAngel Member Posts: 470
    edited January 2011

    Vermont has asked for some type of exemption, but not to avoid accepting the bill, they want to take it faster and further by going single payer.  I am not sure what the impact will be on their plans if this bill is overturned.  My sister is planning on moving back, and it is certainly something I would consider if they are successful in implementing single payer.

    I don't consider it a bad thing at all that most cancer advocacy groups, and "UNIONS" supported the bill.  It is a far step forward from what we had.  Unions may sometimes overstep, but the labor protections we have in place are because of unions.  Since Reagan was so successful in his efforts against unions, the American worker is much worse off in terms of pay and benefits than he was in the 1970's.

    I sincerely hope that if this goes to the Supreme Court that it is not overturned.  I do not want to see us go backwards.

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    But, IJBCA, what about the fact that the insurance companies supported it? My heeby-jeeby antennae went on full alert when that happened. I think we need a total rework. If the insurance companies like it, it can't be good for the country or us.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011

    Single Payer is the answer, but I'm sure the Insurance Companies won't go for that.

  • IronJawedBCAngel
    IronJawedBCAngel Member Posts: 470
    edited January 2011

    I think it is a waste of time and major tax dollars to repeal this bill just so the Republicans can grandstand.  There are many components that are agreed upon, keep the good, tweak to improve the rest.  I do not trust for one second that Mitch McConnell has any plan that is going to bode well for me.  I wish we could have had single payer or a public option, but the Republican party and the "Republican in Sheeps clothin" Bluedogs made it clear they would not stand for either.  I am willing to compromise on some things, but nothing that I have heard the Republican party discuss is going to be of benefit for most cancer survivors or anyone else with a pre-existing condition.

    Not sure if you caught Eric Cantor stating that in regards to reducing the deficit, everything was on the table, including cancer research and survivor support funds.

    They want us to repeal the bill and trust them that they have a better plan.  Make a bet they have a bridge in London to sell also.

  • bluedahlia
    bluedahlia Member Posts: 6,944
    edited January 2011

    Barbara, lovely pics.  You're a nice looking lady!

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited January 2011

    Thanks, Blue!! The photos are blurry which helps! We had soooo much fun. That was DH under the palm tree getting a massage...his first ever. Now he'll want one every week.

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited February 2011

    Thank you L! 

  • sunny210
    sunny210 Member Posts: 292
    edited February 2011

    I'm just skimming the posts today. Our furnace died on Fri. Today it's being repaired. It's currently a balmy 50 degrees in my house. All this by way of saying that I may be repeating someone else's point, but I'm too cold to sit still for long. 

    I'm no fan of insurance companies, but it's my understanding that the Health Care Bill requirement that everyone purchase insurance prevents us from buying insurance when we're sick, and then opting out when we have recovered. It also prevents those of us that have insurance from subsidizing those who don't which is how it operates currently.

    To those of you support eliminating the pre-existing condition clause of the HCB, what do you suggest for those of us who do have a pre-exiting condition and don't have access to health care. We have always had insurance through my husband's employer. In a one-two whammy, his company went out of business (bye-bye insurance) and I got too sick to work. I really never thought either of those things would happen. I am grateful to live in a state that has a high risk pool, but it is very expensive and has many problems. I really don't think it is a viable - or fair - solution. 

    So, I'm looking for positive solutions here. There is a great deal of opposition to this part of the the reform bill in particular. To those of you who do oppose it, what would you suggest instead for people who don't qualify for insurance, have too many assets for medicaid and are too young for Medicare?

    Bren - how is your hubby?

    Sandy 

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited February 2011

    Barbara and Ang:  Did I miss out on something?  How do you know you don't have cancer anymore? Did your Oncs do a test and let you know?  I didn't think there was a way to find out.  I would like to know too.  It won't get me a great cruise or even a muffin from my DP but it sure would give me some piece of mine if I could know.  Thanks!

  • BarbaraA
    BarbaraA Member Posts: 7,378
    edited February 2011

    Med - once it was out, I decided I was cancer free. Just sayin'.

    I fully support the pre-existing conditions clause in the health care bill because tomorrow, I could be without health care and I know what that means. I just have a big issue with much of the rest of it. If the government could run Medicare, fine, but so far, after so many years, they are doing a terrible job and adding double digit millions of insurees will not make them do a better a job.

  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited February 2011

    Barbara:  That's great to take the optomistic view.  I like that especially once we have survived it for a certain number of years.  It's been about 7 for me.  Hey!!  I deserve 2 cruises and all-suites this time! I just will leave DP at home and rent me a young guy who likes "older" (Ha!) women.  Now that's my idea of surviving!Wink  

    As for Medicare, we don't bother with it because it doesn't cover as much as I need.  We have an Advantage Plan for the extras.  It means paying two premiums each but you have to have what you have to have when you have medical problems.  I tell you tho.  I am just so thrilled I didn't get bc until I was 65.  The Onc says it's the reason I am surviving.  It's not as aggressive on "older" folks.  I finally found something good about aging!

  • AnneW
    AnneW Member Posts: 4,050
    edited February 2011

    Sandy, my god, you must have frozen today!! But since tomorrow's high will be -2, I'd say the furnace guys came in the nick of time. Please holler if you need anything, okay?

    I, too, am interested in other solutions. Especially to your particular issue. I have not heard of any concrete solutions from the other side, but in all fairness, maybe I missed a post or an article?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2011

    I believe we ladies on the right are in favor of insurance insuring people with pre-exisiting conditions.  None of us have ever said otherwise.  How to implement is another question.

    Medigal, I was 58 when I got BC.  I was older..way past meno.  It was aggressive.  I had a mammo in March '04 and found the large lump in Dec. 04 by accident.  I should have been doing SBE.  It was in 5/9 nodes AFTER neo-adjuvant chemo WITH extranodal extension.  I had the standard chemo, then 6 months of Xeloda after surgery and rads.  I then went on Arimidex and last Sept. or Oct. I found out, accidentally again, that it was in my spine.  However, if yours was caught earlier than mine (my turmor was 4.5 cm..shrunk to about half after chemo) that will give you a much better chance of never seeing it again.  The sad thing is there is no amount of years that we who have had BC can say we're cured.  We want a cure!

  • lewing
    lewing Member Posts: 1,288
    edited February 2011

    Amen, Shirley: we need a cure.

    L

  • Ang7
    Ang7 Member Posts: 1,261
    edited February 2011

    Medigal~

    I had the same thought as Barbara.  They took out the cancer so...cancer free.

    My onc. does not do scans after...

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2011

    Exactly how did the US Supreme Court "SELL THE ELECTIONS" for the Corporations???????

    Very interesting statement.  What proof do you have of that?  Which corporations?  Do you have any articles, links??  I would be very interested

    THANKS

    E

  • Enjoyful
    Enjoyful Member Posts: 3,591
    edited February 2011

    Just when you thought it was safe to go into the water...

    *sigh*

Categories