CYP2D6 ability to metabolize tamoxifen and recurrence
Comments
-
solfeo--I don't think my doc was really looking at the estradiol levels. He seemed more concerned with the other things. I had a baseline TVUS about a year into Tamoxifen. It was actually my suggestion based on what I had learned here. The baseline showed a slightly thickened lining, uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts as well as a slightly enlarged uterus. My gyn at the time immediately started throwing around "hysterectomy" and a full abdominal one saying that since I'd never had kids they couldn't do it vaginally (!). Fortunately my dad's a doc and suggested a second opinion and I found my current guy who did such a great job. He actually just did some watchful waiting for about a year before deciding that my lining was getting too thick. I don't think he really cared about my levels or if they were any part of the problem. My ovarian cysts were getting bigger too as well as the fibroids. Finally he just said "It's coming out!" and that was it. I'm 53 now so I'm sure menopause wasn't too far away. And I'm trying to avoid the AIs just because I don't feel the slight benefit is worth the worse SEs, much less the heart and bone issues that I'd like to avoid. So I'm at 4 years and going to 5 on Tamoxifen at which time we'll do a BCI test and figure out what to do then based on the results.
-
solfeo, all I can tell you is from my personal experience, which is a sample size of one, so........ But anyway, my doc checked my estradiol & whatever else they check, to see if I was in menopause, and I was on tamoxifen at the time, and the level was very low. So I switched to the A.I. It had been a little over 2 years since my last period (chemo stopped them).
-
Thanks ladies.
Sure does make me wonder if high estradiol while on tamoxifen could be an indicator of who might go on to develop the uterine changes. Just because no one has put it together yet doesn't mean there might not be a connection. Kind of makes sense though, doesn't it? One way they determine which substances are estrogenic is by looking at whether exposure causes an increase in uterine weight. I wasn't given a TVUS because the ASCO standards recommend against it in premenopausal women. Didn't feel the need to ask because I don't plan to be on tamoxifen very much longer and I haven't had any warning signs.
I did not have chemo so my periods were not affected by that. My last period before I had the random one in April was in September of 2015. That was two months before I started tamoxifen, so I had already skipped a month before tamoxifen. That was also the point where my weight loss had reached a significant level, so I had also lost a bunch of estrogen along with the fat. BUT, that was also the highest stress time after the diagnosis, waiting for surgery that had been postponed several times. So the stress very well could have messed with my periods. Now I weigh a total of 139 lbs. less and I'm in the "normal" BMI range. I certainly didn't expect higher estradiol now than when I was morbidly obese.
Can I just whine for a moment? I am so sick and freaking tired of always being in a state of dilemma because it seems like everything about my case has been in a gray area making every decision less than clear cut. My doctors suck with gray areas because they are completely lacking in creativity. I know I'm not alone here but it's really bugging me today. And I've had other weird bloodwork in the last few weeks too. I'm starting to dread looking at the results. Heaven knows what the endoxifen test is going to tell me because that's another gray area.
If anyone else can share their estradiol levels while on tamoxifen, along with details about their menopausal status and what their doctors said about it, it would really help me decide what to do next.
-
Solfeo, is the Mayo clinic the one to check your Endoxifen levels? My Onc is totally willing to get my blood tested for Endoxifen, but she could only find a trials lab at the Mayo clinic doing it. I'm an ultra-rapid metabolizer, but so far 4 months in, have absolutely no side effects from Tamoxifen, so I'd like to see this isn't a sugar pill. : )
-
Hi Lisey. I had the blood drawn at my regular lab. It was a special order that they had to send out but they didn't say where. It usually says on the report. I'll let you know if I find out.
As I've mentioned I have never had bad hot flashes while on tamoxifen. They got a little worse when I doubled the dose but that went away after a month or so. I get slightly uncomfortably warm a couple of times per day but that's about as bad as it gets. I wonder if the high estradiol explains that? I do have other side effects though, like constipation, insomnia and I'm also prone to muscle injury since I've been on tam. That has all been manageable with supplements and avoiding muscle strain.
-
Hey Y'all!
Solfeo ~ Don't know if this will help..... My estrogen was 105 (low normal) in early 2012 - the year before being Dx'd Stage IV de novo. I am CYP2D6 Normal Metabolizer *1/*1. I started Tamoxifen in early 2013 and was on it only a month when it knocked me into menopause at age 47. Two years later, I had progression to a subclavicular lymph node that signaled that the Tamoxifen was failing. My estradiol at that time was 13. My MO switched me over to Femara/Letrozole and have been on it since. Because of my bone mets, scans are the primary way to keep tabs on what is or isn't going on.
