Node Question-So confusing

Options
Pure
Pure Member Posts: 1,796
edited June 2014 in Stage III Breast Cancer

So some of us had lots of nodes removed ( i had something like 28 removed with 12 pos)

So of course I am stage 3c.

But others only had 8 or 9 rmoved with lets say half of those being positive. They could NEVER be stage 3 c b-c they didn't even have 10 or more nodes to remove.

So is it the amount of nodes or is it the percentage of nodes.

 I do remember when my doc told me how many nodes I had she said the good news was that they were small and self contained and not brimming to the tol.

«1

Comments

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited July 2010

    Hi Pure,

    It's the number of positive nodes, not the number removed, or its a tumor greater than 5cm with any positive nodes.  Or it can be the location of the positive nodes ie. supraclavicular or infra-mammary.  Or it can be the condition of the positive nodes ie. clumped and matted together etc.  Any one of these factors can result in a Stage 3 dx.  So yes someone with less than 10 positive nodes can still be Stage 3.

    Here is a good link on staging:

    http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/Patient/page2

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited July 2010

    no I guess what I m saying is some women only have 9 nodes removed so they could never be stage 3 b-c they didn't have 10 or nodes to remove in the first place.

  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited July 2010

    yes I was wondering do some women only have 8 nodes?

  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010
    I think I belong in the case! At the time of my SN removal my surgeon noticed that I had more than the SN affected as he saw a cluster of affected nodes. He removed the whole cluster. In total the path report showed 8 were removed and were ALL positive (8/8+). One was 3cm-that's a frickin tumor!!! This was my first Q as I was concerned that more positive cells could have been left behind. I would have felt better knowing 8+/16 nodes (removed). Just knowing that all 8 were affected made be worry more could still be inside of me. My surgeon told me that NOT everyone has the same amount of nodes under their arm. They are trained to take out all the nodes that they can see. The path reports sorts out which are negative or not. So someone could have 43 nodes (positive or neg) and someone else can have 10 nodes (positive or neg). Should there have been some stragglers (nodes) NOT seen at the time of surgery -(which there could have been) the hope is that chemo and rads will do their job! My surgeon was against going back in to "see" if there were more nodes left behind-as that is what they do in the first surgery. He went on to say that there is a higher risk of perm. SE's as nerve endings are involved with the affected arm and he did not want to take that chance. He is confident that what he saw at the time of the initial surgery -all nodes were removed, but as we know nothing is guaranteed. So on paper I am a Stage 3A but could quite possibly be a 3C. Personally, I don't really think it makes a difference as my treatment at dx-would have been the same either way and my prognosis is the same regardless. So I could worry about it or just try to move on and live my life. I am trying to do the latter.
  • Pure
    Pure Member Posts: 1,796
    edited July 2010

    Its funny I am almot a year out and I feel like I am coming out the fog and shock and now have questions:) I  see my doc next week so I will ask. I swear sometimes I am paranoid they didn't tell me everything.

  • krcll
    krcll Member Posts: 343
    edited July 2010

    I have a friend that had 8/8 nodes positive too. They assured her that they took out all the nodes. She has had a hard time knowing that 100% were positive. My impression is that there can be huge differences as to how many nodes each person has.

    I did read a study somewhere (but I think it was old) that made the case that the percentage of nodes is also important, but I haven't heard anything more about it.

    That I had a lymph node that was "extra-capsular" (2 mm.) I know wasn't good- I guess it shows how much "on the move" my cancer was. So I do think there are lots of different factors that play a role.

    I think that there are just so many factors that affect prognosis and they just don't really know how important each factor is yet. I just read about 2 identical twins that were very close (studied and worked together) that got the same kind of cancer at the same time. They got the same treatment and one is fine and the other got mets. It is a crap shoot....

  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010

    Pure-What is it that worries or confuses you? You know how many of your nodes were removed and how many were positive as well?

    Sherri-You answered my Q about "extra-capsular" today on another thread -is this what krcll-is referring too-when a node is increased in size (2mm). So with one of my nodes (bing 3cm) in size, I would have also likely had extra-capsular? right??? I have never been given a copy of my path report (yet). I have only read the Onc's consultation reports that was sent to my (work-benefit company). I copied and read these (limited reports) before mailing them out. I was told that I would have to pay $50.00 to get copies of a limited amount of paperwork (path report, reports of scans). Once the $50.00 was covered I would have to pay another $50.00 and have a credit -until it again runs out for copies of my reports. I just haven't been bothered to shell out that kind of $ (yet) but I will one of these days. But I am also one of those people that get caught up in detail-and reading my reports I will GET caught up on every terrifying term and have it tatooed in my mind forever!!!

