Are BS better than General Surg & Should I get a second opinion

Options
truper
truper Member Posts: 10
edited December 2016 in Just Diagnosed

Can someone tell me if a BS is better than a General Surgeon? And does your Dr. get mad if you get a second opinion? Any info on what to do or how to do it?

I'm so confused on what to do. I've seen the MO a General Surgeon & Reconstruction Dr two times but I think I was still in denial at the time and did not know all these question to ask....now I'm not sure what to do. My surgery is Dec 13th. I was diagnosed in Oct and have went thru so many test and still having testing done, my thyriod scan is today a Dexa Scan on Dec 6th.

Can I upload my Pet and MRI scan on here? ( there is so much to type).

Please help...I can't sleep!

Thanks for all your help!


Comments

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited November 2016

    Personally - I would not go to a General Surgeon for BC surgery. I'd want someone who specialized in/was very experienced with BC for the optimal outcome. General Surgeons are just that - surgeons that do not specialize in any particular type of surgery but do general (all sorts of) surgery.

    With that said, my Surgeon was not strictly a Breast Surgeon but a 'Woman's Surgeon' - meaning he only did surgery on women for breast AND reproductive surgery. His reputation is outstanding and he is the one my PA said she would want IF she ever needs surgery for any female issue. He was fantastic.

    I have no idea how any individual Dr would react if told that a 2nd (or 3rd or more) opinions are sought. I would assume that different ones would react differently. I did not seek 2nd opinions on any of my Drs or TX plan - it all made sense to me and I really liked all my Drs. If you are questioning and feel you want/NEED a 2nd opinion - get it.

    Being IBC, recon at time of UMX was not an option so I had not seen any Plastic Surgeon at the time. By the time, it was an option (a yr later), I had decided that I was fine with being able to do everything I wanted to do (very active outdoor woman) and did not want to take a chance that more surgery could have an effect on that - you can never be sure how any surgery will turn out. We are each so unique - what is 'right' for me may not be for someone else and visa versa.

    Have you had a DEXA Test before? If not, it is a lot quicker/easier than any of the Scans. It is basically just X-rays of hip area which will show the density of bones that will show if the density is lowering (as in osteopenia or osteoporosis). I did not have a DEXA test before starting TX as I'd been having them cor yrs so it was already known I was osteopenia (huge family HX).

  • Luckynumber47
    Luckynumber47 Member Posts: 397
    edited November 2016

    Hi truper,

    After diagnosis and before surgery is such a scary time for everyone. So many unknowns. So sorry you find yourself here.

    The first thing I would recommend is that you fill out the diagnosis part of your profile and make it public so we can see what is going on with you and if the treatment recommendations seem reasonable.

    Your general surgeon might be the most awesome dr out there, we would have ko way of knowing but some things you could ask are: how many of these surgeries do you do a year, why are you recommending this type of surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy), and are you doing just a SNB (if lymph nodes look negative before surgery). My only concern is that some general surgeons might still be "old school" and not the most up to date on limiting the number of lymph nodes removed.

    My dr encouraged me to get a second opinion. I didn't, because I felt completely comfortable with her recommendations but you should always advocate for yourself. If you have even the slightest doubt about what is recommended or unsure of the surgeons skill, by all means, get another opinion.

    It sounds like your dr has left no stone unturned in regards to tests. You should feel very confident that they know the total extent of your cancer. The dexa scan is super easy and is just a baseline for bone density.

    Sending you warmest hugs,

    Lucky

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited November 2016

    Are you getting reconstruction? That's what makes the difference. I had a General Surgeon and showed two ladies who'd had plastic surgeons and they both said my incision line was WAY neater than theirs!! Go figure. I had no intention of recon ever and told my surgeon to make me dead flat. He did. Some surgeons will leave extra skin because they think you will change your mind later.

    I can wear a tight tank top and have NO bulges or ripples or indents. I am very happy with my surgical results. My chest is not weird to look at.

  • snowsogal
    snowsogal Member Posts: 79
    edited November 2016

    Dear Truper:

    I just went with a regular general surgeon, not a breast surgeon. Even though people did not like my choice, and tried to talk me into going to a breast surgeon. I think it depends on your situation. This is just my opinion; I figured that the regular surgeons have done more of these mastectomies long before the breast surgeon title came along. I wanted to stay local, and not have to drive way down town, or find other people to drive me way down town. I was sent to a Christian surgeon, and that was a great comfort to me. I had a friend, who was sent to a cancer center university, and she had a re-occurrence last year, because her breast surgeon and oncologist did not think she needed radiation the first time around.

    I am glad I did it the way I did, because sometimes I had to get to the cancer center right away because of issues.

