Recently Diagnosed - Many Questions - Overwhelmed

Options
woodstock99
woodstock99 Member Posts: 338

Hello -

Sorry this will be a long post so hope you stay with me. Had my annual mammogram about a month ago that showed calcifications in left breast that were not there the year before. Was told by imaging facility that I needed a biopsy so I had stereotactic biopsy and was told by radiologist verbally that I have stage 0 DCIS high grade (grade 3) approx 2.5cm in size.


Married, no children, work, 62 years old. The only BC I can track going back to great grandparents, their children, grandchildren and great grandchildren is one aunt (father's sister) who had mastectomy in 1980 when she was in early 60's but her daughter said she never had any follow-up treatment or chemo or meds and lived another 25 years and died of heart issues at 88 so we are unsure of actual diagnosis.

Lots of longevity (late 80's-90's) in my family (both sides) except my father who died young and only cancer in family was maternal grandmother who died of multiple myeloma at 86. I have a sister 4 years younger than me with no issues.

Here is my final pathology report (edited down):

-Extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, high nuclear grade with necrosis
and associated microcalcifications
-No definite invasion identified

Microcalcifications
Guidance: Stereotactic
Size of Lesion: 1.2 cm
Location: Left breast 2:00, 9.0 cm from nipple
Birads: 4
Calcifications in specimen radiograph: Yes
Breast Imaging Diagnosis: DCIS intermediate to high grade

Results
Estrogen Receptor (ER) by IHC: Positive
Percentage of cells with nuclear positivity: 100%
Average intensity of staining: 3+

Progesterone Receptor (PR) by IHC: Positive
Percentage of cells with nuclear positivity: 30%
Average intensity of staining: 2+

Additional information for predictive/prognostic markers:

Interpretation of ER and PR
Positive: d1% immunoreactive tumor cells
Negative: <1% immunoreactive tumor cells
Intensity: 0 negative, 1+ weak, 2+ intermediate, 3+ strong
The interpretation of ER/PR is based on the 2010 ASCO/CAP guideline (J Clin
Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784-95).


At first, the doctor was positive and talked about lumpectomy, radiation and hormones (probably optional) but also said she would also do a sentinal node biopsy (2-3) But then she told me there is a 2nd small area of calcifications and wants me to have another stereotactic biopsy. I freaked out and I am angry. The 2nd area was on my mammogram so why wasn't it biopsied when I had the first biopsy?

Next she wants me to have an MRI. I am concerned about false positives & all that may bring. Then she started talking about oncoplastic surgery and referring me to a plastic surgeon for a consultation.

Next came genetic counseling about gene testing but I have concerns about this testing and why I need to do it. Is it just because now I have been "diagnosed" and am Jewish? How does genetic testing affect your future insurability - medical, life and long-term care? How does diagnosis of DCIS affect same? I understand you can do gene testing anonymously but if you tell your doctor results they will put in your records.

I asked about the OncotypeDX test and she said that I would have to join a trial and if you score low then you can't get radiation. She did say I could do Canadian protocol of radiation (3 weeks higher dose) but not pellets.

I have an appointment with another BC surgeon later in the week who is associated with a different group and facility but am freaked out by today's visit. I like the 2nd doctor but not the facility she is associated with.

Thanks in advance for your support and opinions and for reading all the way to here.

Comments

  • NotAgain2015
    NotAgain2015 Member Posts: 223
    edited November 2015

    Hi Balthus, I am so sorry you are having to face more tests! I understand your anger and frustration. not to mention all the time each appointment represents. If I were in your shoes, I would want to move forward with all possible testing. You want to know what you have so you can decide on the right procedure and protocol for your treatment. I believe it is common practice to go for genetic testing. Yes there are chances for false positives and more scares with further testing, but better to know completely what is there.

    Bottom line, you will have all of these tests and then they sit you down and provide you with statistics and recommendations. Then you decide what you want to do. You will want all of the facts.

    If you have access to a teaching hospital or are willing travel, once you have your test results, you could request a second opinion to help you make or confirm your treatment decision.

