The Brand New Respectful Presidential Campaign Thread

Options
1303133353661

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Anneshirley, don't even get me started about AT&T!  That's all I have to say about them!  I've said plenty on many threads.  It concerns our new insurance FROM THEM.  It sucks big time!

    Shirley

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited April 2008

    Another CEO story, of those hard-working men (and very few women) who have insured that all those peon hard-working employees stay employed:

    I worked for a few years for a software consulting company as technical director to Bell Labs.  The company was sold by its owners to General Electric and renamed GE Consulting.  GE let go the man who actually knew something about consulting and put in his place, as CEO, the head of one of their appliance manufacturing plants.  As so many "Idiot" CEO do when coming into a new company, he announced we had to cut back on costs, and his solution was to not hire any more consultants.

    For some reason, it escaped his notice that GE Consulting made its profits by selling the services of consultants to other corporations.  Without employees we had no services to sell and no profits to make.  He lasted two years, during which time our profits dropped big time.

    Oh, those lovely, knowledgeable CEO's. 

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited April 2008

    And then there's Carly Forina of HP fame!! She made out like a bandit (and I mean that literally) when she "left" HP. AND left behind a pile of s*** for others to clean up.

    Oh, I know a few who worked for Lucent. They were great for overworking the workers who actually worked in systems admin and costing out systems--hired them at a salary so they didn't have to pay overtime, and then expected them to do 60-75 hrs of work per week in 40! Of course, everyone worked the hours to get it done, but only got paid for their 40. And if you complained, you were on the list for a layoff.

    Also, find funny happenings in the higher education ivory tower. If you are the squeaky wheel too often, you go on a list for layoffs also. The more you are perceived as having "power" the more those over you want to take you down. There are exceptions, and that's if the power's that be find out that you have an army of supportive employees behind you, and when they  inform the President of that suddenly you are removed from the list. But you are always on someone's hidden list for the future. It's amazing the politics that are present in institutions of higher learning. Too bad they don't run these institutions like they do a business.

    And the administrators are never fired--they even get their raises every 3 years--no matter how many poor evaluations they receive. Supposedly the raises are for exceptional management, but it appears that every one (even the one who spends his time online during work hours checking his stock purchases & setting up special hunting trips--not sponsored by institution) has done a phenomenal job in spite of poor evals. Mmmm.......maybe they are trying to run their ivory tower like a business.

    Excuse the sarcasm, I was inspired by Anneshirley's work experiences. Thanks for getting me started. LOL

    Shirley--are we talking about the dh's eating all the candy or the CEOs?? LOL

    I'm glad we agree on something--but I bet we actually agree on a lot more, we just haven't found out what that is!! :)

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    No, Grace, it wasn't about the candy!  LOL

    I know that managers (CEOs) should make more money.  However, what they do sometimes make is obscene!

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    "Rosemary--Do you have secret inside information on the Republican party's plans to wreak havoc on Obama? You say with such authority that he's "going down," but what makes you think that will really happen? Is it because Obama won't stoop to Clinton's and McCain's negative campaigning? Oh, should we Democrats be scared? Oooooooooooo! You frighten us so, we are just quaking in our boots! LOL"   

    Grace, What are you 12?

    This is what I said which really didn't warrant such a response from you. 

    "They have his program that he's running on.  Already I'm reading hits on it.  You'll be hearing all about it as soon as one of them is nominated.  The republicans won't do each others job for them now. 

    Watch and see what's coming.  They won't have to attack the man, they have his programs to take apart, and they will."

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    I'm waiting, Rosemary.  I don't think McCain is going to run untruthful, nasty ads.  He's gonna run truthful ads that will hurt Obama's campaign. LOL


    Shirley

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    Shirley,

    McCain won't be shy either.  I've already heard him say a thing or two, so he's gearing up.  I really think McCain would rather have Obama to run against, he's got so much material to work with.  And a lot of Hillary's supporters will vote for him should she not win at the convention.   We wait and wait.

  • Paulette531
    Paulette531 Member Posts: 738
    edited April 2008

    Healthcare is the least important? Pennsylvania, what's wrong with you folks?

