Still waiting to move forward? I want to hear from you!
A friend sent me the NYT article about Dr. Laura Esserman, UCSF, a prominent breast surgeon who believes that in many cases, doctors rush too quickly to perform lumpectomies and radiation or mastectomies after the discovery of DCIS. I had a limited lumpectomy on September 14, after numerous imaging studies (mammograms, ultrasound, stereoscopic biopsy, MRI, additional manmograms before surgery). At the end of the week, the nurse from surgeon's office called and said I had DCIS that would definitely turn into breast cancer. The doctor wanted me back for surgery in two to three weeks. After about a week, I started to feel uneasy. Something didn't feel right. So, I joined this board and starting to talking with family, friends, healthcare professionals that I know and trust. It is now October 4, and the surgeon never called to discuss the pathology report with me or to provide surgical options. I had to research the topic of DCIS myself and figure out the options. After prodding from the patient care coordinator for breast health at the hospital where I had the first surgery, the surgeon had the appointment setter call to set up an appointment with me. I declined the offer, saying that I was not well, that my mother was dying from metastatic breast cancer, and that I wanted to get a second opinion (I never got a first opinion). I heard about a doctor at a big university hospital about four hours from where I live who has a spectacular reputation, and I thought about making the big trip to see him. Then, I read about Dr. Esserman, and I thought about flying across country to San Francisco to meet with her. I have yet to see my pathology report. I am going to pick it up at the hospital on Tuesday.
None of my images showed any indication of invasive breast cancer. The nurse who called did not mention invasive breast cancer. I am sure she would have brought up the topic as it would have been a great selling point to get me in quickly for surgery. So, I am certain that my pathology report showed DCIS with no invasive breast cancer. The doctor said he took a large tissue sample (I could not even see a difference in my breast!), and from that big tissue sample, the pathologists did not find invasive breast cancer. I realize that many people turn out to have invasive breast cancer intermingled with DCIS cells, and that some people have invasive breast cancer in other areas of their breasts that is only discovered after a mastectomy. Still, I am really starting to have an issue with the idea of jumping on the operating room table when nobody can show me any proof that I have invasive breast cancer. At first, I was inclined to have a mastectomy and then a double mastectomy. I definitely don't want to go through radiation for a host of issues. I don't mind the idea of taking several medications as opposed to breast surgery. My mother took tamoxifin for years, and she still looks great at 85. She never looked like an old crone.
I have a friend of 40 years whose niece is a top tier breast surgeon. She told me her niece is brilliant and very conservative. In other words, she would not rush the patient to surgery without good reason. After I get the pathology report, my friend is going to send the report to her niece and ask for her opinion. My friend was a former professor of mine, and we have remained friends since I was in college, in the olden days.
So, am I being recalcitrant and hard-headed for no reason? I would like to hear from other people who took their time, who got second and third and maybe fourth opinions, who talked to friend, family, and healthcare providers they respected before making a decision. When did you feel you had sufficient information to make a decision? How long did you wait? Are you still waiting? Your stories and collective knowledge are vital to helping me understand how to navigate this very complicated subject.
Comments
-
I also have DCIS and have done my fair share of reading. I am choosing a BMX due to a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancers, but I have read over and over and over again that DCIS is stage zero, it may or may not ever develop into anything invasive, and if it does develop into something invasive, it's a slow process. I have read that those of us blessed with DCIS are also blessed with time...time to research, time for consultations, time to make decision, and even time to change our minds. Get several opinions and you'll know what is ultimately right for YOU!
-
Hi, Trichick1964,
Thank you for writing. I am sorry to hear that you are high risk for breast cancer due to your family history. Although my mother has breast cancer and now metastatic breast cancer in her bones and liver, I understand from reading and from what others have told me on this site that it is unlikely that I am high risk. My mother probably has breast cancer due to being given high doses of diethylstilberol (DES) during pregnancy. That gave her a 30 percent increased risk of breast cancer over a typical woman. I only have a 2 percent extra risk from being exposed to DES in utero. So, unless I have genetic tests that reveal a genetic risk for breast cancer, I am not high risk. And, it is possible that I have the genetic risk factor, as we may have hidden Jewish roots , but I have not yet been diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, and I am 60 years old now.
