Aromatase Inhibitor and just walking away.
Comments
-
Nuclear medicine scan could identify who might benefit from aromatase inhibitor treatment
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/1505...
-
New research suggests that exercise can turn white fat into brown fat—which is not heart-unhealthy, is stabler, increases metabolism and decreases insulin resistance. Who knows if brown fat also secretes less androstenedione than white fat? Is the change at the cellular level (walls, nuclei) or just the fat stored in them? Worth looking into.
And since the fat in the cells is metabolically inert—it’s the cells themselves that function as a sort of organ system insofar as estrogen synthesis is concerned, would surgical excision, liposuction or cool-sculpting (the only ways to remove fat cells themselves) reduce estrogen production? Would those of us with large fatty breasts be advised to have them bilaterally reduced along with or after lumpectomy?
-
I see that commercial for cool sculpting all the time. A friend tried it. If that isn't the biggest bunch of crap..
I follow Medscape on twitter and today's info is on AI's:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/884916?src=soc_tw_170902_mscpedt_news_mdscp_mdscp_breastcancer
-
Artista thank you so much for this article. I am right at the point of deciding whether to go on with Letrozole. Already have Aortic Stenosis. Apparently extention helps a small few. I wonder if they would have done well anyways. It's been a month since stopping and this morning I woke up stiff and in pain all over. I hope that goes away with time. The pain was way worse a month ago.
Bummer on the cool scupting I was really thinking about it.
-
The link to that article doesn't work for me. Arista can you direct me to it? Thanks!
-
It didn't work for me either, I went to Medscape, clicked on Breast Cancer and scrolled through today's news. It's called:
Extended AI Use Linked to CV Events and Bone Fractures
Roxanne Nelson, BSN, RN
August 29, 2017
-
Try checking it out on twitter-
-
I was just reading General Surgery News:
New Edition of Cancer Staging Manual Includes Tumor Biology
http://www.generalsurgerynews.com/In-the-News/Arti...
...Another important inclusion in the new edition is the use of genomic profiling based on level 1 evidence. As the manual was being printed in early 2016, only the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX) had level 1 evidence from the TAILORx trial showing excellent outcomes for patients with a recurrence score of less than 11.
"This means that all patients who have a T1 or 2 tumor, N0, M0, ER-positive, HER2-negative and a recurrence score less than 11 are staged as a stage IA cancer because they have a recurrence-free survival of 99%-plus," Dr. Edge said.
The AJCC will issue rolling updates, "carefully defined and carefully constructed so as not to overwhelm the registry community," as level 1 evidence emerges on other genomic profiling assays, he added.
The prognostic staging system will rank many patients into groups different from what they would have been using the seventh edition. "For example, a T1, N0, M0, grade I triple-negative cancer would have been staged as stage IA in the seventh edition, but it's a IIA in the eighth edition, reflecting a worse outcome for these patients," Dr. Edge said.
By contrast, a patient with a T3 tumor, N1 or 2, M0, grade I, HER2-positive, ER-positive and PR-positive whose cancer was classified as a stage III cancer in the seventh edition, will be a stage IB cancer in the latest edition.
"In fact, there will be an increase in the number of patients who will be classified as stage I and a decrease in the number of stage II and stage III patients who receive the appropriate therapy," Dr. Edge said.
I have an oncotype DX score of 11. Not sure what "T1 or 2 tumor, N0, M0" are but I'm astounded by the "recurrence-free survival of 99%-plus".
If the recurrence rate is less than 1 percent and AIs lower it by 50 percent, wouldn't that mean the rate before AIs was 2 percent. I plan to discuss this with my MO next month to make sure I am understanding this correctly. Makes me much more comfortable with my decision not to do anti-hormone therapy.
Now after re-reading it, I'm not sure if the Oncotype score of 11 is the same as the "a recurrence score".
-
Above it has oncotype in parentheses so I guess recurrence and oncotype are the same. It looks like what they've done is DOWNGRADE a lot which means those downgraded will qualify for less treatment. We need someone who will spell this out for us to be sure.
"In fact, there will be an increase in the number of patients who will be classified as stage I and a decrease in the number of stage II and stage III patients who receive the appropriate therapy," Dr. Edge said.