SEs aren't a good way to judge if a hormonal therapy is working or not. Everyone reacts differently. I did have a bad time on Tamoxifen, others have mild or no problems. My SEs on Femara are mild but many other women have difficulties. Very difficult to make sense of something that has no rules..........
Sorry your stressing
Lisey! (big wave) I've seen some of your posts on other threads. I wish I had your tenacity; you've really been busy researching and sharing some great stuff! Zero SE's so far? Hoping you are one of the lucky ones that is able to get positive results without the ucky stuff
-
Hi Solfeo and Shep,
I would really appreciate knowing any other labs who tests for Endoxifen. My Onc says I should just 'have faith it is working"... then she laughed and shook her head and said "I bet that doesn't work for you, right?" I'm into facts and figures.. gotta know it's effective or I'm switching to an AI/ OOPH. If it's effective and I'm SE free I'll consider myself lucky.
I do think that Lattice implant is a really cool idea to test for future mets. I'm excited about the future tech.
-
So yeah, there is an increased risk of recurrence in women with high estradiol on tamoxifen. Found an article on BCO and the study it is based on. (BTW, why doesn't BCO include links to the studies it is reporting on in these articles?)
High Estrogen Levels May Lead to Recurrence
Reproductive Steroid Hormones and Recurrence-Free Survival in Women with a History of Breast Cancer
I guess my decision has been made for me, regardless of how the endoxifen test comes back. AI + ovarian suppression here I come. Also extremely worried about what kind of damage may have been done already, especially considering I wasn't fully metabolizing the tamoxifen for the first 7 months. And the debacle of trying to get my shoulder pain diagnosed that left the nagging doubt about mets because of the problems I had getting the proper MRI.
-
Solfeo
I skimmed the article that you posted. I think I need to talk to my MO given my high estrogen levels! I found a 2010 study done in Norway. I don't understand a lot of what is it in, but they are drawing associations between blood levels of tamox and estrogen levels.
http://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2407-10-313
Associations between tamoxifen, estrogens, and FSH serum levels during steady state tamoxifen treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer
Abstract
Background
The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes 2C19, 2D6, and 3A5 are responsible for converting the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen to its active metabolites 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4OHtam) and 4-hydroxy-N-demethyltamoxifen (4OHNDtam, endoxifen). Inter-individual variations of the activity of these enzymes due to polymorphisms may be predictors of outcome of breast cancer patients during tamoxifen treatment. Since tamoxifen and estrogens are both partly metabolized by these enzymes we hypothesize that a correlation between serum tamoxifen and estrogen levels exists, which in turn may interact with tamoxifen on treatment outcome. Here we examined relationships between the serum levels of tamoxifen, estrogens, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and also determined the genotypes of CYP2C19, 2D6, 3A5, and SULT1A1 in 90 postmenopausal breast cancer patients.
Methods
Tamoxifen and its metabolites were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Estrogen and FSH levels were determined using a sensitive radio- and chemiluminescent immunoassay, respectively.
Results
We observed significant correlations between the serum concentrations of tamoxifen, N-dedimethyltamoxifen, and tamoxifen-N-oxide and estrogens (p < 0.05). The genotype predicted CYP2C19 activity influenced the levels of both tamoxifen metabolites and E1.
Conclusions
We have shown an association between tamoxifen and its metabolites and estrogen serum levels. An impact of CYP2C19 predicted activity on tamoxifen, as well as estrogen kinetics may partly explain the observed association between tamoxifen and its metabolites and estrogen serum levels. Since the role of estrogen levels during tamoxifen therapy is still a matter of debate further prospective studies to examine the effect of tamoxifen and estrogen kinetics on treatment outcome are warranted.
-
here is another article from 2013, that discusses tamox and estrogen levels in premenopausal women.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0066616
"the results confirmed that the variations of estrogen levels induced by tamoxifen had no statistically significant impact on DFS"
-
I got my endoxifen results. They actually tested the level of tamoxifen and all of the metabolites so I got more information than I bargained for. Results are below, and Lisey, the name and address of the lab is at the end.
-------------------------------------------------
Tamoxifen 86 ng/mL
Reporting Limit: 1.0
Tamoxifen undergoes demethylation to
N-desmethyltamoxifen and tamoxifen and
N-desmethyltamoxifen are hydroxylated to
4-hydroxytamoxifen and
4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen (endoxifen),
respectively. Tamoxifen is a prodrug; the
pharmacological effects are mediated through its
hydroxylated metabolites.
