Mamma print ki67 score 30% Help is this gray area for Chemo

Options
2

Comments

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2016

    all the pills once you take chemo for nausea, bone pain,

    Decadron , Claritin,Zofran,Compazine

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2016

    neulasta shot after Chemo

    Decadron

    Claritin

    Zofran

    Compazine

    I haven't decided yet...one minute it is I have to, then next it is am I strong enough

  • Jackster51
    Jackster51 Member Posts: 357
    edited December 2016

    Just reading through this... and it seems that someone so on the fence of needing chemo - they are giving you some hard core stuff. Not everyone has problems, but Taxotere is pretty brutal. I not only did not get my hair back, I have crippling neorapathy in my feet and can no longer wear closed toed shoes of stand on my feet. I was 47 during treatment. 5 years ago and neither of those Taxotere side effects have gotten any better. . Not trying to scare you, but given your hesitation of needing it, the possibility of 6 rounds of Taxotere is really using a sledge hammer. Also to note, a good friend of mine had Taxotere 5 years ago for early stage BC. Three years later she has cancer in bones and liver. She is very upset that she cannot do Taxotere again, as it is really for stage 4 BC. She is out of options for treatment now. Just things to consider. Sorry you are facing this decision.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited December 2016

    Jackster, sounds like taxotere let her down why would she think it would help her stage 4 cancer if it didn't seem to prevent recurrence?

  • Optimist52
    Optimist52 Member Posts: 302
    edited December 2016

    Positive2strong, ultimately the decision is yours. There are so many factors that come into play. You don't have node involvement and have a small tumour. Anti-hormonals are a very effective treatment in ER+ breast cancer. Also I understand that the mucinous type is generally less aggressive. I think being in your mid-sixties is another reason not to do chemo. Just my opinion. Am I right in thinking that you didn't have an Oncotype DX test?

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2016

    Hi Postivie2strong:

    Did you obtain a second opinion from a medical oncologist from an independent institution? That is the most reliable source of additional advice that you could obtain.

    BarredOwl

  • keepthefaith
    keepthefaith Member Posts: 2,156
    edited December 2016

    p2s, I had 4 TX's of CT. I was DX'd at 58. It was not a picnic by any means, but I was fortunate that I really didn't have major SE's....more like a lot of little ones at once! They are long gone and I have no regrets. With that said, we are all different and will react differently to the TX's we are prescribed. I did have my MO reduce the Taxotere dose on my last infusion. I wasn't liking the (possible) allergic reaction I was having. After gathering all of the information you need to make a good decision, follow your gut and do what you think is right for you. As you already know, there are a lot of helpful people here and whatever route you take, you are not alone. Plenty of support and tips to get you through it. Best wishes.

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2016

    jackster they are recommmending 4 infusions 3 weeks apart

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2016

    no I do not have onotype test, I had the mammaprint and the ff . Came back 20% high risk for recurrenc

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited December 2016

    keep the faith,

    Did they want you to have chemo because of high risk recurrence

  • keepthefaith
    keepthefaith Member Posts: 2,156
    edited December 2016

    P2S, My onco score was 21-intermediate...which is about a 13% risk, with 5 yrs of Hormone therapy. I did not do the Mammaprint, but it was offered. My MO left the decision of chemo up to me, but I have a family history (and 8 grandkids)...so, I wanted to take advantage of the chemo, while I could. I know that may sound crazy to some, but to me, it was a chance I was willing to take. Good luck with your decision. It's a lot to think about.

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited January 2017

    Optimist52

    The MO said because my tumor was large 1.5 cm and for? 20% I should have chemo I went to another MO said same thing they are both st the same center and The RO said to do chemo

    I have so much anxiety to sit there for 3-4 hrs and I may try the dignity cap which also is confining.

  • keepthefaith
    keepthefaith Member Posts: 2,156
    edited January 2017

    P2S, I'm glad you made a decision. I hope your TX's go well with few SE's. Go kick some cancer butt!:)

  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited January 2017

    Positive, Bring someone with you; bring comforting music with headphones, bring things to do (crosswords, etc). Chemo is boring, but I found the time passed faster when I brought things with me. I don't sit still long; I get bored. I sometimes just walked around in there with my IV pole. I was one of the lucky ones who tolerated chemo very well. I wish the same for you.

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited January 2017

    thank you, did you ice your feet and hands, I hope I can get earphones in to listen to movies. I just have anxiety attacks when I sit still.

  • Smurfette26
    Smurfette26 Member Posts: 730
    edited January 2017

    I had Taxotere and iced during the infusion. I have no neuropathy.

    Painting your nails a dark colour seems to help protect the nail bed. My breast nurse advised me to to this and I never lost any nails.

    Wishing you the very best.

