Positive Obama thread

Options
18081838586107

Comments

  • Little-G
    Little-G Member Posts: 647
    edited December 2008

    Grace,

    I agree with most of what you said on your post.  I'm from Germany, but live in the US.  Most of my family lives back in Germany.  I took my kids back for a visit last year for a little over 2 weeks.  They all thought we were crazy for "only" having that much vacation time.  My cousins every year go to Spain, Hungry, or other country's for 4 weeks..paid.  And then usually take the other 2 weeks off at home..paid.  Health care, they are taken care of far better than I am and I am paying huge!!  I'm self employed and pay for my medical insurance, which is crap.  They do have cars, but they walk to the stores and get fresh food every day.  No freezers.  All environmentally healthy as well as a good personal choice.  Maybe its the name "socialism" that scares people?  I don't know.  But I do think they better get ready.  As I spoke about before, the greed factor that has been going on in this country I believe is reaching a ceiling.  People can not continue to hoard things and let the masses go hungry and with no health care or housing.  It WILL get ugly at some point.  That's history.  That's human nature.  I don't see the problem in taking care of each other.  I don't understand.  I am middle class..well..maybe now considered to be working poor.  My point is there are people that are much worse off than me.  And I am for helping them.  It can not continue that the small percentage of the population hoards the money and expects the rest to do the work.  It will fall from the top down.  Good post, Grace. 

    g

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    The citizens of Norway are cared for from cradle to grave, and yes their taxes are about 50% of their income. However, there is daycare, paid family leave for a year when child is born, retraining for a new job, healthcare, best schools one can hope for, after school care (which includes ski lessons and field trips), elder care, etc. You can list it, and it's covered by the government. She has had excellent health care--including extended care for her back to help her return to work.

    Grace, all those things sound good, as does the 4 week vacation in Germany .. I know in Italy and France, it's 5 weeks vacation for everyone.  In Italy, since it's in their constitution, even PRISONERS get 5 weeks vacation --- no making license plates, cooking or cleaning while in prison --- because even prisoners are entitled to their constitutional rights.  

    I wonder, though, in order for socialism to work, we'd have to have enough tax-base.  Norway can afford all those things -- I don't think that they have a huge immigration problem.  Here in the US, we have elderly people legally coming over from different countries, who've never contributed a dime, yet get to draw on our social security system. 

    Here's a quote from Factcheck.org:  "For instance, in the race for Colorado's 7th District, Republican Rick O'Donnell released an ad on Oct. 2 saying his opponent "Ed Perlmutter supports Ted Kennedy's plan to give illegal aliens amnesty. It costs over $50 billion dollars. Perl mutter would give illegals welfare, Social Security, even in-state tuition rates at our colleges." For one thing, it's worth noting that of the six sponsors of "Ted Kennedy's plan," five are Republicans, including John McCain of Arizona and Sam Brownback of Kansas; Kennedy is the only Democratic sponsor."

    John McCain is not tough on immigration ....  I actually voted for Mitt Romney in the primaries since he was the only tough one on immigration.  I have no idea who Perlmutter is.   So, although ILLEGALS don't get SS ... once they become legal, they get it.  And so do people who come in legally.  

    And I totally disagree with people who are here on vacation or illegally, that if they have a child here, the babies are automatically American citizens.  I don't know if everyone is opposed to all types of socialism ... People in England and Canada don't seem to have it so bad.  I think people fear not having quick access to medical coverage ... doctor's making decisions about your healthcare, wait time for surgeries, etc.  I think people today ARE disgusted with outrageous salaries that some people make, while most of us work our butts off daily, hoping to have enough money to make ends meet and provide a little bit of relaxation and joy for our kids.

    I, personally, would love to live a simpler life.  I've travelled and the perfect spot for me would be a small village in Italy, France or even the USA where you can walk to town and get your produce.  But what the heck could I do to earn a living???  That's my dilemma, if anyone has the answer let me know!!

    ------------------------

    EDITED TO ADD .... that when illegals or vacationers have a baby, the baby is an automatic citizen!!  Big Woops there!!

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited December 2008

    Grace and Little-g,

    The scoialist experiment did not work as evidenced by the fall of socialist regimes in Soviet Union and other Eastern Europe countries. Germany is a captialist country which has some social programs supported by government. But with this comes strict rules and government control.