    I hope and pray for excellent results for you overall. I'm so sorry it is such a rocky and scary road to get there. It is so hard at first, but soon you will have facts and make a plan.

    Take care!!!!!

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited November 2015

    It is my understanding that the MRI is a pretty standard part of the pre-surgical workup, as it helps the surgeon identify the true extent of your tumor (I think this is particularly true with DCIS, which might be very tiny indeed) and lowers your odds of needing a rerun of your surgery to achieve clear margins. And by the way, please do have the MRI before the second biopsy. There is a chance that it will show another area of concern needing biopsy. I know you do not want to go through that a third time when the two could be combined in one unwelcome procedure.

    My MRI showed an area that, when biopsied, proved to be a conglomeration of about six different benign but abnormal cellular changes.. Technically, this was a false positive. In my opinion, it was a lucky find and I was very happy to have it removed.

    As for your insurability, genetic counseling has no effect. Your testing is not designed to diagnose a problematic set of symptoms, but to determine whether your risk of future breast cancer is high. Your diagnosis of DCIS, however, does affect the life insurance and disability rating an underwriter would offer. At this point, completing your diagnosis and treatment would be required before an offer could be made. Existing term life insurance can normally be converted into a permanent plan at the same rating as when you first took it out. Feel free to pm me with questions along this line as this is my professional expertise.

    Someone with more knowledge of DCIS will probably be along soon with clarifications, but I believe it highly unlikely you would need to join a trial in order to have an oncotype test. Moreover, I believe radiation is standard for medium or high grade DCIS.


  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited November 2015

    The genetic testing would affect your decision regarding lumpectomy versus mastectomy. There are at least a handful of women here who found out after lumpectomy that they were positive for various onco genes and wished they had known beforehand because they would have had mastectomy instead. Sometimes the issue has arisen after other family members developed cancer & family testing was done later.

    Was it by any chance Meghan you saw in genetics

  • owlwatcher
    owlwatcher Member Posts: 130
    edited November 2015

    Here in California where I live doctors often use a breast mri, stereo. biopsy,ultrasound and mammogram to get as much information before they "go in". What I learned here on this site is that each test gives the doctors a different look or perspective  of the area in question.In my opinion that is a good thing.  Stay on this site and you will learn a lot. My own doctor (primary care) told me I knew more than she did about dcis and it is because of the women here that are actually doing research and are sharing it. But remember each woman and case is a little different in what type of treatment they need and the treatment we choose for ourselves.

  • owlwatcher
    owlwatcher Member Posts: 130
    edited November 2015

    I want to tell you something my breast surgeon told me.(other women here have also had their doctors tell them)My breast surgeon told me that even with all this information they collect (biopsies, scans etc.)previous to a lumpectomy or mastectomy, until she goes in and  takes breast tissue out and the pathologist analyzes it she cannot tell me what is there. Remember any more tests are your decision to do. In general the more information we collect the better we are able to make a decision on treatment for ourselves. Please come back so we can support your feelings and validate you.

  • woodstock99
    woodstock99 Member Posts: 338
    edited November 2015

    Thank you ladies for your kind, logical and positive responses. This is really great website and I learning a lot. Was not expecting some of the additional info and possible scenarios that I got today and not prepared emotionally or physically for all this. Appreciate your support and information. Pleasant dreams.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited November 2015

    Hi Balthus:

    My initial diagnosis was quite similar to yours. This excellent post from Beesie regarding DCIS was very helpful to me. It was a lot of information for me to absorb at first, so I bookmarked it and just read it over and over. Her post is the first post, so scroll to the top of the page:

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/68/topics...

