Lifetime limit on PET scans?
Hi all,
I have been having PET scans to monitor my MBC for the last 5 years. My MO believes it to be the best modality for monitoring bone mets, so has always ordered a PET. It's scan time again, but this time my insurance refused the request, saying I had met my "lifetime limit" for PET scans. HUH? I know some insurance companies will not allow PET scans, but as I had never had any problem getting them authorized in the past, this came as a shock. I was certainly never informed that there was a lifetime limit.
This info came from my onc's MA. I plan to talk with the insurance company tomorrow to confirm this and find out how to appeal, but just wondering if anyone else has run in to this problem. I am on a Medicare Advantage plan.
Thanks in advance!
Jo
Comments
-
I am fairly certain that I read in the Medicare rules that you can only have three PET scans for the same "condition." I've had 2 so far, and my MO has now scheduled a CT, telling me that Medicare won't pay for a third (which I believe is incorrect). She said that they would pay if there was a change in circumstances, so maybe that's the kicker?
Good luck, and let us know what you find out.
-
I haven't heard this but am concerned as I am in a somewhat similar position. I have been getting PET scans, mostly on an every 3-month basis, for 4.5 years. Tumor size doesn't give me all of the important info I need and having the info about metabolic activity has been a key for my specific cancer. My tumor starts to light up on the PET scan before it grows in size and starts to go metabolically inactive before it shrinks.
-
Just chiming in. All so blasted confusing.
I had read on here (BCO) that a person can only have 3 PET scans in a lifetime with Medicare in the U.S. Don't know if that is true.
My health insurance (thru my work) allowed me to have 1 PET at diagnosis for the baseline testing. Denied another 1 year later (wanted yearly PET). NOW my insurance is balking at 3 month CT's. Denied latest one and MO had to call insurance company and do a peer to peer phone call. If this one stable, don't know what insurance will say in 3 more months.
Jobur-- I see you are from Wisconsin. I am Illinois. Close in terms of area of U.S. Don't know if that matters. And you are bone/liver like me.
JFL- PET'S EVERY 3 MONTHS FOR 4 1/2 YEARS !!!! Wow. I don't know what area of the country you are. Also you are bone/liver like me.
I do not understand how insurance companies can be so different in what they will allow. I wish we could do at least a yearly PET for me. Each type of scan shows a little different thing about the cancer and all I get is the CT's. If my insurance will allow that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I've had 15 PET scans. No issues with coverage--I've been very fortunate in that regard. Another one coming up soon.
-
I asked my PA this question just last week. I am covered by Medicare and a supplemental plan. She stated that most insurance will cover PETs, but was sure if several (never stated a number) went by with no evidence of disease insurance would stop covering. She also said once you switch to CT scans the only way to warrant a PET is to have disease progression. I have had four PET scans so far and a fifth is on the horizon. The only bad one was the very first. I do worry some about the cost and the amount of radiation being stored in my body. Guess it is worth it for the certainty of the test. It is amazing how different insurance companies see diagnostic tests.
-
Sorry I'm not stage IV, but thought this might be helpful to medicare people.
I have traditional medicare & a supplemental plan. So far since breast cancer diagnosis - I've had 6 PET/CTs and 4 CT scans. Oh, and one low dose spiral CT to check my lungs after all the treatments. They switched back & forth depending on what they were looking for or whether a surgeon wanted definitive placements. I've never had one denied and not been told that I couldn't have which ever the doc orders. Also had 3 MRIs tossed in there. My MO who retired did tell me if I wanted scans I would have to push, since lots of docs didn't believe they were useful.
-
Not on Medicare yet, but there could be a difference if one person has a Medicare Advantage plan and another has regular Medicare with a supplement, isn't that correct?
As I understand it, the Medicare Advantage plans are private plans and they have leeway in what they cover. although there are some minimum guidelines set by the government.Also, there could be regional differences because there are regional boards or bureaus that decide what is covered and/or how much reimbursement providers get.
