Must biopsies be done?

Options
Nammo
Nammo Member Posts: 8
edited November 2015 in Waiting for Test Results

I am scheduled for 3 biopsies next week. Two by Ultrasound and one stereotactic (hollow tube used). I am absolutely petrified because I'm reading in the news biopsies have been responsible for spreading the cancer. Will a surgeon do mastectomies without doing biopsies first? Does anyone out there know? I haven't talked to anyone. My own doctor is on vacation and I got a referral to a big hospital in Seattle, but I have to wait a week for the biopsies to be done. According to my ultrasound and mammograms I have a 2-3 cm tumor with lymph node mets. If they know that, isn't it better just to have a mastectomy and not bother with biopsies? Thanks for any info!

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2015

    Hi Nammo, sorry you have to be here but glad you are asking questions as you will need to get as much info as possible to assist your med team with your treatment. My thought is that the biopsy is necessary because how else would they know whether it is really cancer and not just a benign cyst/tumor/whatever? I would think no surgeon would go ahead with mastectomy when the possibility exists that it is not cancer. Please be careful with what you find on 'Dr Google'. Others may be along to give you more accurate information regarding your question as this is just my own thinking on it.

    HUGS

  • 614
    614 Member Posts: 851
    edited November 2015

    Dear Nammo:

    Biopsies cannot spread cancer.  That is absolutely false information.  Do not worry about that.

    You must have the biopsies so that the doctor will know what kind of cancer that you have.  Tx decisions cannot be made without this information.  No doctor will do a mastectomy without a biopsy first.  After the biopsy, they will usually order an MRI.

    Make an appointment with a medical oncologist as soon as possible after the biopsies so that the MO can explain everything to you and set up a plan for tx for you.

    Good luck.  I am hoping that the waiting and wondering does not cause you too much stress and anxiety.  I hope that they caught your cancer at an early stage.  I am sending you positive thoughts, prayers, and hugs.  It is very scary.

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited November 2015

    The only way cancer and the type can be confirmed is via biopsies. It is very important to know what type of BC you might be dealing with as the TX (treatment) plans vary with the type. 80% of biopsies do not show any type of BC. MMmos and US show areas of concern but do not diagnosis IDC, DCIS, ILC or IBC.

    Again enlarged nodes do not automatically mean 'mets'/metasis.

    No - a competent surgeon will not just do surgery without more information (ie biopsies).


  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2015

    614, did I give incorrect info? I thought the biopsy was to first determine malignancy or benign? Yep, my brain does not always function properly. Thanks!

  • zayb
    zayb Member Posts: 83
    edited November 2015

    In 2009, I had a biopsy/mastectomy scheduled at the same time. We were nearly certain that I had cancer via mammography and ultrasound so the surgeon agreed to this. They did an excisional biopsy, waited for the preliminary path results while I was on the table, and when cancer was confirmed proceeded with the mastectomy. Had cancer not been confirmed, the surgery would have ended with an excisional biopsy. I realize that this is uncommon, but given the likelihood of cancer, I appreciated the surgeon's willingness to do everything in one surgery. At that time I was diagnosed with triple negative, multi-focal, but no nodal involvement or lymphatic invasion even though the tumor, with the dcis included, took up the entire upper outer quadrant of my left breast.

  • zayb
    zayb Member Posts: 83
    edited November 2015

    PS. I know it is scary, but waiting a week for the biopsy is not a long time. If the biopsy comes back positive for cancer, they won't make you wait a long time to move forward with a treatment plan.

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited November 2015

    All biopsies do not require surgery - there are FNBs that are only 'needles' being inserted in the nodes of concern or areas of concern.

    There is no ' One Size Fits All' with us at individually or with all types of BC.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited November 2015

    There are at least two scenarios where it is important to not only establish that you do indeed have breast cancer, but also to have the biopsy in advance of surgery to determine what kind of breast cancer you have, because of the potential need for chemotherapy prior to surgery.  In the case of triple negative breast cancer - where the estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and Her2 are all negative - neoadjuvent chemo is often given to make sure the chosen regimen is having the desired effect.  The only way to see this is to leave the mass(es) intact and measure them throughout the course of chemo to see them becoming smaller.  If the chosen drug regimen is not working you then have the option of switching to another regimen.  If the cancer had been removed prior to chemo, you would never know if the regimen you are receiving actually works.  Because there is no adjuvant (post-surgical) systemic therapy for this type of breast cancer it is very important to determine that chemo is working.  The other scenario is for a cancer that is Her2+.  A cancer of 2cm or greater, or node positive, is eligible for the targeted therapy drug Perjeta.  This drug is approved in early stage cancer for neoadjuvent (before surgery) use, and is combined with Herceptin, Taxotere and Carboplatin, usually.  If you do have breast cancer of this size, and/or are node positive, it may be very beneficial to receive this newer drug to treat this aggressive form of breast cancer.

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    Patoo, thanks so much for your input! Believe me, it is reassuring. I was an RN in Critical care for 25 years, and so I am very careful not to even check out Dr. Google! But the biopsy thing frightened me as the idea of a needle going in and out in several places made me wonder if that's the best route but it looks like biopsies are still necessary so I will do it I guess to get the answers we need. Thanks so much for responding so quickly as I needed this tonight. I am grateful to you!

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    Thanks 614! Your info was reassuring to me. Sometimes we just have to let go of control and do what's necessary to get answers. I don't like the idea of a needle going in and out many times in the areas of question, but maybe I just don't have a choice. Thanks so much for a quick reply as I needed it! Best to you!

