SANDPIPER clinical trial

Options
LindaE54
LindaE54 Member Posts: 2,054

Anybody on this clinical trial or planning to be? For ER+/PR+, Faslodex plus Taselisib or placebo.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02340221

«13

Comments

  • JFL
    JFL Member Posts: 1,947
    edited August 2015

    I am not in the trial but am happy to hear about another potential targeted therapy for down the road! I hope some others chime in.


  • LindaE54
    LindaE54 Member Posts: 2,054
    edited August 2015

    Thanks JFL - I have CT and bone scan in mid Sept - if progression is confirmed I will ask my Onc to participate in this trial. I would rather have Ibrance and Faslodex, but Ibrance is not approved here and not likely to be for a long time.

  • pajim
    pajim Member Posts: 2,785
    edited August 2015

    Not eligible (already on Faslodex) but all new drugs are welcome. . .

  • Lynn_R
    Lynn_R Member Posts: 1
    edited February 2016

    I am on this clinical trial. I started on January 28th of this year. So far, no serious side effects.


  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited February 2016

    Hi Lynn_R and welcome! Thank you for sharing and we look forward to hearing how the rest of the trial goes. Please keep us all posted!

    --The Mods

  • LindaE54
    LindaE54 Member Posts: 2,054
    edited February 2016

    Lynn - thank you for sharing. Wishing you the best with Sandpiper and glad to hear SEs are doable. This clinical trial remains an option for me in the future. I would very much appreciate that you keep us updated. May I ask you where you live? You can pm me if you prefer.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited May 2016

    Results of Sandpiper II trial from ASCO

    Abstract:

    A phase II study of the PI3K inhibitor taselisib (GDC-0032) combined with fulvestrant (F) in patients (pts) with HER2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (BC).

    Sub-category:
    ER+

    Category:
    Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

    Meeting:
    2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Abstract No:
    520

    Poster Board Number:
    Poster Discussion Session (Board #8)

    Citation:
    J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 520)

    Author(s): Maura N. Dickler, Cristina Saura, Donald A. Richards, Ian E. Krop, Andres Cervantes, Philippe L. Bedard, Manish R. Patel, Lajos Pusztai, Mafalda Oliveira, Joseph A. Ware, Huan Jin, Timothy R. Wilson, Thomas Stout, Michael C. Wei, Jerry Y. Hsu, Jose Baselga; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Institute of Health Research, INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, ON, Canada; Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota, FL; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

    Abstract Disclosures

    Abstract:

    Background: The PI3K pathway is activated in HR+ BC, often via gain-of-function mutations in PIK3CA that occur in ~40% of HR+ BC. Taselisib is a potent and selective PI3K inhibitor, with greater selectivity against mutant PI3Kα isoforms than wild type (WT) PI3Kα. Phase Ib data demonstrated good tolerability and preliminary efficacy for taselisib + F in HR+ BC.

    Methods: This Phase II, open-label, single-arm study enrolled post-menopausal pts with HER2-, HR+ locally advanced or metastatic BC (mBC) who had progression or non-response to ≥ 1 prior endocrine therapy in adjuvant or mBC settings. Pts received taselisib (6 mg capsule PO qd) plus F (500 mg IM on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, then q4w Day 1 of each cycle) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. PIK3CA mutation status was centrally confirmed retrospectively on archival tumor tissue by 'cobas'PIK3CA Mutation Test. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (RECIST version 1.1) and clinical benefit rate (CBR; confirmed CR and PR, or stable disease for > 180 days) in all pts and pts with PIK3CA mutations. Secondary endpoints include additional measures of safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics.

    Results: 60 pts were enrolled; 17 had PIK3CA mutations, 27 had WT PIK3CA and 16 had unknown PIK3CA mutation status. Among pts with baseline measurable disease, confirmed response rates were: PIK3CA mutations (n = 12) 41.7%, WT (n = 21) 14.3%, unknown (n = 11) 9.1%; all confirmed responses were PRs. CBRs were: PIK3CA mutations 41.7%, WT 23.8%, unknown 27.3%. Common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) were colitis (13.3%), diarrhoea (11.7%), hyperglycaemia (6.7%), and pneumonia (5%). 18.3% of patients discontinued taselisib treatment due to an AE. More detailed safety and efficacy data will be presented.

    Conclusions: The combination of taselisib plus F had an acceptable side effect profile and clinical activity in pts with HER2-, HR+ advanced BC, with a numerically higher response and CBR in patients with PIK3CA mutations compared with WT pts. Taselisib is currently being tested with F in a randomized Phase III study (SANDPIPER, NCT02340221). Clinical trial information: NCT02340221

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited May 2016

    Sandpiper III trial is open:

    SANDPIPER: Phase III study of the PI3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor taselisib (GDC-0032) plus fulvestrant in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC) enriched for pts with PIK3CA-mutant tumors.