So, I know that Dr. Esserman is very controversial but I still think she is raising some very important viewpoints. There is apparently a Time magazine article today on the topic under discussion. I am going to post the link if I can find it. What really bothers me is that the surgeon's nurse called at on Fridayafter I had a limited lumpectomy on Monday (excisional surgical biopsy) and told me that I have DCIS that will definitely turn into breast cancer. It was a scare tactic that I think was designed to get me on the surgical table for the second time in three weeks. I am putting the brakes on everything to plan for the best and worst case scenarios. If I had reacted in fear, I might have had surgical complications that would have placed me in debt for the rest of my life. After joining this site and talking to friends, family, and healthcare providerers I trust, I have determined that taking action too quickly on a DCIS diagnosis unless there is clear evidence of invasive cancer cells intermingled with the DCIS cells, and rapid treatment without understanding the facts can have lifelong personal and financial effects on a woman and her family. I am going to take out an expensive supplemental policy before I do anything major. Just one unexpected development such as the need for chemo and radiation after a mastectomy could lead to thousands and thousands of dollars in medical bills, enough to sink a woman on a limited income.
-
Hi Decisonfreak, the one good thing about DCIS is that you have time to get second and even third opinions which you should most definitely do. I don't think you are being recalcitrant at all (love that word btw!) by advocating for yourself.
My take on this is that the very least you should do would be to get it out of your breast. Period.
Why would you take a chance that it could morph into invasive down the road, even a small chance when you can get it out and get it into pathology for confirmation of grade, size etc.?
If that is all you decide to do, then that is up to you and at least you will know they took it out. Make no mistake about it. These are MALIGNANT cells we are talking about. There is absolutely no way to know which will morph that last step and which won't thus the lumpectomy or mastectomy surgery.
Of course, that is my opinion only but I think most doctors also feel this way. Dr. Esserman, while a pioneer is definitely in the minority.
-
DecisionFreak! I would jump on the chance to send your pathology report to your friend's niece or to go to the top-notch hospital 4 hours a way. You can also request additional slides to be made from your tissue and sent for pathology second opinions. I would hesitate to jump on that plane though, because - who would do your "watchful waiting" into the future, if you could get an appt with Dr. E and that was her recommendation? Perhaps there is a physician at that big hospital 4 hours away who would help you with that. If I were you, I would read your pathology report carefully (I can't believe it has been kept from you so long!) the features I would focus on are the grade and whether the cells were er + or -. The grade indicates how quickly the cells are multiplying and how different they are from normal cells. I think the movement to avoid "over treating" DCIS concerns the lower grades, 1 and 2. Personally, if I had Grade 3 (again) - which as far as doctors know today, is the most likely to further mutate into cells capable of being invasive, I would opt to go back in for further surgery if my initial lumpectomy left me with a positive margin. I would also consider more surgery if my pathology report showed that the DCIS cells were er- because I would not have the tamoxifen or AI option. If your cells are Grade 1 or 2 and perhaps verified by a second opinion by another pathologist - I would seriously discuss with a doctor who is open to such a discussion - watchful waiting.
I agree with you that the genetic testing at your age (I was 59 when diagnosed) is silly if the only bc in your family is your mother. I would like to correct you on the Jewish gene thing. BRCA1 and 2 might be associated with being Jewish, but it is not exclusively a Jewish gene and there are other genes and syndromes connecting breast cancer to other types of cancer and which run in families - however, it doesn't sound like your family has a history of cancer - and if you don't have children, those are other reasons to rule out the need for/distraction of genetic testing.
-
Hi, everybody,
I picked up the pathology and other reports today and spent hours reviewing them. I will get into that topic later.