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    Zayb, thanks so much for your input! It has been very helpful to me. The excisional bx sounds way better, but I believe in my case they wouldn't go for it as I have some calcium deposits near my armpit and a swollen lymph node that they also want to examine. So, guess I need to relinquish some control in order to get some answers. Thanks again and my best to you!

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    SD, thanks so much for your input as well as all the others who quickly responded! I can only hope the swollen node doesn't mean mets but I guess I will need to do those biopsies to know for sure. I am grateful for your input. The best to you!

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited November 2015

    Nammo-

    We just wanted to pop in and welcome you to the community. As you can see by the feedback you've gotten, this is a very knowledgeable and supportive group!

    Good luck on your biopsies, we'll be thinking of you.

    The Mods

  • zayb
    zayb Member Posts: 83
    edited November 2015

    I did have a lymph node dissection at my mastectomy, both (mastectomy and lymph node dissection) immediately followed an excisional biopsy that confirmed the presence of cancer. So i had all my surgeries done in one event, but only after the biopsy confirmed cancer. All my lymph nodes looked normal on ultrasound and i think the original plan was to do a sentinel lymph node biopsy but the surgeon saw an enlarged lymph node up the chain and ended up removing 13 lymph nodes, none of which were cancerous.

    My understanding is that neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo therapy are equally effective. The oncologist who treated my triple negative was reluctant to use neoadjuvant because he said this approach does not work for about 20%/of women, many of whom experience disease progression. I know it is a minority of people but still something to consider. I thought one of the benefits of removing the cancer first was the reduction of the tumor burden, which in turn made dd regimens more effective.

    Even in the 6 .5 years since I was diagnosed with my first primary, there is so much more information, even about triple negative!


    In any case, it is important to have a biopsy so you know what you are dealing with and can move forward with a treatment plan should your biopsy show cancer.


    Best of luck.

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited November 2015

    Nammo biopsies do not cause the cancer to spread! I believe what you are referring to is that there seems to be a slight increase in areas where benign masses were removed or biopsied. That actually happened to me. I had a fibroadenoma removed 30 years ago and now have a IDC in the exact same spot. They are still doing studies but again it's not the biopsies that cause the cancer to spread. You must have the biopsies to know exactly what the masses are so you can then go ahead and make treatment decisions. Good luck. Keep us posted...

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    Have to admit I have no idea what neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemo is, nor triple negative. Can you explain? Thanks!

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited November 2015

    nammo -  neoadjuvent is chemo before surgery, adjuvant is chemo after surgery, and triple negative means that you are estrogen & progesterone receptor negative (no receptors on your breast cells - so the cancer is not feuled by hormones), and Her2 negative (meaning the cancer does not have an overexpression of the Her2 gene).  When you are negative for hormonal receptors there is no anti-hormonal therapy to take after chemo and surgery to help you, and if you are Her2 negative there is no targeted therapy to take either.  This limits your options to surgery, chemo and radiation.  One of the reasons to do neoadjuvent chemo with triple negative is to tell whether or not the chemo is working against the tumor - if it is not, the regimen can be changed.  If you have surgery first you have no way of knowing whether the chemo works because the tumor is already removed.  The flip side is what zayb mentioned - if the chemo doesn't work it takes a while to figure that out and the cancer may grow in the meantime, but you also have the option of having surgery then, and resuming chemo with another regimen afterward.  I do have a TN friend that did this - the chemo was working but having a negative effect on healing of her SNB incision and port incision, so she stopped and had a BMX, then resumed with a different chemo afterward.

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited November 2015

    Neoadjuvant. Hemo iz done before surgery and adjuvant is done after surgery. It is standard with IBC to do neoadjuvant chemo to get it to shrink and form in a 'lump' with margins as it forms as a 'nest' or in 'bands'. It is becoming more common to do neoadjuvant Chemo with other types also. Sometimes 2 different Chemo will be done neoadjuvant but for some of us we do both neoadjuvant and adjuvant. I did 4 DD A/C neoadjuvant and 12 weekly Taxol adjuvant followed by radiation.

    Triple negative means your cancer was negative for ER, PR and HER2. So estrogen blockers and/or herceptrin are not needed.

  • zayb
    zayb Member Posts: 83
    edited November 2015

    Kicks, that is what I understood too, always neoadjuvant for IBC. I have also heard of people doing chemo both before and after surgery. I have even read in a few places that people are doing neoadjuvant anti-hormonals. As people said, triple negative is negative for estrogen, progesterone and her2, typically very aggressive with no targeted therapy. I had triple negative successfully treated 6.5 years ago. I recently had a single (1/21) node removed from my other side that is highly er/PR positive and her2 neg. Either an occult or something related to/ residual the dcis I had on that side. Just started chemo for the node that was removed with all the others on the right, even though we were not able to do any oncotype testing on it.

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited November 2015

    Yes - with IBC neoadjuvant is the first line of TX. Most will do 2 batches of different Chemo neoadjuvant but a few of us don't. A few of us will do 1 batch neoadjuvant (for me 4 DD A/C), surgery, then a batch adjuvant (for me 12 weekly Taxol) and then radiation (started rads a week after last Taxol and Femara a week after starting rads. This is different than most do but it worked for me apparently - 6 yrs and still NED so it worked for me.

  • Nammo
    Nammo Member Posts: 8
    edited November 2015

    Thanks so much for the explanation. I know there is so much to read, and it's hard keeping up. I suppose I will know more after I get assigned an oncologist.

Categories