    Sub-category:
    ER+

    Category:
    Breast Cancer—HER2/ER

    Meeting:
    2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Abstract No:
    TPS617

    Poster Board Number:
    Poster Session (Board #103a)

    Citation:
    J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr TPS617)

    Author(s): Jose Baselga, Javier Cortes, Michele De Laurentiis, Veronique Dieras, Nadia Harbeck, Jerry Y. Hsu, Vivian Ng, Frauke Schimmoller, Timothy R. Wilson, Young-Hyuck Im, William Jacot, Ian E. Krop, Sunil Verma; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; National Cancer Institute "Fondazione Pascale", Naples, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Brustzentrum der Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Samsung Medical Centre, Seoul, South Korea; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Abstract Disclosures

    Abstract:

    Background: PIK3CA mutations are one of the most frequent genomic alterations in BC, being present in ~40% of ER-positive, HER2-negative breast tumors. PIK3CA mutations promote growth and proliferation of tumors and can mediate resistance to endocrine therapies in BC. Taselisib is a potent and selective PI3K inhibitor that displays greater selectivity for mutant PI3Kα than wild-type PI3Kα. Taselisib has enhanced activity against PIK3CA-mutant BC cell lines, and clinical data include confirmed partial responses in pts with PIK3CA-mutant BC treated with taselisib either as a single agent or in combination with fulvestrant. SANDPIPER, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III study, is designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of taselisib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal pts with ER-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutant locally advanced or metastatic BC.

    Methods: Pts with disease recurrence or progression during or after aromatase inhibitor treatment will be randomized 2:1 to receive either taselisib (4 mg qd) or placebo in combination with fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, and on Day 1 of each subsequent 28-day cycle). Randomization will be stratified by visceral disease, endocrine sensitivity, and geographical region. The study enriches for pts with PIK3CA-mutant tumors who will be randomized separately from pts with non-mutant tumors; a valid PIK3CA-mutation result in tumor tissue via central assessment is required prior to enrollment. The primary efficacy endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival in pts with PIK3CA-mutant tumors. Other endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of objective response, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes. Target enrollment is 600 pts; > 100 patients have been enrolled onto study, and enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02340221

  • gp193
    gp193 Member Posts: 23
    edited September 2016

    My wife is starting this trial in a few weeks after she experienced progression in bones and liver while on Xeloda. Is anyone else still in this trial? I'm curious how the side effects have been and how you're doing!

    Gina


  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2016

    GP- I was considered it but I did not have the testing back to make sure I have the mutation so I am on just the faslodsex.

    I don't of anyone on the trial but I am very interested in knowing. I heard there were troublesome SE of the trial but MO didn't elaborate. I think one was that it caused your glucose to go crazy.

    Keep us posted Carol

  • LindaE54
    LindaE54 Member Posts: 2,054
    edited September 2016

    Gina - I'm not on the trial either. But still in my tool box for the future. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone on it. Keep us posted!

  • gp193
    gp193 Member Posts: 23
    edited September 2016

    Thanks for chiming in. One of the side effects is high blood sugar, so we'll be sure to keep a close eye on that. According to our onc, the trial drug has been pretty well tolerated. LovesMaltese, has the Faslodex been effective for you? It's nerve-wracking to have the possibility of only getting a placebo, so I hope the Faslodex will be effective at least on its own.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2016

    Hi GP- I have only had 2 loading doses of faslodex so not enough time to know anything yet. I failed on Ibrance and letrozole after 10 months. I think it's easy in some situations to know if it's placebo. A no brainer with this trial is take your fasting blood sugar in the am before you start the trial and monitor blood sugars all day long. If you start the trial, compare the numbers. I bet it spikes it up a bit for everyone. Which bothers me because low glucose is good for not feeding cancer cells.

    Carol

  • gp193
    gp193 Member Posts: 23
    edited September 2016

    Carol,

    Great idea. I had the same thought about high blood sugar being counterproductive, so if that's an issue we will be extra careful with diet and talk to the onc about diabetes medication.

    Not sure why my diagnostic/treatment info isn't showing up here. My wife has stage IV IDC with mets to liver and bone. She's ER+/PR-/HER2- and her genetic testing shows that she has the PIK3CA mutation.

    Gina

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Metformin is a diabetes drug that is used by many folks with cancer, but not diabetes, because it appears to prevent and treat cancer.

    No studies or trials have been completed, so the theory has not been supported by data.

    Do your own online search for metformin and breast cancer to find several references.

    best, Stephanie

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited September 2016

    Hi Gina,

    I am also very interested in this trial, because the PI3K inhibitor it tests (Taselisib) is looking like it is significantly more effective than two other new ones in the pipeline.

