Lump felt by dr. Normal breast tissue on mam & us

Options
Aspires01
Aspires01 Member Posts: 6
edited February 2019 in Not Diagnosed But Worried

My dr felt the lump I showed him as well as one other and thought it was fibrocystic changes. I had diagnostic mammogram as well as limited us in that area and the radiologist came in and told me I was feeling normal breast tissue. I’m 36 and she said she’d see me at 40. I’m very confused by this. Do I just trust the radiologist and forget it for 4 years? Am I crazy and feeling things that aren’t there? If so, why did my gyn agree

Comments

  • Lexica
    Lexica Member Posts: 259
    edited February 2019

    How long has it been there? I'd have no problem with a 'wait and see approach' - but not wait for 4 years. I would think they would want to see you again in 6 months - especially if it gets bigger in that amount of time.

  • cecyc
    cecyc Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2019

    Hello,

    I had the exact same issue, felt lump, pcp felt lump, went for mammogram and limited ultrasound and was just told that I have scattered glandular tissue in that area and to come back in 4 years since I am also 36.  Funny to read your story since it sounds exactly like mine.  Not sure if you are having pain but for me pain is what led me to discover my lump.  My pain is in left breast, shoulder, armpit and chest.  I keep thinking that I have cancer that has metastasized to those areas but then I feel that if that was the case then the mammogram and ultrasound should have seen something. I am very tired of this pain so I have an appointment in Friday with my OBGYN and then he will refer me to a breast surgeon.  Coincidently the issues started one month after I had mirena inserted.  I am wondering if the hormone changes are affecting me.  Wish you luck in finding out what is wrong. 

  • Aspires01
    Aspires01 Member Posts: 6
    edited February 2019

    I noticed the small lump ( a little larger than a pea) about 3 weeks ago. My GYN did a breast exam Thursday and said he felt the lump I was talking about as well as another somewhere close by. I can’t actually feel the second one. The radiologist clearly said that I’m feeling normal breast tissue. Wouldn’t my GYN that at works in a women’s health and imaging center know the difference between normal breast tissue and changes? I’m very confused by this. I’d be fine with a “I see it, but it looks benign, no big deal” but that’s not what she said

  • Aspires01
    Aspires01 Member Posts: 6
    edited February 2019

    Cecyc,

    Wow our stories do sound alike. I hope you get answers when you see the BS. I had a complete hysterectomy in 2005 so hormones shouldn't be affecting me. I don't have a lot of pain. The reason I found the lump is sharp almost stabbing pains in that area the first week. That pain is gone now. Good luck finding answers

  • cecyc
    cecyc Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2019

    Keep me updated please. I always look for updates from others going through similar issues.  even though I know that every story is different and it doesn't always result the same way for everyone but it is still helpful to know what other are going through. 

  • AnnieB7777
    AnnieB7777 Member Posts: 26
    edited February 2019

    Aspires and cecyc, I'm having the same issue - a large and growing lump felt by me and my gyn, which didn't show up on mammo or US. I waited over a year and it has continued to grow, is noncyclic and has become quite painful -so I saw a surgeon (he felt it as well) who ordered an MRI, which is next week. I feel the same way as you guys do: it's there, so why can't it be seen?

    After reading these forums for the past year or so, the one thing that's become clear to me is that it's a total crapshoot. Some who had no symptoms whatsoever ended up with bc, as well as some who had tons of symptoms - and every scenario in between. On the flip side, many who had every sign and symptom in the book ended up NOT having bc. Statistics say 80% of lumps are benign, so that's reassuring. But sometimes there's no way we can know for sure without an MRI.

    If your gut is telling you to get it checked out, and/or it's making you obsess, then better safe than sorry. Hoping the best for both of you! :)

  • Aspires01
    Aspires01 Member Posts: 6
    edited February 2019

    Update:

    I received my mammogram and ultrasound reports today.

    Narrative

    CLINICAL DATA: Left upper inner quadrant mass

    COMPARISON: None

    The primary goal of mammography/sonography is the detection of
    occult or clinically unsuspected breast cancer. A negative
    mammogram/sonogram should not delay biopsy of a clinically
    suspicious breast abnormality. All mammographic images are
    performed on digital equipment. All sonographic images are
    permanently recorded.