-
Olma - yes there is a significant difference. As a simplification, with traditional medicare I can choose any doc or any procedure that my doc orders. There really aren't any gate keepers. With an advantage plan, you have to have a recommend from a PCP to a specialist and lots of things have limits.
Edited to add, I am not a medical professional. This is just my experience with both my parents and now 10 years with myself
-
Candy, I am in Florida, which has notoriously AWFUL health care administration. I do think that my MO does play a part in that he told me at some point that he usually has to get on the phone with the appeals rep at the insurance company (who is an MD) and speak to the rep but that a convo is always sufficient to get it approved, so long as the PET is coded as "restaging". My MO pushed back on me getting PETs in the beginning because he thought I would have insurance trouble. I told him I wanted to try and reassess if they were denied. I have been denied coverage of many things from my insurer that I thought should have been covered but for some reason, I have never had an issue with scans and in other instances, scans have been covered for medical services that insurance doesn't cover (like my scans I received when I had IVF 5 years ago - the IVF doctor told me that they would not be covered and I would have to pay them out of pocket like the rest of the IVF fees). I asked the clinic to submit them to my insurance and all were covered with no questions asked. Saved me thousands of dollars. Not sure what the deal is but I will ride this wave as long as I can. Also, my company is self-insured although administered by a large insurance company. It is possible my company set up different rules/thresholds and their rules around scans are more inclusive than the large insurance company would have for itself if it were the actual insurer.
-
Thank you to everyone who replied! Here's what I have learned so far. This only applies to Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans, not individual or group insurance.
Olma and MinusTwo - Medicare Advantage plans are REQUIRED to follow the rules set by Medicare. They can limit your choice of doctors/facilities, but coverage must be the same or better. For example, my MA plan has some basic dental stuff covered and a discount on hearing aides (both have to be in network Providers.)
BevJen - According to the Medicare website PET scans are covered and there is no stated limit that I could find so far. I have had at least 6 PET/CTs since being on my Medicare Advantage plan. Granted, not original Medicare, but both JCSLibrarian and MinusTwo above are on traditional Medicare and have had more than 3 PETs, so the 3 PET limit sounds like bs.
https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/diagnostic-non-l...
Medicare Part B (Medical Insurance) covers these tests (like CT scans, MRIs, EKGs, X-rays, and PET scans) when your doctor or other health care provider orders them as part of treating a medical problem.
And from the CMS site regarding PETs for bone mets
NaF-18 PET for Bone Metastasis
This national coverage determination (NCD) was issued on February 26, 2010. It establishes specific clinical indications under which CMS will cover NaF-18 Positron Emission Tomography (NaF-18 PET). The NCD concluded that NaF-18 PET scans are reasonable and necessary under Section 1862(a)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act in the context of Coverage with Evidence Development (CED).
Prospectively under CED, NaF-18 PET imaging must lead to:
- A change in patient management to more appropriate palliative care; or
- A change in patient management to more appropriate curative care, or
- Improved quality of life; or
- Improved survival
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/Coverage-wit...
As for my own particular case, I called my insurance company today to get more information on why my PET was refused. After taking all my info, they had to call the 3rd party company that handles their pre-approvals and I was able to talk to them. According to the woman at this company, my PET was not refused, my clinic withdrew the request and agreed to a CT scan instead. Next I called the clinic to hear their side of the story. The nurse who apparently works on getting scan approvals again told me the PET had been refused during a peer to peer (clinic nurse to insurance nurse or doctor) review, so to ensure I got some kind of imaging, she agreed to the CT. So the game the 3nd party "pre-approver" plays is to verbally refuse during the peer to peer so that the clinic agrees to a CT, but in order to do so they must first withdraw the initial PET request. So I have asked my clinic nurse to again request a PET, but force the insurance company to formally refuse it. Then maybe I can fight it.
Yuck. I normally lead a pretty stress free life, but this stuff really gets me rev'd!! We need transparency! We need to know the next time we need a scan they won't decide to limit CTs, or MRIs, or whatever. And we need this clearly stated in writing!
