If you've bought Pet food at PETCO

Options
saluki
saluki Member Posts: 2,287
edited June 2014 in Life After Breast Cancer
If you've bought Pet food at PETCO

Comments

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited June 2008
    /adclick.php?n=ae11776f' target='_blank'><img src='http://www.petconnection.com/openads/adview.php?what=zone:1&amp;n=ae11776f' border='0' alt=''></a>

    FDA seizes foods at PETCO distribution center

    By Christie Keith

    June 19, 2008

    This just in (why do I suddenly feel like Ted Baxter?) from the FDA… and it’s time for Christie’s head to once again explode:

    Today, at the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Marshals seized various animal food products stored under unsanitary conditions at the PETCO Animal Supplies Distribution Center located in Joliet, Ill., pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court in Chicago.

    U.S. Marshals seized all FDA-regulated animal food susceptible to rodent and pest contamination. The seized products violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because it was alleged in a case filed by the United States Attorney that they were being held under unsanitary conditions. (The Act uses the term “insanitary” to describe such conditions).

    During an FDA inspection of a PETCO distribution center in April, widespread and active rodent and bird infestation was found. The FDA inspected the facility again in May and found continuing and widespread infestation.

    “We simply will not allow a company to store foods under filthy and unsanitary conditions that occur as a direct result of the company’s failure to adequately control and prevent pests in its facility,” said Margaret O’K. Glavin, associate commissioner for regulatory affairs. “Consumers expect that such safeguards will be in place not only for human food, but for pet food as well.”

    Are your pets’ foods affected by the seizure? The FDA release continues:

    The distribution center in Joliet, Ill., provides pet food products and supplies to PETCO retail stores in 16 states including Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.

    What should consumers do who have purchased foods in those states? Well, there aren’t any reports of animal sickness from eating the food, but be sure to wash your hands after touching the packages you bought there:

    FDA has no reports of pet illness or death associated with consumption of animal food distributed by PETCO, and does not have evidence that the food is unsafe for animals. However, the seized products were in permeable packages and held under conditions that could affect the food’s integrity and quality.

    As a precaution, consumers who have handled products originating from the PETCO distribution center should thoroughly wash their hands with hot water and soap. Any surfaces that came in contact with the packages should be washed as well. Consumers are further advised as a precaution to thoroughly wash products sold in cans and glass containers from PETCO in the 16 affected states.

    If a pet has become ill after eating these food products, pet owners should contact their veterinarian and report illnesses to FDA state consumer complaint coordinators.

    While I applaud FDA for taking this bold action, it might be nice had they informed consumers of this problem last APRIL when they discovered it, and let us decide for ourselves if we wanted to give our money to Petco.

    How was this allowed to go unreported for two months? How can FDA claim “We simply will not allow a company to store foods under filthy and unsanitary conditions that occur as a direct result of the company’s failure to adequately control and prevent pests in its facility,” when obviously, they do and they did, since April?

    I won’t ask how this happened, because I know how it happened. The “small government” people always want to let market forces operate unless, you know, they don’t. In other words, letting people know what they need to know to make informed decisions is bad, protecting corporations is good.

    And hey, no foreign country to blame this time, either.

    -------------------------------------------------------------

    above is from Pet Connection Blog

Categories