-
It has down graded most as I can see it but upgraded triple negative. I'm wondering if they're finding the als or tamoxafin work well enough to forgo chemo
-
In the whole article it states they are just catching up with treatment that has changed over the last ten or five years. Some new studies say chemo doesn't work anyways for hormone positive.
-
T: the size of the tumor. Tn—microscopic to 1mm; T1–1mm to 1.5cm. T1a—1-5mm; T1b—5-10mm; T1c—1-2cm. T0 is an “occult primary tumor,” which was seen by imaging but could not be found upon surgical exploration.
N: the number of nodes involved, i.e., in which cancer cells are found. N0—no nodes involved. N1, one node, and so on…
M: the number of metastases (“mets”), i.e., evidence of cancer cells that traveled past the axillary nodes, in distant parts of the body. M0—no metastases.
So as a node-negative 1.3cm tumor without evidence of mets, my tumor is classified as T1cN0M0.
I read that article too, and it was not about initial AI therapy but rather extension past 5 years. Yes, there was a higher incidence of fractures & heart disease. But most women about to get AI therapy are given DEXA bone density scans (if they haven’t had a recent one already); and if the scan shows osteopenia (weakening bones) or osteoporosis (weak or brittle bones), we are given bone-strengthening treatment (oral or I.V. bisphosphonate or Prolia injection). If the scan shows normal bone density, common-sense measures to maintain bone health (calcium supplementation, avoidance of steroids or PPI drugs for GERD if possible, and weight-bearing exercise) are advised; another DEXA is done at 2 years.
As to cardiovascular risk, Tamoxifen is riskier for those already at risk or have a family history of ischemic (blood flow interrupted by a clot) heart disease or stroke, because it can cause blood clots. At this point, there is no causal relationship or anything more than a statistical relationship between AIs and heart disease, only a mathematical correlation. The difference between the AI and no-AI groups was small. The mechanism by which AIs increase CV disease risk is not known, other than decrease in systemic estrogen accelerates aging, and aging raises CVD risk. It’s not the AIs themselves, but their effect in lowering estrogen below levels in women who have had no estrogen-lowering treatments.
The takeaway from the study is that overall survival (time till death from all causes) is the same for both groups. And both ER+ breast cancer and CVD can have decades-long courses of progression. (My mom was diagnosed with heart failure at 65; she lived till 85). The longest period studied was 82 months, less than 7 years—definitely too short a time to come to definite conclusions for diseases that can take decades to kill. The #1 cause of death in early-stage ER+ breast cancer patients is heart disease—but not because the cancer or its treatment causes it but because patients live to be old enough to die of heart disease.
The uncomfortable truth is that we all will die sometime, of something. "No one here gets out alive,” as the Doors sang. But some of us get to stay longer and more pleasantly, and leave through different doors.
-
Optimal Duration of Extended Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer; Results of the IDEAL Trial (BOOG 2006-05)
Erik J. Blok, Judith R. Kroep, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, Marjolijn Duijm-de Carpentier, Hein Putter ...
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Volume 110, Issue 1, 1 January 2018, djx134, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx134
Published: 23 August 2017
The optimal duration of extended endocrine therapy beyond five years after initial aromatase inhibitor–based adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer is still...
Abstract BackgroundThe optimal duration of extended endocrine therapy beyond five years after initial aromatase inhibitor–based adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer is still unknown. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to compare two different extended endocrine therapy durations.
Methods
In the randomized phase III IDEAL trial, postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to either 2.5 or five years of letrozole after the initial five years of any endocrine therapy. The primary end point was disease free survival (DFS), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS), distant metastasis–free interval (DMFi), new primary breast cancer, and safety. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined using Cox regression analysis. All analyses were by intention-to-treat principle.
Results
A total of 1824 patients were assigned to either 2.5 years (n = 909) or five years (n = 915) of letrozole, with a median follow-up of 6.6 years. A DFS event occurred in 152 patients in the five-year group, compared with 163 patients in the 2.5-year group (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 1.16). OS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.38) and DMFi (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.45) were not different between both groups. A reduction in occurrence of second primary breast cancer was observed with five years of treatment (HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.81). Subgroup analysis did not identify patients who benefit from five-year extended therapy.