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited January 2017

    thanks for the advice, I wish my infusion center or Doctor would tell me things, so happy you are all here

  • teacher30plus
    teacher30plus Member Posts: 13
    edited January 2017

    Positive2strong,

    I couldn't help but reply to you after reading all of your concerns. I too, had a very similar diagnosis with a much higher ki-67. After Mammaprint results came back, I was also placed in this same high risk group. After much going back and forth, I had my TC chemo treatments last year starting January 12. I survived!! It was doubtful at times. The sitting there for 2-3 hours was easier each time, as I talked to nurses and patients around me. I also listened to good music on my phone, and even read some. You can do it, if you have the right mindset. I don't know if you take anything for the anxiety, but MO suggested I start taking Lexapro, and it did seem to help. I am 58, and have just had to have another biospy last month. (same breast) Got the results two days before Christmas that it was benign!! Best gift ever! I will be praying hard that the chemo will be easy on you!

  • Positive2strong
    Positive2strong Member Posts: 316
    edited January 2017

    Teacher...thanks happy to hear your good test results.

    My mamma print ff score was 20% my post of 30% was incorrect but don't know how to change it

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited January 2017

    Hi Positive2strong:

    The MammaPrint test is a completely separate test from Ki-67 percentage.

    The MammaPrint test (a gene expression profiling test that looks at mRNA levels of 70 different genes) was performed at Agendia Inc. The output is a MammaPrint Index (a number on a scale of -1.0 to +1.0) reflecting the degree of correlation of the tumor's gene expression profile with a low risk template profile), which is further classified into one of two risk categories (High or Low). The result was: High Risk.

    The Ki-67 percentage, which uses labeled antibodies that bind or "stain" Ki-67 protein using immunohistochemical methods (reported as the percentage of cells that show staining for Ki-67) was determined by standard pathology.

    If you'd like to fix the title of the thread, you can send a PM to the Moderators with a request. Be sure to include a link to your thread.

    Based on the information you provided, the title should probably read something like: "MammaPrint/BluePrint: High Risk Luminal-type (B); Ki-67 20%: Help is this gray area for Chemo?"

    BarredOwl


  • barcelonagirl
    barcelonagirl Member Posts: 52
    edited January 2017

    Hi Positive! Sounds like you had many of the questions that I had several years ago when diagnosed. I was Stage 1A, IDC, with 2 tumors of 1.4cm, no nodes. One tumor had a Ki67 of 20% the other was 5-10%. The PR on my higher Ki67 tumor was 0%, but still highly ER+ and HER2-. My oncotype came back low intermediate (21) and surprisingly, the MammaPrint came back High Risk. I really didn't think I needed the chemo, but the MammaPrint test convinced me otherwise. I did opt to have 8 rounds of ACT based on the MammaPrint results, and four years after finishing treatment, I feel fantastic!

    I had friends come to my chemo treatments, and we had themed days...game day, movie day, cookbook/recipe day, etc. Spending the time with my friends helped it pass more quickly, and let them participate in my treatments and healing. I found that Ativan would take the edge off those anxious times, and found that certain days right after chemo were worse than others...usually lasting a day or two and varying depending on the type of treatment. I drank TONS of water (typically not a good water consumer, but so important to flush things out) and walked in the neighborhood each day (even if I came home and took a nap!)

    Everyone has a different experience, but are all so incredibly supportive on these discussion boards. I did not do the cold cap, as information about it wasn't as prevalent several years back. My hair did grow back and is as thick as ever. Since I now work as an advocate for MammaPrint, I'm more exposed to new options, and have seen several different models of "cold caps" out there. Another type is called the "Dignicap" and is FDA cleared. There are some great news articles on the success women have had using them, and many have written about their experience on these discussion boards. One woman started The Rapunzel Project to help other women going through chemo who don't want to lose their hair.

    Keep asking your questions, and stay positive...as difficult as that may be to do! Hope this helps!

  • lisabekind
    lisabekind Member Posts: 89
    edited January 2017

    Mellee, I was reading your diagnosis, and have a question . I had a double mastectomy Jan 26, this past Thursday. I was planning to have reconstruction . I had the sentinel biopsy and found micro. So, my plastic surgeon said no with the expanders or drop in implants. His theory is if I need radiation the implants might get in the way, or other issues may come up.

    Honestly, that ticked me off. I don't have the greatest relationship with him.

    Now it's the waiting game for the final pathology report.

    Question: was there any deliberating about your reconstruction after 2 nodes came back positive? Do you need any radiation?


  • lisabekind
    lisabekind Member Posts: 89
    edited January 2017

    Mellee, I was reading your diagnosis, and have a question . I had a double mastectomy Jan 26, this past Thursday. I was planning to have reconstruction . I had the sentinel biopsy and found micro. So, my plastic surgeon said no with the expanders or drop in implants. His theory is if I need radiation the implants might get in the way, or other issues may come up.

    Honestly, that ticked me off. I don't have the greatest relationship with him.

    Now it's the waiting game for the final pathology report.

    Question: was there any deliberating about your reconstruction after 2 nodes came back positive? Do you need any radiation?


  • mellee
    mellee Member Posts: 434
    edited January 2017

    Lisabekind, there was no deliberation. My PS went ahead with my direct-to-implant reconstruction knowing about the positive nodes. While radiation has the possibility to cause complications to the reconstruction, my PS thinks that reconstruction is more difficult after radiation because the tissue has been compromised. And implants don't "get in the way" of radiation therapy. An RO is perfectly capable of radiating around them.

