Stage IV breast cancer found in the stomach

Options
KBL
KBL Member Posts: 2,521

I had written a few days ago under Just Diagnosed. I went for my second oncology visit today. I have had two endoscopies and biopsies that found breast cancer in my stomach. It has not shown up on any imaging, but thankfully, it was found before it spread to any of my organs. I am curious if anyone else has had this type of diagnosis. He did say it’s rare

He has made his recommendations on what to do but would also like me to have a second opinion and see if there are any trials before I start with his suggested therapy of abemaciclib and Anastrozole.

Anybody else on this regimen? How are you handling these two things together?

KBL

Comments

  • vlnrph
    vlnrph Member Posts: 1,632
    edited June 2019

    What a shock! I read your other postings about weight loss, etc. Has anyone suggested genetic counseling? There is a mutation in CDH-1 which leads to gastric as well as lobular breast cancer. ILC is difficult to detect because it does not form lumps like the more common ductal lesions. It can 'hide' especially in dense tissue through typical imaging such as mammograms and ultrasounds. Surprising that your MRI did not find it.

    The other metastatic condition which you may want to read up on is peritoneal carcinomatosis: there is a thread on this forum populated by gals with that diagnosis. While not exactly the same clinically, they also have gut issues...

    There are quite a few of us on Verzenio with some kind of anti-estrogen therapy, fulvestrant injections for me since I had a hard time tolerating aromatase inhibition. I wonder why Arimidex was selected for you. Seems as though letrozole is chosen more often. Because you are already having GI problems, I hope the diarrhea from V doesn't impact you too badly. Loperamide is usually used but it worked too well for me resulting in uncomfortable bloating and abdominal cramps. After a dose reduction, I found that control of the loose stool is possible by taking two FiberCon tablets daily. The other meds in the class Ibrance and Kisqali don't have this side effect (blood counts are their downside) so I think a second opinion is an excellent idea.

  • KBL
    KBL Member Posts: 2,521
    edited June 2019

    Thank you for your response. Actually, he gave me two choices. One is letrozole. I’m leaning towards that combined with palbociclib.

    I will research genetic counseling and see if my insurance will cover it.

    I’m also leaning towards starting on those and skipping the clinical trials. These issues started in October of last year. I’m not willing to wait any longer to start treatment so I can lower my hormone levels.

    Thank you, again.

  • EV11
    EV11 Member Posts: 127
    edited June 2019

    KBL- it is not uncommon for ILC to spread to anywhere in the abdominal cavity. It seems to have a predilection for GI/GU organs--and less of a likelihood for spreading to the lungs.

    Most people who have ILC do have a mutation in the CDH1 gene, but most of those mutations are somatic (acquired after birth) and NOT hereditary (genetic.) BUT in a small number of patients the mutation is hereditary and having genetic testing can help you identify if you need to consider additional treatment approaches. HOWEVER, having stomach and upper GI mets does NOT confer a greater likelihood that your mutation is genetic. Primary gastric cancer from a hereditary CDH1 mutation is VERY different from an ILC breast primary spreading to the stomach.

    If in addition to genetic testing you choose to do genomic testing (to identify if your cancer has certain frequently-associated with cancer mutations; this is different from genetic testing that looks to see if you have hereditary mutations) be sure to use Foundation One rather than Guardant 360 for the liquid biopsy testing. Guardant does not sequence the entire CDH1 genome, so if your mutation happens to be in an unsequened region it will not be detected. The Foundation One platform does sequence the entire CDH1 gene. I learned that after having a Guardant test and my CHD1 mutation did not show up. I had tissue testing done previously and knew the exact mutation; I sent that info to Guardant and the geneticist told me that my mutation was in a region they don't test. It was actually the Guardant geneticist (who has been VERY helpful over the two years I have done G360 testing) who suggested that I might want to use F1-- but I wanted to follow another mutations the G360 test had found using the same testing platform...