Conclusion
This study showed no superiority of five years over 2.5 years of extended adjuvant letrozole after an initial five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy.
She who lives well lives best
-
The more I read and hear the more confused I get. It sounds like this breast cancer is a crap shoot, and we take whatever the hell they give us and hope for the best. I have been on Anastrozole for 4 1/2 years and am so done. I am not sure if I will make it the 5 years that was first suggested by my onco and who is now saying 10 because that is what whoever said it should be..I am tired of the hot flashes that attack me every 20 minutes, I am tired of walking like a duck in the morning or whenever I get up off a chair. . I am tired of not having my sense of humor anymore, I am tired of my libido being completely at a zero. I am tired of feeling so not myself. So what do we do, go off of and pray for the best. I wish I knew...
-
Help is on it's way.....
MEDICAL RESEARCH
New cancer treatment can eradicate tumors, scientists say
Published August 29, 2017 Fox NewsScientists unveiled a new cancer treatment on Monday that can remove tumors, reduce side effects and prevent the disease from coming back better than current techniques. (iStock)
Scientists unveiled a new cancer treatment on Monday that can remove tumors, reduce side effects and prevent the disease from coming back better than current techniques.
The treatment, called Caspase Independent Cell Death (CICD), showed to effectively remove tumors in experimental models. Unlike chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy, which uses a process called apoptosis to kill cancer cells, CICD was shown to cause less side effects, Sky News reported.
"[CICD] may be a more effective way to treat cancer," said Dr. Stephen Tait, who led the University of Glasgow research.
"In essence, this mechanism has the potential to dramatically improve the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapy and reduce unwanted toxicity," Tait said. "Taking into consideration our findings, we propose that engaging CICD as a means of anti-cancer therapy warrants further investigation."
Scientists used colorectal cancer cells in their tests, but said the treatment may be effective on other types.
"This new research suggests there could be a better way to kill cancer cells which, as an added bonus, also activates the immune system," spokesperson Dr. Justine Alford said.
The new method is able to alert the immune system to help kill off tumor cells that weren't detected in the initial round of treatment.
-
BB I have made my decision, I choose not to speed up the aging process. It's been a month, I feel better today than yesterday. Going natural, healthy food and exercise, supplements. My kids are supporting me in this choice (DIL is a nurse). You can always go off, see how you feel, and go back on again. But it has to be your decision. Not sure how old you are? Have faith.
-
I'm 99% sure that I have decided not to start the AIs. I do not want to turn into an old lady overnight. I currently am a very active 68-yr old, and feel more like 35. On taking the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Calculator, it says that my life expectancy is about 18 yrs, and would be shortened by 2 months if I choose not to do AIs. I certainly would regret it if I ended up with bone mets next year, but would regret more inducing permanent drastic aging. I can't do tamoxifen, I can't do bisphosponates. And I am in the middle of osteopenia in spite of 10 years of strength training. I have a friend who developed severe OP after heavy duty rads and chemo for stage IV anal cancer. She did not have a choice about her treatment. And cancer appears to be gone. But she has multiple compressed vertebrae, including a lumbar fx that has left her unable to walk now. She has been hospitalized or in rehab for 8 of the past 11 months. Mostly because of lymphedema and multiple bone fractures in addition to the vertebrae. That is no way to live when you are young (69) and active. I don't want that for myself.
Sorry for the rant.
-
Don't be sorry MariH, that was a very nice rant. Good to see someone else has woken up. I feel like I've been sleep walking thinking I was getting help from the AI when all I was getting was old and creaky. My calculator shows I would get another 140 days survival maybe. Meanwhile my eyes were getting blurry with serious issues. The pain started to feel like I had crushed glass in my muscles and joints. Off it now and starting to feel better. One doctor said it takes a year for hormones to balance. I'm reading a good book, What Doctors Won't Tell You About Breast Cancer. I'm sure someone will come along and call it propaganda. Oh well, I did about 28 months, it's my choice.