    Here's what OncoLink has to say (I've bolded some of the info, but you may want to read the entire article for a more complete picture -- (https://www.oncolink.org/cancers/breast/treatments...):

    Immediate versus delayed reconstruction

    Once a decision has been made between a patient and the plastic surgeon for breast reconstruction, one of the first decisions to be made is regarding either immediate (at the time of mastectomy) or delayed (after mastectomy) reconstruction. Most patients are eligible for immediate breast reconstruction.

    Delayed breast reconstruction refers to reconstruction of the breast after completion of mastectomy and all chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Some physicians feel that delayed reconstruction may help a patient receive the chemotherapy and radiation she needs more efficiently and with fewer risks of side effects than she might develop if the reconstruction were done right away; however, with modern approaches to radiation and chemotherapy delivery, most physicians no longer have these concerns. Modern radiation equipment, which incorporates CT scan three-dimensional planning and computer modeling in virtual reality, allows sophisticated treatment plans to be developed for most patients with or without a reconstructed breast. Another reason for delaying reconstruction may include patient preference because she is not certain she wants reconstruction at all, or if she is medically not a good candidate for the procedure. In some cases, there may be a concern that scheduling and recovering from reconstruction could introduce an unacceptable delay between mastectomy and chemotherapy. This fear may be greater for a patient with locally advanced breast cancer than one with early stage breast cancer. Delaying reconstruction until after completion of all adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation does have some potential downsides: It may mean a patient waiting 6-9 months for the procedure - which may be unacceptable to some women. In addition, delayed reconstruction requires that a patient undergo a second major operation. Finally, delayed reconstruction may be more difficult for patients who require a breast implant for their reconstruction. Because decisions regarding delaying reconstruction are so complicated and individualized, they should be discussed carefully with a plastic surgeon.

    Immediate timing of reconstruction, when the breast is reconstructed during the mastectomy, will provide the patient with an important cosmetic and psychological benefit - not awaking from mastectomy with a complete absence of a breast. Immediate reconstruction is also associated with avoidance of a second major operation, since both the mastectomy and reconstruction of the breast are done at the same time. Again, the decision of whether to pursue immediate or delayed reconstruction is complicated, and should be discussed with the treatment team before the mastectomy is performed. Having some more information regarding types of reconstruction may be helpful, and these details are discussed below....



  • mellee
    mellee Member Posts: 434
    edited January 2017

    Also, as to whether I need radiation, I am currently deliberating. I've had 2 RO consults and my case presented before a tumor board, and leaning against it. But for women with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, we're in a bit of a grey area. There might be benefit, but there are also considerable downsides. I talk about it more in this thread: https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/96/topics...

    Looking at your diagnosis, my guess is that if you only had micromets in one node, you probably do not need rads. But final pathology could change things. Things that are in your favor:

    • small size of tumor
    • small size of nodal metastases
    • hormone positive
    • Her2 negative

    I don't know the Grade of your tumor (lower is better), your age (less risk for those over 40), or whether you had lymphovascular invasion (heightens the risk of recurrence), but those all factor in as well.

    When making your decision, be sure to discuss the new 2016 postmastectomy guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology with your RO: http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.1...

    Best of luck with your treatment and treatment decisions! Let me know if I can answer any other questions. I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.

  • lisabekind
    lisabekind Member Posts: 89
    edited January 2017

    melle, thanks for the information!! I'm 46, and grade is 2. Radiation was mentioned to my husband, when I was in recovery. I will not know treatment until the final pathology is in.

    I really need to talk to my ps, so I can hear with my own ears why he went that direction.

    Thanks again!

  • Time2change
    Time2change Member Posts: 1
    edited November 2017

    I loved what you had to say, i myself had the same thing Idc, breast cancer. Just had surgery October 5th and now the MO says it's up to me what I want . Chemo plus radiation ,or just radiation. My husband said we need to think about it. So I'm in the gray area, that means in the middle #20 on the onkotype .I was not happy about being in the middle . So I asked for the Mammaprint, the Dr. was not sure why but I insisted and told her that my husband wanted it too . If my mammaprint is high I probably will get the chemotherapy.

  • Wildburg
    Wildburg Member Posts: 4
    edited June 2018

    Can mammaprint work on triple negative? I know oncotype won't but book I have says mammaprint will....onc I see says she doesnt do them for triple neg....but think thats cause she only does the oncotype

  • moth
    moth Member Posts: 4,800
    edited June 2018

    Wildburg - yes it can. "Unlike other similar genomic tests, the Agendia Breast Cancer Suite of tests has no restrictions on other factors such as hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor), HER2 status, or hormonal therapy prescription" http://www.agendia.com/patient/breast/faqs/


  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited June 2018

    Oncotype is not typically done on triple negative because the purpose of Oncotype is to help make a decision on the benefit of Chemotherapy. Triple nagative typically means you get Chemotherapy since it is the only systemic treatment available

Categories