Jelsen, thank you for providing accurate information on genetic risk factors in families. I do not know much about BRCA1 and 2 or other cancers that run in families, so it is good to make sure that readers on this site have correct information.
april485, you make some good points! Let me address them, and please do be patient with me. I had a excisional surgical biopsy on September 14, and I picked up the pathology report today, so I have the benefit of now having a nice collection of data on my condition. On September 18, the surgeon's office called and said I had DCIS that would definitely turn into cancer and that I needed a second surgery. That would mean two surgeries in three weeks, but the surgeon never called to tell me what he was planning to do or to go over the pathology report findiings with me. From that i have read, when they hear that they have DCIS, most women throw the decision into the doctor's lap and then rush to have lumpectomy and surgery or surgery within several weeks. Many women think that if they get the affected tissue taken out and treated by radiation or if they take off the breast that they are finished and can get back to their lives. I was first inclined to do the same thing, and I thought maybe I should go ahead and have one or maybe both breasts removed. Then, I came to my senses and decided to wait and get the facts. I cancelled the surgery until I could gather more information.I wil get into that information later. It turns out that having a breast removed is major surgery with potential life-long consequences that can be serious. I discussed this option today with my general practitioner, who is a brilliant doctor that will only be in my city for a brief time. He pointed out that I could die from cancer, but I could also die on the operating room table. I have multiple health conditions that are cripping. I have suffered from these conditions for a long time, and I am going to consider carefully the impact of having one or two breasts removed. I do think the decision-making in regards to DCIS is very complicated, and I don't blame any woman in the world from doing what makes her feel the most secure about her future. I don't have children, so what I decide will mainly affect me. I have definitely seen the word malignant in reference to DCIS cells, and it is confusing to me. DCIS consists of non-invasive breast tissue. Depending on the grade, DCIS cells can grow slowly or they can grow quickly. I am not sure why they are malignant, but I am going to do some research to see if I can figure it out. Even if you have surgery or lumpectomy or surgery, it is possible that there will be invasive cells left behind that were undetected. It is possible to remove the breast and still have a re-occurance of the same cancer or the development of a new primary cancer where the breast was before removed. So, I admit to not knowing very much, and I am on a fact-finding mission. Based on the pathology and other reports have read from a wealth of imaging studies done on my heavily studied right breast, I think that there is plenty of time to talk to friends, family members, healthcare providers, and cancer patients on all stages of the disease spectrum.
Jelsen, I have low grade DCIS (grade 1 out of 3). The tumor stage is pTisNX. The tissue reveals estrogen positive and progesterone positive cells. All of the radiology reports, including a report of an image of biopsied tissue taken post-surgery, recommend that I have another mammogram at six months to confirm stability. In addition to DCIS, the pathology report found some cellular changes related especially to my fibrocystic breast disease. I agree that it would be a good idea to get a second opinion on the pathology report and to send the slides to another pathologist for review and interpretation. I have typed out the main portions of the speciman description, the pathology report, the hormone receptor study, along with statements from the imaging reports, and sent them to a friend of mine who has forwarded them to her niece who is a breast cancer surgeon in Virginia with a superb reputation. My main question to her is whether or not I need to rush right away to meet with a breast surgeon and schedule surgery? I don't know what she will say. I am not an expert. I may be very uninformed, but I still don't understand why I was told that I had DCIS cells that would definitely turn into cancer and that I needed surgery immediately.
Jelsen, I called the University of California, San Francisco and spoke with the woman who sets appointments with Dr. Esserman. It is possible to meet with her, although it can sometimes take a few months or longer. I would prefer to stay closer to home as opposed to make a cross country trip. Yes, I know that some people on this board intensely disagree with Dr. Esserman. I have not read everything that she is has said, and I know that some who are reading my post know a great deal more than I do about Dr. Esserman, but I still hold to my original feeling that she makes some valid points. She is fanning the flames of a very important discussion that we need to have in America. Heck, in the state where I live, women are being told in the local newspaper that they need to start mammograms at age 40 when the U.S. Preventive Service said in 2009 that women should start mammograms at age 50 because the benefits of starting at age 40 are unproven. Breast tissue is very dense before the age of 50. I think I started having annual mammograms on a regular basis at age 58, not recommended or wise, but I had to wait for reasons that go beyond this discussion.
