The Respectfully Republican Conversation

Options
1201202204206207252

Comments

  • ibcspouse
    ibcspouse Member Posts: 613
    edited January 2009

    I am honored, as the token male on this thread, to be agreed with 1% of the time would be an achievement.  The Resolution Trust worked, I agree, but it worked also by closing things like Silverado S & L and prosecuting the corrupt ones and firing the inept ceo's.  In this case with the bailout, the ceo's are either remaining or getting huge parachutes.  If you create a Toxic Asset Bank, don't leave the weasels in the hen house.  Remake Fannie and Freddie into the toxic holding company.  I have suggested before, to take the foreclosure mortgages and allow the people who own these properties to rebuy the reduced mortgages.  In exchange the "Toxic Bank" would maintain a 50% owner in the appreciable equity of the home.  If the market improves and the owner sells the home is a few years, he gets one half the equity and the bank gets half.  This would be a way to help people stay in their homes without punishing the people who worked hard and made sacrifices to maintain there good loans.  It is not fair that if two people with the same income have the same type mortgage, one eats out and buys new cars and run big bills up and is rewarded with a lower mortgage than the one who did the right thing. 

    This way, there would some chance of helping the market by limiting the foreclosure homes hitting the market, and allow for the bailout money to be recouped.  The same thing can be done with new home buyers.  If they are credit worthy, a half equity ownership loan can be used to allow people to buy.  Hell, seems I am becoming a "lets put the government in the banking, insurance and real estate business" kind of person.  How do I get to the other thread? 

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited January 2009

    You can go to Rush Limbaugh's website and sign a counter petition.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    I can understand refurbishing the grass on the national mall, but seed costs a small fraction of the cost of sod, and while it takes several weeks for grass to come in as opposed to days to install the sod, what is the hurry...it's the middle of winter.  I suspect that should be an ongoing item in the park budget, not an item in an economic stimulus bill. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    And, it should be paid for with funds that the District already has ...  People live in DC and their taxes should be paying for it, not us. I know DC is the home of our capital but this is not economic stimulus, lawn is an appearance thing, "dressing" ..... talk about lipstick on a pig!!!!

  • suzfive
    suzfive Member Posts: 456
    edited January 2009

    Do you think the grass on the mall might need to be replaced after the masses stomped all over it last week at the "coronation" - didn't they budget for that? Oops - just like the trash removal - let someone else do it and pay for it.

    Heard the bill also contains $$ for smoking cessation. Looks like the Dems just want to get all their pork barrel projects through before the "ban' sets in (didn't PBO say that there would be no pork?) They think the people are so stupid we won't notice - after all Rangel said that the middle class is too busy trying to feed and clothe their children to notice anything else (in reference to Reich saying that the infrastructure jobs should NOT go to professionals or white male construction workers). With all the doom and gloom being spouted - yes people are afraid. I just want to know what bridges these non-professionals will be building/repairing so I won't have to drive over them!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    I vote for astroturf on the mall.  No maintainence.  LOL!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    This from another favorite writer:

    The election and inauguration of the "The One" as president was supposed to make the entire world love America, in what is now the eight-day-old "Golden Age of Obama".

    O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma! O-ba-ma!

    You remember all of that hooey.  One of the key reasons Obama's followers insisted he should be our 44th POTUS was because "the world hates America, and we need the world to love us again". And Obama was supposed to be the bridge to that unprecedented, unadulterated lovefest.

    Well, people in Yemen with guns never got that message, because they shot at the US embassy there again yesterday, for no apparent reason besides their all-consuming, unquenchable, pay-no-attention-to-whomever-is-POTUS, hatred of America.

    Apparently, they're working under directives of two Yemeni Al-Queda members who were held securely at Guantanamo Bay for some time, but were released recently (and immediately returned to Al-Queda as commanders to pick up where they left off).

    But, of course the 94 Yemeni terrorists currently being held in Guantanamo Bay's detention facility will never, ever in a million years become Al-Queda operatives or commanders once Obama closes the prison and deports them back to Yemen.

    According to Reuters:

    Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh said on Saturday he expected the repatriation soon of 94 Yemenis held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, adding that they would be living with their families at a center to undergo "rehabilitation ... to rid them of extremism" before being released.

