removing lymphe nodes

Options
sonnebe
sonnebe Member Posts: 16
edited June 2014 in Lymphedema

Hi guys.  I had a lumpectomy done 2 weeks ago, along with snb.  The surgeon informed me today that he had removed two lymph nodes one was clean the other had cancer cells.  He now recommends I have all my lymph nodes removed under my left arm.  I will also have chemo, followed by radiation and then start on Tomoxifen.  I'm really upset having the lymph nodes removed as I'm worried about lymphedema.  I work with horses.  I know my first concern should be my cancer but the thought of always worrying about cuts, bites insect stings scares me.  Have any of you opted not to have your lymph nodes removed?

P.S.  I'm so glad I found this site.  I don't know anyone who has gone through breast cancer.

sue

Comments

  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited December 2007

    Hi, Sue, and welcome! I'm glad you found us too! Smile (Only I'm sorry you had to Frown).

    I hear you on not wanting to worry from now on about nicks and bites and who-knows-what. That is, for sure, not easy to face. Here's the thing: bad as lymphedema is, it's not even in the same class as the breast cancer beast. And it's treatable. Not convenient, not fun, but definitely manageable. Those of us who have it already have learned to deal with the threat of infection by keeping wet-wipes and antibiotic handy for those scrapes and nicks. It's doable.

    Bad news first: with the surgery you've already had, you are already at risk for lymphedema (LE). Whether your surgeon is aware of it or not (many are not) any surgery to our chests puts us at risk regardless of the number nodes removed. Many of us here have had only one node removed and have developed LE, or we've developed it following prophylactic mastectomies. Yes, more nodes removed increases the statistical risk, but the risk is there already and you'll want to know how to reduce that risk, recognize possible problems, and get help if you should ever need it. 

    The good news: there are simple steps you can take to reduce your risk. You can find them at the National Lymphedema Network website in their Position Papers. The ones on "Risk Reduction," "Exercise," and "Air Travel" are especially helpful. All here: www.lymphnet.org

    Please, fight the beast first, with everything you've got. And throughout your journey, do let us know how we can help you deal with your lymphedema risk AND get your life back at the same time. You can do this!

    ((((Hugs!)))) and best wishes for a smooth and succesful journey through treatment,

    Binney 

  • sonnebe
    sonnebe Member Posts: 16
    edited December 2007

    Thanks Binney.  I'm just so over whelmed.  When I first found my lump I started preparing myself for the worst.  I've gone through lots of crying moments.  Crying mostly in private so not to upset my family.  When I went back in yesterday to see the surgeon and he told me they found cancer cells in one of the lymph nodes and I would have to go back in and have the rest removed I felt I had been hit with a ton of bricks.  Up until then I felt it was a dream, not really happening to me.  How could it, I'm healthy, physically fit, don't smoke, drink, but reality is it is happening to me.

    I'm so glad this site is here, I wish I would have found it sooner.

    sue

  • FloridaLady
    FloridaLady Member Posts: 2,155
    edited December 2007

    Sonnebe,

    I would get a second opinion on more nodes removed.  If you have decided to do rads and chemo...I would not take them out.  You have a great after treatment drug also to help you hopefully stay clear.  If you had her2 or triple neg like me I would think differently but you just have a lot less chance of recurrence.  I'm very active too (now was) and this stuff can be a big pain. 

    I was told by my rads doc just make sure you can put your arm out of the way to get good rad coverage.

    Ask now not later.

    Living in hope,

    Flalady

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited December 2007

    Sue,

    You are right that all the BC treatment decisions we must make can be overwhelming.  I fully understand where you are coming from since I was faced with the exact same situation in 2000.  I will share my reasoning with you only as another perspective to consider.

    I too had a lumpectomy and SNB in 2000 on the right breast for a small invasive ductal cancer.  The preliminary path report my surgeon received while I was still on the table was that my nodes were all clear.  She had removed 6 nodes in the SNB procedure.  My onc told me she planned to only do radiation of the breast and no chemo would be needed.

