Vitamin D Deficiency Linked To Spread Of Breast Cancer

Options

http://www.medicaldaily.com/breast-cancer-vitamin-...


Vitamin D Deficiency Linked To Spread Of Breast Cancer; What It Means For Prevention

Comments

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited March 2016

    Would it kill doctors to test BC patients for vitamin D deficiency, and give supplements to those who are deficient? Considering many BC treatments lead to osteoporosis and bone health could help prevent metastasis to bone, there are plenty of good reasons to make sure D levels are within the healthy range. And it's not that hard to avoid toxicity if you test every 6 months or so, and you don't megadose! Not to mention vitamin D toxicity is rare and the negative effects of deficiency are very common. Seems like the benefits far outweigh the risks.

  • labelle
    labelle Member Posts: 721
    edited March 2016

    Would it kill them to test all women for vitamin D deficiencies and then treat as needed? It is a pretty simple and inexpensive test. No one should have to guess about whether or not they need supplements of this substance and given the possible ramifications of low vitamin D levels, not just in terms of BC, but also in terms of bone health, no one should be running around with low vitamin D.

  • glennie19
    glennie19 Member Posts: 6,398
    edited March 2016

    I live in Florida, and you would think, down here, we would not be deficient in vitamin D,, but we are! I know many people, including myself, in that position. And sun exposure doesn't seem to be getting our levels where they need to be. My mail lady was just diagnosed with BC,,and she is low in Vitamin D,,, she is outside delivering mail all day long,, wear sunglasses, but no sunscreen or hat,,, so go figure.

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited March 2016

    How much Vitamin D should a woman be getting every day? I've been taking a One-a-Day Women's multivitamin every day for at least 15 years. It has 1000 IU. Seems like that should be enough...

  • Manu14
    Manu14 Member Posts: 153
    edited March 2016

    I took 1000 IU of vitamin D3 for several years before my cancer diagnosis. When my oncologist tested it, it was 36 which falls in normal ranges, but isn't considered ideal by some in the cancer community. It wasn't until I started taking 2000 IU daily that my lab results came back at 50 after six months. I feel comfortable staying at that dosage

  • glennie19
    glennie19 Member Posts: 6,398
    edited March 2016

    I'm taking 3000 IU daily to keep my levels above 50, which is where my doctor wants them.

  • GraceB1
    GraceB1 Member Posts: 213
    edited March 2016

    I had my level checked in the summer time when I was outside gardening a lot and it was only 27. I started taking 1000 a day and by Dec. it had dropped to 24. Then I switched to drops and upped my dosage to 4000 a day. Last Dec when I had it checked it was up to 36 so I upped my dose to 6000 a day. I'm aiming to get above 40. I guess I just don't process Vit D very well. My local clinic is checking almost everyone for Vit D levels now with their yearly exams. I had to request it be done but they were fine with it.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited March 2016

    My BS checked my levels at my first visit and now my MO monitors them, but I've been shocked by the number of MDs who haven't a clue about the need to do so.

    I'm also kind of ticked at the way some organizations dwell on the risks of toxicity but ignore the pretty significant risks associated with sub-optimal levels of D. Frankly, most people are NOT likely to OD on Vit. D, but the number of those not getting enough is pretty substantial.

  • glennie19
    glennie19 Member Posts: 6,398
    edited March 2016

    when I was in pharmacy school, we were taught about the toxicity potential of fat soluble vitamins. Vitamin A can really be a problem with higher doses, but I've seen people on Vitamin D 5000 to 10,000 IU daily trying to get the blood level up to "normal". Seems to me that getting a blood level of D should be part of your annual checkup.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited March 2016

    I agree, Glennie. Especially since it's pretty inexpensive.

  • ksusan
    ksusan Member Posts: 4,505
    edited March 2016

    I take 5000 IU a day to stay in normal range.

  • lisa137
    lisa137 Member Posts: 569
    edited March 2016

    5000 IU per day here, also, by order of my MO. He checks it at every visit. It was quite low the first time--before I even had chemo, so he put me on that dose at that time. Last year, at one visit, it was quite high up in the normal range, so he had me bring it down to 2000 IU per day. The next visit showed it still in the normal range, but it had dropped like a rock. He put me back on the 5000 IU per day. He also told me that he takes it himself, because even though he's out in the sun a lot--he's a biker, and he runs--his D level was low without supplementing it; that for some people, being out in the sun just wasn't enough.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited March 2016

    When I was first diagnosed and researching bc like crazy, I learned about the importance of vitamin D. So I asked that my vitamin D level be checked, and it was deficient. So I started taking a supplement right away. The surgeon and radiation onc were just going to let me wait several months through surgeries and radiation, until I finally got to the medical oncologist! When I got there he was kind of territorial about it, asking, "Who ordered the vitamin D test?" My current onc, like lisa's, says that many people can't get what they need from sun exposure. In her experience, most people need 2000 iu per day to keep the levels good.

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited March 2016

    I was taking 5000 IUs per day for a few years before my diagnosis. My level was 70 when I was diagnosed (tested by my Chinese Medicine doc, who is also an MD), which all of my doctors agreed was good. Then I started exercising more outdoors and getting more sun, and I was worried about taking too much, so I cut the supplement back to 2 to 3 times per week. I live in a tropical climate with no shortage of sun.

    I was tested again a couple of weeks ago (six months since the original test) and my level had dropped to 33! I guess I'm one who doesn't convert it from sun exposure so efficiently. I'm back on 5000/day to get it back up, but I'll need to be tested again in 90 days, and then periodically after that to make sure I've still got the balance right.

Categories