Post Mx Radiation Improves Local Control Not Overall Survival

Options
Molly50
Molly50 Member Posts: 3,773

After 10 Years, Postmastectomy Radiation Is Shown to Improve Local Control But Not Overall Survival in Women with Breast Cancer and One to Three Positive Nodes


September 28, 2016—Boston, Massachusetts--After 10 years of follow-up, postmastectomy radiotherapy improved local control but not overall survival in women with breast cancer and one to three positive lymph nodes, even after controlling for poorer prognostic features.



This outcome was reported at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), from September 25 – 28.



Moses M. Tam, MD, of New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, explained that the role of postmastectomy radiation in women with breast cancer and one to three positive lymph nodes in the setting of modern systemic therapy is controversial.



"I wanted clarification," Dr. Tam said, "on the controversy regarding the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with one to three positive nodes. In fact, just last week, the ASTRO/American Society of Clinical Oncology/Society of Surgical Oncology released a consensus statement on this subject. They stated that postmastectomy radiation therapy confers a clear disease control and survival benefit in patients with T1 - T2 disease and one to three positive nodes."



He continued, "Subsets of patients may be at such low risk of disease recurrence that potential toxicities may outweigh the benefit of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Our analysis evaluated one of those patient subsets, essentially, those who received modern systemic therapy."



Dr. Tam and colleagues set out to investigate the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on breast cancer outcomes at 10-year follow-up in women enrolled on Breast Cancer International Research Group 005, a phase 3 trial of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant vs sequential docetaxel.



Individual patient data at 10-year follow-up were analyzed for 1649 women treated on the control arm (sequential docetaxel). All women were node positive, HER-2 nonamplified. They underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy with negative margins followed by axillary lymph node dissection with at least six lymph nodes removed.



Postmastectomy radiotherapy was given at the investigator's discretion. Adjuvant hormonal therapy was given in hormone-positive disease. Primary analyzed outcomes included local control, locoregional control, distant metastasis, and overall survival.



Statistical analysis of categorical data was performed with Χ2 test. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival estimates were obtained using log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazard model using SPSS statistical software. A propensity score analysis was performed with R statistical package.



Five hundred twenty-three women underwent mastectomy with one to three positive lymph nodes. Thirty-nine percent received postmastectomy radiotherapy, which included the chest wall, supraclavicular field (71%), and internal mammary nodes (27%). Women receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy were significantly younger, had more positive nodes, and had more advanced T stage than patients who did not receive the treatment.



Postmastectomy radiotherapy improved 10-year local control (99% vs 94%, P = .006) significantly vs patients who did not receive postmastectomy radiotherapy. The therapy did not improve 10-year distant metastases (20% vs 17%) or overall survival (86% vs 84%) vs patients who did not receive postmastectomy according to the use of propensity score analysis. A trend toward locoregional control was observed (95% vs 92%, P = .08).



Subgroup analysis including larger tumors, poorly differentiated disease, two or three positive lymph nodes, or premenopausal status did not identify a patient cohort in which postmastectomy radiotherapy predicted for improved overall survival.



Dr. Tam concluded after 10 years of follow-up, postmastectomy radiotherapy improved local control but not overall survival in women with one to three positive lymph nodes, even after controlling for poorer prognostic features.



"We found," he commented, "that patients treated with modern systemic therapy experienced excellent outcomes in local control and overall survival, regardless of whether they received radiation therapy. We also found, however, that radiation therapy provides a clear local control benefit and a trend toward improved locoregional control once we adjusted for imbalances in underlying patient characteristics."



He continued, "On multivariate analysis, we identified younger age (<40 years) and higher-grade disease were associated with higher risk of locoregional recurrence and death. These patients, therefore, may be more likely to benefit from radiation therapy"



"Future directions will involve a larger cohort of patients to help answer the question of whether radiation therapy impacts overall survival in the era of modern systemic therapy"

Comments

  • agfischer
    agfischer Member Posts: 18
    edited September 2016

    I think I've read the same thing about lumpectomy/radiation - it reduces local recurrence but not necessarily distant mets.

  • swivel2020
    swivel2020 Member Posts: 12
    edited September 2016

    so as I understand he is referring to women with 1-3 positive nodes who received chemo in a "phase three trial of " chemo and also radiation. No mention of hormone therapy. I'd like to one without chemo but with HT.

  • samanthamala
    samanthamala Member Posts: 12
    edited September 2016

    I seriously regret having radiation. I had a locally advanced tumor with 0 nodes. They told me they were being aggressive because I was "so young", and all I can think is, that just means I have a couple extra decades to show up with some long term complication.