    One week later we got back the final pathology report which included the Histochemistry...these showed that I had micromets to 2 of the sentinel nodes.  My surgeon also wanted to take me back for a complete axillary dissection.  My onc told me that the presence of any cancer cells in the nodes kicked me into needing chemo.  The plan was to use standard chemo protocol (which back then was AC/Taxol) radiation of the breast plus the lower axilla, and start on Tamoxifen.

    I chose to not have any additional axillary nodes removed because I had only a very tiny amount of cancer found in the 2 nodes, the other 4 were clear, and now that I would have chemo anyway my treatment plan would be the same whether I had additional nodes removed or not.  I knew there was a risk in making that decision but had my oncs support and felt the risk of LE was greater in my specific situation.

    As it turns out that cancer was very successfully treated without any recurrence or development of LE in my right arm.  In 2005 however, we found a brand new primary BC, this time Lobular in the opposite breast.  My decision process this time was much different because of the much more advanced pathology.  We knew based on MRI and PET that I definitely had nodal involvement on the left.  A SNB was attempted at the time of my bilateral mastectomy but not surprisingly the surgeon had to do a total axillary clearance including all 3 levels of nodes.  23 nodes were removed, all 23 positive. In this situation I knew the removal of so many cancerous nodes was essential in my goal of successful treatment along with full chemo, radiation and hormonal therapies.

    I developed LE of the left arm within 2 months of surgery and while taking chemo.  I am very grateful today that my dominant right arm remains non-affected by LE even though I recognize it will always be at risk. 

    Binney very appropriately points out that the decision making process MUST be focused first on the successful treatment of your cancer.  The type of cancer (ductal vs lobular or other types), the grade, degree of nodal involvement and plan for chemo/radiation and hormonals should all come into play when deciding whether to have further nodes removed.

    I have had experience now with 2 very different situations and thus 2 different decisions.  I do not regret either of my decisions made in 2000 or 2005.  As much as we all hope to find a "roadmap" that will tell us what to do, we must make our decisions based on the best current information provided to us by our professionals and then go with what feels right for us.

    I wish you the best in your journey!  Please come here often for support.  You will find that many of us have dealt with very similar feelings, fears and anxiety and you never have to feel alone.

  • sonnebe
    sonnebe Member Posts: 16
    edited December 2007

    If you have already had SNB done and in my case 1 node was free the other was not why would you need to have a full lymph node discetion?  I thought the reason for removal was to see if the cancer had left the tumor and if it had then this would determine treatments. (radiation, chemo, temoxifen)

    sue

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited December 2007

    Sonnebe: I think the rationale is very similar to why we have a lumpectomy or mastectomy to remove the cancer from our breasts ...   if cancer is found in the lymph nodes the doctors want to remove as many lymph nodes as they need to to remove as much of the cancer cells as they can ...   they do not want to bet that the chemo and/or radiation will remove any/all traces of cancer cells - they want to remove as much as they can surgically to ensure you have the best prognosis going forward.   I'm not a medical professional - but this seems to be the rationale from everything I've seen.

    Doreen  

  • MtnMama
    MtnMama Member Posts: 133
    edited December 2007

    Sue -- You're right that the test helps determine the treatment, but the most effective part of the treatment to obliterate the cancer from your body can be direct removal of any known or likely cancer cells.  Chemo, radiation, and hormonal treatments in the majority of cases are effective.  But there are no guarantees, so it's all about balancing the risks.

    You raise some really good questions about lymphedema risks.  I would discuss them with your onc, and even get a second opinion if needed.  I would have probably made the same choices as LindaLou53 if faced with her decisions.

