PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor Receives FDA Approval

Options
JFL
JFL Member Posts: 1,947

Two days ago, the FDA granted blanket approval of Keytruda, a PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor, for all cancers with MSI-H/dMMR biomarkers, including breast cancers.

Time to break out my Foundation One genomic testing report! Not sure if this bio marker is shown on the Foundation One results but hope it is.

Interestingly, I have also heard of triple negative BC patients without these biomarkers nevertheless responding to the drug.

Anyone out there taking Keytruda or one of its competitor drugs, Opdivo or Tencentriq, either through clinical trials or off label? Would be very interested to hear your experiences!

Below are the first two paragraphs of the FDA's press release on this, which summarizes the approval.


FDA approves first cancer treatment for any solid tumor with a specific genetic feature


May 23, 2017

Release

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today granted accelerated approval to a treatment for patients whose cancers have a specific genetic feature (biomarker). This is the first time the agency has approved a cancer treatment based on a common biomarker rather than the location in the body where the tumor originated.

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have been identified as having a biomarker referred to as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). This indication covers patients with solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options and patients with colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with certain chemotherapy drugs.


Comments

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited May 2017

    Thank you for posting this news, JFL. It makes sense to me to look at mutations and not just location. One of my VUS (Variants of Unknown Significance) on F1 appears to be significant in colon cancer, so why not, at some point, consider the drugs used in that setting?

    I believe MSI-H and dMMR refer to categories rather than being names of particular genes and mutations. For example, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 are all mismatch repair genes that F1 assays.

    My genetics counselor said that having one of these mutations show up in the breast tumor --it's actually a germline mutation -- did not make it a micro-satellite unstable tumor. But if subsequent testing reveals more such mutations in the categories mentioned above, then they would consider a PD-1 inhibitor for me. It brings hope to see advances in personalized cancer treatment.

  • JFL
    JFL Member Posts: 1,947
    edited May 2017

    Shetland, thanks for the info. This knowledge is helpful. Iam not yet familiar with these strains of mutations. Is your genetic counselor through your MOs office? My center had one but not sure if they still do. I don't even have my full Foundation One report. My MO sent me the relevant/summary pages of it when I requested a copy. I would really like the whole report and will have to push for it.

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited May 2017

    JFL- Wow, really! that is great news! I remember reading quite awhile back that where the best response rates for the most sensitive of cancers to immunotherapy is maybe only 15-25%, if the cancer has mutations in the mismatch DNA repair pathway (ie, mutaions in the mismatch DNA repair -MSH-proteins), then 67% of those cancers respond to immunotherapy. So it makes sense that FDA would open up immuno to anyone with a cancer having that defect.

    But where it gets further interesting is that some drugs may introduce mutations or loss of expression of mismatch DNA repair proteins. Some CDK inhibitors might do this, for example (but not Ibrance, to my knowledge)- so, if any drugs are identified that block the expression of the MSH proteins, that drug would enable a cancer with normal MSH proteins to become sensitive to immunotherapy. So now a big search in pharma for drugs that affect the expression or activity of the MSH proteins!

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited May 2017

    JFL, I am treated at a large cancer center with a cancer genetics department. I have spoken with both an attending physician (MD) in that department, and a genetics counselor with an MS. Actually, it was the MD who mentioned the PD-1 inhibitor information. I don't know if what he told me would apply to someone who had a tumor with one mismatch repair gene that was somatic (just in the tumor); the mutation for me is germline (in all my cells including the ones gone awry) and is not thought to be involved in my developing bc.

    The full F1 report I have includes a page with known deleterious mutations and space for any applicable therapies and trials. Then another page lists the variants of unknown significance. Another page has a list of all the genes assayed, which is useful if I read about a mutation and want to see if they checked for it. The other pages have technical info. It should not be hard for you to get your report. It is part of your medical record so just ask your onc for a copy or request it from the medical records department. One more thing about F1 -- did you know they have a service to match you with trials at your request, even after the initial report?

    That is interesting, Cure-ious.

  • Heidihill
    Heidihill Member Posts: 5,476
    edited May 2017
  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited May 2017

    Thank you JFL. What a bunch of nerdy breast cancer patients we are.

    Shetland - we once chatted about a trial that combined Ibrance and Keytruda. I don't think they selected participants based on biomarkers but I'll bet they are going back and looking at their participant records this week. If you hear anything about outcomes on that trial, let us know ...

    >Z<

  • PeacockGirl
    PeacockGirl Member Posts: 162
    edited June 2017

    I am in a phase II trial in Portland Oregon for TNBC mets to lymph nodes (stage 4) and have been on pembrolizumab (Keytruda) since December...infusion every three weeks with concurrent chemo of Xeloda one week on one week off. I didn't have foundation one testing done prior to getting enrolled in this trial but what "appears" to be happening is the cancer is traveling node to node and where it gets knocked out, it does not appear to be returning. I have whole sections of my neck that do no light up on PET scan anymore that did in October of 2016. I do have NEW nodes that light up now but my immune system appears to be keeping the cancer within my lymph system and is not allowing it to escape.

  • JFL
    JFL Member Posts: 1,947
    edited June 2017

    Heidihill, thanks for posting the article. It definitely gives me hope that this drug will help at least some of us on these boards!

Categories