    A stereotactic biopsy does not provide enough tissue for an Oncotype test, so if performed, it would be done after surgery. In addition, a stereotactic biopsy only samples a small amount of tissue from a focused area and imaging has limitations. If after breast conserving surgery (lumpectomy), you have no evidence of invasive disease (pure DCIS), then as BrooksideVT noted, the Oncotype Test for DCIS is commercially available, and to my knowledge, formally speaking, one can have it done outside of a clinical trial. With the full surgical pathology in hand regarding the true extent of DCIS disease, grade, and margins, plus an estimate of your personal risk of recurrence, and the potential risk reduction that radiation might achieve, a decision about radiation would be made with input from a Radiation Oncologist. At that time, you can discuss the potential value of the Oncotype DX test again. This may include a consideration of the similarities between your surgical pathology and that of the patients included in the studies that evaluated the test. (See post below for more on this).

    As far as genetic testing, did you discuss that with the surgeon or did you meet with a Genetic Counselor? If you only spoke with the surgeon so far, please do not hesitate to ask for a referral to a Genetic Counselor for further information and more detailed discussion. A genetic counselor will conduct an assessment of your family history and can help you to better understand you personal risk factors (e.g., due to a personal diagnosis, ethic background). They will also review the kinds of testing available (e.g., focused testing for specific BRCA point mutations; full BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, including gene sequencing and assessment for certain genetic rearrangements; or multi-gene panel testing), the pros and cons of such testing, and make a recommendation.

    Meanwhile, if you would like to learn more, see for example:

    http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-preventi...

    BarredOwl

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited November 2015

    Hi Balthus:

    I am just speculating here, so please confirm things with your providers, but I think it is possible that your surgeon feels that the Oncoptype test for DCIS may not be very valuable for decision-making in your particular case. But if it were done, she would support it in the context of a clinical trial.

    Perhaps she is surmising that traditional pathological factors will weigh in favor of radiation in your case, and/or she may feel that the test is not sufficiently validated, and/or that the test is not sufficiently reliable for you in view of the composition of the patient pools in the studies performed to date. Although the decision will ultimately be made in light of the final surgical pathology and in consultation with a Radiation Oncologist, I do appreciate that the likelihood of receiving radiation may play in to the decision between lumpectomy and mastectomy. Thus, you may wish to ask your surgeon to explain the basis for why she does not support the test, in case it reflects a view that radiation therapy would likely be recommended. You may also ask for a consultation with a Radiation Oncologist prior to deciding on your surgical plan.

    I note that Beesie's post (last edited on Feb 11, 2015) linked above has commented on the composition of the study population (relevant text reproduced here):

    "If you have pure DCIS and are having a lumpectomy, you may benefit from the new Oncotype test for DCIS. The original Oncotype test was used to determine distant recurrence risk and the need for / benefit from chemo. Since chemo is not given for DCIS (see above), that version of the Oncotype test wasn't used on women who had pure DCIS. In December 2011 a new version of the Oncotype test was made available, specifically for women with DCIS. This Oncotype test provides an estimate of the 10-year risk of an invasive recurrence after lumpectomy surgery; test results may be helpful in determining whether or not to have radiation after surgery. Note however that all the patients in the trial had low or intermediate grade DCIS that was ≤2.5 cm in size or high-grade DCIS that was ≤1 cm. The other criteria in the trial was that surgical margins had to be 3mm or greater. Therefore this test may not be worthwhile for those who have larger areas of DCIS or smaller margins, cases where it's more clear that radiation can provide a significant reduction in recurrence risk. Note as well that the Oncotype for DCIS is new and doesn't yet have a lot of testing behind it. Even Genomic Health, the company that sells/markets the Oncotype tests, says that the test provides "additional information" that doctors and patients can use in addition to "the traditional measurements such as margin width, tumor size and tumor grade". Given the cost of the test (approx. $4000), this may put into question the value of the Oncotype test for current DCIS patients, at least until more testing is done on the test itself."

    I believe that this is the study Beesie is referring to (with accompanying commentaries):

    Solin et al (2013): http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/10/701....

    Berg commentary (2013): http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/10/680....

    Duggal commentary (2013): http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/10/681....

    However, since she last edited her post in Feb. 2015, another study came out in which "Individuals in our population cohort were not as highly selected as those in the ECOG E5194 study":

    Rakovitch et al. (July 2015): http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-01...

    pdf access here: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-01...