    Because the plan is for Yemen to send all of those terrorists back home to their families for a spell, before letting them loose into the world again. Considering the fact Al-Queda members tend to be brothers, uncles, cousins, fathers, and sons, recruited from large extended families, sending former Guantanamo Bay detainees to be rehabilitated by living with these people is like sending Liza Minnelli to the Kennedy compound for rehab and detox, with Ted Kennedy as her sponsor and designated driver.

    That's zaniness that practically writes itself!

    ------------------

    There's proof right there that if these GIZMO detainees get released, they WILL be just like the pig returning to the mud.  Pigs love mud, they will always go back, it's their nature ... these terrorists have been trained, its been inculcated into their hearts and minds that they are doing the right thing ...  they believe that Allah approves of this. I don't see how "retraining" them is going to change their heart condition.

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited January 2009

    rbm,

     You bring up an interesting questions : why are liberals so angry not that they won. Could it be that they are actually afraid to fail with no one to blame as they also control the House as well? I mean all this change and hope and Wohooooo can only go so far. They will be judged in less than 2 years by people voting for Congress .

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Isn't it illegal to discriminate on the basis of gender/color?  I understand wanting to include traditionally underrepresented populations in the recovery, but for the government to exclude whole segments of people based on their gender, or color, or level of education seems the wrong way to go about it.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2009

    Did anyone see the news report on TV the other day about this "rehabilitation" program the Yemeni's had going?  It showed the Yemeni men that had been returned from Gitmo were doing craft projects and painting for their rehab?  Tim and I were laughing so hard.  What a joke.  And the one guy that was sent back was now one of the terrorist leaders involved in bombing the embassy in Yemen.

    I can't remember what station this report was aired on.

    I have no problem with the additional pork spending included in the stimulus package.  Many of those pork allocations keep states funded with needed money for worthwhile projects.  Of course ... not all of the pork is necessary and worthwhile.  Lowering the small business taxes will be a good thing. 

    The funds in the first stimulus pkg went to banks and investment firms.  That money just disappeared.  Credit and lending is just as bad now as it was in October.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Sherri, Pelosi blamed the October bailout on Reps ... even though the Dems are the ones that were behind this and Reps didn't want it ...  Whatever!!!!!!  The point is, now what?  Obama is supposed to be smarter, better and a good organizer ... let's pray we start seeing some of what he promised:  CHANGE.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    BinVA .. if the nation is going to fund a water park in FL, then it should be considered a National (Water) Park and rangers should be the lifeguards .. and then we, Americans, should collect the profits .. but the profit of this venture is going to be privatized ...it's not a city owned water park, is it?  Nope ...

  • vivre
    vivre Member Posts: 2,167
    edited January 2009

    Wow have you guys been chatty today. Took me a while to read it all!

    Mr Spouse, I think your idea of people buying back their mortgages is brilliant. It sounds much too logical for the pea brains in DC. And to your other comment about RFK, remember that BO's good buddy, the anarchist Ayers, dedicated his commie book to Sirhan Sirhan, the assassin.

    Rock,  I too  think the Kennedys are now toast. Caroline showed what a mindless twit she is. People saw her act as if she was better than everyone else, and they did not buy it. I think the clan will now fade into oblivion. No more camelot. And now maybe they can stop proclaiming the new era of Bamalot. No one is going to pay any attention to the Kennedys anymore. They are yesterday's news!

    Rock, about the BC. The one thing that I wondered was how was BHO allowed to travel to Pakistan in the 80's? American citizens were not allowed in, and there is no record that he had a US passport? Did he get in on an Indonesian passport? The other theory is that he was adopted by his stepfather. This goes back to the fact that he had to be a citizen of Indonesia to attend the school he went to there. If Obama would just put these facts out there, people would let it rest.

    I was listening to the radio in the car today. A congressman from VA was saying that there will be no Repubs in the house supporting the porkuous unstimulus package(RL defininition). He was saying that only about 6cents of every dollar will actually stimulate the economy. The rest is just a spending package. Rush is going to put a link on his website to show where the money is going. I also heard that the Senate vote will be tight too. It is losing support. The republicans know that the dems want them to sign off so they can get equal blame if it fails, which it will. There is no effort here for the dems to have bipartisianship. They just do not want to take the fall all by themselves. Fortunately, the GOP seems to be getting the message. This will be sinking ship that brings back the GOP in 2 years.