A dose-concentration relationship has been identified
for tamoxifen.
In patients receiving 1, 5, or 20 mg/day tamoxifen for
28 days, mean (range) plasma tamoxifen
concentrations were:
1 mg/day = 7.5 (2.9 - 120.9) ng/mL
5 mg/day = 25.2 (1.9 - 180.9) ng/mL
20 mg/day = 83.6 (8.7 - 134.4) ng/mL.
The ratio of whole blood concentration to serum or
plasma concentration is unknown for this analyte.*
4-Hydroxy-Tamoxifen 3.1 ng/mL
Reporting Limit: 1.0
A dose-concentration relationship has bee
n identified
for 4-hydroxytamoxifen, an active tamoxifen metabolite.
In patients receiving 1, 5, or 20 mg/day tamoxifen for
28 days, mean (range) plasma 4-hydroxytamoxifen
concentrations were:
1 mg/day = 0.6 (0.4 - 6.0) ng/mL
5 mg/day = 1.3 (0.4 - 5.9) ng/mL
20 mg/day = 3.1 (0.4 - 7.3) ng/mL
Hydroxylation of tamoxifen to 4-hydroxytamoxifen is
catalyzed by CYP2D6 and genetic polymorphisms which
result in low CYP2D6 activity (poor metabolizers) or
co-administration of drugs which inhibit CYP2D6 can
greatly reduce plasma concentrations of
4-hydroxytamoxifen reducing the overall efficacy of
tamoxifen.
The ratio of whole blood concentration to serum or
plasma concentration is unknown for this analyte.*
N-desmethyltamoxifen 180 ng/mL
Reporting Limit: 1.0
A dose-concentration relationship has been identified
for N-desmethyltamoxifen, an inactive tamoxifen
metabolite.
In patients receiving 1, 5, o
r 20 mg/day tamoxifen for
28 days, mean (range) plasma N-desmethyltamoxifen
concentrations were:
1 mg/day = 9.9 (1.3 - 135) ng/mL
5 mg/day = 36.2 (3.6 - 282.2) ng/mL
20 mg/day = 112.3 (14.3 - 211.6) ng/mL
The ratio of whole blood concentration to serum or
plasma concentration is unknown for this analyte.
*Endoxifen 12 ng/mL
Reporting Limit: 1.0
Hydroxylation of N-desmethyltamoxifen to endoxifen, an
active tamoxifen metabolite, is catalyzed by CYP2D6 and
genetic polymorphisms which result in low CYP2D6
activity (poor metabolizers) or co-administration of
drugs which inhibit CYP2D6 can greatly reduce plasma
concentrations of endoxifen reducing the overall
efficacy of tamoxifen.
Women receiving 30 mg tamoxifen/day for
10 - 112 (average = 42) days had a mean (range)
endoxifen plasma concentration of
8.6 +/- 7.0 (3.0 - 28.0) ng/mL.
In one study, patients taking a CYP2D6 inhibitor alongwith 20 mg/day tamoxifen for four months had mean
plasma endoxifen concentrations of 14.8 +/- 10.6 as
compared to patients taking only tamoxifen (mean plasma
concentration = 26.7 +/- 15.4 ng/mL). In comparison,
CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had mean plasma endoxifen
concentrations of 7.2 +/- 2.3 ng/mL.
The ratio of whole blood concentration to serum or
plasma concentration is unknown for this analyte.
Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/
TandemMass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Testing has been performed by:
NMS Labs
3701 Welsh Road P.O. Box 433A
Willow Grove, PA 19090 -
I edited my post about the endoxifen results to take out the part about the level being to low because I think I may have misinterpreted the results. I was thinking in terms of nmol/L from prior reading and the results were in ng/mL. It might actually be high enough if I'm doing the math correctly now, but I'm not trusting myself to have accomplished that at the moment. There is no established "normal" as it is, just a few attempts at guidelines, and I want to be sure about my interpretation before I confuse the issue even more for others. I'll clear it up as soon as I know what I'm talking about.
I see my MO tomorrow. My appointment was Monday but they called to reschedule at the last minute.
-
Solfeo, I sent the info on the lab to my oncologist, and I called them. They charge between $350 - $550 (plasma vs. blood) for the Endoxifen test. I also found Quest Diagnostics offer it, so am asking for a price from them. I find it hard to fathom that this test is as expensive as the mammaprint. Sigh...