    And of course, the day before yesterday, I provided the anesthesia for a 40-something survivor who had returned not for a breast cancer recurrence, but a large radiation-associated sarcoma.

    Ffffff%$#@&amp;^.

  • Mariangel43
    Mariangel43 Member Posts: 136
    edited October 2016

    I received the ASCO Guidelines for RT in women with mastectomy and I will reject tx. I have the criteria of recommended but not highly because of side effects. So, I will go to new RO, be evaluated and then go to PS and finish recon. I am blessed. What I have read about RT was freaking me out. See you at night. Bye.

  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited October 2016

    This study took data from another group meaning it was not randomized. Radiation was given at discretion which means they were likely cases where the docs thought there was more chance of recurrence. In that case, you really aren't comparing apples to apples. It is helpful info, but not the end all be all final word on it. Risks versus benefits have to be weighed for each patient. Unfortunatrly, a lot of ROs gloss over the risks

  • Mariangel43
    Mariangel43 Member Posts: 136
    edited October 2016

    There is so much controversy and so little studies about many things. They talk about rising the percentage of survival but there are not studies that prove it. Those who can evaluate the different radiation therapies comment that IMRT, or IGRT, or 3d-conform are the best (for what?) but no one has presented the stats for that. I don't really know if the group of women w/ mx is larger or smaller than the one w/ lumpectomy. No stats either. I think in earlier years mx was the rule when a woman was diagnosed w/ cancer. Now the fad is shrinking tumor and then lumpectomy.

    The thing is that if we consider that cancer is totally different in every woman, why using protocols and treating each cancer the same way? The only thing that changes is the dose because weight is a critical factor. Even if the group is small, at least it was observed for a period of time to check on survival, side effects, and other variables. The most important conclusion is that ROs need to consider personal variables in their evaluation and not fully radiate every person if not needed. If we are trying to cure our bodies of cancer, why then we should surrender and let be radiated to the point that in 20 years we will be suffering with a post-rad cancer?

    Consider the graph of Tamoxifen. With so many women using AI, why these are not added to the graphs to make new graphs? There are no graphs for percentage of survival for women who received RT. Why? In one video, the director of a major RT center said that the percentage of survival RT added to women w/ mx was 4%. (Don't know if he included chemo). I was shocked. In spite of that we are being fully radiated with a full lifetime dosage and I ask myself if they are considering all the RXs, the MRIs, and other studies we have to endure in the future and that are part of our follow up and are also sources of radiation that might add to the damage RT is doing.

    We must all be aware that cancer is a multi-billion industry and see this as an economic situation. As Darwin and Lamarck said, the rule is survival of the fittest, and strangely cancer people are the prey, the victims of the system. I am not ignoring the fact that there are physicians who work because they love what they do, they respect their patients and they look for their patients' wellbeing. But in each branch of medicine, 80 to 90 percent of doctors are looking for getting rich and pay their loans the fastest way. Well, you might say that is not bad and I agree. What I am claiming is that sensitivity and humanity are lost in their way upward. That is what I miss.

  • 7of9
    7of9 Member Posts: 833
    edited October 2016

    I did not have a choice to opt out of radiation after a local/regional recurrence (no rads first go round) though I just wish I understood the effects better that kicked in 4 - 5 months after. It drives me crazy how my muscles changed, the aches, I have no way to compare my "cancer side" to my "good side" anymore. I caught both my initial diagnosis and recurrence myself (both within 2 months of annual and bi-annual check ups!) now I feel as if I'm stumbling in the dark. I hate to ask for an ultra sound to check for recurrence or soft tissue damage because both times I've had an US before = bad news. My quality of life is great but anxiety sucks. Thank God for Attivan or Ambien or i'd be a walking Zombie nutcase. My coworkers and husband may say I'm already there. :(

  • Houston2016
    Houston2016 Member Posts: 317
    edited October 2016

    Hi everyone, I'm at the point of my treatment with a dilemma. I finished chemo, AC,Taxol from April - September 2016. Then UMX on 10/5/16 with very tiny positive margin, so had to go in for another surgery. Met with my BS and OC today they said I had three negative lymph nodes from the 10/5 and my tumor was small so I'm kinda in the gray area for rads. She said I did have one positive lymph node to begin with so she said there may be more at the time that didn't do biopsied. Honestly, I do not want rads on the left breast due to its closed to heart and lung. Is it possible to do rads only on the lymph nodes?

Categories