I want to refuse radiation after bilateral mastectomy.
38 years old & I have Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, ER & PR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. My tumor was 6cm and have 1 lymph node involved.
Because of the size of my tumor it was recommended to do chemo first for my treatment plan. I started chemo in November and I have three more treatments to go. Next will be my surgery.
My cancer has responded very well to the chemo and hand exams by my doctor have shown that the tumor has shrunk to almost undetectable by touch alone. I am a candidate for a lumpectomy but the surgeon has made it very clear that due to the location of the tumor and surrounding tissue he would need to take that my breast with most certainly collapse and that radiation could also possibly shrink it and make it even more deformed. I have therefore decided to go with a double mastectomy and reconstruction.
I have not felt right about radiaton form the start. However, if I was going to have just the lumpectomy, I was planning on doing it because it's the best choice to make sure all that cancer is killed. Now that I've decided for a double mastectomy, I don't feel the same way. A lot of the studies of the benefits of radiation with a mastectomy are women who are having the surgery first then possibly chemo and then radiation. There is not a lot of data yet for women in my case who are having the chemo first and the chemo is doing the excellent job of shrinking the tumor & killing all the cancer before surgery.
I obviously want to make the best choice for my health and non-reoccurrence. However I'm not finding a lot of back up where the benefit outweighs the risk of the radiation. I just can't shake this feeling in my gut that it's unnecessary.
Looking for comments, experience, whatever - good or bad from those who have had the masectomy and did the radiation.
Comments
-
I just wanted to chime in and say I was exactly where you are back in December deciding on radiation after double masectomy.As you stated I was also one of the ones who DIDN'T have chemo before surgery and with the location of my tumor I had to have radiation after surgery.I was very apprehensive about it but here I am now 2 weeks afterwards and I can honestly say all the horrible things you read about didn't happen.my radiation oncologist designed my individual plan to where they were able to avoid my heart and lungs.The worst part for me was I burned and shed like a snake but believe or not it WAS NOT PAINFUL it was just itchy and more like dead dry skin being exfoliated is the best way I can describe it.PLEASE DONT BE AFRAID to go thru with the radiation I feel good now knowing I thru the book at this cancer.Please feel free to ask me any questions you need answered BEST WISHES. p.s. we are close in age so I completely understand your concerns
-
I just wanted to chime in and say I was exactly where you are back in December deciding on radiation after double masectomy.As you stated I was also one of the ones who DIDN'T have chemo before surgery and with the location of my tumor I had to have radiation after surgery.I was very apprehensive about it but here I am now 2 weeks afterwards and I can honestly say all the horrible things you read about didn't happen.my radiation oncologist designed my individual plan to where they were able to avoid my heart and lungs.The worst part for me was I burned and shed like a snake but believe or not it WAS NOT PAINFUL it was just itchy and more like dead dry skin being exfoliated is the best way I can describe it.PLEASE DONT BE AFRAID to go thru with the radiation I feel good now knowing I thru the book at this cancer.Please feel free to ask me any questions you need answered BEST WISHES. p.s. we are close in age so I completely understand your concerns
-
Thank you for sharing. Congrats on being through with treatments!
It’s hard to explain and may even sound a bit crazy, but I’m not scared of radiation, I just have this really bad gut feeling whenever I think about doing it. It’s weird. I didn’t feel that way about the chemo, and I don’t feel it about the surgery. But I have this gut wrenching awful feeling whenever I think about saying yes to the radiation - and I can’t shake it.
I think I’m going to wait till after the surgery and the pathology to make my final decision.
-
I had 33 radiation treatments and had very little burning and just slight fatigue halfway through my 33 treatments. I do know women who were not as fortunate. I felt the same way about chemo that you do about radiation. I heard the horror stories and I prayed I wouldn’t have to have it. I didn’t thankfully.
Regardless you do what’s best for you. After all it’s your body and your life.
Diane
-
I got 3 opinions on radiation and they all said the risk was not worth the benefit even with micromets in one node, so you may not need radiation if you have a mastectomy.