    Let's take Germany for example. Do you know for instance that a high school student cannot gto to college unless he passes some "ability" test in 9th grade so he can be considered college worthy. If he does not pass it, he is steered toward a "trade school'. He can take college entrance exam later , but his chances are considerably smaller at that point. I used to work wih a man from Germany who had to apply for 3 years fater high school to get into a college since he did not do well at this one time test in his high school. That's how they keep education chepaer by classifying kids into college bound or not early on life and weeding out considerable majority. Here in America we beleive that everyone should be given a chance. He also told me how restrictive life in Germany was and how happy he was to be here.

    As far as a socialized healthcare goes, I have an interesting story. We met this couple from Canada and she was telling us that their national helthcare was very good, she is able to see her doctors when needed right away. Her husband smiled and said that she was omitting some details though. Then she added that her father was a physician, so when she needed an appointment he would call and she will be seen in a few days. And her friends who would have to wait 4-6 weeks would call her father asking for help and their wait will be cut to 1 week.

    This reminded me of my life in Sovite Union. We did have a national healthcare, but it was who you know . I remember  I had some serious health issues with my kidneys and I would have to wait 2-3 weeks to see a specialist. But my uncle had a friend who had a friend who knew an urologist so they were able to see me in a few days. My Mom was so worried and I sometimes think of it and think how horrified I would be if one of my kids were in this position and I did not know anyone.

    Having said that I would like to have some kind of a basic healthcrare available to all citizens funded by our taxes. But then for more elective thins we would either get employer insurance, buy additional insurance or just pay out of pocket.

     As far as Norway goes, they enjoy good life because of the oil they produce. I guess they don't mind oil dirlling like we do here in America :) as they like their other perks. There is price to pay for everything, no such thing as a free lunch.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008

     ijl- there are different ways to run socialized medicine and socialism than what you experienced.  Holland has a queen, but is a democracy and elects a prime minister, and has socialized medicine.

    My friend in Holland has had great experiences with socialized medicine. Her husband's company provides private insurance for him and that, for a healthy person is virtually no different. My friend's mother died of breast cancer a few years ago, a few years after I was diagnosed. Under socialized medicine she received cutting edge treatment. She didn't have to wait for appointments and she had access to call the doctor when she needed it. My friend has asthma and bad allergies so there are times when she needs to see the doctor right away and she never has to wait more than a few hours. She just got back from vacationing in Viet Nam and came down with the flu. She called the doctor, who wanted her to come right in, because it could have been something more serious (like if she got bit by a mosquito and got dengue). Fortunately it was only the flu.  She had a breakdown last year and got better mental health care than any type of insurance would cover here. She was free to recover at her own pace, not the pace of her insurance company. The type of care she recieved was similar to the MH care that we had in the USA, before HMOs turned pencil pushers into the ones making medical decisions.  She never had a penny of copay, was at one of the best hospitals in her country and is doing great now. In the USA, even with good health insurance, the goal would have been to get her stabilized (meaning not a danger to herself or others) and out of the hospital ASAP. If she got more than a week she would be fortunate. She has her choice of doctors too and a relationship with her GP. She sees her GP for more than the 10-15 minutes we have here, She doesn't go to a clinic nor does she see a different doctor every time she gets sick, unless her doctor happens to be on vacation or on a day off. Disability pay and care is excellent in Holland too.

    I don't see a downside to what Holland has vs. what we have.

    Imagine we had government sponsored health care. The UAW wouldn't need to deal with health care in their contracts, nor health care for retirees so that would decrease the cost of making cars, which would help the US auto industry.

    Health care is civil and human right, and I believe everyone should have the same access to that health care, because wealthy people and people who have great insurance aren't more important than less wealthy and those without health insurance. I don't care if people are here on vacation or illegally, they deserve to be able to survive illnesses, recover, get prenatal care, be vaccinated and everything else.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    Amy,
     
    I'm glad you agree about Hillary.  I really think it is very frightening to have her as Secretary of State, that's a very high profile position to make the understatement of the year.
     
    I don't know CP well, but I thought her description of Hillary was right on, she's got a good way with words.  Just cause someone is wrong about one thing doesn't mean they're always wrong!!!!
     
