Guilt and Judgement

Options
2»

Comments

  • Rowan47
    Rowan47 Member Posts: 151
    edited June 2016

    Maybe, another way of looking at it, is to think yourself a "survivor of a major health scare"? Although it's not cancer, it still needed similar treatment, and with it similar anxieties etc. Hopefully it won't be too long until doctors discover a way to determine which cases of DCIS will turn into cancer......it would sure save a lot of anguish for many women.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited June 2016

    DCIS is cancer

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited June 2016

    DCIS is still cancer--it hasn’t left the duct, but the cells are not just “atypical” and have proliferated. Some doctors (now Susan Love among them) consider LCIS not to be cancer, but I’m not sure why. Is LCIS less likely to mutate into ILC than DCIS is into IDC?

  • Rowan47
    Rowan47 Member Posts: 151
    edited June 2016

    Isn't there a push from many oncologists to re-name DCIS? I read somewhere that they want to take the word "carcinoma" out and replace it with "benign lesion", or something like that...I thought it was pre-cancer unless/until it became invasive? Sorry, could have misunderstood....there's so much research and info out there that it's bit confusing.

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited June 2016

    Haven’t heard DCIS being re-named “benign” in any way. Not even ADH is considered a “benign” lesion in that it is a high risk factor for developing DCIS or even IDC. I have heard some doctors (Laura Esserman among them) considering calling DCIS a “pre-cancer” that at the very least needs to be closely and vigilantly monitored for any ominous changes.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited June 2016

    Hi all:

    The earliest paper I have from Esserman et al. suggesting the renaming of DCIS as an "IDLE" (indolent lesions of epithelial origin) tumor is dated October, 2009. The proposal was made almost seven years ago, and has not been implemented. The main problem with the concept is that "DCIS" encompasses a broad range of conditions with very different risk profiles, and as of this date, clinicians cannot reliably identify which DCIS lesions are truly lower risk and would be properly classified as "IDLE".

    Layperson reports are often superficial and anecdotal. The fact that a few people with small, low grade DCIS have declined surgery and are addressing their disease with an investigational regimen of endocrine therapy plus surveillance does not speak to the appropriate treatment regimen for the majority of DCIS patients. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncologists (ASCO), in women diagnosed with apparently pure DCIS by minimally invasive biopsy (e.g., stereotactic core-needle biopsy), invasive cancer is reported in 10% to 20% of cases overall, approximately half of which are microinvasive cancer. As of this date, current imaging methods appear to lack the ability to detect either the presence or onset of invasive disease. My own diagnosis of "apparently pure" DCIS (Stage 0) is illustrative; despite the use of MRI in the work-up, I was found to be Stage IA on surgical pathology.

    Clinical trials are underway to evaluate other approaches to DCIS, such as active surveillance alone (LORD Trial, in pure low grade DCIS) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy plus surveillance, but evidence establishing the long-term safety of such approaches is many years away. Accordingly, these approaches remain investigational and are outside of current consensus treatment guidelines, which include surgery at a minimum (see e.g., NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, Version 2.2016).

    BarredOwl

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited June 2016

    The DCIS discussion is a bit of a red herring. I should add that even those with invasive breast cancer may now be able to avoid chemotherapy (e.g., based on lower risk clinico-pathologic features, Oncotype Recurrence Score, MammaPrint Index), such that receipt of chemotherapy cannot be considered an accurate litmus test for breast cancer survivorship by anyone who knows anything about it.

    BarredOwl

  • Ampdol
    Ampdol Member Posts: 1
    edited June 2016

    I understand what you are going thru. I had my lumpectomy a month ago and my margins came back not clear. I now have to get a second lumpectomy along with genetic tests to see if I can the gene mutation for more invasive cancer. I need additional imaging as well. There was mention that I may need a bilateral mastectomy if the tests come back positive and or if they can't get a clean margin. I also am getting a sentinel node biopsy. I feel guilty for feeling so lost and scared but realize there are women out there fighting for their lives and losing hair and getting sick from chemo. I hope all is getting better for you. You definitely are not alone as I mentioned with feeling guilty. All the best. Alicia PA

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited June 2016

    We just want to say welcome to Ampdol, and thank you for chiming in as well. Your supportive comment is helpful!