-
I’m 72 years old with a long history of breast problems. Was treated for left breast her2neu in 2013 at the Lineburger Cancer center in Chapel Hill, NC. I tend to research issues to death. I never had to have chemo, but I had 7 weeks of radiation. If I ever had to have it again, I would decline it and let the chips fall where they may. I have fair skin and blue eyes. After the first treatment, I was the color a raw roast with blisters. I got bad chills and it was so taxing on my system, I looked in the mirror several hours later and I looked like I was 95 years old. I had no clue how i was going to do 7 weeks. I remembered using aloe on a cruise for severe sunburn. I had the same shaking chills. Aloe rescued the problem. I rushed to the store and got the 100% aloe gel. By the next day after radiation my color was more normal and the blisters were gone. So I took it with me to my radiation appointments and at the end, daily, I would go to the ladies room and slather it all over. I really thought I had sailed through until about three years later, I developed cement hard scar tissue, the size of two fist. I had lost 3 neg nodes. I have lymphedema in that left arm and Im considering having that scar tissue blob removed, which means I will lose that breast that was reconstructed with a abdominal free flap in 1993. The blob cuts off my circulation when I sleep on my left side. It is so pressure packed it feels like the breast wants to explode. I also have developed a chronic wet cough. I’ve never smoked in my life. I’m neg for lung cancer and gastro endoscopy shows no related problems. Basically, if your put a pork chop in the microwave on high for 30 minutes, that’s what uour breast tissue is like. Furtherest thing from quality of life you can imagine. Radiation....the gift that keeps on gIving.
I heard that Duke and The Cleveland Clinic now offer a single radiation treatment that is delivered only to the area of the removed cancer during your surgery. I think they roll the machine into the OR while you’re asleep. I’d consider that, but I’d pass on the 7 week protocol where they hit your whole chest area if the doctors can tell you favorable odds for skipping it.
Best of luck. Remember, the only thing any of us can do is make the best decision we can based on the info we have at the time. Often, those answers are based on the medical facility where the questions are being asked.
A few years ago, a Cleveland Clinic researcher developed a vaccine for her2nru. We all need to be writing letters and demonstrating in the streets to have that option made available. It smacks of big pharma being able to make more from chemo.
Take care,
Lafybug531
-
I think there are guidelines that would confirm what you want to do. One node is optional radiation. Now, if the cancer is really close to the back of your ribcage, consider the radiation, too.
-
Rkelmarie, why are you choosing the bilateral mastectomy? Pure curiosity on my part. I was offered double but in the end, chose to leave the healthy side alone. Some of what factored in my decision was limited change in risk for cancer recurrence with a bilateral but twice the risk for surgical complications as well as risk that the flap on the "good" side would be the one that failed. I'm not questioning your decision, simply wondering how you got to it. if you will share. Not a problem if you don't want to.
radiation was harder for me than chemo but I don't regret it.
-
Im 69 and had 7 weeks of radiation lasting from late October through mid-December. I was so resistant going in, because I was still recuperating from a major unrelated surgery done after the lumpectomy, and it hurt like hell to stretch out for the rads. I'm also very fair-skinned and knew I'd be a blistered mess. Well, after the first two weeks I didn't hurt much anymore, and all I got was a little reddish around my collarbone, eased with a dab of aloe gel and Aquaphor. Don't assume the worst. And you can start and at some point say "No more" if it becomes unbearable.
-
Let me start with I would not have done anything different from what happened. That said, I agree with radiation the gift that keeps on giving. It's not the skin you have to worry about, it's the damage to everything else. Ribs, shoulder, nerves and it can significantly impact reconstruction. I could not go into treatment without doing everything I could to prolong my life so I would do it again. I too hated the idea of rads... hated it every time I got on the table, but for my peace of mind it's been worth it.
-
I was in a similar situation. 6cm IDC, ER/PR+/HER2-. No nodal involvement, no LVI, but grade 3. Complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemo, and almost complete pathological response. But I'm post-menopausal, so lower risk. Because of node negative, my RO said I was in a "grey" area. Risk of recurrence was 14%, which radiation would cut in half. I, too, had a really bad "gut" feeling but opted to go with radiation, and regret it. But here's the key - I don't regret radiation per se, I regret the way they delivered it, and that I didn't question them more closely. They gave a large dose to my lung, and now I have permanent fibrosis. They also gave my thyroid a large dose.
I believe your age, tumor size, and one node probably means radiation is indicated. And LVI on final pathology would also be a strong indicator. Research shows radiation - including radiation to nodes - does cut recurrence. Look at MA-20, EORTC and Danish studies.
Do - by all means get more than one opinion. But don't get caught up in a bunch of risk stats that don't pertain to your particular case. And get specifics from your RO. Where was your tumor located? Does it requite internal mammary node coverage, which is highly controversial? IMN coverage is shown to reduce recurrence in medial tumors or those close to chest wall, but results on lateral, node-negative tumors are not conclusive. And it increases lung dose and the risk of fibrosis. What will dose to your heart be? What about lung dose? Not just a v20 of under 35% (they aim for 35% or less of your lung receiving 20gys) but what about v40, where damage can occur? Did you have any lung issues with chemo that might indicate you could have a greater sensitivity to radiation? What about lymphedema? If you already have it, or are at risk for it, know that nodal radiation can increase chance of developing it (but the risks are still low for average BMI and sentinel node biopsy.) Are you having immediate reconstruction or delayed? If delayed with tissue expanders, what affect could those have on radiation plan and might it be advisable to deflate a bit before radiation?
