Outraged by TSA
Comments
-
Check out We Won't Fly. Among other things they suggest that you contact your airports, airlines and hotels. The use of the TSA is NOT mandated. Some southeastern airports are already considering using private screeners. The only problem is that IF they have or get the scanners, the airports must use them, probably to cover the cost.
-
I'm grateful people take offense to this as a possible violation of our civil liberties. The point is not whether we can stand a pat down now, rather, the slow descent into more and more invasive procedures. For me, the cynicism is all about the lobbying the scanning company did to put them in place, and the fact they refuse to have an outside company provide us assurance of their safety (forget efficacy, that seems pretty questionable!)
I travel in countries with military presence in airports. I'm much less concerned about that than our insidious capitalistic use of fear,and as I've stated, I believe this is what we are talking about here. And from what I can see, breast cancer patients and survivors are being victimized by it.
-
Junie, I'm sorry but I just don't see where your healthy son's experience has any relevance to me, a breast cancer survivor with a breast prosthesis and an artificial knee. Anyone without medical devices can probably just breeze through, as your son did, and as my son and DIL will when they visit us for Christmas. Those of us with prosthetics will be groped even if we do walk through the machine, because they will want to investigate what shows up on the screen. I don't want to show a TSA agent "what's in my bra." Period. I don't want to have to take a prosthesis out of my carry-on and show it, either. So your son's experience is no more reassuring to me than the experience of my own DH, who flew to Chicago and back incident free a week ago. Both are healthy males without breast prostheses. Apples and oranges.
-
I've spent the last 2 hours reading all these posts! LOL
But I agree with so many of you. I tell my grandson, you must stand for justice, even if you are the only one standing.
This is a travesty. The TSA has way too much power and no checks. I hope there is a huge protest going on.
Seems to be our (USA) usual knee-jerk reaction. There are terrorist sleeper cells in our country. There are many, many ways to display an attack, besides flying a plane. We have cargo planes that are not being watched. i.e. UPS, FEDX and other carriers. We have water supplies that could be contaminated. We have airborne virus's that could be let loose. I would have to agree that the "terrorists" are just laughing it up over our meager attempt to plug a hole that can't be plugged.
I will not be going through a scanner. And I will request a private screening with a female attendant. But like the chef/server that would spit or worse in your food if you aggrevate them, what's to stop an agent from taking their time to come "frisk" you so that you don't make your flight. What's it to them?
Thanks for all the articles and opinions.
-
Back to the subject of rads. This is a concern and on Wednesday this week I'm due for my annual check-up with my rad.onc. I plan to ask about the full body scans and the TSA claims about the minimal exposure. My rad onc is an assistant prof at Harvard. I think she might have some opinions. I'll let you all know what I learn on Wednesday.
I did travel recently and before I realized what was happening I was in the scanner! When I began to think about it, I became more and more upset. I'm already VERY well done from rads!
I'm glad I like where I live. I think my frequent flying days may be over.
Blessings
-
I just spent about 1/2 hour writing my senators and representatives. This is probably the most important thing you can do, these folks answer to us on these issues. Please spend some time tonight writing emails or calling the House and Senate. I spoke at length about how these new techniques unnecessarily victimize people with special needs and devices.
-
MHP70, I'm with you on that!
For anyone needing a little help fueling the anger: http://networkedblogs.com/bb5Ri
I loved the comment, I'm getting tired of reporting TSA abuse. This was even before the new guidelines from what I can tell. Just had this conversation with someone at work "we didn't have any trouble this weekend!" I just shook my head and asked if he didn't realize TSA had softened over Thanksgiving to try and stem the controversy. I'm really afraid if we don't all write letters and let our feelings be known we'll be stuck with this egregiousness permanently.
-
Scuttlers I'm LOL at your black body-underwear idea, that's been just my thought too if i ever have to fly during this "security" fiasco. Last time I wore a black catsuit (shimmying seductively down a spotlit theatre ramp to the tune of "The Minute you Walked through the Door, derrrum, I could See you were a Man of Distincton, a real Big Spender... Hey BIg Spender.. Spend a little Time with Me") it was a high-school assembly when i was 15 and it brought the house down, sadly not because of my stunning figure as i didn't have one, but because i was such a well-known tomboy... ah, the memories! Now, where does one buy a catsuit in my present size I wonder, at sites that my family-friendly filter won't block?!
-
I emailed my senators and congressman this morning.
I thought you all might get a kick over this.
www.fastcodesign.com then look for Sign of the Times Metallic-Inked Undies Give TSA the Constitutional Middle Finger It is very tongue in cheek and I think clever.
-
Thanks, Madalyn. I was worried about that, too.
-
Sherri,
I'm buying that shirt, thanks for the link, the irony!
-
Well, I saw my rad onc. and I'm not sure I'm any more secure or informed about the dangers of backscanners at the airports. My rad onc gave me the quote the government has been saying. "The output of radiation is minimal." When I suggested to my rad onc that that is what we are being "told" should we "believe what we are being told?" she really didn't have a response.
My conclusion is until the government is a little more upfront about devulging information about the rad output from the machines being used, THEY are "suspect"! Why should they refuse to release information about this?
I've got a hunch the "would be terrorists" are laughing their "underware" off watching from the sidelines at the financially ridiculous chaos they what successfully created.
-
Last Sunday (I believe it was Sunday) a doc on one of the "cable" shows was asked, in an e-mail from a viewer, if the scanners were "dangerous".. he went to great lengths to say that, first there were other scanners that could be used and are being used at a few airports and then that the radiation that the scanners emit was "very low - when compared to CT's and standard X-rays".. He then went on to say that he and his wife fly "quite a bit" and they "always" opt out of scanners and have the TSA use the hand wand or the pat down.. Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth!!!! I think it is safe to say he has no intention of exposing himself and his loved ones to the minimal amounts of radiation! That told me everything I needed to know - still won't be flying!