    Warmly, The Mods

  • Maya15
    Maya15 Member Posts: 323
    edited June 2016

    Alicia, please don't feel guilty. The hair, it grows back. The sickness, it ends after the chemo finishes. Our breasts don't grow back, and waiting for tests and pathology reports is the worst part. We are all of us fighting for our lives no matter what treatment we are having, and you are one of us.

  • april485
    april485 Member Posts: 3,257
    edited June 2016
  • dragonsnake
    dragonsnake Member Posts: 159
    edited June 2016

    According to my understanding, DCIS is a heterogeneous disease, and small low-grade lesions may have different prognosis than high-grade extended DCIS. Molecularly and histologically those tumors are different.  As I remember reading Dr. Esserman's publications, she clearly  separates  these two cases, and recognizes the seriousness of high-grade DCIS.

    As for the survivor's guilt, I guess we have to compare ourselves to healthy people that are pain-free and enjoy life without a cloud of cancer over them for the rest of their lifes.

    Those whom this disease did not touch, are usually do not want to be bothered with our problems, hence the response. In the words of my lovely father, "Why are you bothering me with your cancer? Didn't I have enough of you over the years? This is you problem;  leave me out of it." Others told me that bc is  eithert curable or highly treatable indicating  that they do not want to be bothered either.  

     There are good compassionate people in this world, you'll  meet many of them on this site. This is your crowd now. Please disregard what  people  that are not capable of understanding are thinking, and, please, do not let them  pushing their standards on you.

  • TrmTab
    TrmTab Member Posts: 832
    edited June 2016

    NIH defines DCIS as "A noninvasive condition in which abnormal cells are found in the lining of a breast duct"

    They no longer consider it "cancer" for research dollars.

  • ksusan
    ksusan Member Posts: 4,505
    edited June 2016

    Those would be the abnormal cells that were necrotizing my breast, right?

  • PerkyKat
    PerkyKat Member Posts: 1
    edited June 2016

    I certainly know what you mean. Had a lumpectomy and am in my third week of high-dose radiation. Haven't gone to any support group meetings because I am concerned about saying, well, no chemo, surgery done, area removed, almost done with radiation and only have to take a med. Meanwhile others are going through so much more than I am. As others have mentioned, we are here to listen and as someone in similar circumstances totally get how you are feeling. My philosophy is that the people who truly know and care will understand that this is a scary process and be there for us. Keep smiling!

  • ksusan
    ksusan Member Posts: 4,505
    edited June 2016

    Speaking as a person who had to get BMX, chemo, radiation, and Tamoxifen, I can tell you that my only feeling for anyone who needed less is happiness for you.

  • muska
    muska Member Posts: 1,195
    edited June 2016

    Being called "survivor" is not important to me at all, in fact I don't like this label. This topic comes up on this site periodically, opinions as usual vary but my take on it was in this year old post: I don't like to be called survivor

  • MeToo14
    MeToo14 Member Posts: 493
    edited June 2016

    I don't like to be called a survivor either, but I don't get into it with those who don't understand, it's not worth it. People just want to be able to put a label on it.

    DCIS IS CANCER! Please do not feel guilty. You were fortunate enough to catch it at an early stage. I went through the ringer and I guess still am, and I consider it cancer. Don't pay attention to those who tell you otherwise, you need to concentrate on you and your health!

  • newbcny
    newbcny Member Posts: 24
    edited June 2016

    Yes, I have a hard time saying breast cancer to my friends and children. Think it's best to be honest about it, but am having a hard time saying the words

Categories