-
I am hoping my insurance will pay it. They always have when a test goes through the local participating lab, even when they send the tests they can't do in-house to an outside lab. I had trouble with Genelex because I dealt directly with them and it was considered out of network. BTW, that still isn't straightened out.
It doesn't seem to say if they tested blood or plasma but the reference information is on plasma concentration. I'll probably get stuck with the higher bill if insurance doesn't pay. I hope that doesn't make a difference in the results. But usually most medical providers will negotiate a cash price if insurance doesn't pay so I may be able to get it down as low as half. You just have to ask.
-
I would like to start some discussion about what level of endoxifen is high enough. Try to arrive at our closest guess to what defines "normal," which hasn't been established yet scientifically. I'll start by resurrecting one of BarredOwl's excellent posts (hope that's OK BO). The target in this one was 30 nmol/mL and my result was 12 ng/mL. I didn't realize at first that we were dealing with different units and 12 seemed very low. But I tried to calculate the conversion from nmol's to ng's and it looks like my level is closer to 40 nmol/mL, which would be above the target.
Is there anyone here smart enough to check that math because I'm not sure I did it right?
I didn't have time to look at every study yesterday but I ran across at least one more that attempts to determine a threshold. I'll post that a little later and I plan to keep reading until I have to leave for my appointment with MO. I want to have some understanding of what we are shooting for before before I see him. I kind of feel like he is going to say he doesn't know because that is how he has responded to all of my questions about endoxifen so far.
---------------------------------------
I believe that there is a good deal of uncertainty regarding the relationship between CYP2D6 genotype and endoxifen levels, and it does not appear to be entirely intuitive. As I noted yesterday, an unexpected level of complexity beyond CYP2D6 genotype alone was seen in this small study:
TADE study, Fox (July, 2016): http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/clincanres/22/13/3164.full.pdf
"Our data show that the use of CYP2D6 genotype alone gives an imperfect guide to endoxifen level on standard dose tamoxifen and after dose escalation. . .
. . . To put these data into clinical context, if a clinician knows a patient has PM genotype, then it cannot be assumed that endoxifen level will be low. One of 8 PM patients had baseline endoxifen levels above 15 nmol/L and PM patients had a 63% chance of achieving endoxifen levels above 15 nmol/L with dose escalation. Conversely, 16% (18/108) UM/EM and IM patients had endoxifen levels <15 nmol/L even when use of concomitant inhibitors was excluded. Those on moderate to strong CYP2D6 inhibitors had an 80% chance of having levels below 10 nmol/L. Importantly, if the baseline endoxifen level was <10 nmol/L, the patient had a 72% chance of substantial endoxifen increase with dose escalation, independent of genotype. In all situations, the measurement of endoxifen takes into account known factors such as genotype, concomitant inhibitor, and adherence/absorption, as well as unidentified factors and could ensure that potentially effective levels are maintained, or help the clinician to decide whether an alternative to tamoxifen, such as an aromatase inhibitor, should be recommended.
While 5/8 (63%) of poor metabolizers ("PM") reached 15 nmol/L target, none of them reached the 30 nmol/L target (See Table 2). The optimal level of endoxifen is still not well-defined in my opinon. For the purposes of the TADE dose-escalation study, this was their approach:
"At the time of commencement of the study, there were few data available to indicate a therapeutic level for endoxifen. Hence, for the purposes of evaluating the effect of dose escalation, an empirical approach was taken to define the study target of 30 nmol/L. Since then, two studies have been published that indicate that an endoxifen level of approximately 15 nmol/L may be a critical level for anticancer effect. The Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study of 1,370 patients with ER-positive early breast cancer reported that relapse rates were higher for patients in the lowest quintile of endoxifen levels corresponding to levels < 5.9 ng/mL (or 14.2 nmol/L). More recently, Saladores and colleagues, have shown in 306 premenopausal women on adjuvant tamoxifen that those with low (<14 nmol/L) compared with high (>35 nmol/L) endoxifen concentrations were associated with shorter distant relapse-free survival (19)."
This was a small study, and more work needs to be done: "Our study did not seek to define an optimal therapeutic endoxifen concentration and we acknowledge that before monitoring of endoxifen levels in tamoxifen-treated patients can be accepted as standard of care, prospective studies are required to prove a link between endoxifen level and anticancer effect."
Those with the option of an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or ovarian suppression plus an AI can avoid these uncertainties.