-
Marijen, congrats on a good decision. I hope the damage done by the AI's reverses. I can understand se's like joint and muscle pain, fatigue, depression, mental fog, weaning, but things like bone loss and heart issue, eye damage, etc. most likely permanent. JMO.
A little bit of your natural estro does a body good. You will continue to feel better. Will it feed your cancer? The jury is still out on that. Unbalanced hormones like we experience during the transition into meno which is when most BC rears its ugly head is the real danger unless dormant ca cells are sitting around waiting to be fed by estro. I'm assuming my surgery and rads got it all and so far, 6 years NED???? A chance I'll take without regret. I'm 62 and and all my se's of aging are what our bodies do naturally. Yes, I'm an "OD". (old douchbag). Just got dx'd with cataracts, and a 3 min sx, zip zip, all gone.
I think you'll continue feel better.
xoxo Maureen
-
Thank you chef, what nice thoughts to start the day with. You are very kind. I have another eye exam in January, until then I'm hoping my body is doing secret repair! Last night I watched a show on TLC channel about a little boy born with only 2% of his brain, the rest was empty space. Since then his brain has grown to 80%, there is a shunt in his head to remove excess fluid. He can talk, think, see (no glasses). He's a little developmentally delayed but they say in a few years he might be like a regular 8 year old, he's a three year when the show was made. He has spinal bifida, but who knows maybe someday he will walk. Cutest little guy ever, a medical celebrity. Anyways the body can do marvelous things if we allow it and help it. I feel better today than yesterday. Out for a walk now.
-
Thanks Marijen and KB870. I was on HRT for 10 years, which is a risk factor for BC. I've been off it for 8 years, which presumably is a huge reduction in estrogen. My other risk factor is having a daily glass of wine, and occasionally more. This can increase estrogen production. But it is something I particularly enjoy
-
A glass of wine raises your risk a percentage of a percentage and is not the biggest factor by far, obesity is. I posted a chart here at bco a long time back, if I find it I'll post it again.
-
KB870: I feel exactly the same way. I'm 64, active, in good health - except for bc - and want to stay this way. With Stage I, Grade I and no node involvement, it seems like overkill to take anti-hormone therapy. I'm going to assume the surgery and the radiation took care of it. I'll continue exercise three hours a week, lose weight and eat healthy.
-
BB with that logic everyone should be on AIs to avoid BC, because we don't know which people with high risks have yet to discover they have a slow growing, ten to 20 years in the making, tumor. Oh but I never had a primary tumor. Just a pop-up in my lymph node. How much is the higher than normal chance as you recall? Do you think you are up to another three years of AI? Because there's a new study that says they found no difference between 2.5 years extended after five years (7.5) or an additional 5 years (10). Do you have any serious issues? I can't remember. Just think 175,000 (.70 x 250000)women per year are dx'd with hormone positive. That doesn't count the ones that don't get checked
-
Hello ladies I am not new to BCO I have been on since 2008 when I had my first breast cancer you can see my stats at the bottom. I had 5 years of Arimidex and then I had a new primary 3 years later. All my SE disappeared within two months of my quitting .My breast surgeon and I actually have a hypothesis that this last breast cancer was probably in there all along way too little to be discovered by MRI or mammogram the Arimidex kept it under control and then it took off in the three years that I wasn't taking the Arimidex, it stayed very small it was 7 mm . When my oncologist told me that I would need another five years on hormone blocker I had the biggest temper tantrum that I've probably had since I was 3 years old . We did the BCI and damn it all it came back that I needed to take another 5 years. I am currently as of today taking Aromasin I cried all day just because I had to take that pill I'm mostly concerned about thinning or losing my hair how vain am I LOL if I was not luminal B I would not be taking this.
-
I've forgotten the difference between luminal A and B?
-
Good explanation somewhere on. BCO LOL
-
Yeah, Chisandy posted it somewhere.....
OG if I get a recurrence can we get together and throw a tantrum together, because I can relate.
-
Yes Marjen we certainly can!!! Oh. and Bosumblues I did do Chemo this time boo hoo! With my 1st BC I was told I had a 7% chance of having a reocurance I should go to Vegas!
-
Yes, OG you won the Recurrance Lottery good going
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team