I say YES. YOU say NO....Numero Tre! Enjoy!

Love the Dr. Oz NO meme -- so much that I posted it too ( I'm on the next page now on my computer ) so that is what the deletion above is about.

Rough edges peek out now and then but he knows what he is doing. Just wish he could get better media attentions for it.

They need most of our help. They are going to be the ones who fix all the things that are broken by both sides. The more we make education a non-burden ( a really good education ) the better for all.

Just having a thought or two.

I am surprised that the Federal Magistrate judge in the DOJ warrant case has been so hornswoggled by 45's attys' word-salad motion for a "special master" that she's actually leaning toward granting it. Discovery of prosecution evidence is never allowed before actual charges are filed--and to grant some third -party attorney or retired judge (especiially one who might have been GOP-appointed or ran on the local level as a Repub.) access to extremely sensitive documents to determine after the fact whether they were "privileged" is unheard-of and outrageous. You know the GQP would declare everything in there discussed with or written by anyone with a law license or even law degree to fall under "attorney-client privilege;" and "executive privilege" (if any) disappears when the possessor of the info is no longer the "executive" in question.

What also flabbergasts me is that there have yet to be search warrants issued for Bedminster or Trump Tower--especially when there are cellphone videos, taken by multiple unconnected people, of people walking out of Trump Tower bearing Bankers' Boxes with blue tape on them. (Nothing indicates the bearers of these boxes are themselves in law enforcement).

Sandy, I think I read somewhere today ( didn't think I'd want the info after I read it ) that the government gets an opportunity to go before that judge and argue why a "special master" is not something that is actually needed. I do sure wish I had not deleted the article I read.

I also read that the Loon has yet to be able to hire anyone competent to take on his defense ( oh what could that be ) mainly for his having secreted government files away with no intention of giving them back. He seems to have used up the strong profile attys. while he was ahem' in ofc. playing at the role of president. No one is interested in helping him and I'l be kind and say there are a number of reasons -- and kinder yet and say in the list I read there was nothing about not getting paid, but most people understand that he would find a way to 'stiff' anyone who signed up with him.

This man is first, and foremost a failure -- a rather persistent one. There was never a reason ( very slow and highly rocky start-up ) to think the Truth Social site would go over. Unless you say going over in a heap and not getting up again which seems to be well on its way.

Wondering Sandy, if the Judge on the " Special Master " issue may have felt a lot of concern about how the Loon and Co,. might view her if she didn't kow-tow to demands by trying to indicate sed was in favor with what they wanted. She might be aware that getting a " master " might not happen or be too difficult, and that would be an out for her. Just thinking about it that way since she is a " Loon " apppointee. Thanks Mitch.

Some lessons are hard to learn.

Loving the signs.