JFL and SchnauzerMom - Glad to hear neither of you have had any problems getting PETs approved. Are you on Medicare? Best wishes for your upcoming scan SchnauzerMom.
Candy-678 - You are so right about different scans showing different things. And it's alarming that your private insurance is now balking at approving CTs! Like you, I would be okay with only getting 1 PET per year if need be, but I absolutely need to know what to expect.
JCSLibrarian - Sounds like you have been NEAD for a while? Very happy for you! And I had a number of normal PETs while on Ibrance/Faslodex and had no problem with insurance coverage at that time. After all, that is why we have PET scans, right? To check for progression? I worry too about all the radiation, and the cost, but I think of both as necessary evils. Hope you stay NEAD for a long, long time.
I intend to call Medicare as well as the 3rd party company I must deal with to see if I can find out if there is any written criteria for us to point to when denied. This all raises my blood pressure so it may be a few days, but I will update with whatever else I learn.
Hugs to all and thanks again for your responses~
Jo
Edited to clarify, a NaF-18 PET is not the same as an FDG CT/PET, so the above info from the CMS website may not apply to FDG CT/PET.
-
ok, even though I'm not on Medicare, this sounds like the same procedure my doctors office has to go through. The first scan I had went through with no problem but the second PET we scheduled was denied and they were going to use some other imaging for me but I managed to get the assistant to tell me that a peer to peer call could be done. Then I made it clear to my doctor that I wanted PET scans...not a CT. So now I get them every time. They do deny first whe the pre-auth is sent but then they do the call and it gets approved.
I also called my ins. Co. as you did and found out the name of the third party approval company. Then I googled them. Their provider manual is online in PDF format and it shows the criteria for “advanced imaging service" approvals. And their manual pretty much says what you just wrote in regards to PET scans for bone mets, jobur. I told my doctor if ever they don't want to approve the PET on a peer to peer call, she should refer them to their own literature.
So try googling that third party company and you may find their manuals online like I did. Best of luck with this, now that you've figured it out you should get what you need.
-
Olma,
Good thought! I googled Novitas Solutions, which is the Medicare intermediary for Maryland, where I live, and found their manual but also a link to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) nationwide guidance. I read that because it is more inclusive. There IS no limit on number of PET scans or any other imaging modality, so I'm not sure where I read that originally (I think perhaps in the booklet that CMS mails out to Medicare participants every year?) I know I read it in 2018, when all of my present issues started to show up and I was worried about Medicare coverage for all sorts of things.
I'm going to go ahead with my CT scan as schedule next week (was told that Medicare wouldn't cover a PET), because I know that I will have a follow up of an MRI by my interventional radiologist within a month, so I should be scanned sufficiently this time. However, the next time my oncologist is ordering scans, I'm going to call her bluff on this CT versus PET scan nonsense and insist on a PET. I'm sorry if she will have to do a peer to peer conference with the Medicare intermediary, but hey, that's part of their job.
Also, I assume that most people know this, but in fact, often insurance companies follow whatever the Medicare policy is. To my knowledge, private insurance companies are not required to do this, but it's just the usual course of business.
Bev
-
JFL- Help me understand "restaging". I have heard that term before, but do not quite understand how that works with the scan ordering. Yep ride the wave as long as you can.
Jobur- Good summary. Thank you for summarizing it. That helps. As far as my CT denial, my insurance company has a third party authorization company also. I have not called them yet. I am going to wait to see if this CT is stable or not. If progression and change in treatment, then the next CT should be approved, right? But if stable, then I plan on investigating the why of the denial. I am going to ask MO her story (what was said in peer to peer phone call) and then call the third party company and asked them their side and get the policy in writing. I am freaked out about my CT denial because if they continue denying then how will we check for progression in the future????????? The CT's is the only scanning I get.
I don't worry much about the radiation exposure. I have Stage 4 cancer so the horse is out of the barn. And the cost to the insurance company doesn't worry me in the least. The administrators are making big salaries while I have Stage 4 cancer at the age of 49 !!!!! Boo freaking hoo for the insurance companies.
