Recurrence after refusing hormone therapy?

Options
13»

Comments

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited October 2016

    Coralliz, As others mentioned... Tamoxifen is a PRO-Drug.. which is the opposite of an active drug. Therefore UMs (ultra rapid metabolizers) benefit the most from tamoxifen. This is entire thread is a great read on the different studies and such showing the metabolizing rates and endoxifen levels. https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/73/topics/798301?page=16

    Jul1970... come on.. you are thin and can ROCK flat without the foobs. Trust me. I do. Find a ton of flowy hippy shirts and leave the pads at home. I think I look better than when I had 34DDs.. : )

  • Pam7712
    Pam7712 Member Posts: 27
    edited October 2016

    Just wanted to chime in with another experience. I was diagnosed with stage 1, grade 1, invasive ductal carcinoma in December of 2012, when I was 46. My oncotype score was 8. I had a lumpectomy plus radiation, no chemo.

    I've been on Tamoxifen for about 3.5 years, and it's been a mixed bag. On the plus side, I haven't gained any weight and I swear the pill has been smoothing out my moods quite a bit. On the negative side, I have night-time hot flashes, occasional joint pain and stomach upset, thinning hair, and some mental fogginess. The worst side effect by far is my decreased sex drive and decreased genital sensitivity. I really miss how sex used to feel. I definitely don't get much out of it now, but I try my best to be enthusiastic, for my husband's sake. Also, my endometrial lining thickened and I needed to have a uterine biopsy (which was negative) and a D&C (which had normal results for someone on Tamoxifen).

    I am looking forward to getting off this drug, but I am so thankful that it exists. I really believe in the power of Tamoxifen to prevent recurrence, which is why I'm still taking it. I am committed to finishing up my 5 years, so I know that I did everything I could to keep the BC monster from coming back.


  • JulieMI
    JulieMI Member Posts: 34
    edited October 2016

    Just want to add my experience. Even though The Tamoxifen caused me to have 2 D&C within 3 years, I am still on it because my girlfriend quit the drug and got another BC. She was initially on it, but within a month her ovary cyst grew to 7 cm, so she had to quit. 2 years later she found another BC. Now she is on Tamoxifen. It's been 4.5 years and she is doing fine.

  • adina65
    adina65 Member Posts: 24
    edited October 2016

    I had an ONCOTYPE DX of 18 and I didn't do chemo either. I was offered Radiation, but I refused because the %'s just wasn't significant enough for me because of my age. Anyway, where I'm at now is that I.ve been on Letrozole for 7 months and I just can't take the SE any more, especially walking around like an old woman of 80, even though I am older I've been active my whole life. Also, I started getting migraines and have never experienced those before either. I'm going to try Aromisin, the generic because of course insurance won't pay for the brand, which I'm going to appeal. I've been off my Letrozole for one week and my bones feel much better, but I still still hot flashes but no headaches. I also receive Prolia 2x annually. Do I bite the bullet like so many other women or do I try to live my life as normally as possible. Either way I live in fear that the BC might come back with a vengence. My breast surgeon said she got it all and I've had 2 clear breast exams. That might mean nothing. I keep on this site because so many omen give incredible advice and share their stories. It's a wonderful community and really helps with making our decisions.

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited October 2016

    New Article/study - thought I'd post it here.