  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010
    krcll- I have also been trying to find articles about identical twin sisters as I am an identical twin. My twin (does not have bc-thankfully) but she is being watched closely by a breast specialist so is my mom b-c I was diagnosed at 38. My twin recently told me that the breast specialist told her that based on her risk assessment she was not in a higer risk category-just b-c I had bc. The only difference that I can contribute my bc is that I had not had children or breast fed before the age of 30.  So I am really curious what is involved with the questionnaire risk assessment that she uses. My twin and I grew up in the same environment, lived only 15 minutes apart and had similar "lifestyles". I have been tested for BRAC1 & BRAC2 in May/10 but in Canada it will take 10-12 months to find out the results.
  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010
    krcll-What does the percentage of the nodes mean? I think I read that someone else posted a "reference" to this as well but it was not given any further explanation.
  • Medigal
    Medigal Member Posts: 1,412
    edited July 2010

    I appreciate reading that link a poster sent about nodes.  I learned a lot.  However, can someone tell me what is the difference between the Stage of a cancer and the Grade?.  I was never told what "Stage" or "Grade" I am.  It seems even my new Onc doesn't feel it's necessary for patients to know all this stuff.  I have tried to figure things out by what I have read from you knowledgeable gals.  So if there is a difference between "stage" and "grade" can you let me know or send me a link to where I can educate myself further.  Thanks!

  • lvtwoqlt
    lvtwoqlt Member Posts: 6,162
    edited July 2010

    medigal, I would ask your onc for copies of all pathology reports and start a file with them. it will help you research your specific cancer.

    Grade: tells you how much the tumor cells look different from normal cells  They usually know the grade after the inital biopsy. http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/path_report/the_cancer/grade.jsp 

    Stage: is based on the size of the tumor, whether the cancer is invasive or non-invasive, whether lymph nodes are involved, and whether the cancer has spread beyond the breast. They don't know the stage until after main surgery (lump or mast). http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/diagnosis/staging.jsp

    Sheila

  • Leah_S
    Leah_S Member Posts: 8,458
    edited July 2010

    Frankie, I think extra-capsular means the cancer has broken out of the node ( the "capsule") into the surrounding tissue. The node can have a 3 cm tumor (one of mine had a tumor almost 2 cm) but be enlarged but unbroken. Don't know the significance of one or the other, though.

    Leah

  • diana50
    diana50 Member Posts: 2,134
    edited July 2010

    all i know is my surgeon told me that even tho he only got 12...and i had 10 totally encased...he was pretty sure i had more positive nodes then what came up on the surgery and pathology report.

  • krcll
    krcll Member Posts: 343
    edited July 2010

    Frankie- I had one node that grew 2 mm. outside the capsule and into the surrounding fat. As I understand it, that means that the cancer had gotten out of the lymph node and could theoretically be on its way somewhere. I don't know HOW bad it is, just that it is better not to have an extra-capsular node. As Leah and Sherri mention, you could have a large lymph node that is still contained in the node. You can just ask at your next appointment with the onc.

    The study I read about node percentages was asking the question whether having a higher percentage of nodes with cancer is more indicative of prognosis than just the number of nodes (as it is now with the staging system). For example, Pure had 12 of 28 nodes with cancer, or 43% of her nodes. She is staged IIIc because she had over 10 nodes with cancer. But I had 9 of 13 nodes cancerous, which is 69%, but I am staged IIIa because I had under 10 nodes with cancer. If they really did take out all our nodes and Pure just happened to be a person with lots of nodes maybe she should be staged with a better prognosis than me since under half of her nodes were affected. I think it is an interesting theory and I wonder how many studies there have been done. I certainly would prefer to have had 9 of 28 nodes affected instead of 9/13 but then again I would prefer not to have gotten cancer in the first place....

    The twins I read about were in a Norwegain paper, so it wasn't anything scientific. Frankie, that is surprising that your twin sister doesn't have any higher risk for BC even though you have it. That is good to hear. 

    It kind of gave me the willy-nillies to write about the details of my lymph nodes again. I was completely obessessed for a long time about every single detail of my path report and what it meant. I kind of thought that everyone with 2 or 3 fewer nodes than me had a MUCH better prognosis and whew! I didn't have 10 nodes because that would be IIIc and MUCH worse. It just isn't like that- cancer doesn't read a path report or know what stage it is. Who knows why some women without any affected nodes get mets or women with 28 nodes do just fine? All those little details- percents, extra-capsular, numbers of nodes, size of tumor, etc- that the doctors have to do lots of scientific studies on to try to unravel the cancer puzzle are just sketchy predictions of which cancers might come back or spread. We each have our own way of understanding and tackling our path reports and mostly I've managed to get to a place where my worries are less theoretical and more practical. I try to think that until cancer gets in my way again (that I have a very clear symptom or a test comes back positive) then I don't have cancer anymore. I know this is said often but it bears repeating- it doesn't really matter if your recurrance risk is 65% or 70% because for every person it ends up either 100% or 0%. Until someone tells me otherwise, mine is 0%....