Jelsen, I have been fortunate to have been referred to a highly qualified surgical oncologist at the university four miles from where I live who has said she is willing to discuss the full range of options with me. It is possible with the report showing hormone positive receptor cells for both estrogen and progesterone that I could take prescription drug such as Tamoxifen and return for a mammogram in six months to see if the situation has remained stable, as the radiologist repeatedly recommended. I don't reject the idea of having surgery if it is clearly warranted. What I do reject is telling women that they require lumpectomy and surgery or mastectomy without discussing in depth the evidence that supports the need for surgery and telling the woman ALL of the possible option. But, that is me, and I have always done things differently than other people. I have rarely regretted my decisions, but I am not saying that I always make great decisions.
I never dreamed when I went in to have a mammogram of a little lump the size of a piece of sand that I find myself in this situation. The radiologist could not find the image of the little lump on the mammogram or ultrasound, but he found atypical cells instead. All of the radiologist's statements that interpret the host of images and imaging studies done before and after the stereotactic biopsy and before and after the excisional needle biopsy steadfastly hold to the interpretation that I had an abnormal mammogram. Period.
-
While you could elect to go with just hormone-blocker treatment, I'm not sure we know enough, right now, for that. This is just my opinion. If you have DCIS cells, I would get them removed. Period. Radiation, hormonal-blockers, etc., is another question, after. While there is a school of thought that says "watch and wait" with DCIS, I do not believe we are there, yet I am deeply upset that we are not, as, though I am happy about my lumpectomy, I have reservations about the rads I had; just had to go with the numbers, at the time. If you have DCIS, we do not yet know which will progress, and which will not, It's about risk-tolerence. I would have lumpectomy, and then think long and hard about future treatment. For example, I had the lumpectomy (which revealed a microinvasion) and rads, but elected to NOT have the hormone-blockers, as my recurrence chance was so low. I get what you are saying about the no kids. I have kids, but they are well-grown, so my decisions were all about me. Best. - P.
-
Decisionfreak My advice is to get to the closest university based teaching hospital. Where we get treated is a huge component of this process. Take your time and do lots of research. Don't let anyone rush your decision. Personally I would never use a doc that didn't go over my biopsy report and treatment options in great length. Good luck...
-
percy4, kayb and dtad,
Wow, thank you all for very thoughtful replies. I contacted a very prominent surgaical oncologist by email a few days ago and explained my situation and asked for help locating a surgeon in my state at a big teaching school.See the next paragraph for additional information. For anyone on this board reading this post, do know that there are many doctors out there in high level teaching jobs, especially at medical schools and universities that receive Federal monies, who will help you if you can find their email and write them. In many cases, it is surprisingly easy to find the email addresses. In fact, many doctors at these teaching institutions may have a civic duty to serve the general public and they will most often reply to an email if they are taking Federal dollars for clinical studies. Many are actually interested in your situation, and some are looking for patients to join their clinical trials. It costs nothing to write a polite email asking for help.
The very well known surgeon I wrote kindly took an interest in my case and went ahead and contacted a highly qualified surgical oncologist in my state at a university-based teaching hospital about four hours from where I live. That doctor has agreed to meet with me to discuss ALL of the options and to work with me in a cooperative/collaborative way. As for the surgeon that did the limited lumpectomy (excisional needle) biopsy, I am washing my hands of him. He did a decent job in extracting the large sample, although it appears that the samples were unoriented, and I want another pathologist to review the slides from the tissue sample. I agree that the surgeon fell down gravely on the job in communicating with me, and I think it was irresponsible for him to have his nurse call me, as she clearly did not know how to explain the medical information in an accurate manner. I wish I could run around this small town and tell everybody I know to avoid the surgeon. If someone asked me about him, I would tell the truth. However, telling my story would risk my making an enemy. In a relatively small town, there are serious consequences to publically criticizing a doctor.
