I don't want more genetic testing

Options
sunshinegal
sunshinegal Member Posts: 209

One of my sisters has been contemplating doing genetic testing given my dx and my mom's dx that preceded mine by 3 months. Mom and I both tested negative for BRCA1/2.

She had a consult with a genetic counselor who apparently said that the "most sensible thing" is for ME to get additional genetic testing b/c they can screen for a lot more now and I am the one, after all, who had cancer.

Is something wrong with me that my first reaction was HELL NO ?

I pretty much don't want or need new stress in my life. I'm still having reconstructive surgeries 5 years later and the last thing I am interested in is going through the angst and worry of genetic testing (reliving past stress) never mind the new stress of having to decide what to do with new knowledge that I may well not be able to do anything about anyway.

I don't know, I feel terrible but want to tell my sister that if she wants genetic information about HER BC risk, than get it done herself.

Thoughts?

Comments

  • dragonsnake
    dragonsnake Member Posts: 159
    edited July 2016

    My surgeon could have ordered the genetics test for me, but he said that I would have to go to San Francisco to see a special counselor  who would go through  the results with me. It's a big stress, and sometimes it's better not to know. I chose not to know.  Let your sister get her own test, if she wants to. After all, you are not identical, right?

  • Annette47
    Annette47 Member Posts: 957
    edited July 2016

    The reason it makes sense for you to do the testing is as the one with cancer, IF there is any genetic issues than can be identified then they know you have them, so if you test negative, they can be fairly certain that they aren't in your family. If your sister tests negative they don't know whether she doesn't have them because it doesn't run in the family or because she just didn't inherit them so they get more information by testing you.

    If the main/only reason to be tested is to assess your sister’s risk, then she should do the testing because all that matters is whether she has the mutation or not; whether it runs in the family is irrelevant. If there are other family members involved, then it would be better for you to do it so that in the event they find something, everyone else knows what to look for.

    For me, I did the BRCA testing not so much for me, but for my two daughters. I was negative, despite being a pre-menopausal Ashkenazic Jew, and no one suggested testing for other mutations (no strong family history - just my decidedly post-menopausal mom who was diagnosed 6 weeks before me, but we don't have many other female relatives to know what if anything would have happened to them).

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited July 2016

    Hi sunshinegal:

    I understand your feelings. Under applicable guidelines, a Genetic Counselor should provide expert advice regarding the best strategy for familial testing in order to obtain the most informative results (i.e., which affected person in the family should be tested first, etc.). However, if one person does not wish to be tested, there may be other strategies available that can provide potentially informative results for family members.

    NCCN Guidelines for "Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian" (Version 2.2016) reflect strategies designed to obtain the most informative results and thereby positively identify a deleterious mutation(s) in a family (if present). Thus, the guidelines indicate a preference for testing a person already diagnosed with a relevant cancer first (as opposed to a person not yet diagnosed), focusing on those whose disease is most likely to be inherited (and not sporadic):

    "For the majority of families in whom mutation status is unknown, it is best to consider testing an affected family member first, especially a family member with early-onset disease, bilateral disease, or multiple primaries, because that individual has the highest likelihood for a positive test result."

    "If more than one family member is affected with cancers highly associated with a particular inherited cancer susceptibility syndrome, consider testing first a family member with youngest age at diagnosis, bilateral disease, multiple primary cancers, or other cancers associated with the syndrome, or most closely related to the proband/patient."

    "The genetic testing strategy is greatly facilitated when a deleterious mutation has already been identified in another family member. In that case, the genetic testing laboratory can limit the search for mutations in additional family members to the same location in the gene."

    Whether you are the best candidate to be tested and/or whether your mother is available and might be a reasonably informative choice for additional testing may be points of further inquiry. You could ask your own Genetic Counselor for her views on this question, to ensure you hear all advice first-hand.

    Best,

    BarredOwl


  • Jenwith4kids
    Jenwith4kids Member Posts: 635
    edited July 2016

    I'm with you 100%. Enough said, I think.


    edited to add - I just read BarredOwl's response, and I do see the point now. But - it still has to be up to you.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited July 2016

    Hi Jen:

    I agree that a person may decline genetic testing if they wish. I am only suggesting that there might be a reasonable alternative that meets everyone's needs (including sunshinegal's desire for no further testing).

    BarredOwl

Categories