  • jacee
    jacee Member Posts: 1,384
    edited July 2010

    My BS told me every woman has a different amount of nodes in the Level 1 and 2 node chains. She said she's seen as few as 9 and as many as 29. Can really make things confusing.

  • KittyDog
    KittyDog Member Posts: 1,079
    edited July 2010

    I only had 5 nodes removed and 1 was positive.  I asked my BS why he didn't remove more and his reply was there was none left to remove.  I had chemo first and chemo destroyed the rest of the nodes.  I am stage 3b because of the size of my tumor.  Before chemo it was 10cm. After chemo it was 5cm mostly made up of scar tissues with a few scattered cancer cells.  So yes chemo did wonders to my tumor. 

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited July 2010

    Yeah, my surgeon said the same - no two sets of lymph nodes are the same.  If you go by %, my 5 out of 32 looks pretty good at 16%, but if you add in the extracapsular invasion (though not sure with how many) and the 2.6 cm tumor in one of my nodes, it's not so good.  Maybe just a little fully-contained cancer in twice as many nodes would be better?  It probably just depends on exactly how each individual lymph system was set up, you know?  The classification system seems crude when you really look at all the possibilities, but I guess they need to start somewhere.

  • jenn3
    jenn3 Member Posts: 3,316
    edited July 2010

    I had 4/15, a 3cm, 4cm, micro mets and extra capsular and was told that extra capsular meant it was leaving the nodes. 

  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010

    Thanks ladies for your info. Geesh....thought I needed big gloves for this fight already for...large tumor, HER2+, node involvement, vascular invasion and now I am not even sure about this new term I just learned from you ladies (EC)??? At this point I 'm not sure I wanna know if I have this to add to my list! By the looks of the node %  8/8+ guess I am looking at 100%. Guess it is what it is...and It will be what it will be. CANCER SUCKS!!!

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited July 2010

    Hang in there Frankie.  From a 23/23 positive nodes gal who also had multiple EC nodes and will be 5 years out in Nov this year, I know how scary all this stuff can be.  Keep on those fighting gloves and give it all you got!  Many, many women with some pretty heavy Stage III dx are doing great and around many years later to tell it!

  • Frankie_
    Frankie_ Member Posts: 422
    edited July 2010

    Thanks Sherri and LindaLou for your words of encouragment!!! I don't mean to be a "Debbie Downer"-but the past few days have been really hard. Just lost a friend (44) to a 4 year battle with Stage 4-Colon Cancer.  I also had a follow-up MRI -at my request to look at my spine (due to conflicting CT Scan and Bone Scans) that were done in April. Had the MRI Thursday afternoon-so I am expecting a call from my Onc's office any day now with results. Scared and frightend!

  • clariceak
    clariceak Member Posts: 752
    edited July 2010

    Frankie - it's scary to see a path report that seems get look worse and worse as you read down.  I read mine once and I will not look at it again.  I decided that the intricate details of the path report had no bearing on my treatment.  Like you, I had vascular invasion and I had a mammary node and the usual lymph nodes and large tumor.  Obviously, they decided to give me the strongest treatment my body could handle.  My scans were clear and my tumor markers are down.

    Just focus on making any lifestyle changes to keep it away. From your pic, you look like you're at a fantastic weight for preventing a reoccurance. 

     I'm so sorry about losing your friend.  That must have so hard for you on many different levels.  Wishing you a clear scan.

  • karen1956
    karen1956 Member Posts: 6,503
    edited July 2010

    My BS did an axillary dissection at the time of mastectomy as we knew that there was node involvement from MRI and 2nd round of biopsies....don't know how many nodes were take at the biopsy as don't understand all the goobly gook in the path report...BS said she was only taking the 1st layer of lymph nodes (we have 3 layers) to help reduce the risk of LE... I had 8/12 positive nodes....she said that we all have different amounts of lymph nodes in each layer....we asked onc about this.....what if more nodes were positive but not taken out since only 1st layer taken....he said that it did not matter since I did chemo and rads and probably got them all with both of those....I am 4 years since finishing chemo and still NED.....it is all so confusing....I've tried doing some of the "calculators" and they just confuse me more.....before MX, I was stage 2B, after MX, stage 3A because of the number of positive nodes....just re-read my pathology report from both biopsies and Mx and cancer was ILC and IDC with ALH andf ADH.....none of the tumors were large in themselves, but the number of tumors in the breast is what added up...I was staged 3A....one more positive node would have been 3B....does that really matter????  My onc has given me all the Tx that were available....bilat, TAC chemo, rads, ooph, AI's (only stayed on for    3 1/2 years...taking a break right now for almost 4 months),,,while on AI's I also took Actonel...onc believes that the Actonel gives a lot of benefit and does not think that Zometa is necessary....since I have no desire to be in the infusion room....I have not pushed the issue....I'm bad as I stopped the Actonel when I stopped the AI's......but I take my Vit D.....Jenn...sorry that I got off topic.....the whole BC journey just stinks.....