-
Well, that's interesting. If they are safe, what 's his problem with going through them.
Thanks for the post, Deirdre.
Blessings...
-
Here's a link to the most interesting article I've seen about radiation risk associated with the backscatter X-ray machines: "Monday, November 22, 2010: Review of the TSA X-ray backscatter body scanner safety report: hide your kids, hide your wife"
http://myhelicaltryst.blogspot.com/2010/11/tsa-x-ray-backscatter-body-scanner.html
I cannot vouch for the accuracy of what the guy says; but he sure says it convincingly. There is no way I'm getting in one of those things.
otter
-
I am very upset by the body scans and pat downs. It is an invasion of your person and sexually abusive. Noone has the right to view your body or touch you in a sexual manner unless it is your spouse. and maybe your doctor for examination purposes. I will not fly anywhere if I am to be so abused.
-
-
MJLToday: I HOOTED with laughter when I saw this!!! Hysterical.
Obviously, this is a serious topic, but for me, humor helps!
Thanks for sharing.
Julie
-
Seriously, that cartoon sums it up pretty nicely!
-
SherriG: Gotta love it!
-
Well, I flew TPA to RDU yesterday and this time they did not 'select' me for the wave scanner. On to LA on Monday. Then back to TPA Friday.
-
hi ladies, loving that cartoon!
Again, tho, this is really exaggerated....no one is getting groped inside of their clothes...it is a big old feel up session tho. Some of them are rougher, some very tentative, and barely make contact. My buddy who hops the pond to britain every week says it's in no way invasive, the worst that she's gotten is someone who sort of lifted up her boobs, but no one goes into your pants or bra. She's yell rape if they did. Asked a shrink friend about kids; she suggested that the mom be with the child and explain that this is OK because of the bad people that want to hurt folks on planes and that hide weapons. That this type of touching is alright IF mom or dad is with you. (Not that it is, but if you want to take your child to Disneyworld, and you don't want the scanner, it is something to try)
We just saw Dr. Rosenfeld on TV talking about the radiation emitted from the wands and scanners....he says you are subjected to far more radiation in the first 15 minutes of any flight.
Since I am already well baked, that's rather good to know........
-
The truth is, I'm sure these machines don't put us at any more risk than our laptops, for instance. But that's not the point. The refusal to release credible information on their safety is reason enough we should all be standing up and saying NO. I will be opting out, and plan to allow more time for flights in order to do so. Security is already a miserable experience,what's another 1/2 hour.
-
Not to pick on Presbyterians, but . . . yes, I *am* worried about radical Presbyterians (and others) blowing up planes and buildings.
And I'm very worried about profiling.
L
-
Even if we are all to believe the various claims regarding how much (or how little) radiation one is exposed to in these machines, what happens when a machine malfunctions? Who are we trusting to ensure that all the equipment is working properly. There have been all kinds of issues with machines giving off too much radiation and no one knowing until the damage has been done. There is no risk of that while you are flying or going about normal business. Here you are standing in a machine and being zapped by an entity that can in no way assure you that the machine will not cause you harm. If you look at the statements put forth regarding safety, they usually include words along the lines of "no known harm." It's the unknown that's worrisome.
And, no, I also do not think it's okay to tell my children that it's acceptable for someone to touch them all over their bodies looking for something dangerous. Where does it end? There are schools in NY that already have metal detectors. Are body scanners and patdowns next? - all in the name of "safety?"
-
While I had a lumpectomy and do not wear a prosthesis, this whole issue is infuriating on many levels. I flew to NY state this Thanksgiving, having bought a non-refundable ticket months ago. I decided I would opt out of the scanner if I was asked to go through it. That ended up not being an issue (I simply had to go through the metal detector). The part that would make me laugh if it weren't so infuriating is this...I dutifully put my 3 oz. or less liquids in the required ziplock bag and put it through the x-ray machine along with my other carry-on. I forgot that I had a FULL 20 ounce bottle of water in my purse. Did they catch it? NO. I only realized it was there after I was waiting at my gate and went into my purse for something else. Security theater at its best.
-
tsxtardust's post reminded me of a column in the New York Times a few days ago. The writer had to be patted down and forgot she had some loose change in her pockets, even after they asked if her pockets had been emptied and she said yes. They never noticed. So she decided to test the system. I forget the details, but she bought a few items, including a battery and put them in her pockets then exited the "sterile" area to go back through security. Did this a few times and even after several patdowns they never picked up any of the items in her pockets.
Saying this is "theater" is being kind to TSA. And the fact that so many Americans think this is what's going to make them safer on airplanes is scary...
-
I am off tomorrow for the Outer Banks where I am meeting up with SV, AmyJo and BarbA from this board and I am going to opt for the scanner since at this stage of the game I do not think the rads are going to affect me one way or another, I do not care if someone seems my naked image and I do not care if my rights are being violated. Since I have an artificial knee, pins and screws in my feet and toes, I always set off the alarm so was subject to the pat down and going over with the wand. I am just happy it takes less time and I am still able to travel and go places.
-
I guess I am going to be in the minority here. If that's the price of being safe, I'll pay it. I think I'd feel a lot more humiliated being in a plane that was blown up than I would being patted down. The lesser of two evils. JMO
With respect to the 4th amendment, I would think that the high court's interpretation might not be that those specific pat downs fall into the realm of "unreasonable" searches. And interestingly enough, polls taken across the country indicated that the majority of Americans did not have a problem with the screening and/or pat downs if it meant keeping them safer - which obviously they believe it does.
-
Two Harvard Law students are suing the TSA over the constitutionality of the scans and searches:
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team