    Research article

    Open Access

    Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups

    • Mustapha AbubakarEmail author,
    • Nick Orr,
    • Frances Daley,
    • Penny Coulson,
    • H. Raza Ali,
    • Fiona Blows,
    • Javier Benitez,
    • Roger Milne,
    • Herman Brenner,
    • Christa Stegmaier,
    • Arto Mannermaa,
    • Jenny Chang-Claude,
    • Anja Rudolph,
    • Peter Sinn,
    • Fergus J. Couch,
    • Peter Devilee,
    • Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar,
    • Caroline Seynaeve,
    • Jonine Figueroa,
    • Mark E. Sherman,
    • Jolanta Lissowska,
    • Stephen Hewitt,
    • Diana Eccles,
    • Maartje J. Hooning,
    • Antoinette Hollestelle,
    • John W. M. Martens,
    • Carolien H. M. van Deurzen,
    • kConFab Investigators,
    • Manjeet K. Bolla,
    • Qin Wang,
    • Michael Jones,
    • Minouk Schoemaker,
    • Jelle Wesseling,
    • Flora E. van Leeuwen,
    • Laura Van 't Veer,
    • Douglas Easton,
    • Anthony J. Swerdlow,
    • Mitch Dowsett,
    • Paul D. Pharoah,
    • Marjanka K. Schmidt and
    • Montserrat Garcia-Closas
    Breast Cancer Research201618:104

    DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0765-6

    © The Author(s). 2016

    Received: 4 July 2016

    Accepted: 27 September 2016

    Published: 18 October 2016

    Abstract

    Background

    The value of KI67 in breast cancer prognostication has been questioned due to concerns on the analytical validity of visual KI67 assessment and methodological limitations of published studies. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in a large, multicentre study, and compare this with pathologists' visual scores available in a subset of patients.

    Methods

    We utilised 143 tissue microarrays containing 15,313 tumour tissue cores from 8088 breast cancer patients in 10 collaborating studies. A total of 1401 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 7.5 years. Centralised KI67 assessment was performed using an automated scoring protocol. The relationship of KI67 levels with 10-year breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) was investigated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for known prognostic factors.

    Results

    Patients in the highest quartile of KI67 (>12 % positive KI67 cells) had a worse 10-year BCSS than patients in the lower three quartiles. This association was statistically significant for ER-positive patients (hazard ratio (HR) (95 % CI) at baseline = 1.96 (1.31–2.93); P = 0.001) but not for ER-negative patients (1.23 (0.86–1.77); P = 0.248) (P-heterogeneity = 0.064). In spite of differences in characteristics of the study populations, the estimates of HR were consistent across all studies (P-heterogeneity = 0.941 for ER-positive and P-heterogeneity = 0.866 for ER-negative). Among ER-positive cancers, KI67 was associated with worse prognosis in both node-negative (2.47 (1.16–5.27)) and node-positive (1.74 (1.05–2.86)) tumours (P-heterogeneity = 0.671). Further classification according to ER, PR and HER2 showed statistically significant associations with prognosis among hormone receptor-positive patients regardless of HER2 status (P-heterogeneity = 0.270) and among triple-negative patients (1.70 (1.02–2.84)). Model fit parameters were similar for visual and automated measures of KI67 in a subset of 2440 patients with information from both sources.

    Conclusions

    Findings from this large-scale multicentre analysis with centrally generated automated KI67 scores show strong evidence in support of a prognostic value for automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer. Given the advantages of automated scoring in terms of its potential for standardisation, reproducibility and throughput, automated methods appear to be promising alternatives to visual scoring for KI67 assessment.

    Keywords

    Breast cancer Automated KI67 Visual KI67 Prognostication
  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited October 2016

    I don't think automated scoring of Ki-67 is available yet for most of us. If they have new more mathmatical way to evaluate KI, rather than just human eyeballs, that will be great.. but it's not out there yet.

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited October 2016

    Anyone watch Genius last night at 10pm? It's about the near future of medicine, with technologists and doctors, no go betweens. It's worth watching, expanding our imaginations about medicine. Can rewatch at xfinity on demand if you've got it.


  • edwards750
    edwards750 Member Posts: 3,761
    edited October 2016

    My 2 cents worth is this. I just passed my 5 year milestone. I did take Tamoxifen and did have occasional joint pain and lack of concentration. There are women who have debilitating side effects from the drug. My ONC said I don't need to take it for 10 years.

    I was afraid not to take it. I had Stage 1b, Grade 1 IDC. I had a lumpectomy and 33 radiation treatments. My tumor was small and my Oncotype score was 11.