    Innocent 
  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008
    Even a broke clock is right twice a day Surprised.  Camillia caused a stir a number of stirs in the early 90s, when I was in grad school which is the only reason I know about her antifeminist stances.  I think that Hillary is smart enough, or at least politically savvy enough to mind her Ps and Qs and not make any huge diplomatic blunders.  I have a hard time seeing her as a negotiater or compromiser-- but I trust Obama's a LOT and I know I have only seen a public side of Hillary, not how she is on the job.
  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008

    I was pleasantly surprised to see a thank you card, with a picture of the Obamas and Bidens, in my mail today! Did all you other Obama supporters get one too?

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    Hey Kool...you gals, you're talking about Socialism.

    I've been thinking socialism too, and Roctober, I've been thinking about the simple life just like you.  I love the community a live in; we moved here five years ago but everyone has been so nice.  I think if we had a Depression, the people out where I live would get along just fine because they always help each other out.  We have farms out here that grow crops and raise horses, and an old railway line that people are trying to revive.  How nice it would be if cars suddenly went out of style!!

    We'd be riding our bikes and using golf carts to go into down and shop, Main Street would come alive again, and we'd do very nicely...

    I certainly wouldn't mind paying more taxes if it meant taking care of people more humanely; perhaps that's what we need.  I don't think it's right to live in a society where a very few are very, very rich, can afford designer clothes, plastic surgery, face lifts, multiple houses, yachts, airplanes, and others are homeless without even a bed to sleep in a night.

  • justanna
    justanna Member Posts: 90
    edited December 2008

    We received thank you cards promptly after every donation and a big Happy Holidays (not specifying what holiday) with a thank you this last week.  We're saving it for our children because it is actually signed by Michelle and Barrack.  In our experience, the Obamas and their staff are very gracious and polite.  It helps prove what incredible diplomats they will be worldwide (very important to us).

    Anna

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited December 2008

     Just out of curiosity how may illegal immigrants in Holland are getting their benefits ? I am guessing less than a dozen.

     Let me ask you all this question. If USA is inferior in a number of things to other countries, why so many people are trying to get here ? They should go to these other places where they would be better off: they will have government taking care of them. How come when you look at our graduate schools you see a lot of smart foreign students who come here ? Our doctors are educated somewhere else and come here.  I am guessing they think this the best place to succeed and make something of themselves.

     Quite frankly in this case the feet do the talking :)

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    Well, other countries have strict immigration laws, we'd be better served if we did the same.

    We have plenty of people that we should be serving rather than take in immigrants who get benefits without having first contributed.  I think we have so many families, who've lived here for generations; generations that have paid taxes, improved the land, taught children, etc and here their descendants can't make ends meet or die because they didn't get a mammogram ... I believe we should be taking care of our own before taking in the poor and downtrodden of another country. 

    I used to be against socialized medicine.  But I belong to an HMO and I like having a network of dr's.  I was asked if I thought health insurance was a right or a privilege.  I smarted off and said it was a privilege, I pay for it!! 

    Two seconds, later, really, I teared up as I thought if I had no insurance how unfair it would be to me and my daughter... that I would have put off the mammo until I could find a free one. That I would never have been able to afford the herceptin treatment which was in trial stages, not the standard treatment.  Soooooooooooo, every child deserves to have their parents raise them.  I told the person, no, it's a right to have coverage. Everyone should have it ...

    But I do believe we have to tighten up our purses, close our doors and take care of our people. We are in sad shape and things do need to change.

  • badboob67
    badboob67 Member Posts: 2,780
    edited December 2008

    "that a high school student cannot gto to college unless he passes some "ability" test in 9th grade so he can be considered college worthy. If he does not pass it, he is steered toward a "trade school'."

    That is happening in the county where I live. In addition to an "ability" test, STUDENTS are allowed to make the decision on their own without their parents' input! My county is even going to build a trade school rather than fix up the overcrowded and dilapidated, ONLY, high school in the county. For some reason, North Carolina seems to be a favorite location to "test" these kinds of programs.  UGH

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2008

    ljl:  This is in response to your post about discussing healthcare in Canada.  What some call "socialized medicine", we call universal healthcare.

    I worked for many years in the largest health sciences centre in Canada, in Toronto.  I retired and we moved to a smaller comunity (about 1 1/2 hour's drive away) where I didn't know any medical people.  Nevertheless.....