    What is the exact drug or treatment history your wife has had thus far, since detecting the metastasis? I assume that you would want to not have been treated with the aromasin/affinitor combo previously? Was the biopsy that showed the mutation for the original cancer or was it done after resistance to a previous drug?

    Also, regarding the sugar, my understanding is that breast cancer is not as sensitive as some other cancers, like pancreatic, so may not be assisted as much by metformin etc...

    Any information you can get from the oncologist or nurses about the side effects and status of the trial is very much appreciated! Good luck!!

  • TarheelMichelle
    TarheelMichelle Member Posts: 871
    edited September 2016

    I was on a different trial with Taselisib this summer. I did not take it with Faslodex but with Femara. My side effects were very similar to Afinitor. As a side note, the medicine appeared to stabilize my blood sugar. I had much lower readings when my blood sugar was tested before my PET scans. So, it may raise some patients' blood sugar, but not mine. I had to stop the trial because of the side effects. I am hyper-sensitive to them. Stomach pains, mouth pain, difficulty swallowing, etc.

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited September 2016

    Michelle- Congratulations on your upcoming five year anniversary- fantastic!!! It is disappointing, but not surprising, to hear that the side effects of Taselisib are so similar to Affinitor, dang! I always get excited about new treatments, until hearing about the side effects. Good for you for trying several different trials, have you considered any combination trial that include immunotherapy? I think there is a femara-Keytruda one, and Atezo looks like it may have exceptionally good activity in combination with several different drugs. Have you had Ibrance? I am taking Ibrance-Femara with no real side effects other than hair loss, and will have a scan Monday to see if its still working ..

  • TarheelMichelle
    TarheelMichelle Member Posts: 871
    edited September 2016

    Cure-ious, good luck with your scan. I still have several conventional treatments I haven't been on yet. I don't want to be in another trial for a LONGGGG time if I can help it. The last trial required me to fly to NYC every other week, which was draining in so many ways. Not sure how long I can stay on Femara. I had excellent results with AI but the side effects are vicious.

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited September 2016

    GP103 - I am very interested in your wife's experience in this trial, please let us know how it goes. Let us know the selection process, the side effects, the outcomes, everything. We're all ears.

    You have to edit your profile AND make it public for the diagnosis and treatment history to appear in your signature. Two steps. Poke around in settings a bit. It's super helpful that everyone has this information updated in their signature. It's one of the things that makes BCO much more useful than other sites, IMO.

    I am on metformin. Prescribed by a complementary oncologist (CO) to support my treatment. I believe it facilitates the uptake of sugar by normal cells, which keeps sugar from hanging out in the blood. This deprives the cancer of sugar. Or that is my best understanding of the Theory of Metformin. I've always had low blood sugar. I've never had diabetes. I'd like to lose 5-7 lbs, but I am not overweight by any measure. It seems like it could help with Taselisib side effects.

    Cure-ious - that is so interesting that breast cancer is not as sensitive to sugar. My CO wants me on it so I do it, but I haven't really dug into it much.

    >Z<

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited September 2016

    Hi Z!

    I too have a prescription for Metformin, but haven't started taking it yet, since I requested it from my physician myself, for its apparent anti-cancer properties. I have a scan tomorrow and was thinking if things look good I might add it. Of course all cancer cells grow on sugar, but I was reading that pancreatic cells are more sensitive to extra sugar in bloodstream than estrogen-driven breast cancer cells, for example. Still, I do eat plenty of sweets, so I probably would benefit. And I think that Metformin also can inibit mTOR, and/or would be expected to complement any protocol with an mTOR inhibitor.

    At any rate, the main thing I wanted to mention is that if you take Metformin, do it at night on an empty stomach- there was an ariticle I read in PubMed last year showing that Metformin literally works 1000-times better on fasting cells!! It makes sense, it can drive down sugar to lower levels and faster if there is less sugar around to begin with?

    The work on the benefits of nighttime fasting is incredible, for example if you feed mice the same quantity of high-fat diet and one cage has full fasting (chow available only during their active period) and the other cage has the chow available 24/7, then the 24/7 mice are obese with lipidemia, etc, and the other cage are completely normal weight mice! Fasting also fixes heart problems and was recently suggested to help with cancer. I did it for a year and a half and it was good for losing 13 pounds and keeping it off ( I did not change my piggy diet even a bit!), and completely got rid of the GERDS I suffered from badly (no more Prilosec for me!). After next week, I intend to get back on the fasting jag, and add Metformin to the mix. Cancer messed everything up there for quite awhile, but I used to really look forward to the fasting cycle, after awhile your body likes the rhythm, and I found going to be on an empty stomach was really enjoyable- if I wanted to eat anything, I'd just plan to do so in the morning. And I took to drinking sparkling water instead of my glass of wine late at night..

