Need help interpreting report, please !

Options
Missmom79
Missmom79 Member Posts: 202
edited August 2019 in Just Diagnosed

Provided clinical information: 39-year-old female with 3 weeks of

right breast redness and thickening pain treated for mastitis with 2

rounds of antibiotics. Not improved. Positive family history in her

grandmother with a history of inflammatory breast cancer.

Procedure and materials: 2-D digital mammography in the CC and MLO

projection and 3-D digital breast tomosynthesis in the CC and MLO

projection were obtained of the breasts. Additional true lateral and

spot magnification views of the right breast were obtained. 2-D images

were analyzed by a CAD system.

Comparison studies: None.

Reason for examination: Right breast redness and thickening

Observations:

Breast composition: b. There are scattered areas of fibroglandular

density.

There are extensive coarse heterogeneous calcifications in a segmental

distribution somewhat in a linear configuration in the 2-4 o'clock

inner right breast with associated asymmetries over an area of 10 x 8

cm. Diffuse skin thickening is noted on the right. Targeted ultrasound

was performed. No suspicious mass, distortion, calcifications, or

other findings identified on the left.

ULTRASOUND:

Multiple real-time 2-D grayscale images of the 2-4 o'clock right

breast and right axilla were obtained. Color Doppler imaging was used

to evaluate vascularity. I personally rescanned the patient. Area of

concern is thickened and erythematous.

Scattered heterogeneous hypoechoic shadowing areas are noted

throughout the 2 to the 4:00 right breast, mid to posterior depth,

likely corresponding to the asymmetry/calcifications seen on

mammogram. Surrounding vascularity is noted. There is borderline right

axillary lymph node with cortex measuring approximately 3 to 4 mm.

Preserved fatty hilum. No other suspicious adenopathy.

IMPRESSION

Extensive suspicious coarse heterogeneous calcifications over 10 cm in

the 2-4 o'clock in her right breast with associated asymmetries and

skin thickening concerning for inflammatory breast cancer. Area of

concern corresponds with heterogeneous hypoechoic shadowing lesions

under ultrasound and tissue diagnosis with ultrasound-guided biopsy is

recommended for further evaluation. Borderline thickened right

axillary lymph node.

Findings were discussed with the patient and her mother. She will be

scheduled to return for her biopsy.

Recommendation: Ultrasound-guided biopsy right breast

BI-RADS Assessment: Category 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy -

Appropriate action should be taken.

Comments

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited August 2019

    To our PM exchange, have you spoken to the Radiologist since you received the biopsy result that only found DCIS?

    If the Radiologist remains concerned, he is in a position to request an additional biopsy, such as a punch biopsy.

    Alternately, you will be seeing the surgeon later this week and should definitely ask him if he thinks a punch biopsy should be done.

  • Missmom79
    Missmom79 Member Posts: 202
    edited August 2019

    not yet but I’m calling tomorrow ! If she was concerned of IBC then she should have done punch biopsy! What kind of radiologists just tells you that you have IBC? Grrrrr...well I know through our ok exchange you asked if I was sure she said IBC and here’s the whole report! I do have redness still. I bio digs something else weird and not IBC! I’m seriously torchering myself. I see the surgeon Thursday now instead of Friday. And another thing if they assume that I do have IBC then why would they refer me to a surgeon, because with IBC you don’t get surgery first you get chemo! So am I thinking corrxly that I should see an oncologist first?

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited August 2019

    Yes, if she was concerned about IBC, she should have done a punch biopsy.

    The reason to do a stereotactic biopsy on calcifications is to determine if there is any DCIS present, not IBC.

    The only person who can explain this to you is the Radiologist, because she wrote the report and I assume she also arranged for the biopsy.

    If you are scheduled to see the surgeon on Thursday, do it. Don't worry at this point if you should see an Oncologist first. First, you need to know the diagnosis, and if anything else is suspected.

  • Missmom79
    Missmom79 Member Posts: 202
    edited August 2019

    yes she did arrange the biopsy but they did a core biopsy where I laid on my back and she numbed me and then took 10 tissue samples from the affected area that she seen thickness on the mammo.i can’t wait to get answers a,though I am sooo scared. And do you know what borderline axillery node means ? Cuz when I asked her if my nodes looked ok on US she said they did.

  • Missmom79
    Missmom79 Member Posts: 202
    edited August 2019

    apparently she’s not too good of a radiologist then. Any radiologist that would suspect that would do a punch biopsy. But then I’ve heard people that have had symtoms of IBC come back Benign. Def confusing for sure

Categories