To chemo or not to chemo?

Options
DTR808
DTR808 Member Posts: 34

The support and wealth of knowledge on these boards are invaluable and am hoping I can get some great feedback on this.

I was diagnosed with IDC in left breast in late-March. You can see my profile and specifics at the bottom here.

Was wondering if anyone has been in the same boat as me here. I have two differing opinions from my original MO and my second opinion MO.

Please bear with me as this is a long story but I wanted to include all the details for context.

First MO didn't really think that ordering an OncotypeDX and a Mammaprint was even necessary since I was a) young, b) LN positive (1 out of 7), c) multi-focal with two medium sized tumors. I ended up pushing him to order the tests for at least my own piece of mind and also in the hopes that it might help guide what type of chemo I will need (as he told me chemo was a given). He mentioned both AC+T or TC. He finally obliged and ordered both the tests.

In the meantime, I sought out another MO because I wasn't really that excited that my original MO tried to dismiss running both tests. I met with her initially before my test results were ready, but she did mention that she would want to see the results on both tests before she gave me her official opinion.

Fast forward to last week. My original MO called me and told me that my OncotypeDX tests came back. The timing couldn't have been better with the recently released TailorX trial news. Got a score of 16 which is considered "low risk". This is really on the cusp of low risk as I am pre-menopausal. He then changed his tune to taking AC-T off the table and possibly just TC and hormone therapy thereafter OR he was also ok with me foregoing chemo. His suggestion was the TC though.

Now, fast fwd to yesterday. Original MO called again to give me my Mammaprint results. They came back low risk! According to him, "very low" and with that he advised that he now felt better to fully back the decision to forego chemo, should I choose (but get on hormone therapy ASAP). I will add that I made it very clear in the beginning that I was really scared about chemo, the toxicity and scared to lose my hair. Not entirely sure if this impacted his decision as far as him deciding on a suggestion to me but thought I'd put that out there. In the end, he said "if it was my sister, I would tell her to forego chemo".

A couple hours after this latest turn of events, I had my second opinion appt with my second MO. She was happily pleased with both of the test results. She similarly advised TCx4 as my first MO mentioned or get on hormone therapy ASAP. When I mentioned the fact that I was conflicted and confused as she mentioned 4 pathways for hormonal therapy, she asked me "would you like me to tell you what I would do if it were myself?". Yes please! "I would do the chemo". She then proceeded to have the "in 20 yrs should you have a recurrence would you regret not doing the chemo?" conversation with me as well as the one where with early breast cancer you have one chance to attack it with everything and that if I forego chemo and god forbid, it came back, we would be looking at a metastasized/stage IV cancer and I would then be chasing it the rest of my life. I don't think she said any of this to scare me, but think she wanted me to look at it from all sides since I was seriously struggling with a decision and was pretty confused.

Am going to go back to my first MO on Monday to talk in further detail and about what backed up his suggestion and to clarify a few more things. Keep in mind, while chemo scares me and I obviously don't want to do it if I don't have to, my main priority here is to live as long and full of a life possible.

Any lymph node positive peeps out there who have been through these same shoes? It's hard to gauge what the right decision is and really struggling. Does the 1-2% benefit that chemo still may offer me worth the risk?? That's the million dollar question.

«1

Comments

  • Runrcrb
    Runrcrb Member Posts: 577
    edited June 2018

    i was 4of5 lymph nodes. Also low risk of recurrence per oncotype/mammaprint. The nodes pushed me to chemo. I don’t think I would have skipped it if given the choice.

    I had four rounds of TC. I lost my hair but otherwise had minimal side effects. I can’t encourage you one way or another as you need to be at peace but don’t let fear of losing your hair be the deciding factor. There’s a thread from last month on wigs if you want to see my before during and after headshots

  • Lula73
    Lula73 Member Posts: 1,824
    edited June 2018

    it’s that 1 lymph node out of 7 that would bother me. If not for it, you would fall into the new data from the TailoRx trial and skipping chemo would be an option. The other thing that bothers me is that you’re young. That would sway me toward chemo. It’s one thing to be in your mid-late 60’s or 70’s, take the chance and skip chemo and possibly develop a recurrence over the next 5-10 years, that potentially takes you out in 5-10 years after that, if you haven’t already passed away from something else. It’s a whole different ballgame in your 30’s. For those 2 reasons, I’d probably choose to do the chemo. Ive been there and done that. It’s not a picnic but I’ve dealt with worse.

