Baseline Mammo/Ultrasound

Options
EPNYC
EPNYC Member Posts: 12
edited March 2018 in Not Diagnosed But Worried

Hi,

I'm a healthy 38 year old female and went for a baseline mammogram/ultrasound. I knew something was up when I saw the lady use a ruler to measure something during the ultrasound. I received a call later that evening and the nurse informed me that I will need to come back in for a diagnostic mammogram/ultrasound. I requested a copy of the radiologist report and this is written:

The left breast parenchyma demonstrates a heterogenous background echotexture. (there are some benign cluster of cysts-so I wont mention the size etc...)

At the 9:00 axis 2 to 3 cm from the nipple is a 0.6 x 0.3 x 0.5 cm oval hypoechoic mass. No definite internal vascularity is seen. On another page it says that it is partially circumscribed partially of scattered mass.

There is also a grouping of calcifications in the upper outer left breast.

I'm trying to stay positive, but expecting that this might be bad news.

What should I expect when I go in on Tuesday for diagnostic? and how worried should I be?

Thank you!

Comments

  • Rondeezee
    Rondeezee Member Posts: 92
    edited March 2018

    Hi,


    Just read your post and just wanted to comment that there are some positive terms in your report i.e “oval” and “no definite internal vascularity”. Did they give you a BIRADS rating? Praying that all goes well for you 🙏

  • EPNYC
    EPNYC Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2018

    BI-RAD is 0.. the nurse that initially called me told me to not be so upset and that since this is my first mammogram they have no way to know if this is new or something that could have been there for many years and be my normal.

    My right breast the radiologist wrote down as benign.

  • Rondeezee
    Rondeezee Member Posts: 92
    edited March 2018

    What the nurse told you is incorrect. Since they have no former imaging studies to coma or to, they scored your screening mammogram/ultrasound as a Birad 0 inconclusive and need more studies.

    I am in similar situation now. I am a BC survivor of 21 years (diagnosed at 29) and I recently had my annual diagnostic mammogram (3D) and they saw an area of increased distortion. Follow up ultrasound (my first) revealed the same area and another lesion in my left breast, which is the same breast that had the cancer. Since I had no prior ultrasound to compare to, I, too, received a Birad 0 on my ultrasound and I have now been scheduled for an MRI. This is appropriate for my history. My ultrasound report hand terms like no vascular flow and posterior enhancement and a few bad terms like angular and irregular margin. I was very upset, but I’ve calmed down since doing a lot of research on Google. What they saw may be scar tissue in my radiated breast or some other b9 finding. I keep telling my self that if what they saw were highly suspicious for cancer they would have scheduled an immediate biopsy. I will have an MRI on March 12.

  • EPNYC
    EPNYC Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2018

    wishing you luck and I hope the MRI shows up with nothing concerning.

  • LisaAlissa
    LisaAlissa Member Posts: 1,092
    edited March 2018

    Hi EPNYC!

    The nurse was correct. There are two reasons you might be assigned a Bi-RADs "0." One of them is simply that additional imaging is needed to make an assessment or reach a conclusion. This is often, but not always, the case with a first (or baseline) exam. Which is why there are often call-backs for women having initial mammograms.

    Not everyone who is having an initial screening mammogram is assigned a Bi-RADs "0," even though there is no prior imaging. Just those where the person reading the imaging needs more information to make an assessment or reach a conclusion. It sounds like this is the case for you EPNYC--you can have confidence in what your nurse told you.

    Where there are prior studies, like in Rhonda's case, the person reading the imaging may feel that they need the prior imaging studies to reach a conclusion. This is the second reason to assign a Bi-RADs "0." The person assigning the score believe that the additional information they need to reach an assessment may be in the prior imaging studies.

    Here's a very helpful description of the Bi-RADs system. Scroll down to "Final Assessment Categories" to see further descriptions of this system of communicating between the doctor reading the imaging study and the people who read their report.

    HTH,

    LisaAlissa

  • EPNYC
    EPNYC Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2018

    LisaAlissa: Thank you for responding. I guess I'll know more when I go back for another mammogram/ Ultrasound on Tuesday.



  • EPNYC
    EPNYC Member Posts: 12
    edited March 2018

    So I went in today for my diagnostic mammogram. I have to go in for a mammogram guided biopsy for my calcifications. The radiologist told me that they were not linear (in a straight line) but not the shape that she knows its usually benign. She wants to rule out early cancer. She said we might as well use ultrasound guided biopsy for my mass since I am going to be here for the calcification. She said that its not perfectly circumscribed the mass but she can def. trace around it. This is how she described it. (I have a feeling if I didn't have the calcification, I probably would have been categorized as 3 and just come back to keep can eye on the mass) So, here I am, 38 years old and the gynecologist didn't even want to send me for a baseline mammogram, due to no family history and breast exam was normal with a BI RAD score of 4A.

Categories