Soy or no Soy?

Options
2

Comments

  • shed
    shed Member Posts: 27
    edited February 2007
    bookworm
    I drink Oat milk or Rice milk. i'm hoping that they are okay.
  • HollyHopes
    HollyHopes Member Posts: 497
    edited March 2007

    omigod...now i have to worry about soy too?? by the way...has anyone found a multivitamin that does NOT have antioxidants in it? has anyone tried immpower (supplement) to boost the immune system. the pharmacist at the hospital where i work swears by it...

  • chris2007
    chris2007 Member Posts: 2
    edited March 2007
    Quote:

    omigod...now i have to worry about soy too?? by the way...has anyone found a multivitamin that does NOT have antioxidants in it? has anyone tried immpower (supplement) to boost the immune system. the pharmacist at the hospital where i work swears by it...




    Hi HollyHopes,
    May I know why you are asking for multivitamins that do not have antioxidants? Is it bad? Thanks
  • HollyHopes
    HollyHopes Member Posts: 497
    edited March 2007

    My oncologist said to avoid all antioxidants (except those naturally occuring in foods) since it works against the chemo and can neutralize the effects of the chemo drugs.

  • Valerie_R
    Valerie_R Member Posts: 66
    edited March 2007
    I am estrogen positive and saw a nutritionist as well as my oncologist because soy products used to be one of my major sources of protein.

    Both the nutritionist and the oncologist told me that 2 small servings of tofu a week would not hurt me, but not to use any supplements or vitamins that were soy based because the amount of soy in them is not regulated and you basically have no idea of what you are getting. I had to switch my supplements and vitamins and change what I ate and am doing just fine. Hope this helps!

    Valerie R
  • Nickig
    Nickig Member Posts: 357
    edited March 2007
    Hello ladies- very interesting thread. Before I was dx in 2004 I was on a high soy diet monitored by a weight loss Dr. LOTS of Soy ISOLATE and Isolated soy products. Since having bc I have eliminated the "isolates" and the isolated from my diet. It is the natural soy LECITHIN that I have come to understand that with moderation is ok. HOWEVER- I am triple negative and still find it hard to consume soy voluntarily. I lost 32 lbs on the diet. But gained 1/2 of it back on chemo. (mood foods) and have been trying to just eat healthier. Like you all have said here, soy is in EVERYTING! Even Tuna! But they are not the processes ones (isolates) so- I'm eased about that. I'm more focused now on getting enough fiber and protien in my body. I was also told and have read that supplements should be avoided too. Good luck to you all...
    Nicki
  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited March 2007
    This sounds good about the way they process to get soy lecithin:

    Lecithin Processing: Lecithin is a combination of phospholipids that naturally occur in soybeans. Lecithin gums are obtained from soy oil after the oil has been extracted from the soybean flakes. Lecithin is removed from the soybean oil using a steam precipitation process. At this point, the gums contain about 25% moisture, 50% phospholipids and 25% soy oil. The gums are dried under a vacuum to about 65% phospholipid content. A wide variety of refined lecithins are made from this stock by filtration, blending, compounding, enzymatically or chemically modifying or deoiling.

    But is this the chemically modifying method they mention above?:

    "Conventionally processed soybean oils use hexane solvents to extract the oils, so the oil is free of protein. This harsh process then requires the oil to be flashed with fire to burn off the hexane solvents. High temperatures can change the structure of the fatty acids whereas they function differently or are not recognized by the human body. Plus, hexane residue remains in the finished product. Hexane is a known toxin and we believe it has no place in a baby's diet -- even if only a residue."

    The soy industry is doing a good job of convincing us that soy won't harm us until we look a bit deeper.
  • chris2007
    chris2007 Member Posts: 2
    edited March 2007

    Thanks for the reply HollyHopes. Hope you are doing well with your chemo.