  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited June 2018

    DTR - I wish I could help you. I had Oncotype 17 and my surgeon said I don't need chemo so I didn't do it. I am currently doing radiation and will do hormonal therapy. I am 54 and did not have any positive lymph nodes. With your low Oncotype 16 and very low Mammaprint, you may not benefit from chemo. Did you get a copy of the full reports? You should get them and maybe send it to a specialist for a third opinion b/c information on these tests are changing so much recently. I think the bottom line is will the chemo do anything to your cancer type that the hormonal therapy can't do? If so, by how much?

  • VL22
    VL22 Member Posts: 851
    edited June 2018

    Such a tough decision. The truth is that chemo is scary and hard, but completely doable for most. I’m actually having a harder time with the anti hormonals!


  • Cpeachymom
    Cpeachymom Member Posts: 518
    edited June 2018

    dtr- I hear you, I had to make the same decision with conflicting opinions from my docs. My Oncotype was 14, my MO still wanted to do chemo, second opinion said no chemo. I opted for no chemo. The part for me is that you can throw everything at Cancer, and it can still come back.

    Someone on a similar thread just said if it was just surgery, rads, Chemo, meds and then you’re cured, then we’d all do chemo without a second thought.

    My Oncotype report actually said a greater chance of death in 5 years if I did chemo. Chemo is doable, but no joke. Ask to see your report.

    I’m not a doctor, but if you recur twenty years from now, it won’t be because you didn’t do chemo. It would be because those cells were dormant while you were going through it and chemo only kills fast growing cells. Cancer is a sneaky MF like that

  • DTR808
    DTR808 Member Posts: 34
    edited June 2018

    Thank you all for your feedback. I really appreciate it!

    I will admit the hair loss is one of the factors that scare me, but so is the neuropathy...the toxicity of it all. I was planning to do the Penguin CC so I think that my chances of keeping the majority of my hair was pretty good. My main concern is that I want to be healthy and live a long, long life —that is the utmost of importance. My main issue is that on both reports, the benefit with chemo was so, so small (OncotypeDX was 1% and Mammaprint was 1.3%) that it's hard for me to think that is worth going through all of that (I hear ya cpeachy!). Sigh.

    Since I had created my original post above, I used a life line. My coworker's cousin used to work with and is neighbors and good friends with Laura Van't Veer, the creator of Mammaprint (who is also a well-known molecular oncology biologist and head of the Breast Oncology Program at UCSF whose professional work as of the past several years, has centered on saving women from potential overtreatment of BC and focus on personalized medicine to treat on a more case-by-case basis). I figure if I have access to her and to get her two cents, then why would I pass that up? Hopefully she can provide a clearer directive. Fingers crossed.

    Thank you again ladies!!!

  • PreludeSing
    PreludeSing Member Posts: 102
    edited June 2018

    Wow DTR, that is a great lifeline regarding Mammaprint. Even though it is totally after the fact for me, I would be very interested to see what she says about your case. Thank you for sharing - it is so very much appreciated 💐

  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited June 2018

    DTR - That's amazing. Chemo would have helped me a little over 1% in 10 years as well. However, after 16 years, there is more benefit from getting Chemo. Does your report say that, too? In 16 years, I will be 70 and I am hoping there will be more breakthroughs in medicine that I am not going to think that far. So happy your on to something great. Good luck!

  • Surella
    Surella Member Posts: 2
    edited June 2018

    Ladies, just looking "to chemo or not to chemo?" My Onc recommended the Prosigna test to test the cells of the tumor and results came back with a high score for recurrence. I am scared of chemo for so many reasons. So I am leaning towards Rads and HRT. I must decide in the next week or so as I am already beyond time any treatments should be started. Just wondering how many ladies out there with same diagnosis, with high recurrence rates on the Oncotype DX or Prosigna tests chose not to do chemo when it is strongly recommended. How many years out are you now with no recurrence? Additional info about me - I am 58yo, postmenopausal, no family history of BC.

    Dx 2/15/18, IDC, Right, 1.5cm, Stage IA, Grade 3, ER+/PR+, HER2-

    Surgery 4/5/2018 Lumpectomy: Right; Lymph node removal: 1 removed -negative; Prosigna score 78

    Hormonal Therapy -waiting for suggestions after chemo/rads or rads (still undecided)

    Radiation Therapy - met with RO - suggested treatment is 16 with 4 boosts

    Chemo - still on the fence and running out of time

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited June 2018

    Ok. I received an oncodx of 34 high risk. I was 95%er 0%pr, 2 tumors one ILC one IDC each 1cm, nodes. My grade was 1 on ilc grade 2 on idc. I didn't do the recommended chemo. I did 4 years AI drugs.