    .....I was diagnosed in late December, had an appt with a bs first week of January, had a lumpectomy 2 weeks later, and then a mastectomy in early February.  Met with an oncologist in early March (after I'd recovered) and then started chemo in April (I had a choice about chemo so took some extra time to decide).  Finished tx in July and had followup appt and diagnostics in November.  All this in my new community where I knew no one.  I could have gone back to Toronto (or anywhere else, in fact) to have all this done, but did my research on the docs here and decided they were just as good!

    My husband waited 3 months for a non-urgent colonscopy, and 6 months for non-urgent cataract surgery.  But, if either had been urgent necessities, he would have been seen immediately.

    When I retired, I decided to continue with the health and dental coverage I'd had at work, but of course I pay for it now.  It is used mostly for dental, and now for Femara, although if I was "in need", the government would cover the cost.  If I was over 65, I would pay about $10 per prescription.  Yes, we pay a bit more in taxes, but I've never ever heard anyone here complain about that.  Instead, I think we all take pride in the fact that we are making sure those less fortunate than us will never go into debt, or lose their houses, or be afraid to change jobs because of personal health care costs.  Sickness "happens", regardless of how well off we are.

    I am truly amazed (and angered) that so many apparently loving, caring, folk are so against universal health coverage.  I don't consider Canadian healthcare to be the perfect model, but it sure beats the "I want what's best for me and to h*** with other people" feeling I get from reading some of the posts on this board.

    By the way, the Ontario govenment initiated a Wait Times strategy a couple of years ago, to help ensure that sick people are treated in a timely (life-saving) manner.

    With respect,

    Linda

  • TorchSong
    TorchSong Member Posts: 348
    edited December 2008

    Let me echo what Linda said about Canadian health care. I have experienced a variety of, shall we say, health care environments. As a child, my parents had insurance through their work. When I had a life-threatening illness, the insurance covered most of it (not quite all, there were co-pays and limits, and so on). When I married, my husband was in the US military--everything, literally, was covered--medical, dental, scripts, eye exams (not glasses, though). And then for a while after we divorced, I went to a free clinic because my income was very low; again, everything was covered, but I had to wait sometimes for an appointment, but scripts were subsidized. The clinic was a non-profit organization, funded by grants and donations. Now, I live and work in Canada and am covered by the provincial health plan. Everything is covered except scripts, but again, because of my income, I qualify for governmental medication coverage.

    In addition, I have worked in hospitals (ward clerk) and in the health care policy field (librarian and researcher).  All that to say that I do have a lot of experience and some knowledge.

    I found the lump in the summer, didn't see the doc until mid August (my choice), ultrasound/core biopsy in early Sept., dx Sept 10, lumpectomy a week later, chemo six weeks after that...no delays, excellent care.

    Yes people sometimes have to wait to see specialists, but that can happen anywhere that speciality is in short supply.

    No one--NO ONE--should have to worry about how they are going to pay for health care, whether it's preventive (mammos, immunizations, prenatal care), chronic illness tracking (diabetes, sickle cell), acute (pneumonia), medications, or cancer treatment and follow-up.

    No system is perfect, but Canada's works pretty well, thanks. I am so very thankful I am eligible for coverage--I don't know what I would have done if I were in the States, as my US job does not have health coverage.

    And yes, I pay taxes in Canada (and in the US), so I am not a "free-loader."

  • katbur2
    katbur2 Member Posts: 14
    edited December 2008

    I have to agree with Torch Song. No one should have to spend their time worrying about how or if they can pay the medical bills.  I am getting really concerned now with the massive layoffs that are going on that there will be people who can not afford to pay the COBRA and may need to stop treatment. Not to mention the women who will delay diagnosis because they can't afford the appointments or tests.  I'm willing to wait a little longer for care if it means that women don's have to die of something that could be treated. 

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited December 2008

    As I mentioned before I am supporting some basic healthcare for all LEGAL residents. The questions I have about Canada are as follows:

    WHy do they keep building all these medical centers in Chicago and surrounding areas that cater exclusivley to cash paying Canadians . They come over the border to have all these non-urgent surgeries willing to pay for them at our high prices rather than waiting for free ones in Canad. Doesn't this create two classes of people those who can pay and those who have to wait ?

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2008

    ljl:  Why don't you ask them why they choose to pay, rather than wait?