    That's encouraging your friend is okay after 3 years but BC is not one size, fits all.

    I would at least try it. It's your decision and your life. Just be sure you don't second guess yourself or look back and say I wish I had.

    There are women who have recurrences who did take it. We all know there are no guarantees.

    Also there are other drugs besides Tamoxifen if it causes too many side effects.

    Good luck!

    Diane

  • farmerlucy
    farmerlucy Member Posts: 3,985
    edited October 2016

    Adina - I'm on Tamoxifen too after trying Femara and Arimidex. Still planning on just five years. My onc advises 10. BTW my locally generated Ki-67 was high at 22%.

  • Holistic4me
    Holistic4me Member Posts: 1
    edited October 2016

    I feel the same way!!. Diagnosed Jan 2016 left breast.

    I was stage 1 mixed lobular & ductal, low recurrence, grade 2, <2cm, 0 lymph, Oncotype dx 14, Er+PR+, Herz2-, double mastectomy, no chemo or radiation. Reconstruction Silicone Implants 10/2016, 62 yr. Postmenopausal

    Hormone therapy prescribed. I tried all 3 aromatase inhibitors the last 6 months and could not tolerate the side effects of any of them! I asked my oncologist to run tests for all my hormone levels while being on hormone therapy. The side effects scared me so much that I went off them. I am seeking out homeopathic therapy. I do not believe these harsh toxic drugs can be good & I do not believe osteporosis, stroke or any of the multitude of side effects that can kill or maime are better than the risk. I am having my oncologist run a new test of all my hormone levels being off the therapy to see if there's really much difference. There are changes in lifestyle and diet that can reverse cancer....a lot to learn. Your hormones need to be balanced and inhibitors only block some receptors. there's plant based and anti- estrogen foods, there are holistic hormone inhibitors and hormone balancers (seek out knowledgeable people at health food store & homeopathic doctor with lots of experience.) Watch the 9 episodes of "The Truth About Cancer" and share it! There are therapies that cure cancer, even the latest stages, taking place all over the world, instead of the toxic therapies western medicine prescribes, controlled by the pharmaceutical companies! Seek & ye shall find what best suits you and your conscience! I will not put myself thru these unhealthy, break down your immune system therapies! God gave us every natural fruit, vegetable & plant, herbs, spices, essential oils, etc.. for our good. All we need to cure every disease or ailment is on this planet. Steer clear of all the environmental toxins & poison in our food. We are all in this together & I felt compelled to share what I learned after my mastectomies, cuz they rush you into surgery without the information to make an informed decision. By the way, several mammograms did not find my cancer even though I pointed out my lump. It took an ultrasound. Best of luck!!

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited October 2016

    Holistic4me...I agree with everything you said. Of course we all have to make our own informed decisions and I respect them. I would like to mention what you said about having your hormone levels checked. Most MO's do not do this and IMO this is a huge gap in our treatment plan. Good luck to all.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited October 2016

    Kaiser Permantente (our insurance HMO) is willing to test my Endoxifen levels for $30. That will determine how I'm metabolizing Tamoxifen. I want to make sure I'm in therapeutic levels, since I have no side effects and Im an Ultra-rapid metabolizer. This is all new science and the Mayo clinic is currently doing a test for an active drug endoxifen - (removing the middle step of Tamox).

    As FYI: I view Tamoxifen as a natural substance, from the yew tree.... It's a huge blessing to me.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited October 2016

    lisey - I don't believe that Tamoxifen is made from the yew - you might be confusing it with Taxol, and indirectly, Taxotere. Tamoxifen is a synthetic drug.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited October 2016

    I probably am confusing it... I thought Tamoxifen was discovered from nature.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited October 2016
    I could be wrong but my understanding is that it was originally extracted from the bark of the Pacific Yew - the location of stands of which were carefully guarded secrets. Eventually it was successfully synthesized in labs.
  • tgtg
    tgtg Member Posts: 266
    edited October 2016

    I can answer the Pacific yew question quite authoritatively, since my husband was a Taxol researcher back in the late 70's--for his work on Taxol, he used the Pacific yew. An American pharmaceutical company picked up on this research and the patented and marketed the drug Taxol based. (Tamoxifen was developed by the Swedish firm Astra-Zeneca.)