    By The Associated Press 25 minutes ago

    Highlights of preliminary exit poll data in the Pennsylvania Democratic presidential primary Tuesday:

    FINALLY, THE MAIN EVENT

    After a six-week lull since the last Democratic primary, Pennsylvania voters were so eager to participate in the hotly contested battle between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama that one in 10 changed their party registration since the start of 2008 so they could vote Tuesday. The contest was open only to registered Democrats. About half the party-switchers had been registered Republicans, while the rest had been unaffiliated with either party. Another roughly 3 percent were voting for the first time in Pennsylvania.

    WHO SHOWED UP

    As expected, Pennsylvania's Democratic voters were overwhelmingly white and - as usual in Democratic contests - there were more women than men. About three in 10 were age 65 or over. Nearly half were from families that earned less than $50,000 last year. A quarter had household income of more than $100,000 and about as many reported having a postgraduate degree.

    Three in 10 Pennsylvania Democratic voters were union members or had one in their household. And four in 10 had a gun owner in the household.

    LOOKS MATTER

    About one in five voters said the race of the candidates was among the top factors in their vote. About as many said that about the candidates' gender.

    MAKING UP THEIR MINDS

    One in five voters said they chose their candidate within the final week of the Pennsylvania campaign. About one in 10 said they made up their mind Tuesday.

    ECONOMIC GLOOM

    Pennsylvania Democrats had a sour view of the economy - four in 10 said the country is in a serious recession and at least as many called it a moderate recession. Only about one in 10 said the economy is not in recession.

    As in earlier primaries, at least half of voters said the economy was the most important issue facing the country. About half as many said Iraq was the top issue. Health care trailed in importance.

    ___

    From a partial sample of 1,421 Democratic primary voters conducted in 40 precincts across Pennsylvania by Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International for The Associated Press and television networks.

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited April 2008

    Rosemary, excuse me but you are the 12 year old here with your just you wait! Quite honestly, your refrain is BORING!!

    Guess you aren't one to share your great wisdom. LOL

    You must be keeping it for the Republican thread. 

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited April 2008

    Paulette,  But health care is an economic issue, one of the biggest.  As more and more people have to pay totally for their own health care or pay larger parts of it, it's becoming one of their biggest expenses, right after their mortgages.  And for some folks, their premiums are higher (and for some a lot higher) than their mortgages.  Health care is an economic issue.

    I've said this before, in 2002 Guardian raised my family rates (mine and my husband's) to $1,000 a month.  Have no clue what it might be now--at least $1,500 but probably more. Never thought I'd be delighted to turn 65 (for Medicare) but I was!  You know the worlds is upside down when a woman is happy to turn 65.

    Go Hillary, and she made a great speech tonight. 

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    "Rosemary, excuse me but you are the 12 year old here with your just you wait! Quite honestly, your refrain is BORING!!

    Guess you aren't one to share your great wisdom. LOL

    You must be keeping it for the Republican thread. "

    Grace, you're sounding very ugly.  Why you Obama supporters have to sound like this is beyond me?  Go to your room and calm yourself down.

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    I never needed health care till I hit 54.  All those years I paid in and just went to see my gyno.  My husband never got sick either till he hit his 50's.  We didn't even have a primary Dr. chosen.  A lot of the young people just aren't into it yet.  They think Hillary's health care plan will be a gov't run plan.  They hear universal health care, and think another social security program is on the way. 

    The candidates have a long road ahead of them to explain the program,  show the differences between their plans, and get people to really want universal health care in the first place.  Right now all we have is Elizabeth Edwards as our champion.  I really don't hear anyone else talking about it yet.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited April 2008

    You're right, Rosemary.  In fact, I was for Edwards, contributed to his campaign, and for just that reason--health care.  I've sent so many letters to both the Edwards since he dropped out, begging them not to endorse Obama because of his health care stand.  I believe strongly that his decision not to support "mandates" was an absolute piece of cowardice.  He's too afraid of the Republicans, and in my view, he thought he would dance into the White House.  He doesn't seem to understand how hard one has to fight to win.  I came to Hillary with some reluctance but after each primary I feel better and better about her. 

    Go Hillary! 