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited September 2016

    Cure-ious - Thanks. You remind me that Metformin directly effects the cancer cell growth cycle and not just blood sugar levels in a dish, so that's another reason to take metformin.

    Reading your brief discussion of night time fasting, my mind and my body said yes, yes, yes. I'd like to learn more if you have any references or additional information. What time of day do you stop eating?

    >Z<

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited September 2016

    Here is a lay summary, there have been tons of papers. UCSD docs are trying it with their heart patients; its one thing everyone could do, and requires no dieting, etc. My understanding is that we burn sugar for the first hour of a fast, but then move to burning fat. This would make it harder for cancer cells to grow, since they grow on sugar (and estrogen)- add to the mix some Metformin to plow down those sugar levels even stronger, and I think whole body metabolism would be stronger in every way. Its super hard if you have young kids though, you have to be prepared to eat dinner early- I was trying to be done with food by 6:30 at night, start up around 7-8 as usual..

    http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/18/science/la...

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited September 2016

    Also if I got too hungry at night and was tempted to eat, I just went to sleep. In my house we stay up too late anyway. This procedure links the food cycle with the circadian rhythm, so its reinforcing to both pathways..

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited September 2016

    Cure-ious - Well, I am going to do night fasting ... including changing my metformin tomong, starting today. I read a lot about it a while ago and it somehow got lost in all the treatment jumble. It's coming back to me. It's super important. And easy.

    Thank you.

    >Z<

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Because of my rare genetic condition that links cancer and metabolism, I've paid attention to CR (caloric restriction) and night fasting research and practices for years.

    My long time practice of not eating between 5 PM and 7 AM has been broken because of my extreme medical condition at end-of-life -–cachexia, malnutrition and dehydration.

    The medical research hasn't been proven by large double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials, but there is good evidence that caloric restriction and night fasting are helpful in cancer and many health challenges.

    This is, of course, best combined with eating what is for you a healthy diet. My general guideline remains that of Michael Pollan - eat food, not too much, mostly plants. But my body craves protein and energy-dense food, so I eat more animal protein than ever before.

    Listening to my body's wisdom seems the best path to success.

    Best healing wishes, Stephanie

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2016

    I will add in on the metformin. My fasting blood sugar can be above normal on some days. I had MO do the A1C or whatever the correct test is that measures as an average. I was still in normal range and asked to be put on metformin. I was told no. One reason is that if you are diagnosed pre diabetic it could disqualify you from a trial. Sandpiper is one of them. I don't like to comment on SE of drugs because we all tolerate different. But MO I just saw said SE being reported from this trial were troublesome. Maybe the positive reports are from placebo. Then there is me, who is having a hard time with Faslodex with body ache. I don't know what it feels like to not ache.

    I never want anyone to get discouraged in starting a trial. So I'm praying this is tolerable for all that is on it. Good luck I'm following this thread.

    Hugs Carol
  • gp193
    gp193 Member Posts: 23
    edited September 2016

    Hi everyone,

    I finally figured out how to make my diagnosis/treatment info appear, so that should answer a few questions. After her primary treatment for stage III IDC, my wife was put on letrozole for maintenance. Unfortunately that was completely ineffective because she developed liver mets within a few months. The genetic testing that revealed a PIK3CA mutation was done after my wife's liver biopsy. When she was diagnosed as stage IV she was put on Xeloda immediately, and while it appears to have worked somewhat, the scan two weeks ago showed mild progression and new bone mets. We are at Sloan-Kettering, which is one of the trial sites for SANDPIPER, and our onc suggested the trial as a first try because of the PIK3CA mutation. My wife will be meeting with the onc again next week to go over all the details for the trial and hopefully get started on the new drugs.

    From what I understand at this point, the selection process is pretty straightforward. I believe most of you would qualify. The trial is still open and there are many sites throughout the US. When I get the detailed info on side effects I will keep posting here.

    Good advice on Metformin - I've heard about it's helpfulness in decreasing blood sugar in order to deprive the cancer cells, but it's interesting that it's also effective via another mechanism. I'll be sure to ask about it.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2016

    GP- Thanks for the update- You are in good hands.. By having that mutation this trial is one of the best ways to go- NCI centers as Sloan will stay away from using the big chemo that they know will work in hopes of getting great results from a trial that is tolerable. This trial is in Phase 3 and is very promising. I am being tested for that mutation as I type.

    Keep us posted.

    Hugs, Carol

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited September 2016

    Thank you gp193. Extremely interested in your experience with the trial.

    >Z<

Categories