Vitamin C infusion....I need your help!

Options
2»

Comments

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited September 2009

    deni63

    Thanks for posting those articles.  The first one is interesting and sounds credible.  The second one starts getting into the controversial Dr. Simoncini and his assertion that cancer is a fungus and can be cured by baking soda.  Can't say I find much to recommend his way of thinking.

  • deni63
    deni63 Member Posts: 601
    edited September 2009

    Hi Timothy - I just think that when you are dealing with cancer, you need to do everything you can to ensure that you prevent a recurrence. There is much that we can do to help ourselves. Talking to a nutritionist who specializes in nutrition for cancer is a good idea. This can really help you to feel comfortable about the food choices that you make in order to maximize your immune system and help you to fight this disease. If there is a strong controversy that something could be harmful and counterproductive, why take a chance? I know that I don't. Best of luck.

  • rpailleret
    rpailleret Member Posts: 47
    edited September 2009

    deni63 makes a good point!!!

  • LJ13-2
    LJ13-2 Member Posts: 235
    edited September 2009

    Natural news is a completely bogus source. Is that where you learned that sugar "feeds" cancer?

    You don't need a nutritionist to understand cellular metabolism. Read Motheroffour's post again.

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited September 2009

    My wife and I have an appointment with a Naturopathic Doctor tomorrow.  We will listen to his suggestions, and do our own research on what he recommends as to whether is has sufficient benefit to risk.

  • deni63
    deni63 Member Posts: 601
    edited September 2009

    Timothy - that is good. Best of luck at your appointment tomorrow!

  • seaofhope
    seaofhope Member Posts: 66
    edited September 2009

    Great, easy to understand article.  So it is excess insulin that may be the culprit.  Very interesting.  It also supports the idea of moderation.  I don't know about you ladies, but the minute I tell myself I can't have something, the more I have uncontrollable urges for it!  Kind of like that hard-to-get boy in highschool!  Moderation is achievable if you don't obsess about food.  Mostly vegies, whole grains, and protein, balanced with good fats.  Sugar as an occasional treat, not forbidden. And it has to be good to be worth it (think Ben and Jerrys, not frozen yogurt). Just my two cents.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2009

    prettyinpink - that was a good article.  This thread caught my eye as some breast cancer survivors that I meet with were discussing this sugar and cancer connection. 

    Now, I have low blood sugar - tested when I was first diagnosed.  Yet, I got breast cancer.  I am wondering why  more diabetics don't have cancer - or at least I have never read a corralation between diabetes and cancer.  Does anyone know if there is one?  I would think they would be at a higher risk.  

    I find it very interesting that a diabetic drug is in trial for breast cancer.  I am trying to stay away from simple sugars and processed foods as well buying organic meat and produce.  

    Sea of hope - I'm with you - it has GOT to be a good quality treat if I have one.  

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited September 2009

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's type I diabetes where the body fails to produce insulin, and then there is type II diabetes where the body may be less sensitive to insulin.   So if there is a correlation between diabetes and cancer, it could well depend on the type of diabetes.

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited September 2009

    PiP  -thanks for sharing that website.  My GP had explained it all to me but chemobrain let it go in one ear and out the other without being fully absorbed!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2009

    TImothy - good point.  I was referring to type II diabetes (the type that can be controlled with a low sugar/low carb diet).  It would seem to me that since they have elevated blood sugar they should have a higher rate of cancer.  The test they give you (when you are pregnant they test for this) is a blood glucose test. 

    Diabetes is such a huge issues in the USA - and, like many things on the rise.  I would think that is a well studied group of patients.

  • carol1949
    carol1949 Member Posts: 562
    edited October 2009

    University of Utah's cancer center  also has research which indicates a sugar/cancer connection.

  • motheroffoursons
    motheroffoursons Member Posts: 333
    edited October 2009

    Just want to say something about sugar/cancer connection.  Yes, rapidly growing cells, like cancer cells, use extra amounts of glucose.  This is the whole basis for various scans, to determine the spots that use extra glucose.  A molecule similar to glucose with a radioactive marker is what is seen on the scans.  This shows areas of increased glucose uptake.

    However, the glucose in the blood is maintained at relatively constant levels unless you have diabetis I or II.  Certain medicines can also affect glucose levels.

    So, even if you have cancer, your body controls the level.  Cuttings carbs or sugars will cause the body to obtain glucose from other sources such as proteins or fats through several metabolic pathways.  Excess glucose is stored glycogen in the liver, and if extra energy is available, fat is formed.Cry  So, even in cancer patients, the glucose is taken at a higher rate by the cancer cells, but the body would still maintain glucose levels in the blood stream. 