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    Anne,

    Then I'll join you in the letter writing.  I've already sent a couple out about health care.  No responses yet.  Have you received any response to your letters?  I think AARP is on our side at their United we stand site.  The Hillary campaign sent me an email asking us to tell them which is the most important issue and why, of course I jumped all over health care in my response.

    Hillary can really think on her feet. I was watching her this morning being given the inquisition over her ad yesterday.  She said it was about me and my credentials, not anyone else.   

     We can't rely on the poll takers anymore.  Rasmussen was off by 6 pts. on Monday.  Too many people have cell phones.  Some small poll taker got it right, they had her winning by 10 pts. and I didn't believe them.  And I don't remember who they were.  I would have liked to have followed them.  Oh well. 

    P.S. I meant to add, in my response to Hillary's campaign, I also asked for John Edwards to be her running mate.  I forgot about that. I pray he doesn't come out for Obama also.  I can just see Elizabeth all over the place about Hillary's health care plan. 

  • Jaybird627
    Jaybird627 Member Posts: 2,144
    edited April 2008

    Okay, I just had to post:  YEA Hillary!!! Laughing

    You know, if by the off chance she doesn't win the democratic nomination you can still vote for her as a write-in. If enough people did that she would have a chance of winning against McCain. I see her as having a better chance against him than Obama. Most dems seem to be split 50/50 anyway so why not vote for the better candidate? JMO.....

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    Good morning political junkies.........first of all congrats to all the Hillaryites........she did an excellent job in spite of all the media bias against her...........I have had maybe 4 hrs sleep.....could not stop watching all the commentaries through the night........and this morning which is even more interesting and all the arm chair quarterbacking......got to give the woman credit where credit is due..........of course not only being a Republican but being conservative not an easy thing to do......I see a change in her that is a bit refreshing.........Obama has made two huge (not hugh)mistakes.........of course Rev Wright has not helped and William Ayers is going to become a lot bigger problem.......but the San Francisco remarks and what I believe is worse is the comment about one of his daughters would be "punished" with a child and regardless if you are pro life or pro choice in the Catholic world and many middle class families whether its your teenage daughter, unmarried grown daughter or unplanned pregnancy in a marriage many people believe that life is a gift..........regardless......you would never classify it as a "punishment"........crap phone I will be right back............shokk

  • saluki
    saluki Member Posts: 2,287
    edited April 2008

    As a Pennsylvanian I thought her win was amazing.  She was outspent three to one.  Every few minutes there was another Obama commercial

    and my mailbox was flooded daily with his ads---Hers were nowhere to be found.

    When two Hillary supporters knocked on my door this past Saturday and I received a phone call from a live person on her behalf --I felt like I won the lottery.Surprised

    Personally, I don't want the government to run health-care but, I do want a single payer system.  They haven't been adept at running anything without waste and special interests --And the Medicare drug program-

    Medicare part D is already in big trouble as well as Medicare itself.

    There are no easy answers here.  

    I'm hoping AARP will pressure McCain to deal with this issue as time goes on.---especially the pre-existing condition business----and not through Medicaid---GRRRRRRRRR! Come on JohnnyboyWink--we know you can do better than that!

    In the meantime, I sent Hillary a donation last night. Cool

    PS--I'm going to join you Rosemary and Anneshirley in the Edwards letter writing department (incidentally he was my candidate of choice)

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    I have been watching MSNBC morning talk show "Morning Joe" because at least former Senator Scarborough is a Hillary fan so at least don't have to listen to all the bad press about Hillary........she must find it interesting to be on the "other" side of the media bias.......any way Pat Buchanan pegged Obama perfect this morning by referring to him as "Faculty Lounge".........loved it..........he is University of Chicago faculty lounger complaining about the middle income person not being smart enough to "get it".......the "common man".......not as enlighten as all the faculty sitting around the lounge making fun of the "working class person love of God and Country" clinging to their guns and religion because they are bitter........whom doesn't get it is the Faculty that has spent a life time on college campuses writing worthless books they make their students buy.............telling their students what a horrible country this is and all the while their parents are struggling to get these children a college education......and want to talk about cost that is out of control and has absolutely no regulation is right on our college campuses.....telling the rest of us how to live our lives when them themselves has never really lived in the "real world"...........many like William Ayers and his wife are still fighting the "war against Imperial America" like it was the late sixties........give me a freaking break...........jeez phone again.........I am not done ranting........Shokk

  • Bren-2007
    Bren-2007 Member Posts: 6,241
    edited April 2008

    Still waiting Shokk ....