BarredOwl
[But see, Hertz (2016) re poor metabolizers, http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/content/early/2016/05/25/theoncologist.2015-0480.abstract]
-
This study does define a threshold of 5.97 ng/mL of endoxifen (which I also exceeded), based on the known breast cancer outcomes of participants in the WHEL Study. Here is the abstract but you do have to dig into the full study to find the 5.97 figure. So here is where my mind goes: if I doubled my dose of tamoxifen and I had 50% CYP2D6 activity, it seems conceivable that I may have doubled my endoxifen level, which would have had me close to the threshold before increasing to the 40mg dose. Of course this is speculation because I didn't have a baseline test, but if that is in fact the case then I think it was a very good idea to try the increased dose. If you can afford it, before and after dose escalation tests would be the most precise way to determine your response.
Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and breast cancer outcomes.
Abstract
We explored whether breast cancer outcomes are associated with endoxifen and other metabolites of tamoxifen and examined potential correlates of endoxifen concentration levels in serum including cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolizer phenotype and body mass index (BMI). Concentration levels of tamoxifen, endoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OH-tamoxifen), and N-desmethyltamoxifen (ND-tamoxifen) were measured from samples taken from 1,370 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer who were participating in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) Study. We tested these concentration levels for possible associations with breast cancer outcomes and found that breast cancer outcomes were not associated with the concentration levels of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and ND-tamoxifen. For endoxifen, a threshold was identified, with women in the upper four quintiles of endoxifen concentration appearing to have a 26% lower recurrence rate than women in the bottom quintile (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), (0.55-1.00)). The predictors of this higher-risk bottom quintile were poor/intermediate metabolizer genotype, higher BMI, and lower tamoxifen concentrations as compared with the mean for the cohort as a whole. This study suggests that there is a minimal concentration threshold above which endoxifen is effective against the recurrence of breast cancer and that ~80% of tamoxifen takers attain this threshold.
Then later in the study, they define the threshold level:
As endoxifen was the only metabolite that was suggestive of a threshold effect on breast cancer outcomes, we explored dichotomized optimal cut-points for a split regression analysis(20) of endoxifen concentrations with additional breast cancer events. After bootstrap resampling and cross-validation, we identified an at-risk subgroup as those with endoxifen below 5.97 ng/mL, a concentration that corresponds closely to the lowest quintile in our sample. In the Cox model, adjusted for both stage and grade, participants with endoxifen concentrations above 5.97ng/mL had a 30% lower risk of additional breast cancer events (HR=0.70, 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.94). The more conservative bias-corrected estimate(21) of reduced risk in this group of participants in the upper four quartiles of endoxifen concentrations was marginally significant (HR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.00). We repeated the Cox model stratifying by time since diagnosis, and the results were essentially identical to the unstratified model indicating that time from diagnosis to study entry did not affect our findings. We also repeated the model including BMI and found that BMI was not associated with breast cancer events, suggesting that the endoxifen effect is independent of BMI.
-
MO confirmed that my endoxifen is "probably within the therapeutic range." He is still not accepting this test was necessary, or even that the increased dose brought it up. Whatever.
On the estradiol, not so clear. He gave me a lot of information that conflicted with everything else we have seen. He wants me to stay on 40 mg of tamoxifen alone for 4 more months and check estradiol again then. If it's still high he thinks I should consider switching to AI/OS at that time. With my endoxifen level adequate I think it's probably OK to wait a little longer, but every day you wait you wonder if you are waiting too long. The only difference 4 months makes is that it may buy me enough time to get to menopause and help me avoid OS. Although I'm not feeling as confident as I used to that it is right around the corner. When do you accept that you're just delaying the inevitable?
I need more information about the estradiol and a second opinion.
-
Solfeo ~ Just popping in to offer moral support. All this "chit" can make one loopy. IMO don't be in too much of a rush to switch to an AI as long as you aren't having any signs of progression. Especially since you aren't having any bad SEs from the Tamoxifen. You don't wan to "waste" the length of time you are on a med that is keeping you stable. Each drug will affect you differently; hopefully you will be lucky and miss out on future SEs. Tamoxifen made me miserable but it worked for me for a while. Femara has been easier but it has caused trigger thumb and finger for which I had to get injections to fix. The longer I take it, the worse my memory and cognitive abilities. This will fade if/when I switch to another hormonal therapy. Horrible for now. Total Flowers for Algernon experience......I used to did be smarterer. My MO actually gave me a pep talk 'cuz he didn't want me to think I was getting Alzheimer's
I need to get my notes from my MO visits to explain better but... As the studies you posted above stated, there is no real way to test to see if a hormonal therapy is working. Endoxifen testing is too lengthy a process and not a true indicator. Estradiol levels are not conclusive -something to do with estrogen being stored/processed in other parts of the body. The only reliable method of determining drug effectiveness is monitoring. Yup. Scan, repeat. At stage 4 all ya do is scan, treat, repeat.