    I confess I am still trying to figure out the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the 2015 study.

    Note that while the National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) guidelines for Breast Cancer (Professional Version 3_2015) include the use of the other Oncotype DX test (21-gene test) in certain cases of invasive disease, the NCCN guidelines (which predate the July 2015 publication) do not seem to mention the Oncotype test for DCIS.

    Anyway, questions for those interested in the Oncotype test for DCIS might include: What patients are eligible for the test? What is the quality of validation of the test? Do consensus treatment guidelines incorporate this test? How relevant are the patient populations studied to my particular presentation? Could the results affect the recommendation in my case?

    Best of luck to you.

    BarredOwl



  • woodstock99
    woodstock99 Member Posts: 338
    edited November 2015

    Thank you. I have read Bessie's post. It's a lot to take in. If I want to do Oncotype test do they use the biopsy from the lumpectomy? I did meet with a genetic counselor. I just am trying to assess how much I really want to know and how much data on me is stored in systems somewhere that could potentially be used against me. I know it seems crazy but I think I am so overwhelmed right now that I am probably not thinking straight,

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited November 2015

    Hi:

    It is a huge amount of information to absorb, and they seem to have given it to you all at once! You are asking the right questions, and you have time to investigate, think on it, and ask follow-up questions.

    I believe the Oncotype test for DCIS would be done on a tissue sample from the surgery (i.e., after lumpectomy). This is because it needs a reasonable amount of tissue. Also, sometimes a small area of invasive disease is found, and if so, then the DCIS test would not be apropriate or meaningful.

    As noted by others, at some point, you may also wish to seek a second opinion. That could include an independent review of the pathology slides (sent overnight), all imaging, related written reports, and an independent reccomendation regarding initial treatment. Again, you have time and can ask your surgeon to confirm that you do.

    BarredOwl

  • ballet12
    ballet12 Member Posts: 981
    edited November 2015

    Hi Balthus, I'm not sure if you would be an appropriate candidate for the Oncotype test. It's really intended for those with low or intermediate grade DCIS. That was the population it was largely tested on. If you read what BarredOwl quoted from Beesie's text, the Oncotype test did not include those with high nuclear grade DCIS greater than 1 cm. If you have extensive high nuclear grade DCIS, radiation is strongly recommended, and even if your Oncotype score came out to be an intermediate number of some kind, you'd still be in a quandary as to whether to do the radiation or not. I was treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering, and also had extensive high nuclear grade DCIS with comedonecrosis and they strongly recommended radiation. I did the Canadian protocol with not a single problem, other than fatigue for a few weeks. I opted out of the hormonal treatment (AI's or Tamoxifen) due to possible side effects. The hormonal treatment is systemic and the radiation is localized.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited November 2015

    Hi:

    The 2015 study I cited (published after Beesie's last edit) included high grade patients, although I'm not sure of the range of sizes. Margins also play in. The margins and true size or extent of the DCIS (now estimated1.2 cms) will not be known until after surgery.

    I agree with Ballet that with certain surgical pathological findings, such as extensive high grade disease, the test reasonably might not be recommended or one might not be at all comfortable in relying on it.

    As Beesie and the commentary stated, the test does not make a recommendation about radiation. It is not a stand-alone test. It is used to predict the risk of recurrence without radiation, and is used in conjunction with all other relevant info to reach a decision about risk/benefit. In some cases, such other info may easily dominate the calculus.

    Again, this DCIS test does not appear in the most recent NCCN guidelines, and if these boards are any indication, is not used nearly as often as the test for invasive disease.

    BarredOwl


  • woodstock99
    woodstock99 Member Posts: 338
    edited November 2015

    2nd Opinion BS & MRI results:

    I had a breast MRI this week and also went to see 2nd opinion BS who is the BS who I have seen the last 6 years after annual screens. She has slightly different take on next steps & treatment than BS #1 a but more pragmatic and less (to me) overly aggressive but said she would have told me to do a breast MRI as well.