  • sccruiser
    sccruiser Member Posts: 1,119
    edited April 2008

    Yes, Hillary did a good job winning in PA. AND Barack did an excellent job lowering the spread from 25 to less than 10--and in just a little over a month. I think one of them will win the Presidential election. Can't wait to see which one takes on McCain and buries him in the debates!!

    Rosemary--you are mistaken--I'm very calm. Just tired of your comments that have no substance.

  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited April 2008

    I find everything about this election year ironic.  I started off thinking Biden should get the nomination (and still do) because he was, in my view, the one Democrat that could absolutely win the election.  I thought it was a big risk counting on Hillary Clinton because she's a woman and there is much bias against women, whether you all think so or not.  I experienced it in business for close to 50 years.  When Biden was out, I went to Edwards because of health care--and also took against Obama when he said he'd go into Paskistan without permission.  I only moved to Hillary when she took up Edwards' mantle on health care.  As I've said before, I've never been into rock stars or worship by personality.  It's platform that matters.  But watching Clinton push every day for this nomination has inspired me.  I believe she'll get us universal health care.

    I can't speak to Medicaid but I've been very happy with Medicare.  The drug program was put in place by Bush and the Republican Congress, not by the Democrats and I refuse to let anyone blame the Democrats for that.  Bush, with the Republicans following along, put in place a drug program where drug companies can charge market prices to the government.  They don't charge U.S. market prices to corporations (the corporations won't allow that to happen).  Bush literally gave the drug companies free range to charge what they want.  

    There's only so much one can do to change government practices, but I believe that Hillary Clinton will make more changes than any of the candidates.  But again if Obama wins, I'll vote for him.  It's all about platform in the end.  None of us will get to dine with any of them, but we'll all get to see drug prices go up, medical premiums go up, gas prices go up, CEO's get more and more millions if a Democrat does not win the White House.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008
    Hey Bren I'm back...........I'm am just a "working class Josephine".....Laughing and freaking proud of it.............and yes I love this Country and I love our political process........not any smug Faculty Lounger is going to tell me that my belief in God or my gun ownership happens because I am "bitter" because my Gov't has not taken "care" of me......since when is it the Gov't (which happens to be all of us)job to take care of me.........I want to take care of myself..............I want the gov't to stay out of my life as long as I am following the laws of the land.........I don't want to spend the rest of the life I have going through gov't bureaucracy trying to get a physical............of course this is just the humble opinion of a conservative woman that is trying to survive bc........I will never really recover financially from my disease and a secondary chronic medical condition that I have that will have to be treated for the rest of my life........but that's ok.......if I am going to be destitute I wouldn't want to be destitute in any other country but this one.....because regardless of insurance or the ability to pay I can walk into any county hospital and be treated.............Shokk
  • anneshirley
    anneshirley Member Posts: 1,110
    edited April 2008

    Grace--he didn't do an excellent job, however.  He spent 9 million dollars and flooded the airways and mailboxes with ads, and he still lost by ten points.  Unfortunately, his wins in red states may get him the nomination but it won't get him the presidency.  It just won't happen, and we'll be stuck again! And I could cry about it.  (And for disclosure, I wouldn't have run Hillary either but she stands a far better chance in the general than he does.)

    I became a Democrat in 1984, and now I plan to leave the Party and become an independent, again (I will vote for Obama if Hillary doesn't win) having no trust left that the Democrats know how to win elections. Can anyone here imagine someone with Obama's experience applying for the CEO position in a major corporation with his scant resume.  He wouldn't even get in for an interview.    