    I think we're talking about two different things here.  There's fairness (everyone is entitled to the same care here, regardless of one's ability to pay), and then there is market availability.  We have private clinics in Canada that provide certain kinds of treatment (orthopaedic procedures, cosmetic surgery, laser eye surgery and hernia surgery, for example) for those who "just can't wait".  But there are also those who mistakenly believe that the care will be better in the U.S.

    My argument is that, when one's life (or lifestyle) is threatened because of sickness, no Canadian goes without care because he/she can't afford it, or has lost their job and lacks insurance coverage.

    Oh, and I believe it's a heck of alot easier to just hand over one's government-issued healthcard, and not have to deal with the administrative nightmares caused by insurance companies who care only for profit, and not for patients.  JMO, of course.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    To anyone who has ever had COBRA ... it is a JOKE .. it is so expensive that if you collect unemployment, you cannot afford it!

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited December 2008

    Linda,

    We have private clinics in Canada that provide certain kinds of treatment

    I undertsand that there are a lot of restrictions on opening private hospitals and clinics. That canadian woman I mentioned in my previous post told us that it's not technically legally to open certain private clinics.

     I did find the following article regarding private practice in Canada which also mentions the technical law issues with private practices. I am interested in hearing your opinion on this.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/28/international/americas/28canada.html

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008

    ijl- Actually there are a lot of people in the country illegally who can access health care. Holland is a popular country and they have a lot of people trying to get there from island countries. The USA isn't the only country people are trying to get into.

    I do not blame people for wanting to be in this country or another country that has a decent health care and standard of living. RM, I can picture you, who fights so fiercely for your daughter, doing whatever it takes to come here to benefit her, if you lived somewhere that had little or no education for girls or poor people, if she had a medical condition and you had little or no access to health care, if you couldn't put a roof over her head. I can't picture you waiting decades to get here legally. If you came here illegally to give your daughter a chance in life, because you couldn't get here legally I would  respect and admire that.  We were fortunate to have been born in a country that takes relatively good care of it's citizens. Certainly not the best and probably not even in the top 10. I do not begrudge those who will do anything legal or illegal to have the same for themselves and their families.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    But should we be forced to pay for them???  And why do the border states have pay for the care that the Feds say we must provide but won't reimburse us.  See, people in, say, the midwest, probably don't have a lot of illegals from down south but their representatives in Congress, along with alot of others voted that we spend our dollars not theirs.

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008

    I hate the word "illegals" because it reminds me of when people who had leprosy were called "lepers". People can't be illegal, even if they are here illegally, imho. People who don't have health insurance routinely use ERs for primary care medical needs. I don't see a distinction between people who don't have insurance.  The government does supply money for medicaid to states, not sure how that's calculated with the uninsured.

  • ijl
    ijl Member Posts: 897
    edited December 2008

    Amy,

    Ther is a difference between legal and illegal immigrants, the last ones are people who cut in front of line. There are people all over the world following our immigration laws, filing the papers and waiting for years to see if they can come in.

    When my family was immigrating, we had to leave Russia first and the wait in Italy for 4 months to see whether USA would let us in. We had to pass a physical among other things and not everyone was allowed to immigrate to USA. We had "easier" time as we were political refugees due to well established fact that Jews were prosecuted in Soviet Union. And even then we had to go through a long process to get here.

    In the perfect world everyone could come here and enjoy all our benefits, but in reality we just CANNOT afford it. I mean it's simple matter of mathematics : so much money, so many people.So we need laws otherwise USA will become Mexico and where will we go then ?

     Holland has immigration problems and  a lot of  people who immigrate there come from very religious background and are not tolerant of Dutch more liberal society. In fact now they make people who are trying to come legally to watch a DVD showing nude beaches and gay couple kissing. The officials then have interviews trying to see  how tolerant of this culture will the prospective citizens be. Of course illegal immigrants are not given this litmus test and a lot of them are prejudiced. As you might recall the famous cases of killing Pim Fortuyn, a homosexual politician and Theo van Gogh, an anarchist moviemaker who was critical of Islam in his work , in 2002 and 2004 respectively. In the resulting shock, the Dutch had to face the fact that many of their newly arrived neighbors were unwilling to accept Holland's traditional liberal tolerance and proclaimed Nederland is vol" (The Netherlands are full).