    NOTE: Images were reviewed with an R2 Computer aided detection
    device. In compliance with FDA regulations, the patient will
    receive written notification of the results in 30 days.

    BILATERAL DIAGNOSTIC MAMMOGRAM

    TECHNIQUE: Bilateral digital craniocaudal and medial lateral
    oblique views of the breasts are obtained. A straight lateral
    view of the left breast was obtained.

    FINDINGS: The breast parenchymal pattern is scattered
    fibroglandular without dominant masses, architectural distortion
    or suspicious calcifications.There is no abnormality
    corresponding to the patient's palpable area of concern indicated
    by metallic marker in the upper inner left breast.

    ULTRASOUND LEFT LIMITED: Ultrasound evaluation of the breast, 10
    o'clock position, 7 cm from the nipple,patient
    directed,demonstrates normal ridge of fibroglandular tissue with
    no underlying solid or cystic mass.

    ACR BI-RAD CLASSIFICATION: 2- BENIGN FINDING(S)

    BREAST DENSITY CATEGORY: b. There are scattered areas of
    fibroglandular density.

    FOLLOW-UP RECOMMENDATION: Routine follow-up at age 40. Findings
    and recommendations were discussed with the patient by Dr.
    Siroty-Smith at the time of the visit. Unless clinical concern
    prompts earlier reevaluation, the patient should return for
    bilateral mammogram at age 40.

    I feel really stupid. Apparently the lump I’m feeling is a ridge of glandular tissue. So, I will be waiting for my next Mammogram at 40. Thanks for everyone’s help.

  • cecyc
    cecyc Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2019

    This was mine.  I wonder if I am also feeling the same thing you are. 

    Technique: standard bilateral views, as well as bilateral exaggerated CC views. The examination was interpreted in conjunction with a computer aided detection system. Ultrasound of the left breast was also performed

    Breast Composition:B-

    Findings: a marker at the skin surface indicates an area of palpable abnormality, at approximately 3-4:00 position. There is asymmetric glandular tissue underlying the marker, with no mass demonstrated.

    Ultrasound was performed in the area of palpable abnormality. This demonstrates normal underlying breast parenchyma with no cyst or solid mass identified.

    Scattered benign bilateral axillary and intramammary lymph nodes are incidentally noted.

    Impression:

    No mammographic or sonographic evidence of malignancy. Recommend clinical follow up. Routine annual screening mammography should begin at age 40. Bi-rads category 2 benign.


  • Aspires01
    Aspires01 Member Posts: 6
    edited February 2019

    Cecyc,

    Your report is almost identical to mine. I am very eager to see what your MRI results are. I hope you will come back and update when you get it. Apparently we are boob twins.

  • cecyc
    cecyc Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2019

    Aspires01, Yes apparently we are!! I don't have an MRI scheduled yet but I do have an appt on Friday with my obgyn.  I will definitely let you know what happens next. 

  • cecyc
    cecyc Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2019

    so just to update, I had an appointment with my OBGYN today and he is sending me to a breast surgeon. He felt the lump and even though he says I have nothing to worry about that he recomends taking the lump out because it is causing me pain. I so badly want to believe him and truly not worry but i just can’t.

  • leftduetostupidmods
    leftduetostupidmods Member Posts: 620
    edited February 2019

    It's great that you have it excised. ILC is ver seldom seen by mammogram. My mammogram showed microcalcifications, US saw NOTHING, stereotactic biopsy showed DCIS, MRI showed large tumor, post mastectomy pathology... look at my signature. I was going to suggest to push for MRI, but excision is better.

  • WC3
    WC3 Member Posts: 1,540
    edited February 2019

    I had the same story 3 years ago at the same age. I trusted the radiologist and the radiologist was wrong; it was cancer, and very aggressive, and because I was told that it was normal breast tissue, it grew in me untreated for another two years before it was properly diagnosed.

    It's visible on the first mammogram but they did not recognize it and I do not know if they saw it on the first ultrasound and didn't recognize it or if they didn't see any due to probe misplacement but given my circumstances (very dense breasts, family history of premenopausal breast cancer) they should have done an MRI or biopsy.

Categories