  • Nickig
    Nickig Member Posts: 357
    edited March 2007
    Wow...Rosemary44- interesting. Until I was hit with this disease I NEVER paid any attention to what I was putting in my mouth/body! It is very hard (and expensive) to eat healthy anymore. Where did you find this info? On that link above? I haven't read the whole thing...It's so mind boggeling.

    take care
  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited March 2007
    Nicki,

    The information about the soy processing came from a baby formula maker. I asked them a question about why they put soy in their organic formula, and they said they have to list it because a trace amount might be in there from the processing plant. Then they went on to explain why we shouldn't eat soy and you see the quote above from them about the hexane in the normal processing. That's the kind we get to eat which is in everything lately.

    I just try to stay away from it, but I'm very upset that there is any soy in baby formulas and food stuffs.

    About finding stories on the net. I use yahoo, and just ask a question. Is soy safe to eat? and up will come a few hundred hits.
  • moonsong
    moonsong Member Posts: 15
    edited March 2007

    flexseed? suppose to be better than soy any ideas

  • Valerie_R
    Valerie_R Member Posts: 66
    edited March 2007
    I got conflicting advise from all medical personnel, and I am estrogen positive. I finally found a great nutritionist who works with cancer patients and she explained soy to me. Soy had been one of the major sources of protein in my diet prior to diagnosis.

    What I was told that two or three small servings of soy products, i.e., tofu, per week, and small being the operative word, will not harm you. The thing to watch out for are all of the soy based supplements and vitamins, which you should avoid like the plague if you are ER+. The reason is the amount of soy in vitamins and supplements is not regulated, and you really have no idea of what you are getting, whereas you know exactly what you are getting with a 3 oz. portion of tofu.

    Hope this helps! I have switched to all non-soy based vitamins and supplements and there are a lot of great products out there.

    Take care,

    Valerie R
  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited March 2007
    You may be interested in this - its obviously still in the cell culture dish stage.
    My concern would be IF IF IF soy contains estrogenic substances which might act in the following manner. That is a big if.

    U. of I. graduate student Xinguo Jiang also found that when breast cancer cells that contain very high levels of estrogen receptor protein are exposed to low levels of estrogen, they produce large quantities of the granzyme inhibitor and become highly resistant to immune attack.

    The researchers were able to show that estrogen’s effect on PI-9 production was the sole mechanism by which estrogen interfered with the natural killer cells’ ability to kill off breast cancer cells. They did so by blocking PI-9 production in the breast cancer cells exposed to estrogen. When these breast cancer cells were targeted by natural killer cells, they were efficiently killed off, even when significant levels of estrogen and estrogen receptor were present.

    http://www.hopkinsbreastcenter.org/artemis/200703/5.html
  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited March 2007
    What that story is saying to me is that all of us should be wary of estrogen, even the ER negatives. That is new that even a small amount of estrogen can turn off our immunity system to produce natural killer cells.

    I don't think soy will be the answer because the unfermented kind has genistein in it which promotes the growth of tumors. Maybe if they use the fermented type, maybe:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query...t_uids=11431339
  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited March 2007
    It's true about the fermented types of soy are supposedly not harmful and we can have a little of it. Here's the list of which is fermented and non-fermented:

    http://www.mercola.com/2004/aug/4/fermented_soy.htm
  • BlindedByScience
    BlindedByScience Member Posts: 314
    edited March 2007
    I just found an article that discusses human clinical trials with soy on mice (of course) and humans with prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has a lot of similarities to bc, so we might think about extrapolating the results to us.

    The researchers claim that the whole soy supplement reduced proliferation of the tumor cells, while genistein (a single isoflavone found in soy) promoted tumors.

    For what it's worth:

    http://www.aicr.org/site/News2?abbr=res_&page=NewsArticle&id=11327&news_iv_ctrl=1201
    Boosting Cancer Treatment via Food Compounds

    some excerpts:

    In laboratory studies, Dr. Sarkar found that genistein along with chemotherapy promoted apoptosis in treated cells, compared to cells treated with genistein or chemotherapy alone.
    ........
    Supported by an AICR grant, Dr. Hillman found that genistein combined with radiation treatment inhibited cancer cell growth significantly more than radiation or genistein treatment alone.