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    I hate the word "illegals" because it reminds me of when people who had leprosy were called "lepers". People can't be illegal, even if they are here illegally, imho. People who don't have health insurance routinely use ERs for primary care medical needs. I don't see a distinction between people who don't have insurance.  The government does supply money for medicaid to states, not sure how that's calculated with the uninsured

    1) People with leprosy are still called lepers.

    2) People who don't have health insurance do use the ER ... and they get a bill.  If they don't pay it, it goes against their credit, their Social Security number issued by the USA is on their admittance work and they get penalized for not paying.  The bill does not go to the State for payment ... rather remains in collection.

    3) In California, we have Medi-Cal.  Illegal immigrants don't qualify but Medi-Cal must pick up the tab.. By law, we must treat them.  The bill does not go to collection, the State of California has to pay it. Not the feds.

    Amy, it's kinda like a house that only can support so many people. We are letting people in faster than we can accomadate them.  I know many, many people who are getting their relatives over here from different countries.  They are elderly.  As soon as they are here, guess what, they get Social Security and they never paid into it.  Kinda not fair, wouldn't you say?  Didn't you used to pay into it when you were working? Don't you need it to be there for you later?  I do.

  • LAphoenix
    LAphoenix Member Posts: 452
    edited December 2008

    RB: Illegal immigrants pay taxes, including Social Security and sales taxes, that benefit us:

    According to a New York Times article on April 5, 2005, "...the estimated seven million or so illegal immigrant workers in the United States are now providing the system with a subsidy of as much as $7 billion a year....Moreover, the money paid by illegal immigrants and their employers is factored into all the Social Security Administration's projections."  

    However,since illegal immigrant workers are here illegally, and ostensibly presented fake ID to the US employer, they will never collect Social Security benefits. "For illegal immigrants, Social Security numbers are simply a tool needed to work on this side of the border. Retirement does not enter the picture," reports the New York Times.

    Part of the problem is that the federal govt. doesn't reimburse the states for money they spend on social services for illegal immigrants.  That's why states with big immigrant populations like CA are always demanding money from Washington.  And big companies that hire illegal immigrants as a way to cut costs don't pony up to the states either.  But for those who hate illegal immigrants, there's a silver lining in the lousy economy: they're not coming over as much now.  Recessions make better walls than actual walls.  (And you know who's building those walls.)  

    On a different topic . . .

    A new Senate report says the physical and mental abuse of detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay Naval Base was the direct result of Bush administration policies and should not be blamed on guards and interrogators.

    The report from the Senate Armed Services Committee is the result of a two-year investigation. It directly links President Bush's policies after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, legal memos on torture and interrogation rule changes with the abuse that was photographed at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq four years ago.

    The report says administration officials publicly blamed the abuses on low-level soldiers but called that "both unconscionable and false."

    And just yesterday, Condi Rice was still insisting the U.S. never abused or tortured as policy . . . 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    Here's a quote from ncpa.org

    "

    But legal and illegal aliens are responsible for the bulk of these visits, putting increased demands on the public health care system. Critics say that taxpayers cannot become the HMO of the world:

    • Sixty percent of the county's uninsured patients are not U.S. citizens, with more than half living in the country illegally.
    • About 2 million undocumented aliens in Los Angeles County are crowding emergency rooms because they can't afford to see a doctor.
    • The added demand for services has led to rationing: Patients can wait up to four days for a hospital bed and up to two years for a gallbladder surgery.

    To make matters worse, illegal immigrants can even get care ahead of American citizens.

    But some critics say the taxpayers can't be the HMO (search) to the world. Last year, Los Angeles County spent $340 million to treat the uninsured; that's roughly $1,000 for every taxpayer.

    "We're citizens here. Why should somebody from another country that's here illegally get anything that we can't get? I mean that's dumb, that's not right," said Don Schenck, whose son, Bill, is mentally disabled.

    Though the Schencks are uninsured, and considered poor by county standards, his father had to find a way to pay for his Bill's care while thousands of others, in the country illegally, get it for free.

    "It makes you feel pretty bad when you're born in that country and you're handicapped and you've got a learning disability and you can't get medical," Schenck said.

    Mike Antonovich, the Los Angeles County supervisor, said the system has been "basically bankrupted."