So, I would like an informal poll here. Dear readers, would you let the surgeon know in person why you decided to find another doctor for the job? I would be glad to pay the $29.00 co-pay and sit down with the surgeon and tell him face-to face- why I put a sudden halt to his doing the surgury. In other words, I would clearly explain what his office did that made me go in search of answers. I might have to bring a friend with me to keep from blowing my stack. In fact, I refused an appointment with the doctor after the patient care coordinator finally called his office and explained that she thought I needed to speak with him in person to go over the pathology report. I refused the appointment because I really did think that I might have a meltdown, and it would not have been a pretty sight. I am calmer now that I understand more about my diagnosis than I did two weeks ago. I am frankly glad his nurse screwed up so badly, as I believe that it has led me to a situation where I will get better care than I would have gotten AND I will have one of the best informed surgeons in the U.S. at a major teaching university.
I am not sure about the size of the tumor. I don't know the full size of the lesion because the surgeon did not manage in the limited lumpectomy to remove all of the DCIS cells. I will keep in mind that I may need another procedure to remove the rest of the cells. I am afraid it may be too large to avoid having radiation, and that would leave me with having a mastectomy. I have serious health problems, and my mother is rapidly declining due to metastatic breast cancer that is slowly but surely draining her life out of her body. I will pull up the path report that I transcribed and include the size of the tissue sample removed in my next post. The tissue samples from a limited lumpectomy showed no microinvasion, and the surgeon sent a large cell sample for the study. The cells were either close to the margins or apparently reached the marginsbut the path report is confusing about the margins. I don't know the size of the lesion because they haven't taken all of the cells out yet. I had to stop and catch my breath and do some research before it was too late for me to make an informed decision.
kayb, it is a difficult decision. The surgeon at the teaching university has agreed to work with me in response to the direct request from the very well known surgical oncologist that contacted her on my behalf. I think that means she might be willing to go along with the watch and wait or active surveillance process or perhaps some modification that deviates from the accepted standard of care. I am a risk taker by nature. It is a trait not frequently found in a woman. I have walked the streets of major cities at night by myself. I worked in a major metropolitan area for nearly 18 years, and I often stepped out to the curb to hail a taxi at 2:00 a.m. because I was working late. I never married. I got very sick and decided to refuse IV antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. I am still struggling with Lyme and the horrendous pain from fibromyalgia that may be the result of chronic Lyme disease but I do not regret the decision to ditch a Lyme doctor who pressured me to have in IV line placed in my chest for antibiotic therapy that would have made her rich. At the time, it seemed like an unwise decision, but now, I think I made the correct decision. IV therapies are now being used in the most resistant Lyme cases, and combination oral therapies with rotation have proven in many cases more effective than single dose IV therapies. Yesterday, one of my doctors offered to work with me on a combination therapy that might at least push the Lyme way back and reduce the symptoms I am having.
My situation is that I have a mother dying from metastatic breast cancer, a brother who cannot work and who has lost significant mobility from a diabetic foot infection that took one-third of his foot along with my own horrendous and disabling pain from fibromyalgia and most likely Lyme disease and/or other co-infections. I also have severe anxiety and ADHD and live on a limited income. I was once a high level professional with a great income and a wonderful life. Now, I am disabled, and the idea of going through cancer surgery and all the personal and financial tolls that this surgery entails are nearly overwhelming. I am fortunate to have a shrink that wrote me a full dose prescription for Naltrexone, a drug used to treat alcoholics. He is giving it to me in hopes of shutting down the pain mechanism entrenched in my body that causes my nerves and tendons to freeze into clusters and pull on my nerves which then send out constant pain signals through my body. His treatment is outside the standard of care, but I promised not to sue him. It carries a remote risk of liver damage, but my liver and kidneys are in great shape, and the doctors can monitor my live and kidney function carefully. Now, with the burden that I am carrying, I am simply unsure that I want my body to be assaulted at this moment by a mastectomy. In my situation, radiation is simply out of the question.
So, I may choose a less traveled path and live as long as I live. I am really not sure what I plan to do. I am going to meet with the surgeon at the teaching university and ask her to discuss ALL of the possible options with me. Then, I will make some kind of decision. It may not be an ultimate decision. Everybody says that I some time. I don't have years, but I have some time to think about all of what has happened.