    But the researchers discovered that genistein, when given without radiation therapy, promoted metastasis from prostate tumors to the adjacent lymph nodes. "This increased metastasis was a big concern, because we were already running clinical trials using soy," Dr. Hillman notes. In the human trials, no adverse effects were seen.
    ........
    An important difference between the clinical and laboratory studies was that the mice had been treated with a solution of pure genistein, while the people received capsules containing whole soy powder. That difference proved to be key. When Hillman switched the mice to dried powder of whole soy, she found whole soy just as effective as genistein in radiosensitizing prostate tumors. Also, whole soy given without radiation did not increase metastasis to the lymph nodes.
    ......
    In addition to genistein, researchers are investigating the sensitizing characteristics of other dietary agents. Curcumin, a phytochemical found in turmeric; indole-3-carbinol, an antioxidant found in cruciferous vegetables; EGCG, a flavonoid found in green tea; and resveratrol, a compound found in grape seeds and red grape skins, are among the substances shown to enhance the antitumor activity of various chemotherapeutic drugs. Research combining these dietary compounds with chemotherapeutic agents shows increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation in tumor cells from colorectal, liver and ovarian cancers.

    In laboratory studies, genistein, curcumin, gamma-tocotrienol - a vitamin E component - and PABA (para-aminobenzoic acid), are among the dietary agents shown to sensitize cancer cells to radiation treatment. This enhanced radiosensitivity has been shown in prostate, cervical, esophageal, breast and melanoma cancer cells.
  • mkl48
    mkl48 Member Posts: 350
    edited March 2007

    While Karmanos is a very respected center, the last sentence says it all. None of this has been demonstrated in living, breathing cancer partients. Cells and mice do not behave the same way human tumors do. It is also too great a leap to say that what appears effective in prostate can be transferred to breast. There have been many attempts to potentiate radiation therapy and none have made it past early clinical trials.Beth

  • mkl48
    mkl48 Member Posts: 350
    edited March 2007

    The question is what would be different about the 13% of women who get breast cancer from the 87% who don't. They all have exposure to pesticides? If pesticide had that great an impact the incidence of BC would be greater.Most smokers do not get cancer, so again the question is what is unique about their biology in the broadest sense? Beth

  • BlindedByScience
    BlindedByScience Member Posts: 314
    edited March 2007
    Actually (my opinion) it is less of a leap between prostate cancer and breast cancer than from mice with human bc to bc patients. Prostate cancer is showing some inheritance patterns in that fathers with pc may increase a daughter's risk of bc. Since everyone is living longer, and men usually develop prostate cancer very late in life, it's getting easier to track.

    Diagnostic tests are finding pc potential can be identified using some of the same genetic markers as bc. (Epigenomics is one company that patented their marker and find it works well for both. They look for methylation patterns on DNA.) These tests aren't on the market yet, so it's early stage development. And the methylation of DNA is not the same as inheriting a gene--it's the body's way to turn on or off particular genes and methylation patterns can change over the course of a lifetime. They can also be passed from parent to child.

    New cases of pc appear with approximately the same frequency of bc--about 200,000 cases per year. Some pc is hormone-stimulated, some not; some of the same drugs are effective on pc as for bc (if androgen+: zoladex. lupron, aromatase inhibitors). Prostate cancer frequency has shot up almost in lock-step eith breast cancer from the graphed data I've seen.

    While similarities do not prove a connection, I have been watching the news releases on pc pretty closely. Again, this is my own musings and leanings and is primarily opinion. I've discussed this idea with a few oncologists who have also acknowledged that they, too, have considered the similarities and the genetic tests and have formed the same kind of question on inheritance. But there is too little data to speak authoritatively.

    We all have to sift through endless results--most of which contradict each other--on nearly everything having to do with food & supplements. I am inclined to believe that whole soy is probably OK (in moderation of course) and that soy supplements or isolated soy protein or other derivatives of soy are likely to have some degree of tumor stimulation.

    That this may also hold true for prostate cancer as described in the article above is somewhat supportive to my interpretation that whole soy may be harmless-to-beneficial for bc survivors. But I can understand it might not be seen as terribly relevant to those who see the two cancers as very different.
  • mkl48
    mkl48 Member Posts: 350
    edited March 2007

    I spoke with my onc who has done collaboration with Karmonos on this issue and in his opinion the results are very unclear. He does not want me on soy, but says normal intake of any fruits or vegs is fine during treatment.