And remember that your RO doesn't do the actual planning - it's left up to a physicist and a resident. And initial plans can change due to your anatomy. I would talk with RO a second time after the plan is designed but before you actually begin treatment. My RO initially told me heart dose would be under 2.5gys, but then the plan came up with 6.5gys, which resident told me was "within normal limits." I emailed RO and said "no way" and he changed the plan.
Radiation does, indeed, save lives. And that is the ultimate goal. But once your plan is devised it's easier to have an informed discussion about risk-benefit analysis, and maybe ask them if they can or should make adjustments. I think the trick is to trust - they have the training and knowledge we don't - but verify.
-
Everyone, I want you to be aware of the option of PROTON rads. There are only 22 centers in the USA that offer protons; they are less common and less known about and rather different.
Proton Rads are more exact, as the protons can be programmed to STOP so they release their energy in the site of the tumor and they do not pass through the body to exit. Many people are here for radiation to unresectable tumors, though there are others like me for normal breast rads. I had a left sided TNBC, and I am covered. I think because protons are less well known about they are willing to work with you to fill their slate (they reduced my copay).
With protons there is far less exposure to healthy tissues, so you still get reddened skin on the front but the heart, lung, shoulder/back are all spared. It's a great option that I am doing right now. I am on 17 of 28. Like many of you, I had a lot of fear about radiation damage, but even MORE fear about Mx when a lumpectomy was an option and I had a pCR from chemo.
I have Obamacare Gold plan and this center, Procure in NJ (which is out of state for me), has been wonderful... they worked with me and reduced my copay so it was much more in line with what I would pay for regular rads, for example. One day there was a power outage and they bought the whole lobby pizzas. ALL they do is proton rads so they have a very organized, efficient system. Great customer service and very humane, thoughtful and kind personnel. I give them an A+.
I also looked at UMD which has a "Ronald McDonald"-type hotel that is very cheap where out-of-area patients can stay. Several centers have non-randomized clinical trials going on (if insurance won't pay). I chose here because I have a lot of loved ones in NYC and thought being near people I know would be better.
-
With all due respect, while in theory proton beam therapy is more precise and less damaging, there are no studies yet to prove it is better than conventional. An early study published by JAMA on proton vs. IMRT (not standard tangential beam therapy) in prostate cancer showed little to no benefit. Medicare covers it for breast cancer but many commercial insurers won't, even for left-sided. One proton center has closed for lack of business, and others are reportedly struggling.
There is a current trial underway on breast cancer, RADCOMP, but results are not in yet. Many centers across the nation are participating, so it's definitely worth asking your RO about.
Let's hope it is, indeed, better and that all women can benefit. And best of luck to you, SantaBarbarian!
-
I was diagnosed with DCIS in July 2009. MRI showed a potential area of 6 cm. I decided to have a bilateral so that I would prevent things in the future.
Pathology, unfortunately, showed what you see in my signature. I had a macromet (3mm) in the sentinel node.
Had chemo, then axillary lymph node dissection. They wanted to do radiation after that. I refused.
After a big argument with my BOS, in which many tantrums were thrown (by both of us), we compromised on no rads if my ALND comes back negative. It did. So I didn't have radiation.
I am not saying you should do the same. Just sharing my story.
Now, the thing is, are you going to have the node dissection? My thought was, if the nodes are gone, what are they going to radiate anymore? Also, I took into consideration my other stats, like negative lympho vascular invasion, Ki-67, etc.
But if you are NOT going to have ALND, be aware that no imaging can give you a 100% clear. So you won't know if it may have traveled or not.
And the most important thing, until you get the final pathology from the mastectomy, any decision you might take is unfounded and lacking important information to consider.
-
Clean nodes do not mean you're clear of cancer. I didn't have node involvement at my diagnosis in 2012 and now that I'm metastatic to bone and lung , no scans show cancer in lymph nodes
-
ratherbesailing, The anecdotal evidence is good, though... and stuff like brachial plexopathy won't happen if the proton does not pass through your shoulder as it exits.... so that was enough for me. They are still proving whether or not the cure rates/ long term stats stack up. I as willing to play in the margins there as my MO and BS both thought it was equally good based on their personal patients experiences
-
seachain - I had a micromet in my SN too. My MO ordered the Oncotype test for me to see if chemo would be beneficial. My score came back@11 so I dodged chemo. Our stats are different though - I was Stage 1b,Grade 1 DX in 2011.
I also had 33 radiation treatments. No unmanageable side effects. Bit burning and fatigue halfway through. I know it can cause other side effects long term but I was determined to do it and glad I did
Diane
-
JoE77, honestly, nothing means you're free of cancer. I just evaluated the pros and cons and considering how.much higher my risk of lymphedema would get with both ALND and radiation, I said pass.
edwards, I had a macromet not a micromet (that pesky difference of 1 mm). That, and the stage and grade, made the recommended treatment to be chemo.