    Sorry to bombard you with more information than you might be looking for... but so few oncologists see many lobular patients, and even fewer send liquid biopsies (yet) that I wanted to save you trouble if CDH1 info was part of your reason for sending that test.

    I have lots of abdominal mets, but for the first four years after my diagnosis of MBC NONE of the ovarian/Fallopian tube/peritoneal/omenta/colon mets that have been discovered during surgery/colonoscopy show up on ANY imaging (not PET, MRI, CT or ultrasound.) It was only this spring that a 4 cm lesion covering the outer surface of my bladder has been detected on a CT scan. I had that biopsied and indeed it is lobular MBC. At least it was large enough to get me into a clinical trial. Thankfully my onc is a PI on that trial, and the trial is sponsored (funded) by my cancer center so she has some leeway in determining if the lesion meets the "Measurable disease" criteria. Technically, due to the very irregular edges of the lesion it is not a RECIST-measurable lesion. But since the trial is actually sponsored by our cancer center, she has the authority to determine that the lesion is indeed evaluable so that they can decide if there is a response to treatment. I was looking at two other trials at different cancer centers at the same time (both with pharma sponsors) and neither would accept my lesion as measurable and so I could not get into those trials. I am very fortunate that I got on to this one.

    I hope that you get a good response to your treatment. I got 39 months on Ibrance/Letrozole and found it very tolerable once I dropped to the 75 mg dose. I have bone marrow mets as well as the soft tissue involvement and had a hard tome with the blood-count effects of the higher doses. Once I dropped to 75 mg I was able to complete all cycles and re-start the next one on time. I was on 75 mg for 39 cycles. There is current post=marketing (real-life) analysis that shows nearly-identical efficacy from all three doses-- so don't hesitate to try a lower dose if you feel that the side effects, including fatigue, are difficult to tolerate. It seems that if it works, it works at any of the three available doses.

    Hope you get a very ling response from whichever regimen you choose.

    Elizabeth

  • JFL
    JFL Member Posts: 1,947
    edited June 2019

    Like EV, I also had issues with mutations not showing up on the Guardant 360 liquid biopsy. It showed 0 mutations while Foundation One has shown 7 or more mutations/amplifications both times I had the test done. The second time, Foundation One showed more, most likely because it adds additional mutations/amplifications to its testing protocol on an ongoing basis. I did have the Guardant test when treatment was working, which may have also impacted the results. If I was progressing at the time, perhaps something would have shown up. Regardless, I believe the liquid biopsy cannot capture as much information as the tissue biopsy. It can still be helpful and may assist in providing some information when a biopsy tissue is unavailable.

  • KBL
    KBL Member Posts: 2,521
    edited June 2019

    EV11,

    My goodness, thank you for all of the information. I read through it once quickly because I'm trying to take the weekend off from reasearching to give my brain a break. I will re-read it on Monday. I felt like I was the only one that didn't have something show on imaging. Thank you so much for sharing. I really appreciate it.

    And thank you, JFL. I will re-read yours as well on Monday You don't know how much I appreciate it as well

    Kris

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited June 2019

    To clarify, regarding the CDH1 somatic mutation — it is a somatic mutation in the cancer cells, not something acquired by the whole body. So if the pathologist has identified breast cancer in the stomach, finding that the cancer has a CDH1 mutation confirms that its subtype is ILC, as CDH1 mutation/loss is the hallmark of ILC. A germline (whole body) CDH1 mutation is rare, as EV11 points out, and families that have it would be expected to have many people with gastric cancer as well as some ILC. The pathologist can tell the difference between primary gastric cancer and ILC breast cancer mets to stomach, the latter being what KBL is dealing with.

    KBL, I think starting with a drug combo we know about, rather than a trial, makes sense, especially as this is your first treatment. As you say, you can start therapy sooner. And when/if the time comes for a different therapy, there may be more info and more options ready for you. I doubt that anastrazole vs. letrozole makes a if difference since they are both aromatase inhibitors. The choice among palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib merits a detailed discussion with an expert oncologist regarding both effectiveness and side effect profile in order to individualize your choice.