  • sonnebe
    sonnebe Member Posts: 16
    edited December 2007

    Thanks guys.  You are right.  There may not be any more it the rest but what if there is...I will go forward with the surgery and take it one day at a time after that.

    sue

  • rubytuesday
    rubytuesday Member Posts: 2,248
    edited December 2007

    Sue, I feel for you having to make this decision.  I was in pretty much the same boat almost 2 yrs. ago.  I had bc 10 years ago and had 6 nodes removed, all negative.  Then 2 years ago, I had a new primary in the same breast.  I had SNB and micromets in the node.  I was soooooooooooooo upset.  I didn't want to have more nodes removed, and didn't want to do radiation with the added risk for lymphedema.  I struggled with the decision, set up the surgery and canceled it the morning of the surgery.  I had decided to talk to the radiation oncologist to see what his take was on it because by then I was determined that it was going to be either surgery OR radiation BUT NOT both.  The rad onc said 4 or more positive nodes and he would recommend radiation.  Then I went to see my oncologist who I thought would recommend node removal so that he could see how many were positive for treatment options (chemo).  Instead, he said: "In my opinion, and I have nothing to gain from this, surgical removal of any cancerous nodes is FAR superior to radiation".  I made my decision based on his statement and went ahead with the surgery. My BS didn't consider less than 10 nodes a good sample (the gold standard of 'treatment') and I told her as they wheeled me into surgery to not go nuts in there and take a bunch.  I also told her that I'd get over it if she only got 8 instead of the flip side where she took 15.  She miraculously ended up taking just 10 which were all negative.  Best wishes!

  • shrink
    shrink Member Posts: 936
    edited December 2007

    I just got my path rpt from Monday's surgery.  The left breast had no cancer but the bs removed 4 nodes when he took the breast.  Is this normal?  Does he get paid by the node?  Anyway, is my left arm now at risk too?  In the hospital they were taking blood and bps in that arm repeatedly.  I didn't know until now that any nodes were removed from the "good" side.

  • nagem
    nagem Member Posts: 353
    edited December 2007

    When I had a bilateral mastectomy (one side to clean up LCIS, the other prophylactic), my surgeon also did an SNB on the "good" side, since once you have had breast cancer, particularly lobular, your chances of having it in the other breast are somewhat greater, and it's sometimes not possible to know that your breast is free of disease until an in-depth pathology is done, with results coming several days after surgery. (My cancer, for instance, did not show up on mammogram or ultrasound. It was diagnosed only by biopsy of my quite palpable and visible lump.) Yes, this does mean your "good" side is now at risk too for lymphedema. The good news, though, is that you didn't have cancer in those nodes!

  • twink
    twink Member Posts: 1,574
    edited December 2007

    I had a bilateral mast last June. SNB came back negative intraoperatively but showed micromets on the path report.  I agreed to a full ALND on the left side.  My BS felt very strongly that 'sampling' nodes didn't provide sufficient information and still left a strong possibility that missed nodes contained cancer.  I opted to have all potential cancerous nodes removed.  As it turned out, the other 14 removed with the full dissection came back negative.  I'm now going through radiation (which I also didn't plan for) but despite the increased risk of lymphedema, I'd rather throw everything possible at this now than regret not having done everything I could.  The surgeries established a level of risk for lymphedema; the radiation increases the risk but as the onc pointed out... better lymphedema than a more dire alternative.

    Marian, I'm sorry to hear of your path report.  You must be very tired of all this and very scared of the outcome.  I too had positive nodes after neoadjuvant chemo so understand the dissapointment in the outcome.  As for 'volunteered' nodes I think that's typical since the nodes are throughout the breast tissue.  My SNB also produced an extra, unplanned node (which was positive too).  I've heard good things about Xeloda...I hope it kicks the crap right out of any remaining cancer.  I'll PM you separately as I am thinking about you...

    t

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited December 2007

    Here is the link to an interesting article that came out of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.  It appears they now believe a specific subset of women with a single positive sentinel node could bypass axillary dissection with a small amount of risk.

    http://www.cancernetwork.com/tech-focus/sabcs/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204805647&cid=ONI-SABCS-121807

    And another related link:

    http://www.cancernetwork.com/tech-focus/sabcs/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=UHB2DPSC4LZS4QSNDLRCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=204805457

  • LindaLou53
    LindaLou53 Member Posts: 929
    edited September 2009

    Bump for Kayleigh and London-Virgina

  • London-Virginia
    London-Virginia Member Posts: 851
    edited September 2009

Categories