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited October 2016

    Tamoxifen was discovered in the 1960's by a British/European lab (later Astra Zeneca), initially researching contraception and a "morning after" pill. Work on Taxol began at about the same period of time in the United States - from the bark from the Pacific Yew as tgtg pointed out. Here are a couple of links that outline the discoveries.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1760730/?tool=pubmed

    https://dtp.cancer.gov/timeline/flash/success_stories/S2_taxol.htm

  • LovesToFly
    LovesToFly Member Posts: 1,133
    edited October 2016
    I was very scared to take tamoxifen, I literally started crying when I was handed the prescription. But I have now been on it since May, the only side effect I have had this hot flashes and they have reduced a lot.

    Personally I think it's worth trying, if you cannot live with the side effects you can always stop, but if you don't try you will never know
  • nancym712
    nancym712 Member Posts: 51
    edited October 2016

    I wish I'd asked these questions before taking AIs. My details are close to yours ((single mastectomy but oncatype 31). I opted in because of oncatype number. The first one gave me terrible side effects so I changed to Arimdex. Tolerable side effects until a month ago. I have terrible hand pain and trigger finger. Much worse than the joint pain I had on Aromisin. I stopped the meds two weeks ago. I only have six months to go but I'm so done with the meds.

    I don't know if 4.5 years of side effects were worth it. My husband thinks yes, but he isn't the one whose body is all messed up. If. Had it to do over again, I'd pass. My five year anniversary is next month.

    Good luck. It's a very personal decision.

    Nancy

  • bevin
    bevin Member Posts: 1,902
    edited October 2016

    HI Nancy

    Being ER+, hormone therapy gives you a 50% reduction. Its the big guns and can save your life. The side effects do lessen over time.

  • JoAnn_K
    JoAnn_K Member Posts: 17
    edited November 2016

    I had very few side effects while on Tamoxifen, but oh how I have suffered since being off. First of all, don't stop cold turkey, or you could go into a hormone storm like I did causing stroke-like neurological symptoms - speech changes, balance issues, head tremors, unrelenting joint pain, and general exhaustion. Two and a half years off, and unless I am exhausted, speech and balance are fine. I still have head tremors and joint pain. Not sure if either will go away. Just another point of view.

  • debharris
    debharris Member Posts: 2
    edited November 2016

    Today I saw my MO to go over my pathology from bilateral mastectomy. I was HER2+, Er 20%. There is no cancer remaining in my breast or the lymph nodes they removed. I was surprised when the MO said she would like me to consider tamoxifen and the first response, in my head, was no way. After reading the comments here, I realize I can stop taking it if the SEs are too much for me. Thank you all for helping e find perspective in this decision. We are going to discuss this some more over the next couple Herceptin treatments but I feel much better about this.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited November 2016

    Deb I actually stopped my Arimidex after a couple of weeks and then went back on it two week later and my side effects were lessened. It's like my body said Oh, I know this drug it's okay.

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited November 2016

    bevin...I'm happy that you did well on anti hormone therapy. However the statement that the SEs lessen in time is not exactly correct. Everyone is different and sometimes SE actually get worse in time. Also some of the aromatase joint issues can be permanent. I'm not saying you shouldn't take them. I'm just saying we should all make informed decisions. I also would like to validate the women who do have major SEs. I would love to see better treatment options. Good luck to all navigating this disease.

  • Bonmon62
    Bonmon62 Member Posts: 5
    edited November 2018

    Where is this article that says all invasive cancer is metastatic?? Thats not something i want to hear

Categories