    You have to do what you are at peace with. I also did not get second opinions, because for me that would have just confused me with making my decision. I just trusted my doctors on who they sent me to.

    Cindy

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited November 2016

    A doctor who would get mad at a patient for seeking a second opinion or not support one (unless the objection is medically based, such as due to timing considerations) would be behaving in an unprofessional manner.

    The main site here has basic information on the second opinion process. There are six sections (see list at upper left of page):

    Second Opinons - First section of six : http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/second_opinion/why

    BarredOwl

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited November 2016

    Truper, if I was in your situation, I would absolutely seek a second opinion with a breast surgeon at a major university hospital like the ones listed in the link I'll give you. Once you do, I think the difference will be clear. If you absolutely cannot get to one due to distance, I would suggest calling the closest one to see if they can recommend a local surgeon. Often there will be someone in your area who has trained at one of these facilities so possesses the thoroughness you find at the bigger institutions. And read my bio page for an example of what can go wrong that you and a general surgeon may not even realize at the time.

    https://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-ce...

    The other benefit of places like those on the list is that you have all the specialties under one roof or on the same campus and used to working with a multidisciplinary/team approach. So, for example, if the team thinks you'll need radiation, for example, you won't start down a path with a recon that isn't compatible with RT.

    Hope this helps. Good luck! Deanna



  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2016

    I felt okay with going with a GS. I interviewed him and since he had worked hand in hand with my PS on many breast surgeries and had done over 300 BMXs in his lifetime I knew he'd be fine. I actually interviewed a breast surgeon who didn't have much experience, even though he was at MD Anderson, and I decided not to go with him because of his limited experience.

    As for second opinions, if any physician would "get mad" because his patient sought a second opinion, I'd fire that first doctor. That would simply tell me the first doc had ego problems and was overly arrogant and defensive about his/her expertise. I would not want any doc with those qualities working with me about my health.

    Claire in AZ

  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited November 2016

    truper - I picked a general surgeon who had done a ton of mastectomies and she worked hand in hand with my plastic surgeon. I asked my surgeon why I should stay with her rather than go to MD Anderson. Turns out she'd had a 'fellowship' there and said she would be the first one to move me over there if there were any major complications other than DCIS. So what is your surgeon's experience?

    I believe in and did get a second opinion before making the decision, but I really liked this team. I had good results - clear margins - scheduled exchange with no problems AND you really can't even see the scars.

  • Beatmon
    Beatmon Member Posts: 1,562
    edited November 2016

    My Dr. Volunteered that I might want a second MO opinion. My case had been to tumor board and I was completely at ease with my MO. My breast surgeon was first a general surgeon, then specialized in breasts. He was so highly recommended I didnt want to interview another. He also offered

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited November 2016

    I had consults with a general surgeon, a breast surgeon and an oncology surgeon who only works with breast cancer patients. The difference between the three was substantial. The latter offered not only a much deeper understanding of what I was facing and the options that might suit me best - she was also the most compassionate of the three and the most generous with her time in terms of answering questions, helping me work through tough decisions, etc. Her staff were also much more helpful and compassionate than the others'. I really did not know how good care could be until I connected with her office. Based on my experience, I'd almost always recommend a second opinion.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2016

    The first surgeon I consulted was, according to my PCP and others, the best general surgeon in town, but he was not a breast specialist or a cancer specialist. I liked him. But when I asked if he had an experienced sentinel node team, he said, "It may be hard to find. If I can't find it, I'll just take them all." What??!! As if an unnecessarily increased risk of lymphedema was not a big deal! So I went elsewhere to a surgical oncologist who does a lot of breast surgery, including sentinel node biopsy. Your PCP may only refer you to others in their group, as mine did, but depending on insurance, you may be able to cast a wider net.

    Claire makes a good point that you have to ask about the prospective surgeon's experience and not just their title. Ask how many times per month they do the surgery you are going to have, and how long they have been doing it. Even at a good institution you may encounter a new doctor who is not yet board-certified, and you have to decide if you are comfortable with that. You have to look them up, you have to ask.


  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited November 2016

    What do you call the medical student who finished last in the class?

    Doctor.


    My surgeon had a sign that said God does all the work but I get all the credit. I adored him for that!

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited November 2016

    I did not feel comfortable having a general surgery perform my BMX, just as I would not feel comfortable having a GP take care of my heart attack or mental illness. I want someone who has extensive training in their field of expertise. As for doctors getting upset about second opinions, well, they can get upset all they want. You do not have to ask permission or even tell them that you are seeking a second opinion. They should be grown-up enough to not take it personally.