    I believe my oncodx was high due to the absence of progesterone. I am 7 years cancer free. I should tell you on both tumors my mitotic scores were 1, slow growing.

  • kaylie57410
    kaylie57410 Member Posts: 127
    edited June 2018

    hi to you- understand your dilemma- I went thru 4 rounds tc last summer==stage2-----2.3cm--2positive nodes--grade 3--oncotype--45- that and the positivie nodes made it a no brainer for me on needing chemo--it really wasnt bad--used Penguin Cold caps with good results-saved 75-80 percent hair and no one could tell..never had any neuropathy,nausea,,just 1 day diarrhea each round,mild fatiigue and temporary loss of energy.

    My concern for you is that you are young with decades ahead to protect yourself and you have a positive node which as you know means your bad cells were on the move. I am in my late 60's and if it comes back in 10 years ,they still keep you going for some time - I would be over 80!

    the man thing is you are doing is do your research- it is still a crap shoot and you must be at peace with your decision and any consequence. Please dont let your potential loss of hair be the deciding factor- with TC the cold capping has an excellent success rate if done properly-it is the adriamycin that is more damaging to hair.

    Let us know what you decide,C


  • gb2115
    gb2115 Member Posts: 1,894
    edited June 2018

    This is such a tough choice. It unfortunately makes you feel like you need to/can predict the future, which none of us can despite feeling like we can through statistics. So many of us here were on the wrong side of statistics so it's hard to put faith in that. I think the idea of these tests is that chemo will only help cells that respond to the chemo. A low risk mammaprint indicates that there is little benefit to chemo because the cells don't respond well.

    I was initially told I would need chemo because of 1/3 positive nodes (and being 38 at the time). A low risk mammaprint changed my oncologist's mind. She said the risk of permanently damaging side effects would be more likely than the chemo helping. So I went right to radiation.

    Only time will tell, but I agreed that later metastatic occurrence wouldn't necessarily mean that chemo should have been done. A dormant cell that doesn't respond...what can you do? This makes me grateful for tamoxifen and I hope in 9 years there is another medicine for me to take!!!

    Good luck with your decision, it's tough, but understand you can't really control your future, so you can only make your best decision with the information you have in front of you.

  • DTR808
    DTR808 Member Posts: 34
    edited June 2018

    Hi Surella - I’m so sorry for the tough decision that you have to make. I can relate as I too need to make the chemo or no chemo decision this week too.

    While I am unfamiliar with Prosigna, seeing that your results pegged you high risk, I would seriously consider chemo. I had two tests done on my tumors (OncotypeDX and Mammaprint) and if they popped out a high risk result then the decision would have been clear for me and that would be chemo. Fortunately for me, both came out low risk, thus my confusion. I did have that one positive lymph node so that is why chemo is still on the table for me.

    Good luck with whatever you ultimately choose and I hope you find the clarity you need to make the right decision for YOU.

    nonomimi5 - both my tests capped off at a 10-yr recurrence rate. I agree with you 100% in that if acrecurrence happens 10+ years from now, there will be so much medical advancement by then that chemo will be Nothing but an old school type of treatment. That is what my MO is telling me as well.

    gb2115 - I can totally relate to you as I’m 44 yo, so young and premenopausal. How did you handle radiation and how are you handling the tamoxifen? Do you remember how long after surgery you had started radiation

  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited June 2018

    Surella - I understand what you are going through. I prayed that I did not have to go through Chemo when I was Dx. Fortunately, my Oncotype was low and Chemo would not have benefited my BC. However, if I had high risk, I would definitely do chemo. There is no guarantee anything you do will prevent BC from recurrence or metastisize, but I would not take a chance.

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited June 2018

    Surella, have you looked at the general stats on Predict http://www.predict.nhs.uk/predict_v2.0.html

    or LifeMath http://www.lifemath.net/cancer/breastcancer/therap...

    While we never know what side of the risk bars we'll end up on, knowing how big the slice is, is important. The majority of people don't recur.