No easy answers..... You are doing everything you can; you are keeping yourself educated, keeping your body as healthy as you can and keeping that brilliant mind sharp. Don't beat yourself up kiddo - you are doing everything "right".
(((hugs))) sister
Edited to add : Checked my notes from MO visit . . . . . testing of etsrogen levels doe not show the amount of Tamoxifen/AI absorbed. by the body . There is no test to check for absorption .
(sigh)
-
On a plus side, I just heard from my miracle worker Onc nurse. Apparently Kaiser will now test for Endoxifen for only $30! Holy shit sign me up. : )
-
Thanks shepkitty. What bothered me was that he didn't know what he was talking about with regard to high estradiol while on tamoxifen. He said it is not common, which I now know it is, and that it has nothing to do with tamoxifen. That would certainly make the sudden doubling of estrogen more alarming if it was true, would it not? But then he's saying delay for four more months. Later he said he doesn't usually run the estradiol test so I doubt he would know from experience. He also got irritated with me a couple of times when I asked too many questions, but he kept giving me non answers and wrong answers, which made me question his advice.
I'm really not confident that waiting is a good idea based on what he said, but mainly that is because I don't have a better understanding than I did before I walked in his office. I need to hear from more women about their experiences so I think I'll start another thread on the Hormonal Therapy board.
Lisey, can anybody test at Kaiser or do you have to be a member?
-
Hi solfeo:
Here are a couple of references (none very new) that I found regarding determining menopausal status and the challenges of same in patients receiving tamoxifen.
(1) Denduluri Reply (Journal of Clinical Oncology 25, no. 24 (August 2007) 3788-3789):
http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/jco.2007.11.5998
(pdf version available under PDF tab)
(2) Vos (2012), "Menopausal status and adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer patients: A practical guideline"
These two articles are behind paywalls. It may be worth purchasing Ortmann (2011):
(3) Ortmann (2011), "Which factors should be taken into account in perimenopausal women with early breast cancer who may become eligible for an aromatase inhibitor? Recommendations of an expert panel"
http://www.cancertreatmentreviews.com/article/S0305-7372(10)00104-0/abstract
"Such treatment [with AIs] should be initiated only after careful consideration of the patient's age, menstrual history and the effects of tamoxifen (which may make hormone levels an unreliable guide to ovarian function)."
(4) Clemons (2007), "Identifying menopause in breast cancer patients: considerations and implications"
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-006-9401-y
"Unfortunately, defining post-menopausal status can be fraught with difficulty, especially when cancer therapy is either recently completed (e.g. chemotherapy), or ongoing (e.g. tamoxifen and/or luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogues)."
I guess you already know this from personal experience.
BarredOwl
-
The following regarding assay methodology for estradiol (E2) is noted, in case of possible impact on prior clinical studies:
Folkerd (2014): "Interpreting Plasma Estrogen Levels in Breast Cancer: Caution Needed"
http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/jco.2013.53.9411
Folkerd was mentioned in a recent study in the setting of women who were premenopausal at diagnosis and who underwent chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea during adjuvant treatment:
Krekow (2016): "Incidence and Predictive Factors for Recovery of Ovarian Function in Amenorrheic Women in Their 40s Treated With Letrozole"
http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/jco.2015.62.2985
Regarding the methodology used in this study (LabCorp or Quest Diagnostics, technical platform not clear):
"Serum FSH and E2 levels were measured at baseline and then every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months during year 2. E2 and FSH levels were also obtained within 7 days of any episode of vaginal bleeding or spotting. Measurements of serum inhibin A and B levels by enzyme immunoassay were performed at baseline and at the end of year 1. These serum biomarker measurements were performed by LabCorp or Quest Diagnostics laboratories in the US Oncology practice regions. Pre-menopausal levels were defined as follows based on reference ranges from LabCorp: FSH less than 23 mIU/mL, E2 greater than 31 pg/mL (or E2 > 27 pg/mL if from Quest Laboratory), inhibin A greater than 4 pg/mL, inhibin B greater than 7 pg/mL. OFR was defined as resumption of menses and/or increase of a serum E2 level into the premenopausal range."
