ONCOTYPE TEST and FISH TEST
Is normal to take so long to get these test results back. I have my lumpectomy done on March 2 and my follow-up appointment with the breast surgeon on March 7. At that time I was told my three nodes were clear of any malignancy. I find it unusual I have to wait so long to find out what my treatment is going to be the number is on the on oncotype test. My appointment is this Friday. Would any of you want to call the lab and find out your results before you speak to the oncologist. Waiting starting to really get to me
Comments
-
Some MOs won't give that info out over the phone. You could ask. At least to make sure the results are in. My tissue didn't get sent to CA for the Oncotype until I started questioning why the results were t yet in. Can't speak to to the FISH. I think that is done locally or in house. Waiting is the worst part of this. Hang in there.
-
It seems unusual to me that Oncotype Dx testing would happen without definitive results from FISH testing. FISH is to determine Her2 status, and Oncotype testing is not done on Her2+ samples. Until the Her2 status is known Oncotype should not be done.
-
My oncotype test came back in two weeks, but my FISH took 6 weeks.
-
See if your facility has a patient portal. Get an account and login to see if any of your reports are on there. If I remember, FISH gets sent out, so takes about a week. For me, my cancer diagnosis came about 24 hours after my core biopsy, the Her2 came a week later, but I don't think anyone told me or told me what that meant. Then 16 days later I met with the MO who told me HER2+++, that he had the tumor sized again based upon the MRI, not the mammo and US, so now it was over 2cm, putting me at stage II and I would need chemo since it was Her2+++. Mind you, getting it over 2cm, allowed me different therapies, but still. Threw me for a loop. No one had mentioned that.
-
wow KN that is scary stuff. I hope I don't go in and get told my cancer is not as small as I originally was told.
-
Actually is is very common for cancer to be larger on final path than biopsy. I was glad I was warned to expect that.
-
oh... well on my pathology report mine was smaller.
-
That is a good thing!
-
I know!
-
I had to wait 2-3 weeks for my oncotype score to come in and the MO would not give me the results over the phone. The only thing that changed on my final pathology was the grade of the tumor (I actually had 3 small tumors) it was upgraded from grade 1 to grade 3, which is the main reason the MO ordered the oncotype test and he didn't even order it until after I met with him for the first time. I knew hormone receptor status right away but had to wait a few days for the HER status.
The waiting is the hardest part, hang in there!
-
Thanks finally got score of 19, and will do radiation and hormonal drug
-
I'm sure that's a huge relief!
-
Such a huge relief. I can finally breathe!! Thamks😀
-
I'll bet, Florida! Do you know yet which AI you'll be on? I hope it works out very well for you.
-
she mentioned. Anastrozale
-
Are you going to start it after radiation? I think that's usual but I'm not sure there's any particular reason for it. At this point I'd be afraid to stop Femara for the duration of rad.- have to ask my BS or MO about that, eventually.
At any rate, enjoy your weekend knowing chemo isn't in the cards!
-
not sure yet. Thanks you enjoy too. I feel so good now there is a plan. Particularly one with no chemo
-
I had a lumpectomy, and am healing fine. I have IDC- I'm 51, and pre menopausal. My pathology report says I am stage 1A, grade 3, ER+ PR+, HER-, nottingham score 9, KI 67= 60%, and I'm waiting on the oncotype dx (genomic) test results. I was wondering if anyone with a grade 3 (aggressive) got a low number? I'm really scared of the thought of enduring chemo.
-
Shanann-
I was grade 3 and my oncotype score was 19. I chose to do chemo even though I could have went either way. Glad I did! Chemo is scary, but wondering if I made the wrong decision for the rest of my life was scarier!
-
I am grade 3, high KI67 and low Oncotype score of 8. I am 95% estrogen positive. The discrepancy makes me nervous.
-
Thank you, Ladies (windingshores & readytorock!! I know everyone is scared. I will do the chemo if the Oncologist recommends it based on the results of the genomic testing. I will find out in about a week. It's just that I've been pouring over situations from countless ladies, but none that I've read quite match my pathology results with Stage 1A, but the high grade and the high KI 67 percentage. I was beginning to worry that the grade might be more important than the stage, but I think that's not the case. I'm not sure about how to figure out the estrogen/ progesterone percentage; I only know it's positive, and the doctor said that was a good thing. Boy! You start learning a lot during this waiting process, and still- things are murky and unclear. If my tumor feeds on estrogen is there something I should or should not be eating? And, if the cancer was not in the lymph nodes why am I worried about the cancer metastasizing? That's very scary!! So, does the Oncotype score tell if the cancer has/will metastasize or just show the percentage of recurrence?