-
BevJen - I did find a couple of oncology journal articles that mentioned the maximum of 3 PETs, so you aren't losing it, ha ha! I have still not found anything on the CMS web pages regarding a max, but I will continue to search as time permits.
Olma - I did the same thing, found the 3rd party website for approval, in my case it is Evicore, and eventually found the pdf file with the clinical guidelines for their oncology imaging policies. Of note, this document has a section for metastatic cancers, but nothing there seemed to apply to MBC. There is also a section for breast cancer which included their criteria for imaging of MBC. Eureka! This is what I was looking for. Here is the Evicore document
https://www.evicore.com/-/media/files/evicore/clin...
To summarize their policy, after initial dx and treatment, PETs are only allowed if CT or/and bone scans are inconclusive. After reading this, I now remember one other time a few years back where they refused the PET and I had to have a CT instead. And guess what, the CT was inconclusive and I got a PET soon afterward.
Regarding the peer to peer review, one of the nurses at my clinic already did this with Evicore and it was still denied. As I have had many PETs in the past, I'm guessing the results of this peer to peer review depends in large part on who the "peers" are and how well they make a case for their position.
Candy - It seems like finding the pdf file for your 3rd party authorization might help you make a case for your CTs in the future. I have to say, you gave me a good laugh with your "boo freaking hoo" for the insurance companies. And I am so sorry you are dealing with MBC at such a young age. Take heart though, lots of new treatments are being developed for us and we are living longer with better QOL. I know, it still sucks.
Thanks so much everyone for your experiences and help in finding this information. And hoping with fingers crossed that we all have good scan results.
-
Jobur and others- I looked up my third party authorization company's clinical guidelines PDF online. It states the indications for each test to be ordered i.e. following up on cancer while on active treatment, but did not give specifics on how many per year or how often each specific test can be ordered. I will reread and print off for future use. But not too helpful so far, in my opinion. Probably vague on purpose.
I did look up NCCN Guidelines for Imaging and printed that too. But lots of leeway i.e. endocrine therapy use- a CT can be ordered every 2-6 months. I do every 3 months, so in that time frame but could go to every 6 months and would still be in the window. But I don't want to go every 6 months with organ involvement - liver. As far as PET's, which is the topic of this thread, NCCN Guidelines say "optional" under "PET scan". Interesting.
Will do more research.
-
I know I’m chiming in here late but according to my research earlier this year and what my Mayo Clinic oncologist has told me, there is a limit of 3 PET scans in your lifetime by Medicare. My supplement goes by Medicare guidelines so if Medicare denies, so do they. However, Medicare can and will approve more if the drs. can give them a compelling reason to do so. Since being on Medicare, I have had 4 and am scheduled for a 5th in Dec. Another thing I have been told is that Medicare in some areas is much easier to deal with than other areas. Humans make the final decision and some look at the rules as cast in stone and some are more reasonable and compassionate. My oncologists said not to worry about it because there’s no limit on other scans and if Medicare starts denying, we can go other routes and get comparable results. It’s more a matter of having one PET scan as compared to several CT scans
-
Hi,
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 eliminated lifetime limits for essential services. So, I am not sure how your insurance company can limit your coverage for PET scans. There is a lot of info online about this. I just found this site, but there are many others. Good luck . https://www.thebalance.com/lifetime-maximum-2645768#targetText=Since%202010%2C%20policies%20issued%20on,yearly%20maximums%20on%20essential%20services.
-
I posted this somewhere- but, I recently read an article by an oncologist saying that his patients were dying while he spent hours on these peer to peer phone calls for denied meds and scans. It is shameful! In our practice we had one full time employee who only did pre- approvals all day. The insurance often refused to talk to her- wanted to talk to the provider and almost always approved after that. What a bunch of BS! In the Bay Area most private practices have been bought by hospitals- doctors are sick of running practices. When the hospital buys the practice all the services are increased greatly in price. The insurance companies brought this upon themselves.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team