    EV11, the same thing happened to me. The foundation one tissue biopsy showed a CDH1 mutation, and the Guardant 360 liquid biopsy did not. I called them to ask why and they told me what they told you, that their test did not look at that region. But I think my onc picked Guardant because it looks at something of interest in ILC. I am very glad to know that Ibrance 75 mg worked for you for 39 cycles and that the current analysis supports lower doses. That helps me set aside wondering if I would have gotten more than 22 if I had stayed at 100. I can think of two people who are struggling with 125 and would like to give them a citation for that if you have one, to discuss with their oncs if possible.

    JFL, I wonder if we should have a thread discussing liquid biopsies and comparing the different ones, and comparing them to tissue biopsies. One advantage I see to liquid, besides the fact that you can get one even if a tissue biopsy is not advisable or possible, it's that it could get around the problem of tumor heterogeneity.

    KBL, smart of you to take a break!

  • KBL
    KBL Member Posts: 2,521
    edited June 2019

    Thank you so much for the great info, ShetlandPony, and I really appreciate you writing me.

    I’m not sure if everyone gets the CDH1 test or that’s a test I should ask my doctor to get for me. Do you think it’s important for me to get it? He could use the stomach tissue from my endoscopy

    I have a question. Have any of you had the symptoms I’ve had? The reason I had the endoscopy is because I had early satiety and the feeling of fullness in just a few bites. I also have nausea after every meal. I lost 11 pounds in six months. I’ve held steady now with my weight and am not losing more right now, but I would really like to not feel this way.

    Also, are you all so knowledgeable because of time spent researching? I look every day for new articles to help me understand.

    Thank you all again so much.

    Kris

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited June 2019

    Genomic tumor testing, such as Foundation One or Guardant (from biopsy sample or blood test), can help with choice of therapy by showing what gene mutations the cancer has and what drugs would probably be effective or ineffective. It’s also reasonable to wait and see if the first treatment is working, and save the test for the time when a treatment change is required. Discuss with your onc.

    As far as genetic testing to see if you have an inherited CDH1 mutation, that is a question for the cancer geneticist. That person would want to see a cancer family tree to judge whether that test is necessary. Without a particular family history, probably not. However, some medical professional oncology body (sorry I can’t recall which at the moment) has recommended a cancer genetic testing panel for every patient, now that such testing is cheaper and faster than it used to be. This seems most important if a breast cancer patient is diagnosed when premenopausal. Whether insurance would agree is another matter. Again, the geneticist can use family history to decided on and justify testing.

    Good for you, reading articles to gain understanding. It is good to be an informed patient. Of course, we each have to find the right balance to avoid spending too much time on it. I read a medical journal articles and attend conferences. I have learned a lot from people here on BCO. We help and encourage each other, and no doubt you will soon be offering some facts, wisdom, encouragement, or sympathy to others here.

  • KBL
    KBL Member Posts: 2,521
    edited June 2019

    Thank you so much, ShetlandPony. I am the first in my family to have breast cancer that I know of. My aunt recently passed from lung cancer and her brother died of, I believe, thyroid cancer a long time ago, but he had been exposed to agent orange. We have heart disease in my family. That’s what I was expecting.

    I’ll start looking at the medical journals. I am not going to become obsessed because I want live and enjoy life.

    It seems that it’s best to wait for genetic testing and see how I do on this medication, but I will definitely keep it in the back of my mind.

    This forum has been so awesome, and I truly hope I can help someone else just starting out like all of you have helped me.

    Thank you, again!

    Kris

  • KBL
    KBL Member Posts: 2,521
    edited June 2020

    No that ShetlandPony put this site back up, I wanted to say I had gene testing done. I don’t have the CDH1 or any other gene they tested for, including BRCA.

Categories