    But on the flip side, "Although more than 90% of patients with breast cancer have early stage disease at diagnosis, about 25% will eventually die of distant metastasis." http://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/7/E268

    Each of us needs to make a decision that we can be at peace with. I personally wanted to know I threw everything I could at it. I'm otherwise healthy & you know what, chemo is just something to get through & it's been ok - even though I haven't had the easiest time during parts of it, it's all been manageable & I'm so glad to have access to this world class treatment.

    Best wishes,

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited June 2018

    So glad I didn't do chemo but hindsight is 20/20 I know.

  • carmstr835
    carmstr835 Member Posts: 388
    edited June 2018

    I also was advised originally there would be very little benefit using chemo. I believe my MO used the pathology from my surgery and at that time I had already been taking arimidex and I believe that would skew the Onca scores. My biopsy pathology came back as Her2+ and 2/15 positive lymph nodes with extra nodal extension. One lymph node cancer grew 2.6 cm in just 9 days and burst after the biopsy. I was also Progestrone negative on 1 tumor. And slightly positive on the other. However, I was strongly estrogen positive for both breasts. I do not believe Onca score or Mammaprint would be valid for me, but my MO send it in anyways. My right breast tumor was scored as 19 and my left breast was 17. The Mammaprint came back as low. He stuck with his original decision not to do chemo the benefit he thought was still not worth it. My 2nd opinion MO adamantly suggested chemo. He suggested 2 different regimes and my MO reluctantly agreed with 4 cycles of TC. Then the pathology was redone by the 2nd opinion MO and that came back again as Her2+ he was very emphatic I get herceptin for a full year. My chemo was switched to TCHP 4 more cycles. So I had 2 TC and 4 TCHP. I had zero issues with chemo except lost most of my hair even though I did the dignicap. I had 90% of my hair until the final chemo when my nurse did not fit my cap on properly. I could not get her to listen to me. And 2 weeks later I lost most of my hair. That was the worst part. I paid $2700 to keep my hair and because of one chemo nurse, I lost it anyways.

    I feel I have done everything I can to keep this disease under control. I also did 30 tomography radiation treatments. Those are and still are the worst part of my treatment. Still even after 8 months I am still in severe pain and tightening of my fascia. I have been told I will have permanent lung damage from the radiation. Currently I have radiation pneumonitis and inflammation that will eventually become scar tissue and loss of lung function. I plan to have reconstruction surgery in a few weeks. And hopefully by cutting up the damaged scared radiated tissue, my chest and arm pain will be alleviated.

    I am not taking the arimidex or tamoxifen, or an of the hormone blocking drugs. I have side effects and can't take them. So I think I will be taking the new drug nerlynx after my surgery.

    My suggestion is to get a 2nd and 3rd opinion about everything. We don't get a "do over" here.


  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited June 2018

    carmstr, I am so sorry. What an absolute nightmare you have been through. I hate everything about this disease. The treatment needs to change. I feel like we are stuck in medieval times when it comes to treatment. And after all of that we don't know if we are cured.

  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited June 2018

    carmstr - I am so sorry for what you went through. I hope you reported the nurse. It is unbelievable what she did. Good luck on your surgery and I hope the new med doesn't give you SE. We will be praying for you.

  • DTR808
    DTR808 Member Posts: 34
    edited June 2018

    Hi everyone,

    Thanks again to all who've provide their feedback regarding my original post here.

    I have finally gotten my “3rd and final opinion" from Laura Van't Veer (inventor of Mammaprint) and I'm excited to say, nooooooo chemo!!!!!

    The main takeaway from her feedback to me was that while from reading my path, the characteristics of my tumor were intermediate (grade 2, stage 2) so while one could interpret this to be a grey are or mid-range wanting to err on the side of caution and advise that chemo should be the course of treatment, looking at the biology of the tumor itself ismore important and more, in her words, “meaningful".

    I didn't want to copy and paste her entire email to me as it's quite lengthy, but wanted to at least on some of the more important parts that others might be able to learn from or takeaway here. Keep in mind, her life's work has been and continues to be BC research through the lens of a molecular biologist therefore, she is always on the cutting edge of data research:


    1 node positive, is not negative of course, but one is recognizing more and more that up to 3 positive nodes is leaning for risk of recurrence more towards negative, certainly if only 1 is positive.