    I actually did experience this. My PS had discussed implants with me about 6 months ago and I said no, I do not want foreign bodies implanted in my body. Period. When I went to pick up my records to take to another PS, she overheard me and came storming out of a room to berate me in front of God and everybody. She said, "I told you I can just pop some implants in there!" Yeah, I know what you said. I left with my records and never looked back. I did see a second PS, who also wanted to "pop in some implants", so I sought out a 3rd opinion, this time from the group in NOLA. They do DIEP flaps all day, every day, which is what I wanted in the first place. I don't care at all that my original PS is pissed with me. She can go sit on a tack!

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited November 2016

    Getting reconstruction is TOTALLY different than getting a BMX only. Totally.

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited November 2016

    Let's be clear that most "breast surgeons" ARE general surgeons. There is no official certification called "breast surgeon" (http://www.abms.org/member-boards/specialty-subspe...). However, general surgeons can belong to the American Society of Breast Surgeons: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/new_layout/membersh...

    General surgeons can also say that they specialize in breast surgery but have little to no experience or training to back that up.

    My excellent surgeon is a general surgeon who is a member of the American Society of Breast Surgeons: https://www.uchealth.org/provider/denise-m-miller-...



  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2016

    One final note: I also chose my surgeon (see above) because he was local. I live in a small city, but it's 3 hours one way from the largest metro area--Phoenix--where MD Anderson and Mayo Hospital are. I had considered getting surgery down in Phoenix--MD Anderson--but I thought if there were complications, I wanted my doctors to be local so I could get in to see them right away and not have to drive 3 hours to my doctor's office.

    Actually, looking back on the BMX/immediate recon, it was kind of anticlimactic. I had the nipple-sparing surgery with biopsy of underlying tissue in my PS' office. No pain. I had the BMX/immediate recon about 10 days later, and stayed two nights in the hospital. I had no loss of range of motion, no real pain, nothing. I didn't take/need/pain killers. The worst part was not being able to sleep on my side for 2 plus weeks, but I had one of those wedge pillows, and I slept on my back on that. It helped, and I was able to get okay rest.

    I hate the numbness of my chest, but glad I gave myself the benefit of believing at least tissue that could have gone wrong is gone. The post-surgery pathology report showed hyperplasia in the "good" breast.

    Claire

  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016
    I am new to group and am not sure if this is the correct forum as I have multiple concerns and having few friends or family to lean on, I'm feeling terribly anxious. My pathology report from surgical excision reads invasive well differentiated ductal carcinoma with tubular feature, grade 1, 4 mm in size, 1 mm from margin, expressing ER and PR, and negative for HER2 over-expression. My story started with ultrasound report of two very small benign cysts. I didn't feel comfortable with diagnosis, so I went to a breast surgeon for an opinion. Surgeon suggested a fine needle aspiration to be positive. The report came back as basically benign papilloma and some ? cells. Surgeon suggested surgical excision to get them out. The pathology report came back as stated above positive for Idc. Was a surprise to the surgeon who basically reassured me it was not a malignancy. Went for Mri and surgeon says it looks good and all this taking place within a week, I am scheduled to have a lumpectomy in four days. I feel I am rushing into surgery and should be getting another opinion, but am afraid I will get more confused. I live in Freehold, NJ and the surgeon is a reputable, competent surgeon in area, but there are other surgeons like Debra Camel, Dr Dultz etc. who are well known and reputable also. I am considering cancelling surgery due to high anxiety. Would anyone from my area be familiar with the local doctors like Camal, Adams, Dultz or others and can share their thoughts or experience? Sorry to ramble. Not sure if this post will even show up on forum.
    Thank you,
    Roche

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited December 2016

    Roche it doesn't matter who does a lumpectomy. It's not an invasive surgery and your area is very small. It's when you get in a mastectomy or reconstruction that you want to shop your doc. You may have a divot in the beginning but it will fill in over time.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2016

    Hi Roche:

    Welcome. The diagnostic process and developing a treatment plan is very stressful and anxiety provoking. If you are suffering from anxiety, please do not hesitate to discuss it with your surgeon, who may prescribe an anti-anxiety medication. Many patients find this extremely helpful during this stressful time.

    It sounds like your surgeon recommended an "excisional biopsy," which revealed a small, ER+PR+HER2- "ductal carcinoma with tubular feature, grade 1, 4 mm in size". So far, your surgeon's judgment regarding the appropriateness of needle aspiration and then excisional biopsy proved correct, which is a good. You have also had an MRI, which is a very sensitive method used to assess the potential extent of disease.

