All antioxidants are not the same

Options

There have been a few mouse studies that have shown that the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) leads to cancer progression in different kinds of cancers (lung, melanoma) by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreasing expression of P53.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/15100...

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24477002

There was also a study showing high doses of folic acid (which also acts as an antioxidant) could drive existing breast cancer growth. But other studies showed folic acid could reduce the risk of getting cancer in the first place.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/271601.ph...

So, the thought is that antioxidants might by good in preventing cancer by mopping up free radicals, including ROS's, but once you have cancer, they interfere with processes by which ROS's kill cancer.

But there was a 10 year study following women who had breast cancer (LACE), that found that frequent users of vitamins C and E (antioxidants) had decreased chance of recurrence, and frequent users of vitamin E had lower risk of all-cause mortality. On the other had frequent users of combination carotenoids (also antioxidants) had higher risk of death from BC and higher all-cause mortality.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21953120

And I just saw a study on the components of turmeric and lemongrass oil (both antioxidants), that showed that, in vitro, they (alone and synergistically) generated ROS and activated p53 to cause apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Which is the opposite of what NAC did!

http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4048/jbc.2015.18.3.225&vmode=PUBREADER

Which makes me think we need to be very careful about treating antioxidants as a single entity, when there are real differences in how they function.


Comments

Categories