    The Department of Health has a $1.2 billion deficit. Caring for illegals is siphoning money from other services and forcing clinics, trauma centers and emergency rooms to close, he said.

    Antonovich says that caring for illegals is diverting funds from other services and forcing clinics, trauma centers and emergency rooms to close. He laments: "We cannot afford to have an open-door policy to encourage illegals to continue to come here and receive all the medical care because it's too expensive"."

    --------------

    Well, they pay Soc Sec taxes on a fraudulent tax id number ... but most work under the table, paying no taxes.  And its not just their fault ... greedy businesses hire them, lazy Americans won't work  but now, Americans need the work, maybe things will change ...

  • crazy4carrots
    crazy4carrots Member Posts: 5,324
    edited December 2008

    Hi RM:

    I'm curious about your note re folks without insurance using the ER.  Hope you, or anyone here, can answer a few questions for me:

    a) do private and public hospitals deal with non-payment differently?

    b) are non-bill payers subject to lawsuits by the hospitals?

    c) what criteria are used in determining eligibility for medicaid?

    d) is healthcare a federal or state responsibility, or is the responsibility shared in some way?

    Sorry, I realize this is sort of "off-topic" for this thread but also an opportunity for your northern neighbours to learn more about U.S. healthcare.

    Thanks!

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2008

    Linda,

    A private hospital can refuse to admit you, a public one can't ... Only if the person is dying and can't make it to a public hospital does the private one have to take you.  Private hospitals make sure you have insurance before admitting you.  Collection ... ruining your credit if you don't pay.  Or agree to settle for a lesser amount and pay payments.   No, they don't take them to court.  From what I see on people's credit reports, they go to collection.  Some have had extreme medical bills ... airlifts, they can't pay it .. but it's on their record as an unpaid debt. 

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited December 2008

    I live on the Central coast in CA. We have a large Hispanic population here. In fact, CA is quickly moving to become a minority majority state. Two of the largest groups moving into  the SF and SJ areas (East Bay also) are Asian and Indian--by far the growth rate in  the middle of CA (including the central valley)  have the  highest change in growth rates in the last 10 years! The Hispanic populations in our areas are staying the same--there has been little change in the growth rates!

    Having been declared disabled and unable to return to work, I am now experiencing the joys of dealing with SS & Medicare. In all their publications and my conversations with SS employees, I have learned that you cannot draw SS unless you have paid into the system for a certain # of quarters, or live with a spouse who is over 65 and has worked at least the minimum # of quarters. I have a relative that has not worked in 35 years, and when she did, only worked a few quarters. She is disabled and is unable to draw any type of SSdisability payments! So, being a true experience for a US citizen, I find it hard to believe that Mexicans are able to do what my relative is unable to do--collect SS!!

    I've also learned through this process that Mexicans who are here illegally do not find jobs that pay them very much money. They are either paid in cash under the table by an employer (who does not send in the taxes and SS payments for their work as required by law) and they cannot draw SS. If the employer does pay them by business check, this is often reported by the employer who either uses a fake SS number or someone else's number to send in the SS taxes. so, the "illegal" (I dislike that name also, Amy) person pays into the system but never benefits from it. At one time, it was reported that there were millions of dollars in the system that have never been claimed. Before we lay blame on the Mexicans who come across the border to earn money for their family in Mexico; we first need to hold the employers responsible for this system. They have used it for a long time in an illegal manner, and they need to be stopped! All businesses should be investigated for any illegal employment and improper tax payments toward SS or any other agency as required by state and federal laws. They should be fined and made to pay restitution. And I would include in this, the people driving by on street corners or near lumber yards that stop and gather up a truckload of Mexicans to come and do work on their property. These two groups--private individuals and businesses--are taking advantage of these immigrants as well as the government agencies they are required to report to. I agree with Amy. Anyone of us would come across the border and want to work in this country if we saw a better life for our family. If eastern european countries had a border w/US--the same type of movements across borders would happen. Position and circumstance relative to US borders creates this, and no matter what group of people lived next to us--if they saw they could do better here they would cross the border!