-
I entirely understand all you have said, and I empathize. Along the way, I had some great docs and some clueless ones. In my opinion, making an appt. and letting the one doc know why you will not be keeping him is a waste of your very valuable energy. He probably won't change. As far as I have seen, clueless docs (nurses) are clueless, and letting them know why is an exercise in nothing. Please use your energy to engage with the better docs you will find along your path. It's about you, not them. With love - P.
-
Hey, percy4,
I think you travel around this site being a guardian angel for kind souls in danger of sinking into quicksand. I somehow got in trouble with one of my brother's doctors, and I will never know what happened. All I know is that my brother went into to meet with his surgeon, and the doctor threw a paper at him and made him sign it. My brother had to agree that I would not be able to call the doctor's office, would not be able to talk to my brother's nurse, would not be able to obtain any information about my brother's treatment. Why? I don't know. I may have repeated a funny story that I heard about the surgeon to a vindictive person who then told the surgeon. I am not certain but that awful person may work for one of the home health agencies that I had to fire because 1) the nurse released my brother from care saying he was in great shape while failing to turn over his foot and make a note in the files that he had gangrene 2) the nurses failed to notice that my mother was losing too much weight to quickly and had started to look like a concentration camp victim and failed to suggest that my mother take an appetite stimulent. So, I had to fire the agency, and I may have told the story to someone at the agency. This is a small town. We have an okay home health agency now (I think they are massive scams, but we need the agency in case my mother gets sick since I live out in the country with my mother and brother) now, and the current nurse asked me the name of the doctor who was in my opinion regligent. I said I didnt want to say and she begged me,and I told her. She drew in a sharp breath and said that the surgeon had done quite a few operations on her family members. She is a very nice person, the nurse, and I made her promise that she would not spread negative information about the doctor because I don't want yet another doctor in the same practice group angry at me. In the meantime, I called the business office of my brother's doctor the other day, and I said that my brother had gotten a weird notice threatening him. I said that I paid the bills, and that the doctor had forbidden me from calling the office. So, the business office person said the notice was a mistake, but she said my brother had to come in and sign new paperwork in order for her to speak with me. And, to end this silly story, the surgeon had coerced my brother into signing the other paper because it was a day before my brother's surgery to remove the rest of his toes and big part of his right foot from a diabetic infection. Now, since the surgery is over, my brother is going to sign new paperwork saying that I am approved to receive informationn about his case. Again, this is a small town, but I will report the surgeon to the State Medical Board if he ever tries to coerce my brother again before a surgical procedure. My brother couldn't run the day before surgery to get another doctor but I think we may take him to the university teaching hospital if he requires any more surgery. So, I get what you are saying about the surgeon who was supposed to do my breast surgery. It is not worth the time and effort to try and straighten him out. Still, there is a part of me that would like to make him very uncomfortable for 40 minutes - the time that Medicare allows for an office visit. At the very least, maybe I will sent him him a polite note saying that I decided to have the surgery performed at a major teaching hospital where I would receive in-depth counseling from the surgeon about all of the options available to me. I have a very fine literary background with significant study as a writer, and it would be satisfying to use some well chosen words to deliver a biting sting. A waste of time? Maybe. There has to be a story in here that I can tell to make some money to pay my medical bills.