In the discussion, they cite Folkerd (Reference 20):
"One point of criticism of our study may be the potential inaccuracy of serum E2 levels determined in large reference laboratories such as those used in this study. (20) However, these results reflect E2 levels available in community practice where access to high-sensitivity E2 assays is limited and use of reference laboratories is standard. Nonetheless, the clinical utility of these E2 levels is in question; there are no available data indicating that the cutoffs used in large reference laboratories predict for effective aromatase inhibition or lack thereof with an AI. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-30 study showed that CIA predicted for improved outcomes in premenopausal women taking tamoxifen, suggesting that cessation of menses may be most important. (21) Conversely, the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 12 trial showed worse survival with goserelin/ AI compared with tamoxifen/AI (22) (and Carlson et al (23) showed that some patients on goserelin/AI do recover premenopausal E2 levels), suggesting that partial OFR without menses may adversely affect outcome. Thus, although the impact of a return to pre-menopausal E2 levels without menses is not known, efficacy data with adjuvant AI therapy are only available in known post-menopausal patients or premenopausal patients on an luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist."
BarredOwl
[Edit: Corrected character in quote from ". 27 pg/mL" to "> 27 pg/mL"]
-
Thanks BarredOwl. I'm trying to read everything. I did find a useful chart at one of the links you posted.
(2) Vos (2012), "Menopausal status and adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer patients: A practical guideline"http://www.nnf-info.nl/uploads/publicaties/EMC/2012%20Menopausal%20status%20and%20adjuvant%20hormonal%20therapy%20for%20breast%20cancer.pdfThey recommend Tamoxifen without OS for someone in my situation, with monitoring of hormone levels. Everyone with estradiol above post-menopausal levels in the "Uncertain Menopausal Status" group is lumped together, and the recommendation doesn't change if estradiol level is elevated due to tamoxifen. There is no discussion specific to that at all, which means it wasn't even considered as a variable. And of course that's the complicating factor that could mean these recommendations may not be best for me, and the question I can't get clearly answered.
The more I read the more I understand, but it sinks in slowly in the form of scientific jargon. It would have been so much better to hear it simplified by my MO, but you can't discuss something he won't admit exists. He was very sarcastic and different from prior appointments. He also discounted my use of magnesium for the leg cramps. He said I have no way to know if the magnesium is working or not. Well, I certainly do know because I don't get the cramps when I take it and I do get them when I forget even for one day. I have duplicated these results many times. I liked him at first but now I can see we are just not complimentary personality types at all. I guess I should start shopping around for a new MO.
-
Happy Holidays ladies!
I received a nice gift in the form of the insurance EOB for my endoxifen test I took a few months ago. Insurance covered it and I only owe $1.90 co-insurance. If you remember they ended up running an expensive full tamoxifen metabolite profile, that was more comprehensive than the simple endoxifen test my doctor ordered. Well, they billed the insurance company $575, but because I went through a local in-network lab, they had to accept the huge contractual discount of $556 and can only bill me 10% of the balance. Whew!
For those of you who have been following, the difference between this situation and Genelex is that I had the blood drawn by the local lab, which they then forwarded to the specialty lab. So the bill to the insurance company came from the in-network provider. I should have done that with my CYP450 tests but I didn't realize at the time that it would make that big of a difference.
Not all insurance is going to be the same but it's definitely worth trying to get your insurance to cover it.
-
Ladies,
I need help understanding my Endoxifen level from the test I got. I know you guys are experts at this, so here goes. I need help convert ngs to nmols.. I think to see if I'm over the 30nmls/ml. (As a review... I'm an ultra rapid CYP2D6 metabolizer, been on Tamoxifen 7 months - not one side effect so I think it's a sugar pill.) By the way, Kaiser did this test for free for me, since it's in their list of approved tests and testing with a docs orders doesn't cost anything.
Component Results
Component
Reference lab test name
TC 91998
Specimen source
SERUM
Reference lab test results
FLEXITEST 2
Comment:
FLEXITEST 2
--------------TESTS-------------RESULTS--------UNITS--REF. RANGE---
Interpretation SEE NOTE
"The level of Endoxifen for this patient is above the lowest
quintile range. This suggests no additional increased risk for
cancer recurrence based on tamoxifen and metabolite levels [1]."