    Oncotype is 16, which is at the border of low to intermediate. The Tailor X trial just showed that this score, 16, patients did not benefit from chemotherapy. Though there is some debate about whether that is true for women under 50. However, there might be a little benefit, but that is not very much.




    MammaPrint is +0.339, which is clearly low risk. The Mindact trial has shown that even for women who have 'high clinical risk features', but their tumor biology is MammaPrint low risk can forego chemotherapy. Their benefit is clinical not meaningful, and not more than 1-2% (meaning that of 100 such patients treated by chemotherapy, up to 2 will benefit, but according to preset criteria in the trial, that would be outweighed by the (short and long term) negative side effect of chemo.




    My conclusion based on level 1 evidence data:




    The patient is considered clinical high risk (for recurrence), but both Tailor X (Oncotype Low/lower end of Intermediate), and Mindact (MammaPrint low risk), have shown that chemotherapy does not give any clinical meaningful benefit. For this exact situation the ASCO organization recommends that patients can consider to forego chemotherapy.

    ———-

    Lastly, she confirmed that my proposed chemo of TCx4, while on the lighter side of chemo, was still too much in her opinion. The proposed hormonal therapy for 5-10 years she thought was justified at five years but should revisit thereafter whether or not the additional 5 years would be necessary.

    I am hoping this helps at least one person or gives someone the peace of mind knowing they made a good decision for themselves to forego chemo based on the unique biological characteristics of their tumor. My hope is that soon, more and more doctors will acknowledge this and wrap their arms around this not-so cookie cutter approach and that BC is not a “one size fits all" deal. If I had just accepted what was advised during my first, surgical path follow up meeting with my first MO (that I would def need chemo and that the OncoDX and Mammaprint tests “weren't necessary because I was young and LN positive"), then I would be one TC infusion down out of 4, by now.

    Another reminder that YOU are your best advocate! Cheers ladies!!!

    Camstr - I am so sorry for all that you have gone through and hope that you are well on your road to recovery!

  • Cpeachymom
    Cpeachymom Member Posts: 518
    edited June 2018

    carmstr- I have a similar experience with rads. I wanted to give you some hope. I don’t know if they are treating you with steroids for the pneumonitis; I assume they are? I was on high dose steroids for months, and I thought it was also going to have lung problems forever. Whatever wasn’t healed by the steroids did turn to scar tissue, but I can’t really notice any shortness of breath, even with exercise. My pulmonologist told me emphatically, “You will get better.”

    Also, that tightness and pain-have you tried PT yet? That is the only thing that helped me. Especially if you can find a lymphedema PT, even if you don’t have it. They are knowledgeable about what rads does to the muscle and fascia.

    I’m sorry if you already went this route, I just wanted to let you know what has helped me in case it could help you.

  • Peregrinelady
    Peregrinelady Member Posts: 1,019
    edited June 2018
    Carmstr, I cannot believe that your first MO ordered an Oncotype on a HER+ tumor. That seems like such an obvious error that I don’t know how you could trust him for further treatment. So glad you got a 2nd opinion.

  • PreludeSing
    PreludeSing Member Posts: 102
    edited June 2018

    DTR - thank you for sharing that valuable information you received from the Mammaprint creator...very much appreciated!😊

    Carmstr835 - I really feel for you. Nobody should have to go through unnecessary stress...this diagnosis is enough of a challenge all on its own. Hope everything settles down for you soon 😘


  • windingshores
    windingshores Member Posts: 704
    edited June 2018

    DTR my post surgical pathology showed grade 3, highish ki67%, and LVI (lymphovascular invasion is considered by some to be equivalent to one positive  node, since it shows a tendency to travel). My Oncotype was 8!  Very estrogen positive and BMX do "just" doing Femara- more than three years now.

    Of note, my first pathology from biopsy samples had me as HER2+. If I had not gone to another hospital, I would have done  chemo and Herceptin and never even had an Oncotype. I got a second opinion (negative), and a third (equivocal), and a tie-breaker 4th (counted 60 cells instead of 20). My 4th opinion also repeated the Oncotype test because my pathology didn't look good.

    I encourage folks to call Genomic Health, the company that makes the Oncotype Dx test.  They really explained some things to me, much like the person from Mammaprint did for DTR.  Thirty percent of grade 3's have low Oncotypes!   And the Oncotypes don't just show if chemo is needed, but also how effective it would be. For me, chemo was more dangerous than not doing it, due to my general health and thank heavens for my low Oncotype.