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited April 2007
    I found this in Medline--it looks to be 2000 and not sure if anything more current but will check:
    Genistein's "ER-dependent and independent" actions are mediated through ER pathways in ER-positive breast carcinoma cell lines.

    * Shao ZM,
    * Shen ZZ,
    * Fontana JA,
    * Barsky SH.

    Department of Surgery, Shanghai Medical University, P. R. China.

    Genistein, a natural flavone found in soy has been postulated to be responsible for lowering the rate of breast cancer in Asian women. Our previous studies have shown that genistein exerts multiple suppressive effects on both estrogen receptor positive (ER+) as well as estrogen receptor negative (ER-) human breast carcinoma lines suggesting that the mechanisms of these effects may be independent of ER pathways. In the present study however we provide evidence that in the ER+ MCF-7, T47D and 549 lines but not in the ER-MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 lines both presumed "ER-dependent" and "ER-independent" actions of genistein are mediated through ER pathways. Genistein's antiproliferative effects are estrogen dependent in these ER+ lines, being more pronounced in estrogen-containing media and in the presence of exogenous 17-beta estradiol. Genistein also inhibits the expression of ER-downstream genes including pS2 and TGF-beta in these ER+ lines and this inhibition is also dependent on the presence of estrogen. Genistein inhibits estrogen-induced protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) activity. Genistein is only a weak transcriptional activator and actually decreases ERE-CAT levels induced by 17-beta estradiol in the ER+ lines. Genistein also decreases steady state ER mRNA only in the presence of estrogen in the ER+ lines thereby manifesting another suppression of and through the ER pathway. Our observations resurrect the hypothesis that genistein functions as a "good estrogen" in ER+ breast carcinomas. Since chemopreventive effects of genistein would be targeted to normal ER-positive ductal-lobular cells of the breast, this "good estrogen" action of genistein is most relevant to our understanding of chemoprevention.

    PMID: 10953303 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited April 2007
    I found something more current.
    Mol Carcinog. 2007 Feb 12;
    Genistein sensitizes inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on the growth of estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-overexpressing human breast cancer cells.

    * Mai Z,
    * Blackburn GL,
    * Zhou JR.

    Nutrition/Metabolism Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Although tamoxifen (TAM) is used for the front-line treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors, nearly 40% of estrogen-dependent breast tumors do not respond to TAM treatment. Moreover, the positive response is usually of short duration, and most tumors eventually develop TAM-resistance. Overexpression of HER2 gene is associated with TAM-resistance of breast tumor, and suppression of HER2 expression enhances the TAM activity. Soy isoflavone genistein has been shown to have anti-cancer activities and suppress expression of HER2 and ERalpha. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that genistein may sensitize the response of ER+ and HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells to TAM treatment. The combination treatment of TAM and genistein inhibited the growth of ER+/HER2-overexpressing BT-474 human breast cancer cells in a synergistic manner in vitro. Determination of cellular markers indicated that this synergistic inhibitory effect might be contributed in part from combined effects on cell-cycle arrest at G(1) phase and on induction of apoptosis. Further determination of the molecular markers showed that TAM and genistein combination synergistically induced BT-474 cell apoptosis in part by synergistic downregulation of the expression of survivin, one of the apoptotic effectors, and downregulation of EGFR, HER2, and ERalpha expression. Our research may provide a novel approach for the prevention and/or treatment of TAM insensitive/resistant human breast cancer, and warrants further in vivo studies to verify the efficacy of genistein and TAM combination on the growth of ER+/HER2-overexpressing breast tumors and to elucidate the in vivo mechanisms of synergistic actions. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
  • catherine7273
    catherine7273 Member Posts: 12
    edited April 2007

    most medical doctors have had very little to no training in nutrition, a fact i find shocking, but explains why most oncs are useless when it comes to advice on diet. my nutritionist recommends no soy whatsoever, while my onc says it's fine in moderation. both say flaxseed is fine. so i've decided to eliminate soy to the extent possible and i continue to eat 2 T ground flaxseed per day.