    I just went online to examine the information from the Huntsman Cancer Center in Utah.  The article does NOT say sugar feeds cancers.  It indicates that an amino acid, glutamine, is responsible for cancer cells absorbing extra amounts of sugars.  Hopefully they will develop a therapy that the glutamine will be unable to trigger the absorbtion of glucose via the pathway currently used.

    In other words, sugar is not the culprit.  The culprit is to find the metabolic pathways of sugar absorption in cancer cells, and slow it down.

    The scientific information can be verified by any good college biology text or basic biochemistry text.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited October 2009

    That was an excellent explanation of the things I have read.  You said it  much better than they did.  Thanks.

  • tripleplaymomma
    tripleplaymomma Member Posts: 1
    edited October 2009

    Hi there, I was also seen at Sloan-Kettering (2nd opinion) but had all my surgery, chemo (for stage 4 b.c.mets to liver and bone). FYI, they do have an online Integrative site where you can plug in all your supplements and get info. regarding how they affect (good or bad) your specific situation. I will go there when I read about something new. A sight I cannot recommend highly enough is Crazy, Sexy, Cancer led by Kris Karr. Get her books, go online..she has SO MUCH great practical advice and a wonderful online community. What I do: went through chemo, have monthly zometa, no sugar, LOTS of fresh green juice, lots of heavy breathing/excersise. I love spinning but also walk. Lots of supplements including raw vitamin C, quercenase, grapeseed, curcummin, cod liver oil etc, etc., no wheat or dairy. I pray constantly!  Also a fan of going with your gut. God Bless!!

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited October 2009

    Back on the subject of Vit C infusions, we saw the Naturopathic Doctor.  He had several recommendations for my wife, Vit C infusions, Helixor (mistletoe) and some detox formulas.  Now since my wife has finished her treatments for stage 3A and shows, NED, I have to admit I am afraid of the potential downside of the Vit C infusions.  All the studies I can find refer to it as part of treatment for someone with cancer, and not as part of adjuvent therapy to prevent recurrance.  This makes me very hesitant.  The theory is that high enough levels of Vit C form peroxides, and healthy cells can break down the peroxides, but cancer cells lack that ability and are selectively killed.  But, my question is, what does it do to the healthy cells?  Is there any long term study of those treated to show it has no ill effects down the line?  My gut instict is that this should only be done if it is beneign, or the benefits outway the risks.  Anyone know better?

  • Husband11
    Husband11 Member Posts: 2,264
    edited October 2009

    One more thing, its not cheap.  Say $125 per infusion, weekly for 6 months or more. 

  • 1dad1life
    1dad1life Member Posts: 1
    edited November 2009

    Hi there, I was on here looking for information about IV C and saw this post about Issels Treatment Center, Yes I know about this place, I have been there with my father, he had melanoma which spread to his lungs, after his 4 week treatment at Issels his cancer was completely gone!

    Please message me if you still want information about it. It wasnt actually my intention to join this board but as I saw your post, I decided to reply.

     So, now I am here. all I am really looking for is where to get IVC near Winnipeg, Canada for a friend who's mum has cancer, if anyone can recommend places to get IVC in or near Canada that would be a huge help

    Thanks

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited November 2009

    Vitamin C infusions do not "feed" cancer.  In fact, it is used by integrative oncologists to shrink tumors.  The National Institutes of Health actually published a study in which high dose IV C was shown to kill cancer cells.

    Noble Prize winner, Dr Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, said that the cure for cancer lies in the mechanism of sugan metabolism.  Glycolysis.  All cancer uses sugar as it's fuel to grow at tremendous speed.  For your doctor to encourage you to consume sugar is, excuse me, ill advised.  You need to pick up a few choice books that address the need to approach this disease with a nutritional and lifestyle assist that integrates your medical care.  They will help you intuit and see what suits you.  

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited November 2009

    What is quercenase?  Is it quercetin and enzymes?

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited November 2009

    The "relatively constant levels" is the problem.  High glycemic food will increase insulin levels.  Insulin is one of the pathways that favors cancer, particularly breast cancer.  Also, there are actually wide variances in the amount of sugar circulating in the bloodstream.  You want to stay at low tolerances if you have cancer. 

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited November 2009

    Studies contradict this, but the bulk of evidence is that diabetes increase risk of malignancy.  Metformin, which lowers circulating blood sugar, is being studied for it's affect on cancer recurrence and risk reduction.

  • MsBliss
    MsBliss Member Posts: 536
    edited November 2009

    My understanding is that prolonged increased insulin levels, correlate with increased recurrence and primary risk.  Insulin provides pathways for stem cell propagation, including cancer stem cells and mets.

Categories