    That Victor Hansen was spot on. Do we have to expect BHO to go around the world now and apologize for America? That just allows the extremists to have more ammo. They can tell everyone "see, even the American president admits his country is evil". Also, if the fact that we now have a Muslim/Christian president is supposed to make the arab world like us, then why is it that the muslims have been fighting muslims for centuries?

    I hope they publicize this petition against Rush. Then maybe the MSM will start telling it the way he actually said it, instead of out of context. I went for a walk with my DH this weekend and he said he could not believe he heard that Limbaugh said he wants Obama to fail. I about lost it! I explained to him that Rush really said he wanted him to fail from putting forth policies that are too liberal. I need to get my husband to stop listening to Brian Williams! LOL

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Right, Rush said he doesn't want Obama's plans to become a socialist country to succeed. He totally believes that Obama will take away the best of the American rights and our dreams and try to "spread" it to everyone.  Even my own daughter says everyone needs to work .. that we should not be taking care of others like we are forced to.  I am not saying that if you are out of work because of lay-offs that it makes you lazy or bad .. but certainly everyone can do something.  I know some people who milk the system and another girl I know is collecting unemployment and will be able to get it for a whole year ... as long as she continues in her school.  So she gets $1800 a month and is attending a 12-month course -- she will be able to be an accountant/bookkeeper when she is done. 

    I think too many people who don't pay taxes are going to get money back!!  That is wrong!!  Too many people commit fraud and it goes unpunished.  Too many people are doing nothing but if you were to video tape them, you'd see that they could do something .. I mean, tons of people are able to stay at home on the computer, what about working from home entering rebates or information that the government needs?  I think that welfare and disability are different than unemployment ... I think welfare and disability patients should be monitored and they should have to work (babysitting, typing, road cleaning, filing, jury duty) to get that check while being retrained.  Retraining should be mandatory (except for some disability patients -- I'd hate to see our Stage 4 girls having to work during the last years of their life!!!!!!!!!  Or someone in an iron lung being forced to babysit!!!!!!!!!!!)

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    OH - I totally agree Kel...the residents of DC SHOULD pay for it...seems to be a no brainer to me. Give them some make-up remover!

    IBCSpouse - Sounds like a great solution...have any of the pols mentioned this as a possibilty?

    OKAY - don't rip me apart friends lol...but I am totally against them eliminating contraceptives for the lower income/minority population in this country. OMG OMG OMG... short term thinking... LONG TERM stupidity! I would NO DOUBT prefer my tax $$$ go toward a $10 prescription of the pill than 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, MEDICARE, ETC. Help me!...And... I am a volunteer for neglected and abused children. There are WAY TOO MANY unwanted, neglected and abused kids - and I've heard it over and over again... "I couldn't afford birth control pills." The economy has made the abuse and neglect even worse. In fact...in just the first half of last year, the cases of abuse had doubled from the previous year! It's only going to get worse. We predict that in the first half of this year...it may even triple! 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Oh...and one more thing... FREEDOM of SPEECH...hmmmmmmmmmm did it go bye-bye?

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited January 2009

    Whelp...the bill passed the house!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Well, we knew it would but the big thing is that the Republicans finally got some backbone and refused to support it.  Bout doggone time they stood up for something.  They just reported that every single Republican voted against it as well as approximately 10 Democrats.   This is all on the Democrats now. 

  • ibcspouse
    ibcspouse Member Posts: 613
    edited January 2009

    Laura, can I call you goat? (389 or 400)

    No I have never hear of this idea from anyone.

    Now I am going to make ya'll listen to all my "where does your mine wander to when you can't sleep".  This idea will be toward the country girls. 

    There are thousand of miles of a nice straight platform, each between 1/4 to 1/2 mile long,  that sits in the sun year around.  It is used only about 30 times a year.  When it is used it uses either electricity or diesel fuel to run generators.  It is the long central pivot irrigation systems.  Big sprinklers that has one end hooked to a water source (well) and a long raised pipe on wheels that travels in an arc.   If solar panels were mounted on the top of these, you would end up with thousands of miles of solar panels that are already or easily hooked to power lines.  When the irrigation is on, they would provide their on power, when the system is not on, it would be selling electricity back to the power companies.  This would give many more solar panels than the largest solar farms, and It would not require billions to build new power grid, as the incremental addition of each system is already connected to the grid.  Also, they are in the sunniest part of the country, cleared farm land, and would have no negative impact on environment. 