    Because excisional biopsies are "exploratory" in nature, they are not intended or designed to achieve good surgical margins. If cancer is found, then a further surgical "re-excision" is quite common, as has been recommended for you.

    With a diagnosis of invasive disease, a "sentinel node biopsy" is also typically recommended (to check axillary (underarm) lymph nodes. If not, then I would be inclined to seek a second opinion to confirm that advice.

    The overall approach recommended for you is a "lumpectomy." Most of the time, with some exceptions, lumpectomy is combined with a course of radiation, although those with more favorable pathology findings may be candidates for more limited types of radiation regimens. Therefore, many patients consult with a Radiation Oncologist prior to surgery to get an idea of what may be recommended (although the results of sentinel node biopsy and re-excision may lead to a different recommendation in some cases). If you have not already done so, you may wish to consult a Radiation Oncologist at your current treatment center.

    Lumpectomy (plus radiation when indicated) is an excellent choice for many. The other main surgical option is mastectomy. Many patients who receive a mastectomy can avoid radiation. However, sometimes certain pathology findings may lead to a recommendation for post-mastectomy radiation. Many find this post about Lumpectomy versus Mastectomy to be very helpful:

    Beesie's post Lumpectomy v Mastectomy (invasive disease):

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/82/topics/848049?page=1#post_4802494


    You mentioned having received an ultrasound and MRI. Have you had diagnostic bilateral mammograms? Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for breast cancer (Version 2.2016) recommend:

    "The recommended workup of localized invasive breast cancer includes: history and physical exam; bilateral diagnostic mammography; breast ultrasonography, if necessary; determination of tumor hormone receptor status (ER and PR determinations); determination of HER2–receptor status; and pathology review. . . "

    Guidelines indicate what is generally recommended in the typical case. (Additional imaging or testing may be recommended in the appropriate case, as well as genetic counseling, fertility counseling, etcetera.)

    I raise the question about bilateral "diagnostic" mammograms, because I had bilateral "screening" mammograms, and a right "diagnostic" mammogram only, plus bilateral MRI. No left "diagnostic" mammogram was done by my first team (despite then current guidelines recommending it). In my second opinion, a left diagnostic mammogram was recommended, resulting in the diagnosis of bilateral disease (despite density). This was not detected by the prior MRI. Bilateral disease is not very common; however, as my case illustrates, bilateral diagnostic mammography and MRI can be complementary and may further inform surgical planning and success. If you have not received bilateral diagnostic mammography, in light of the recommendation in the NCCN guidelines, you may wish to ask your current team about it, and/or seek a second opinion review of all pathology, imaging, and treatment recommendations.

    Some patients choose to seek a second opinion, while others do not. It can be a reasonable choice not to do so. Most of the time, in what appears to be a routine case, the second opinion review and advice should be generally consistent with the first. If for some reason it is not (as in my case), then you would probably want to have that information to inform your decision-making and treatment plan! The challenge is that one cannot know with certainty what the outcome of a second opinion will be, which is part of their value.

    Also, when you are not sure about something or are uncertain about proceeding, a second opinion at an independent institution can be very helpful to further discuss available treatment options, to probe the quality of the work-up and medical advice received to date, and to obtain additional explanation and discussion. The process is educational and may give you added confidence in your treatment plan.

    General information about second opinions can be found on the Main Site here (see all six sections):

    http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/second_opinion/why

    By the way, if you choose to seek a second opinion, look for a breast surgeon who specializes in the treatment of breast cancer or patients at risk of breast cancer as essentially all of their practice, preferably located at a comprehensive breast center. If feasible, an NCI-designated cancer center (confirm insurance coverage and in-network) may be a good option:

    https://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-centers/find

    You will find a lot of support here. Don't hesitate to ask more questions. You can start your own thread in the newly diagnosed forum at this link:

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/5

    At that link, near the top of the page, click on the big pick button to "Start a new Topic"

    image

    BarredOwl

  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016

    Thank you Barb for the reassurance. I'm just thinking that every dr has their own style and method of doing surgery based on education and experience, etc. which could affect surgery outcomes sometimes. I'm very confused, and don't know much about breast cancer. I'm not able to process unfamiliar info as well as when I was younger. .A little knowledge is dangerous for me.I'm trying to interpret members' diagnoses, but as of yet not really understanding them. Only the tumor was removed during the first procedure b/c surgeon was confident the diagnosis would be benign but suggested to remove it anyway. Called it surgical excision. Seems to me like it was an incomplete lumpectomy. So,this upcoming surgery seems like a second lumpectomy, minus the lump, and was it even necessary? And according to surgeon, there may be a future surgery. At that point there won't be much breast left. Surgeon describes first surgery as removing the meat from the walnut and now will remove the shell. That's interesting. So I guess at this point I should let surgeon do this lumpectomy (?) and look elsewhere down the road for treatment t if I lose confidence in the dr.