    These things are complicated. It is good to keep going until you feel okay about your path- though it can take time and we are limited in that after surgery.




  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited June 2018

    DTR - Thank you so much for reporting back to us. I am glad that I based my treatment based on Oncotype DX and on the biology of the tumor. I did not understand your information about the nodes. Can you explain that part again?

    1 node positive, is not negative of course, but one is recognizing more and more that up to 3 positive nodes is leaning for risk of recurrence more towards negative, certainly if only 1 is positive.

  • star2017
    star2017 Member Posts: 827
    edited June 2018

    I went ahead with chemo. My details are in my signature. I didn’t have any oncotype or mammaprint testing down, at least I don’t think I did. The results are not something I’m aware of

  • DTR808
    DTR808 Member Posts: 34
    edited June 2018

    Nonomimi - I think she (Laura) meant that positive node up to 3 they are now learning is leading more to negative as far as recurrence risk. That is great news, yes?!?!? :)

    Star 2017 - hope you are healing well. Regarding Oncotype and Mammaprint tests, I think the reason why your MO may not have mentioned it is because you were had 4 positive nodes. Usually 3 positive nodes are the cutoff for the tests

  • kaywrite
    kaywrite Member Posts: 219
    edited July 2018

    Hello ladies, I dropped in to follow the path of someone in our rads group forum, and just read through all of your posts as a result. I just want to say that while I have not had to answer the chemo question with my original diagnosis (and hopefully never will), I can relate to all of the confusion and stress that comes with the breast cancer freight train (you can read about my journey here: https://www.kayspencer.com/blog/hangman-my-cancer-...). I felt totally unprepared for and grossly uninformed about the decisions I HAD to make. Thanks to posts like this one, I know more, can ask more informed questions.

    My Medical Oncologist used the Sloan-Kettering predictor tool to show me chances of recurrence with and without radiation and/or hormone therapy. He also told me there was no change in prognosis for me given the choices of mastectomy or rads/hormone therapy. I chose the lesser invasive course, meaning rads and oral chemotherapy (aka hormone therapy) for five years. I am a couple of months post-rads and aromatase inhibitors, and doing well.

    I'd also recommend the Ask An Expert forum at Johns-Hopkins for help in understanding pathology reports, etc. They get back to you same-day, free of charge: http://www.hopkinsbreastcenter.org/services/ask_ex...

    All in all, I'm left believing there is no one right answer, just the answer that is right for you. Knowledge is power, the more we share the more prepared we are to make those decisions. Thank goodness for BC.org!

  • nonomimi5
    nonomimi5 Member Posts: 434
    edited July 2018

    Kaywrite. Thank you for dropping in and the informative links. I willl give Johns Hopkins a try with my next questions

  • Marymc86
    Marymc86 Member Posts: 102
    edited July 2018

    Deciding on chemo is a tough decision. I had lumpectomy. No node involvement and clean borders. Stage 1 and grade 2. They thought my oncotype would be low, so, from the beginning they were telling me probably no chemo. I was thrilled and ready to celebrate once I got confirmation of the low score. Well, surprise, my score was 27! I had just turned 55, but my MO said when a score in the intermediate range is that close to 30, which is high, she then considers age. She put me in the young group, usually 50 and under, and starter talking chemo. I freaked. I didn't want to take hormonal therapy and was banking on the low score helping me decide against tamoxifen. Well, now that's back on the table. Ultimately, I decided against chemo. Now wondering if I should have done it. If you choose chemo, it's done before radiation in order to weaken the cancer cells so radiation can knock them on off if they linger. I'm in radiation now and it's been pretty easy on me. This week is the end and I'm not even burned! So, given I've made it through that fine, I'm thinking I could have weathered chemo well, too. Your situation will determine what you choose. I had started a new career and diagnosed a week into training. I saw chemo delaying my start and paycheck 3 more months. And, as supportive as people at work are, they really don't understand what you are facing. If I had had a positive lymph node, I believe I would have chosen to do the chemo. I've been depressed ever since receiving my oncotype score. I wish mine had been low and I kind of wish I didn't know it. I think your situation is just as tough because of the stage and node involvement. It boils down to your onc's question "Would you be comfortable with a recurrence in 20 years with your decision to forego chemo?" For me, if 20 years, yes. But, what about next year? Not sure. For me, no kids, no husband. If that were different, I think my decision would be, too.

    Good luck. You'll make the right choice.

Categories