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited April 2007
    Effect of broccoli, soy on cancer cells explained

    April 16, 2007 06:36:29 AM PST

    Eating foods like broccoli and soy has been linked to lower cancer rates, and California researchers said on Sunday that they may have discovered the biological mechanism behind the protective effect.

    Using cells in a lab dish, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that diindolymethane (DIM), a compound resulting from digestion of cruciferous vegetables, and genistein, an isoflavone in soy, reduce the production of two proteins needed for breast and ovarian cancers to spread.

    "We think these compounds might slow or prevent the metastasis of breast and ovarian cancer, which would greatly increase the effectiveness of current treatments," said Erin Hsu, a UCLA graduate student in molecular toxicology.

    The UCLA team, which reported its finding at a meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, will next test the theory in mice.

    The findings highlight "an entirely unique mechanism ... Preventing the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells is crucial," said Dr. Alan Kristal, associate head of the cancer prevention program at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

    Cancer cells express very high levels of a surface receptor known as CXCR4, while the organs to which the cancers spread secrete high levels of CXCL12, a ligand that binds to that particular receptor.

    This attraction stimulates the invasive properties of cancer cells and acts like a homing device, drawing the cancer cells to organs like the liver or brain.

    The study found that when cancer cells were treated with either DIM or genistein, movement toward CXCL12 is reduced by at least 80 percent compared to untreated cells.

    Hsu says that this same chemotactic attraction is thought to play a role in the development of more than 23 different types of cancer.

    The amount of DIM and genistein used in the study is probably comparable to use of a high dose of supplements, and is likely not achievable through consumption of food alone, the researchers said.

    Both DIM and genistein are already being developed for use as a preventive, and a chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer, although more extensive toxicological studies are needed, they added.
  • SoapMaker
    SoapMaker Member Posts: 157
    edited April 2007
    There is so much controversy on soy or no soy. Some docs say yes, some say no...as with everything. No clear cut answers. I did research and what I found was this: Soy is a weak plant estrogen. What it does when you eat it is to take the place on the receptor that the body's estrogen would normally take. To put it simpler...you eat the soy and it jumps onto the receptor and knocks the body's estrogen out of its place, so that the body's estrogen does not have a home. To me...that is a good thing. It keeps the body's estrogen from being able to attach to your receptors, being that the soy estrogen has already taken that spot. All in all, soy is still an estrogen, but a very weak one. Hope that is making sense.

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Where is the cure
    www.truefacesofbreastcancer.org
  • jah4377
    jah4377 Member Posts: 42
    edited April 2007

    Wow, I just read Soy Alert That Lilly suggested and in the article it said, "Soy foods increase the body's requirement for vitamin D." Wasn't there just some findings that women with breast cancer had very low vitamin D in thier bodies?

  • moonsong
    moonsong Member Posts: 15
    edited April 2007

    where would I find DIM and genistein as a suppliment?

  • Rosemary44
    Rosemary44 Member Posts: 2,660
    edited April 2007

    Vitamin stores would have DIM. They still have a lot more explaining to do about genistein. They can't have it both ways, does it increase the size of a tumor or decrease it?

  • SoapMaker
    SoapMaker Member Posts: 157
    edited April 2007
    I've always had genistein on my list of supplements because when I got bc, years ago, the research I did told me it was a good thing. I was surprised to see that it is now suppose to support tumor growth. As with everything else...first it's good for you, then it's not, then it is...who knows what to believe anymore...about *anything*.

    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Where is the cure
    www.truefacesofbreastcancer.org
  • NancyD
    NancyD Member Posts: 3,562
    edited March 2008

    Bringing this back to the top since it's such an interesting topic for me.

    I didn't want to have my dx hanging around my sig, but I am ER+/PR+/Her2-.  The estrogen was very highly receptive (like 100%). So I am also looking at making some dietary changes. Ironic that I was just starting to bring in more soy products into my diet to help me in my menopause (I'm 56).

    So, no edaname?

Categories