    Thank you ,

    Roche

  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016

    Hello Barred Owl,

    Thank you so much for the reassurance that the breast surgeon is following the correct protocol. Feel like I got a shot of calm now. I am planning to read and reread your post. Great information. Surgeon is removing sentinel node for biopsy and widening margin. So I guess I'm having a lumpectomy minus a lump. I'm still reeling from the diagnosis. I don't like any of my choices. Reading and signing consent papers for lumpectomy is in itself stressful. Go in for a lumpectomy and maybe due to unforeseen problems, end up with mastectomy?? I don't like idea of rad or chemotherapy. It's pick your poison. This is especially difficult for me b/c I'm not a fan of conventional medicine, avoiding it most of my life and eat pretty much clean food. Surgeon said rad starts one month after surgery, so I should have time. I go for breast exam and mammography each year, each one 6 months apart. My last mammogram was normal in April, 2016, so I thought. . At my 6 month Gyn check, I had an area of concern and he sent me for ultrasound which they diagnosed as two benign cysts. Not feeling comfortable with the report, I went to breast surgeon. He pointed out a lump that I hadn't been aware of and was overlooked by my Gyn, and after needle aspiration, diagnostic mammo of THAT breast, surgical excision, MRI of both, I have a diagnosis. In a way I am thankful/lucky that the breast surgeon took the US findings further.

    I'm not familiar with bilateral disease. Is it ductal tumors in both breast? I'm sorry. It seems whenever a diagnostic mammo is required in my area, these breast centers only check the breast of concern. I'm glad you were aware of the possibility of this condition and able to seek treatment elsewhere. We try to do all the right preventative measures and yet, oversights, carelessness, incompetence, and sometimes dismissal of our concerns cause unnecessary havoc in our lives. I think many times it's all about luck, or maybe a guardian angel watching over.

    Roche

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2016

    Hi Roche:

    Disease in a single breast is "unilateral" disease, and disease in both breasts is "bilateral" disease. In my case I had DCIS on one side, and a small IDC plus DCIS on the other.

    Here is an explanation of "margins" from this site that you may find helpful. The goal of the "re-excision" is to achieve adequate margins. In other words, to remove enough tissue so there is a "margin" or band of healthy tissue all around (a disease free-outer boundary). Such an area (margin) of tumor-free tissue suggests the whole tumor has been completely excised. See the explanation and illustration at the bottom of this page. This is the "walnut" and "shell" your surgeon described, in which the "shell" is the healthy, tumor-free "margin" he is shooting for.

    Margins: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/diagnosis/margins

    Regarding the possibility of yet an additional procedure, as you already know firsthand, imaging has some limitations and disease is sometimes more extensive than expected from imaging. If the re-excision margins are involved or otherwise not adequate (suggesting possible tumor remaining in the breast), then, another re-excision procedure or mastectomy might even be recommended (or elected). More often than not, no further surgery is required. Sending good luck your way for nice margins.

    As best practice, be sure to request copies of your original pathology reports from the biopsy and all surgeries, for your review and records. You will learn more and more. Understanding your diagnosis will be helpful to you, as you move forward and consider what additional treatments are offered or recommended.

    BarredOwl

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited December 2016

    In my opinion, if you do not feel confident about the doctor or the plan, you should ask him/her if it is safe to wait long enough to get all your concerns addressed and to get a second opinion. I think it does matter who does your surgery and where. Even for the cosmetic result.

  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016
    Hello and thank you.
    My thoughts too. I go back and forth trying to decide. However dr is basically following protocols so far from info I have received here and on Websites and does have good credentials. Too much to think about. Too many decisions to have to make.
    Roche
  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016

    Hi Barred Owl

    I am grateful for all info you are sharing. I'm understanding much more. Thank you for your

    well wishes. And I hope your journey is/ has been successful and is under control also. To be honest, I'm not sure I will be strong enough to handle this.

    Roche

  • roche
    roche Member Posts: 61
    edited December 2016

    Hi Barred Owl

    I am grateful for all info you are sharing. I'm understanding much more. Thank you for your

    well wishes. And I hope your journey is/ has been successful and is under control also. To be honest, I'm not sure I will be strong enough to handle this.

    Roche

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited December 2016

    Roche, the steep learning curve and the high-stakes decision making can be exhausting. If your doctor is following appropriate standards and has good credentials, you may decide to just let him manage things while you focus on taking care of your emotional well-being.That is a reasonable option.

Categories