Endoxifen 26.00 ng/mL 6.01-43.19
Tamoxifen 77.00 ng/mL 12.54-233.07
N-Desmethyl Tamoxifen 136.00 ng/mL 2.59-373.96
4-Hydroxy Tamoxifen 3.00 ng/mL 0.24-5.05
N-Desmethyl-4'-Hydrox Tam 5.00 ng/mL 1.17-19.95
4'-Hydroxy Tamoxifen 3.00 ng/mL 0.40-6.33
The clinical interpretation of the quantitation of Tamoxifen and
its metabolites is not yet fully established. The assay shows
good agreement with published data from a clinical trial [1].
That study showed that women in the lowest quintile of values for
Endoxifen had a 26% greater chance of recurrence than those in
the upper 80% of values. Therefore we have used that quintile
threshold for interpretation of results for this assay.
Endoxifen quintiles:
20th Percentile 6.00
40th Percentile 12.29
60th Percentile 21.29
80th Percentile 27.18
100th Percentile 72.01
1. Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and
breast cancer outcomes., Madlensky L, Natarajan L, Tchu S et.al.,
Clin PharmacolTher. 2011 May;89(5):718-25
For more information, please refer to
http://education.QuestDiagnostics.com/faq/FAQ146 This link is
being provided for informational/ educational purposes only.) -
Ugh.. need to add. The atomic weight of each element is accounted for in the conversion.. you can't just plug the NG/ML amount into a calculator for say Testosterone. I tried 3 calculators and got three different answers. Not sure how to get my nmol/l for Endoxifen as there is no online calculator specifically for Endoxifen.
Here's the progesterone one: http://www.endmemo.com/medical/unitconvert/Progest... (I got 82 nmol/l on that one)Here's the Vit D one: http://www.endmemo.com/medical/unitconvert/Vitamin... (I got 10.416667 nmol/l)
Does anyone have a Endoxifen Calculator?
-
HOw do you interpret the statement that your value on Endoxifen is 26 and that you are above the lowest quintile? looks like you are in the 60th and 80th?? what am I missing
-
JoJo, I interpret it to mean that I am above the 20% lowest group that doesn't get the full advantage of Tamoxifen converting to Endoxifen. From what I'm gathering I"m near the 80th percentile for Endoxifen levels. The latest studies released that are referenced above show that if you are in the 20%- to 100% percentile (so 4/5 of the groups) your levels are effective. However if you are in the lowest group, <20% percentile, your protection is reduced.
What I am really interested in knowing is the conversion for my score ng/ml to nmol/l, as many studies only discuss nmol/l levels in their results. I'd like to see where I land. Since I'm a UM, I should have some higher levels of endoxifen as Tamoxifen should be really effective for me metabolically at least. I have no side effects, so I thought it strange and wanted the testing done.
At least my numbers are now out there for others to compare to when they get their endoxifen tested. It's a newer test, but Kaiser treats it just like a normal blood test and don't even charge a copay. More people should see their levels and if its at a therapeutic level for them, ESPECIALLY if they are a poor metabolizer.
-
Lisey, I am 99% sure that you are golden in the 80th percentile. I would say 100% sure but I am not a doctor or mathematician. I am ~40th percentile and my doctor told me I am above the threshold. He didn't know the exact ng/ml to nmol/l number but he knew I was in the therapeutic range. I tried to estimate it myself online but had the same problem with the conversions that you did. I can't remember exactly how I did it, but I believe that when I plugged in most of what I reasoned might be similar substances I always got above 30. I rough calculated an average and between that, what my doctor said, and the study that broke the levels into quintiles, I concluded that mine was OK. Your level is over double mine.
If you really want to know you could try calling the lab.
I changed generic brands and my side effects have changed. I get more hot flashes, and my constipation has improved a lot. I think it might be affecting my heart more though, which I plan to discuss with my MO in February. I switched from Teva to Watkins brand, and the latter seems to dissolve a lot easier. The Teva pills were very hard and maybe didn't absorb as well. It would be interesting to know if my endoxifen has changed with the change of brands. Try Watkins if you want some hot flashes but there is really no reason to worry that it isn't working when your level is so high.
-
Thanks Solfeo,
I partly added my numbers for the crowd sourcing knowledge of this board - since I'm an UM, I thought my numbers should be high. Given my desire to know everything about my situation - I think I will call the lab and get the math confirmed (and I'll share it on here for future users as well that are struggling like we were to find the molecular weight). I still have no side effects, so I guess I'll just consider myself lucky and know it's working.
FYI: I mentioned to my doctor about her idea to switch me in a year to an OOPH/AI and she's changed her mind. She says since I handle Tamoxifen so well and I'm a UM, I should probably stay on it for as long as possible - as long as I don't have any symptoms/side effects. I'm good with that as long as it's truly protecting me.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team