-
Decision Freak
I am in a situation similar to yours. I have DCIS stage 0 Grade 1. Pretty minor as far as cancer goes. The diagnosis is based on 2 mammograms (the initial regular screening, and then an additional extended diagnostic mammogram) an ultrasound, and a stereotactic needle biopsy. I have not gotten an excisional biopsy, as you have. I do not know my ER status because the hospital that did the needle biopsy did not run the test. I had all of my records, including the biopsy slides, sent to 3 other institutions for another opinion. The 3rd institution is the number 2 cancer center in the country. ( I live in New York State where #2 is located, #1 is in Texas). All 3 doctors agree that I at least need a lumpectomy to take out the DCIS region. (and to run the ER/PR test on the tissue, check for co-mingled invasive cancer, and check the margins). I discussed the work of Drs. Laura Esserman and Shelly Hwang with all 3 doctors. And they all pretty much had the same response. They said that Drs. Esserman and Hwang are raising important questions, and are initiating clinical trials to test their theories, which, after several years and many repetitions will give us the hard data we need going forward to know which women can watch and wait, and which can't. But we don't have this information yet, because no one has completed any long term clinical trials yet. So the DCIS pre cancerous lesion may or may not turn into invasive cancer, and because we don't know if it will or not, surgery to remove it is the standard procedure. I suspect that if you do go to San Francisco you would be enrolled in a clinical trial, where you would probably have to sign consent forms acknowledging the treatment you were receiving was experimental. I don't think any competent doctor will consent to monitoring alone outside of a formal clinical trial.
Having said that, I am still as undecided as you are. I am scheduled for a lumpectomy next week and I am seriously considering cancelling. I'm having a difficult time getting comfortable with the decision to have the surgery. But foregoing surgery outside of a clinical trial would probably mean I'm on my own, without the benefit of medical monitoring to catch an invasive cancer, if it formed, at inception, before it spread too far. The lack of hard data is maddening.
-
P.S. to my last reply. Is there a National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center in your state? You can search for one on the link below:
http://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-centers/find
-
Yes, there is a National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center in my state. That is at the major medical center and teaching university whereI am going for my care. The pathology report for the limited lumpectomy was indeterminate in my opinion.
Some doctors take out the affected cells without doing radiation. At least, I think they do, but I may be wrong. The limited lumpectomy was okay, but the path report said the tissue samples were un-oriented, and the margins were close. It said that the samples with cauterized and inked edges MIGHT go out to the edges. I think that some sloppy work was performed. Actually, I may post the substantive portions of the pathology report and ask for responses.
There was no invasive cancer in my samples. There were no distinct lesions in my sample. I was estrogen/progesterone positive. I will probably have another surgery to see if the new surgeon can remove the remaining cells, but I am going to wait until I have supplemental insurance because the doctors are breaking the bank in my case. They have run me into the ground already to the tune of $800. When I go to the new surgeon at the teaching hospital, she will send out the slides of the biopsied tissue to another pathologist for a second opinion. I am not convinced that the first opinion is competent. I have become extremely cynical of the medical profession. Doctors are making a killing from gold digging in our breast tissues. I understand they are saving lives, yes, but I want to make sure that in my case the surgeon who collects my tissue and has is analyzed is giving me an accurate idea of the problem. I am not convinced that I got an accurate interpretation of the tissue samples.
So, look for a new post with the path report. I would be curious to hear what other people have to say about it. There are some very sharp people on this board.
I am not going to sit on my hands and do nothing. I simply want to know that I am making an informed decision.
I am going to donate some money to this organization running this board. It is one of the best health sites that I have ever visited. The people who participate in this board - those with cancer who has been through the stages - are doing important and merciful work to respond to those of us who are struggling with major decisions.
I don't know the size of your lesion. I was under the impression that if the lesion is small and low grade that sometimes the surgeon will remove it and do nothing else except recommend regular mammograms. Am I incorrect? Can anyone tell me?
-
The path report is vital. I did have an outside pathologist look at mine, for $700 (worth it). Dr. Michael Lagios. You can Google him. Women have their actual tissue samples, in addition to the scans on CD and written reports from you doc, sent to him from their hospitals from all over the world (he is in SF). I did not find this hard to do, and my extensive written path report from him, in addition to the hour-long phone appt. with him (where I could ask anything) were invaluable to me. You can also email him more questions, for free, in the future. In my case, he did concur that I should have rads, because my margins were clear but close, and also because I had a microinvasion. But mostly because of close margins with the DCIS (NOT the micro; that was right in the middle). He is basically the DCIS expert, for many years, since DCIS was even known about. My HMO breast surgeon and MO had to admit that this was true, and they were interested to see his report. He often flies in the face of automatic radiation and/or hormone blockers. Not in my case, but often, and he will tell you why. You can read about him. xx
-
To add. He found a larger area of DCIS (low-grade) than did my hospital pathologist. And I had had a second path opinion within my HMO, first. He was VERY clear with me that hormone-blockers were not necessary in my case (HMO was on the fence about this), and he was also able to calculate my personal recurrence chance much more closely. I am sure he can do this even with the findings I see in your path report, even though they do not definitively find DCIS. He's just good at this. It has been his life's work. This can all be done on-line, but I chose to call the office to begin the process, and ask questions. His assistant, Sheila, walked me through everything.