    How is this for hijacking a thread...and boring all of you

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    What platforms are these?

    ---------

    Laura, I am ok with providing the birth control .. I'd rather have that than more welfare. But if it's free for them, then it should be free for everyone. I am so sick of income brackets determining funding for certain things ... some of us live in high cost states where rent, real estate, food is more than other places but the minimum wage is not higher.  There should be a matrix if they are going to do that.  Wage/cost of living matrix.

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited January 2009

    Rock,

       This was also what I wrote .. Of course ... not all of the pork is necessary and worthwhile. 

        Will the water park in FL create new jobs and revenue?  Will the private owner be paying payroll taxes?  Will venders be able to sell their sodas and candy at the water park?  The owner will have to hire lifeguards, contractors, construction people, sales people, landscape maintenance people, etc. 

        I have no problem with my tax dollars going to create those jobs at the water park.

        I just used the water park as an example.  

        Welfare recipients follow the rules of the individual states they live in.  SSD is a federal goverment program (as you know).  The Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening program (medicaid) here in VA has saved countless women's lives. 

        I agree .. there are likely many people who milk the system.  But, I think they are in the minority.  Lots of middle class folks have lost their jobs all over this country. 

        I believe the National Mall should be maintained.  The Viet Nam memorial, Lincoln memorial and all the other reminders of our national heritage should be preserved.  Again, I wonder how many folks would be able to get jobs for preserving the National Mall. 

       In VA they have a program through the health department where every young woman can get birth control pills, etc., and training in safe sex, screening for STD's, etc. They have to go through this program in order to obtain health benefits.   

       I definitely do not believe people who have not paid taxes should get a tax refund.  I sure don't want my tax dollars going for that.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Boehner wants NOTHING to do with this bill.  Hopefully, it can been stopped in the Senate.  Of course Repubicans will be called obstructionists.

    I was trying to make sense of this SCHIP for kids.  I was listening to a senator on C-SPAN talking about how in this stimulus package they wanted for people to be able to have their children on this when they made $138,000.  This is supposed to only target low-income children.  It was all confusing to me, but it seemed wrong.  I have no problem with lower income children having this insurance.

    I ashamedly admit I have some family members who have abused the system.  Used food stamps when not eligible.  And other programs.  This is what milks our system.  I don't mind people getting help when it's needed.

    Rocky, I have a friend who has Rheumatoid Arthritis really, really bad.  It started when she was 32.  She went to nursing school which was hard for her.  She then worked in a nursing home entering whatever on the computer.  They had to have an RN for the job.  She graduated at the top of her class.  She attended four years of nursing.  She worked for several years with this disease.  Near the end she would have to go home, get in the bed and rest and then go back to work.  Finally, she had to quit.  She is now on disability.  It didn't take her but a minute to be approved because you can see the deformity.  So, she is one who cannot work, period.  And now she's laid up in the bed with something to do with her spine..herniated disk or whatever.  She has a handicap parking permit, and I'm sure some people would not know she has a hard time walking.  She actually let her husband push her in a wheelchair yesterday to see the doc because she couldn't walk..big thing for her to do.  She has a little pride...LOL  She is one of the most honest women I know.  So, there are a few people who truly cannot work..  However, it's maddening when one can work.  We've seen those people who claim to have this horrible back problem and then they're filmed doing work that they should be able to perform.  Truly sickening.  Just had to take up for my friend..LOL

    Laura, watch out for the Fairness Doctrine Act!  If Pelosi et al has their way.........

    Talking about people being laid off from their jobs.  My SIL was laid off a couple of weeks ago.  However, he'll be doing consult work for the company making less money and doing more work.  He'll have to pay for all of his expenses and taxes thus making much less money.  In fact, he's going to make much less money if he DIDN'T have to pay those extras.  But, he grateful to have something.  He works for a small developing company (bad time for that kind of job) and has been so busy.  However, the banks are giving out credit which affects how much the company can pay for their employees.  I'm so mad at the banks!