    One of the reasons Obama insisted early on that people should vote for him was that he would get Hillary voters but she wouldn't get his.  It was an arrogant statement (he's strong on arrogance), and it's now backfired, with a much larger percentage of Hillary's voters saying they won't vote for him.  And counting on the new, younger voters to elect a president is foolish in the extreme.  Those who have to be fed rock stars for breakfast before they'll do their civic duty and vote don't deserve our consideration and they also can't be counted on when all the banner waving and shouting is over. 

    This election year may have inspired some; it's only made me more of a cynic.     

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    Grace AnneShirley is giving you some foreshadowing........she is right about Obama.........he will never survive the fall elections........he's too far left.........and if he thinks Hillary has gone negative.......is he out of his mind?............she has done nothing to him like what is coming from the Republicans..........Shokk

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    Shokk, great comments this morning, wish I had seen the show!

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    Hillary's argument of being more electable will have more credence if she keeps adding white male voters to her camp.  Indiana will give us a good picture if this trend is expanding towards her.

    Here's the breakdown of yesterday's primary:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080423/pl_politico/9812

    There were few surprises in Pennsylvania, according to the exit polls conducted by Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International for television networks and The Associated Press. Clinton held about 65 percent of white women and about 55 percent of the key swing bloc of white men, a strong showing though slightly weaker than her Ohio showing.  Clinton has now won white men in 12 states and Obama has done the same in 10 states.

  • shokk
    shokk Member Posts: 1,763
    edited April 2008

    Thanks Kelly I am a bit fired up today............it looks like you have a picture of your beautiful "punishment"  posted....jeez what a beauty........Shokk

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2008

    Shokk,

    I haven't been watching MSNBC lately because of Chris Matthews.  I don't want to see him even accidently.  Sounds like I missed a good one. 

    Susie,  they got to you eh?  Made a contribution did ya.  Me too.

    Ok, we'll start with John Edwards, then who to write?  Maybe we should find some elected superdelegates, why not, everyone else is writing them.

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited April 2008

    Well, congratulations to the voters of Pennsylvania! 

    While the results may have been expected and while the candidates may have held on to their usual consistuencies, I think if you look under the covers at the numbers, there is now evidence that Obama's statements and associations have hurt him, not just with Independents, but with Democrats as well.  Take a look at this map of Pennsylvania:  http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=PADEMMAPPRIMARY1  As you scroll over each county, you can see that Clinton had 65%+ of the vote in pretty much every rural county.  I don't know that those voters particularly loved Clinton, but I think they were sending a message to Obama and the Democratics that they really don't like Obama.  Meanwhile, with the exception of Philadelphia proper, the counties where Obama won were much closer between the two candidates. 

    Similarly, I'm sure that all of us who watched the results last night saw the polls which showed that a many more of Clinton supporters than Obama supporters say that they will either vote for McCain or stay home in November, if their preferred candidate is not the nominee.   While some reports today are saying that these Clinton supporters are "hateful", I think the problem for these voters is that they simply don't feel that they can trust Obama with the presidency, given his lack of experience and some of the issues of judgement that have come up recently. 

    I think this is a very big problem for the Democrats.  More and more, it's becoming apparent that Obama may not be electable in the fall.  But despite the fact that Clinton has won the last three primaries, despite the fact that she has won the big states and despite the fact that she has won the majority of the November "must win" states, it still appears that Obama has the lock on the nomination.  Boy, have the Democrats ever dug themselves into a hole!    

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited April 2008

    I wonder who McCain would rather go up against ... obviously, he wants the weakest one with the American masses.  I wonder if thats why he did this:

    "

    Obama has come under fire for attending a Chicago church for two decades where the Rev. Jeremiah Wright was pastor. Wright espoused inflammatory views including saying the U.S. government spread the AIDS virus to African Americans. He has since retired.

    The 30-second ad in question attacks Democratic North Carolina gubernatorial candidates Beverly Perdue and Richard Moore for their endorsements of Obama, referencing the Illinois senator's "judgment" in supporting Wright and calling him "too extreme for North Carolina."

    North Carolina is one of two states holding the next crucial Democratic primaries on May 6 in the tight race between Obama and Hillary Clinton to oppose McCain in the November presidential election.

    Traveling with McCain, Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan said he had tried to call the chair of the North Carolina party to ask the ad be withdrawn"

Categories