    I saw BS2 after my screening and she reviewed my images with me as well as prior year images and concurred I needed the 1st stereotactic biopsy. She received my pathology report. When I saw her yesterday as it was soonest I could see her, she told me she felt that a lumpectomy + rads of the DCIS would be fine for me. I asked her about the 2nd smaller calcification area in that breast and she had nothing in her notes about that, I told her BS! saw them and said they needed to be biopsied. She said she would get my films Monday and look again but did not note anything about that area when we met 2 weeks ago and she said she must not have felt it was of concern as she knows my breasts and has all my images and radiologist reports for past 6 years.

    I asked her about her surgery record f clear margins and she said she hits them about 80-85% of the time. I asked her if she would be removing a few SLN's like BS1 said she would and BS2 said no - she saw no reason at this time to do this based on non-invasive nature of current diagnosis and said I should ask BS1 why she wants to do this beyond "just to check".

    I asked BS2 about Onctotype DX testing and she said I could have that done (BS1 said I could but only if I participated via a trail) and when I asked her about rads she said that she would not want to commit to type of treatment until after surgery and without brining in oncologist,

    My husband was with me yesterday and felt she was very pragmatic yet concerned but was not an alarmist and while we prefer the facility where BS1 is located (I could do rads there or elsewhere) he thought she was being less aggressive or following a more 1-size-fits-all protocol than BS1,

    We left it that she would look at my films again and also get the MRI results and we'd go from there. She did say I should do the surrey before Christmas and get it over with so I could recuperate during a slower time of year for me at work. BS1 said I had up to 3 months from 1st biopsy for surgery which would put me late Jan/early Feb.

    I left there wondering if I need a 3rd opinion when BS1 called me with prelim MRI results.

    DCIS (Left) breast fine but they saw some things in right breast that they want to evaluate with MRI guided biopsy. They want to do both the MRI & stereotactic biopsy this coming Tuesday but I want BS2 to get results and see what she thinks, Problem if I don't do Tuesday I will not be able to do for 2 weeks as I am out of town most of the week after November which may then push everything to after Christmas and NY holidays.

    I also do not know "what things" they saw and why this type of biopsy and my anxiety level has once again shot through the roof. I feel,like I am on a train going 200 miles an hour all alone with no conductor.

    How do you decide when enough is enough or choose a BS when they are so different but both have excellent reps.

    Thanks.




  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited November 2015

    Just want to add I believe preoperative breast MRI is very important before making any treatment decisions.Good luck....

  • BrooksideVT
    BrooksideVT Member Posts: 2,211
    edited November 2015

    No, at this point you do not need a third opinion. What you need right now is to get bs #2's opinion on the MRI Personally, knowing a biopsy is indicated, I would cannonball right in and get it done and on Tuesday. That way, both bs #1 and #2 will quickly have all available information and you can revisit and interview (grill) both of them in depth. Once you have a really good sense of both of their views, you will be in a better position to determine next steps. I would not worry too much about trying to fit surgery in before the holidays. Your goal is to make the right decision for you, and that will take whatever time it takes. Also, if you choose a lumpectomy, you'll be back at work (assuming no lifting) in no time.

    Also, in revisiting bs #1, you may find that the trial he mentioned is concerned with a particular (experimental) type of radiation delivery or dosage that is available at that facility, and that non-trial rads is also available. At any rate, after you have healed from your surgery, you will meet with an RO at one or both facilities and you will make your rads decision with his, her, or their, expertise.

  • woodstock99
    woodstock99 Member Posts: 338
    edited November 2015

    Thanks for the info. I will try to connect with BS2 on Monday just to give her a heads up but plan to do both procedures on Tuesday.

  • april485
    april485 Member Posts: 3,257
    edited November 2015

    Hi Balthus, I just wanted to reassure you about your genetic information and how it can and can't be used legally. There is a law that protects you. It is known as the "Gina" law. You can read more about it here- I hope this helps and please know that we support you and you can ask any questions and someone will help you if they can.

    http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/gina.cfm

Categories