    There's so much to get caught up on here. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    SHERRI, FOR YOU!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    YOu know ......... there are railroad tracks crisscrossing the land .. how come they can't figure out a way to tie solar plates to them? 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Yep, as far as the republicans voting for the bill..I heard Boehner this afternoon saying absolutely not..not the way it's written.  I bet the dems are madder than h*ll!

    Now I need to contact my senators.  This bill is horrible!  And,no , I'm not in favor of the stimulus building a water park...sorry. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    I agree Sherri...no stimulus to pay for contraceptives.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Sherri, our own people who live in this great country has bad mouthed our government all over the globe.  If they bad mouth our government what do we think the world is to believe.  We have freedom of speech.  And I agree...THANKS BHO!  I can't wait to hear what BHO says..nothing I'm sure..LOL

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Shirley wrote: Laura, watch out for the Fairness Doctrine Act!  If Pelosi et al has their way

    Thanks Shirley! I will definately eduacate myself to this!

    ibcspuse - Yes you can call me GOAT... I love our GOAT... it's heavily modified... 454...7.1 liters.

    Sherri - I thought the same thing... but it was part of the stimulis... a little confused.... will have to do more research to justify my opinion.

    vivre - that dh of yours... knowing you...you will reform him...

  • ibcspouse
    ibcspouse Member Posts: 613
    edited January 2009

    Just to clarify, to laura, in case you jargon was not the same as ours, goat was name we used for GTO s. back in the day when I used to look at them in my rear view mirror of my  SS 396 chevelle

    Sorry posted this before I read your post.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited January 2009

    Did ya'll hear that Iran is ready to have a nuclear weapon by the end of this year?  Wonder who they're planning on using it on.  Israel?  I think BHO should sit down with Iran's mad man and try to use WORDS (diplomacy) on this man.  He'll go away scratching his head trying to figure out just wha BHO meant.

    BBC NEWSIranian leader demands US apology

    Iran's president has responded to an overture by the new US president by demanding an apology for past US "crimes" committed against Iran.

    The US "stood against the Iranian people in the past 60 years", Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said during an address in the western region of Khermenshah.

    "Those who speak of change must apologise to the Iranian people and try to repair their past crimes," he said.

    The US president has offered to extend a hand if Iran "unclenched its fist".

    President Barack Obama discussed the possibility of a softening of US policy towards Iran in an interview recorded with a Saudi-owned Arabic TV network on Monday.

    Mr Ahmadinejad will, as expected, stand for re-election in June, close aide Aliakbar Javanfekr told Reuters news agency on Wednesday.

    Strong tirade

    America's crimes against Iran, the Iranian leader said in his televised speech, included support for the Iranian coup of 1953 and backing for Saddam Hussein in the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s.

    The Iranian president welcomed the possibility of US change, but said it should be "fundamental and effective" rather than just a change of tactics.

    The remarks are the first Iranian comment on the US since Mr Obama took office eight days ago.

    The BBC's Jon Leyne in Tehran describes it as one of Mr Ahmadinejad's strongest tirades against the US.

    Our correspondent says we may see twists and turns out of Iran as its leaders work out whether Mr Obama is offering real change and what they may offer in return.

    While he was playing to the crowd, adds our correspondent, he could also be staking out his position ahead of Iran's presidential election in June.

    Mr Ahmadinejad congratulated Mr Obama after his election in November but the message was criticised in Iran and received a cool response from Mr Obama.

    'Hell' for Bush

    Mr Ahmadinejad also attacked US support for Israel and its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    He called on Mr Obama to withdraw US troops from their bases around the world and for America to "stop interfering in other people's affairs".

    Referring to Mr Obama's predecessor, George W Bush, he said he trusted that he had "gone to hell".

    Relations between Washington and Tehran reached new lows in recent years over attempts by the US and its allies in the United Nations to curtail Iran's nuclear programme over fears it is trying to build nuclear weapons.

    Tehran says its programme is to develop civilian nuclear power only.

    The new US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, said on Monday that she was looking forward to "vigorous diplomacy that includes direct diplomacy with Iran".

    The US broke off diplomatic ties with Iran in 1979, after students stormed the US embassy in Tehran after the Islamist revolution overthrew the US-backed Shah.

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/7855444.stm

    Published: 2009/01/28 16:52:03 GMT

    © BBC MMIX

    Print Sponsor

Categories