  • paml
    paml Member Posts: 81
    edited July 2010

    Hi Girls,

    Oddly enough, I am stage 3B because I had a tiny tumor under the skin. ( very small)

    Only had 2 lymph nodes involved and tumor was a 5.5 cm which is only a half cm over. Its that one stinking tumor under the skin that gave me this stage. This disease sure is bizarre.

  • kimber3006
    kimber3006 Member Posts: 586
    edited July 2010

    Frankie - I'm so sorry about your friend.  I'll be praying for clean scan results for you!

  • amlg1
    amlg1 Member Posts: 596
    edited July 2010

    Well I am a 31+ node gal out of 34.I am stage 111c.I  can remember leaving the Dr.office in a fog.OMG I never saw anyone on this site with so many positive nodes.In hindsite,I am blessed my surgeon scooped out all my nodes,because she said they just didn"t feel right.I did find out after,everyone does have a different amount of nodes.

    The thing that scares me so much is my er-/pr-/Her+,with ILC,which is very rare.You girls are so uplifting,and so helpful.God Bless All !

  • AnacortesGirl
    AnacortesGirl Member Posts: 1,758
    edited July 2010

    Karen's BS described it the same as my BS.  After all my scans were done during my initial dx the recommendation was to remove levels 1 & 2 when it came time for surgery.  It's actually a "on the fly" decision when the surgeon has a chance to actually see the nodes and determine what needs to be removed and what is OK to leave behind.  Levels 1 & 2 are under the armpit and relatively easy to get to.  Level 3 is up and towards the chest and underneath a muscle.  My BS told me that she uses her fingers to feel the clump and determine if they need to be removed.  But because it would involve muscle damage she doesn't take them out unless she strongly feels it necessary.  But it's the rads that takes care of the issues with any cancer that's in the fat (from the EC) or left behind in a node.  That's why we get zapped in the entire breast area, under the arm and the clavicle area.

    It was also a piece of trivia that I remember her saying that the highest number of nodes that they've seen at SCCA was 55. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2010

    Pure, I don't think it's the amount of nodes removed that determines 3C,  I had 18 nodes removed with 2 being positive for cancer.  I copied and pasted the 3C criteria from breastcancer.org below:

    Stage IIIC describes invasive breast cancer in which:

    • there may be no sign of cancer in the breast or, if there is a tumor, it may be any size and may have spread to the chest wall and/or the skin of the breast, AND
    • the cancer has spread to lymph nodes above or below the collarbone, AND
    • the cancer may have spread to axillary lymph nodes or to lymph nodes near the breastbone

    image

    Barb

  • yellowfarmhouse
    yellowfarmhouse Member Posts: 279
    edited July 2010

    HI Frankie,  I'm thinking of ya tonight. I'm so sorry you are feeling this way.  At my one year mark, I lost a dear friend and it hit me so hard... I was crying for days and really losing hope that I'd be OK.  My kids were very small at the time.  I'm sorry for bringing up abourt percentage of nodes... I think that there is a lot they just don't know about this awful disease... they really need to study it more as often this disease doesn't "follow the rules" .  I try to remember that we went through the hard treatments and that we do what we can and then go from there... I still spend time worrying and then I regret that I do that.  It helped me a lot to go to a retreat for survivors--- they are held in Wisconsin-- Breast Cancer Recovery Foundation.  They even paid my way for me as I couldn't afford to go otherwise.  I met women there who had all stages of dx ( 1-4) and yet were living their lives -- they all gave me encouragement and strength.  They have flags waving made by women who have gone to previous retreats and just the site of that was awesome.  Wishing you peace and joy...

    Wendy

  • sonochick
    sonochick Member Posts: 3
    edited July 2010

    I, too am having Chemo first.  I have large lymph nodes > 3 cm, clumped together.  Also the MRI showed multiple nodes under the arm.  Your report gives me courage.  I want to just have surgery and get it out! 

Categories