Edit to add. Apparently at about the 10 years mark, several studies have shown that T2 patients with singular macrometastasis somehow start getting a poorer prognosis in terms of recurrence and metastases.
-
I am in the same place. I had a 7cm. Tumor did chemo first. After second treatment tumor could not be felt by hand. After chemo I had a double mastectomy and two lymph nodes removed and pathology came back cancer free. I just don't get why I need to go through anymore trama with radiation. I really don't want to but people close to me say I'm selling myself short if I don't do it. They just don't get how much I have already been through. I'm tired I just want my life back
-
You should not feel forced into radiation. I felt really strong armed first into getting a mastectomy but deep down I felt I should it and do reconstruction. Then the oncodx score came back and I was strong armed by everyone to do chemo. My gut said "say NO", and I refused chemo. What a relief I felt it was the right decision and still do almost 8 years later.
-
RKel-Marie
Hi! Sorry you are going through this..and still pretty young too.
Hmmm
A dilemma for you no doubt and lots of stories and advice too.
I had the same pathology as you and mets in 1 node with extra capsular spill. My tumour(ended up being 2 after surgery) was not as large as yours. I had a double mast. cos had widespread dcis with spill out in other breast...
So had double axilla removal too.
No rads were mentioned. Just chemo post surgery. Thought you'd want to know that. And it sounds like chemo worked well in your breast area which is encouraging.
I had a recurrence(or they missed a micro met) the next year post surgery and chemo. Then I had to have surgery and rads anyway. I founds rads a walk in the park compared to chemo. I Just put fresh aloe vera on the burn straight after blasts. They grew it in the hospital garden outside for us. Works a charm!
Whatever you decide
I wish you safe passage and no recurrences.
Astrid.
-
I was in a very similar situation, although my tumor was smaller (2.3 cm) and I didn't get chemo based on Mammaprint testing. I chose a double mastectomy specifically to avoid radiation. But then they found 2 positive nodes (1 macromet, 1 micromet) and did an ALND.
I consulted with several ROs. They acknowledged I was in a grey area, but recommended radiation. I opted out because I was very worried about lymphedema getting worse (I had 32 nodes removed), as well as other radiation side effects.
2 years later I had a local recurrence at the needle biopsy site just under the skin. I had surgery to remove it and am now doing 32 sessions of IMRT. I don't spend a lot of time looking back, but I do believe that if I'd had radiation I wouldn't be in this boat. I wish that in my original surgery, they had not done the ALND and had referred me directly to radiation.
That said, I made the best decision at the time based on the information I had. You need to do the same for yourself and be comfortable with your decision. I played the odds and lost. But I knew what the risk/benefit equation was and I was okay with it. And I didn't take a blind gamble. I spent a lot of time researching studies and recommendations and discussing them with my dad and sister (a BS and PS, respectively).
I'm still nervous about the long-term effects of radiation, but I'm getting IMRT, which has less adverse effects (proton radiation, as I understand, is not an option after mastectomy, only lumpectomy. Although I think they're currently doing a trial at MD Anderson). I'm also going to talk to my RO about taking pentoxifylline + oral vitamin E for at least 6 months following radiation. There's research showing it can help prevent radiation-induced fibrosis and capsular contracture.
I would also say that it's important not to conflate chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Chemo is a systemic treatment (and chemo doesn't work as well or completely on slow-growing ER+ cancers as it does on other, more aggressive types). Radiation is targeted. There is nothing better than radiation for ensuring there are no cancer cells left locally.
-
Here are the Postmastectomy radiotherapy joint guidelines from the American Society for Radiation Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology. They were last updated in late 2016: https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30159-X/fulltext
They break down what is recommended based on the therapies and surgeries you've received.
However, after reviewing the guidelines, I don't believe you are in the grey area. The grey area is defined as women with T1-T2 tumors with 1-3 lymph nodes. Your tumor was a T3 tumor (over 5 cm) so I believe that is an automatic recommendation for radiation. Maybe the fact that it's shrunk during chemo to a T1 or T2 size might change the calculation, but I'm not sure.
I would recommend you bring in the guidelines to your next consult. Clinical question 3 is the one that might pertain to you ("Is PMRT indicated in patients with clinical stage I or II cancers who have received NAST?").
-
Hi Mellee, I am sorry you had a local recurrence. I was in the similar situation (1/3 nodes positive after mastectomy), but I declined ALND and chose 33 rounds radiation and more chemo. Lymphedema is just more devastating than anything else, and I know ALND + radiation will make the change of getting lymphedema higher than 50%, if I remember right.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team