-
Hi, percy4,
Thanks for telling me about Michael Lagios. Well, $700 is a small fortune to me. I live in an area of the country where the cost of living is relatively low, and nobody has much money! I am on a limited income. It is a challenge for me to pay for a new supplemental insurance policy to cover additional surgery and to pay the transportation and housing expenses to travel to the teaching hospital four hours from me. Well, we'll see.
My pathology report was not extensive! It was very brief. I have posted it in this forum in a new posting. I think most of my pathology report relates to my fibrocystic breast disease, not DCIS.
So, you read my path report, yes? I thought they did definitely find DCIS based on what they said in the report. No? The nurse from the surgeon's office said they definitely found DCIS. Can you please explain?
-
"I am not going to sit on my hands and do nothing. I simply want to know that I am making an informed decision."
This is all anyone can do really. I hope you find what works for you. I just know that the one thing anyone diagnosed with DCIS should consider doing is getting it all out of the breast. Not rushing into this is fine with a grade 1 since you have lots of time. You should get at the very least a second opinion. Hugs!
Oh and to answer your question, many people have lumpectomy and are not given radiation or tamoxifen or an AI. It depends mostly on margins and pathology.
-
I just read your pathology report on the other thread and it all refers to your DCIS, except for the one paragraph regarding the incidental finding of benign cellular changes.
-
I also posted on your other thread. My interpretation of the info on the report is that your removed specimen was inked - that means it was oriented. Inking tells the pathologist and surgeon how the tissue sample was positioned when it was in the breast. I interpret the comment about the narrow margin that, because it is much more narrow at .5mm than the generallyaccepted minimal margin of 2mm, it is likely to, without examining the entire inked edge, to have DCIS cells.
-
Sorry; no, I had not read the path report in the other thread. Now I have, and see you were actually diagnosed with DCIS. I know $700 is a small fortune. To me, as well. I do hope you can find a way to come up with it. I doubt Dr. Lagios has a payment plan, but it never hurts to ask. I'd go to his website and call and talk to Sheila, if you possibly can. If not, not. I did have two other sets of eyes read my path report, within my HMO, and although they may not give the interpretation and explanations that Dr. Lagios does, I would never rely on just one pathologist. Again; I agree with SpecialK about getting the DCIS out of your breast, even if you do nothing more. Mine, from the biopsy, was low-grade DCIS. Upon lumpectomy, some intermediate DCIS and also a microinvasion were found. I applaud all of your careful questioning. I was the same way. - P.
-
If you look at my dx, you'll see I was originally diagnosed with only DCIS, AFTER lumpectomy. This was in Santa Rosa, CA. A week later, they called and told me it was found to have a microinvasion (after I had told my kids and parents there was no invasive cancer). They had sent it on to the Oakland facility to look at it more closely, without telling me. I then requested they send it on to the SF facility to be gone over again. This was all from them looking more closely at ONE slide. I really do wonder how many women out there were told (and believe) they only had DCIS, when, in fact, a micro was missed. Not to worry you, but I'll bet it has happened to more women than just me. A good reason to take the DCIS out and look at the lumpectomy sample, for sure.
-
Excellent commentary. Thank you all for weighing in. I have all of the reports and imaging disks except for initial mammograms and an ultrasound done on September 3 at another hospital. It is clear to me that I need to go ahead and get in touch with the new surgeon, send the path and other reports, and get the wheels in motion for a second review and opinion of the tissue slides from a different pathologist!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team