    As far as healthcare, any of us can find pro and con situations that happen in any healthcare system. My example would be that my pain management doctor has a 90 day waiting list because he is one of the finest docs in Northern CA. So, we all will wait somewhere along the line, even if we have the best medical insurance we can afford! Some healthcare plans are better than others. And then there are those with no healthcare plan or unable to afford a healthcare plan. What is wrong with having a Universal healthcare plan for all citizens that is EQUITABLE in cost and care. That is the key word! As RTM said, it is a right. This country is so rich in resources, why aren't we, US citizens, willing to give a hand to those less fortunate than us? What happened to treating others aw we want to be treated? What happened to bring your tired, your hungry, your pour? Our relatives were all there reading those words at sometime in our lives (unless we were First Nation people on this continent). Why do we not look at how other cultures work to raise everyone up, and instead we are so eager to step on our fellow man to raise ourselves--so selfish. As Hilary said, "It takes a village to raise a child." Well, it takes a country to raise it's poor and make this country a better place to live for all of us.

    There was a poll report on the news last night--of those polled, 64% said they would be willing to take a 5% pay cut, if it would save the jobs of their fellow employees. This is what will make America great again. You are only as rich as your poor! We have Americans living in 12,000 sq ft homes with all the stuff money can buy, and enough money to buy the next gadget that comes out or the dream trip that costs thousands of dollars. Yet, last night walking on the levee in our downtown with the two dogs and my dh, we came across two homeless men sleeping in the open with a thin blanket to share. The comparison is so embarrassing when we consider this is supposed to be the greatest nation in the world. That we can let this happen all over the United States is a disgrace. That we can turn a blind eye to these conditions is a disgrace. That we can go and buy whatever we want; and these two men face the possibility of dying from the cold is abominible. If it hadn't been so late, we would have gone to the department store miles away and returned with a blanket for each of them.

    I agree with Madalyn, many come here because this is a great country. Many of us stay here because this is a great country and we want to make it even better; or better yet, we want to return it to a prosperous place to live once more and hopefully for all of us. If we all unite together we can make that happen. Right now, we are only as strong as our weakest. We must care for our neighbors again. We must look to the left and right of us and work to bring about the rights we all should have, not just the few. Giving of ourselves and our wealth; will return to us tenfold. 

    It's time we did what is right for all. 

  • NoH8
    NoH8 Member Posts: 2,726
    edited December 2008

    ijl- Please don't treat me as though you think I'm stupid because we have different opinions. I'm probably more educated, have a higher IQ and have spent more time studying the topic than you have. We disagree and that's fine, but it's not for lack of understanding on my part. I have a lot of compassion for people who are less fortunate and who were born into countries or situations where they can't get adequate care.

    rm- In what socially acceptable circle are people with leprosy called lepers? Is that a term you would want used for yourself or your daughter if you had the illness? Some people still use the N word to describe blacks, doesn't make it right. Life isn't fair, especially economically. JFK said to whom much is given, much is expected. For the most part, people who get bills from the ER because they don't have insurance have no consequences, except a stain on their credit history, which is likely poor anyway if they are of low income, have medical problems and can't afford hospital stays.

    Why is it that republicans are always crying-- this isn't fair, this isn't fair.

    linda- a) private hospitals often have charity care. When I had surgery and they wanted money up front I laughed in the face of person registering me. She directed me to a woman who was in charge of the charity care and I had to fill out an application. Apparently the hospital wants folks to pay up front, if they can.

    b) I have never seen a lawsuit for failure to pay by a hospital. Usually the hospital will go through a collection agency or try to work out a payment plan.

    c) States set the guidelines for medicaid eligibility with wealthier states having higher eligibility. Medicaid is both a state and federal program, meaning that it's run through the states, but mandated through the federal government. Children are funded through SChiP programs and income eligibility is less of an issue. In my state, PA, all children under 18 are eligible for CHiP but if parents are above a certain level they have to pay into the program.  I  believe that state money also goes into funding the program. I had fairly wealthy clients who's father was self employed and they had no insurance.  They lived with a "hope no one ever gets sick" philosophy, but when their daughter needed therapy and CPS got involved they were mandated to get therapy. Apparently legally parents to have to have insurance for their kids, though it's not usually checked.

    d) by law ERs can't refuse care to someone who comes in for an emergency, whether public or private. In poor areas where many people don't have health care, people come to the ER for things like a bad cough or the flu. which clogs up the ERs for people with real emergencies. Usually people in the ER are triaged with the most serious cases taken first, so the wait can be a long time, in terms of hours.

Categories