-
I am going to nutritionist tomorrow after radiation to ask that question about food and if I should avoid certain food.
-
Shanann - it gives you a recurrence %. No way to know if it will metastasize.
windingshores- my score was 11 - IDC, Stage 2, Grade 1. That is unusual for a Grade 3 to have such a low score.
Diane
-
You're right. It gives the % chance of recurrence, but it also studies 21 genes and how they will respond to treatment, which is how they know whether we need radiation or chemo or both, right? So, it analyzes and predicts. I just thought since if they would treat us with chemo with a high chance of recurrence (could be same area, or in the brain, eye, liver, etc...) and, since the chemo works in the bloodstream to kill cancer that may have traveled elsewhere or be in the process of traveling elsewhere, isn't that metastasizing?. Otherwise, why would we take chemo? I guess I'm not understanding something. I mean, isn't the radiation more directed at killing the area where the tumor was in order to prevent recurrence in that same area; whereas, chemo is meant to go throughout the body and look for and kill it where EVER it might be because the high number suggests it? I'm sorry. I'm so new to this, and have so much more to learn. I'm a little slow too.
-
Oncotype test will tell you the percentage of Estrogen positive.
The Oncotype company tells me 30% of low scores are high grade. But there are aspects of their test I don't trust (such as HER2) and I am troubled by the fact they won't reveal most test results or even the genetic components they test. Ki67 is one.
My pathology results for biopsy and surgical specimen were different and my tumor is heterogeneous. I tried to have a retest of Oncotype because it was done on biopsy materials. My oncologist ordered this but would not advocate strongly for it. So I am changing MD's.
I think it's scary that Oncotype trumps everything else. I found an MD who thinks for herself and is retesting some of my surgical results, particularly HER2, which was positive in biopsy and negative on surgical with two equivocals including 2+.
All I can say is, I am glad I woke up and kept trying MD's: this is my 4th and I have finally found the right one.
-
Good for you to keep trying, and finding one you feel comfortable and confident with!! I see your concerns. I am concerned that my Oncologist, while seeming very compassionate, already told me I would be taking Tomoxifen, which must be standard at this point, I suppose. One of the side effects of this pill is ovarian cancer. I was reading that there is a drug (starts with an "A" can't spell) that does the same thing without that side effect, so I was questioning why the doctor was so adamant that I'd be taking it before my test results came back. I am happy for you, and I do wish you the best!!
-
After I posted I was afraid I sounded too negative. There are so many excellent doctors in this field. My case is a little unusual for a few contradictory tests.
Tamoxifen is good if you are premenopausal, and the aromatase inhibitors (anastrazole/Arimidex, letrozole/Femara, and Aromasin) are first line for post-menopausal women.
An earlier question asked about why chemo when nodes are negative. Chemo is used preventatively now, in cases where there is a chance something microscopic could have slipped through. MD's are using Oncotype to determine whose tumor is going to respond to chemo (some women were getting chemo but not benefiting) and those with high estrogen positivity can benefit even more from hormonal meds- tamoxifen for you apparently.
The Mayo Clinic has a really good, manageable, clear book about breast cancer. Susan Love and John Link (both MD's) also have good books out. It helped me a lot to get a book!
-
Shanann,
I wanted to let you know that the Oncotype Dx recurrence score is only relevant to whether or not CHEMO is beneficial to you. In the Oncotype DX trial all women took tamoxifen for 5 years, so the Oncotype DX score assumes that you will take 5 years of tamoxifen. Therefore, it has no relevance on your decision of whether or not you should be taking hormonal treatment. For women with very low Oncotype scores, they may be extremely responsive to hormonal treatment (and hence low Oncotype scores and NO CHEMO), but if they had not taken the hormonal treatment, their recurrence rates would be much higher.
I keep writing on various threads about this distinction, because it seems to me that many women are putting too much stock into this ONE number in their treatment decisions, and especially when they are deciding to forego hormonal treatment - as stated above, the Oncotype DX score has NO relevance as to whether or not a patient should have hormonal treatment - it is only relevant as to the decision with respect to chemotherapy.
Also, as you know tumors are made up of cells, and one or more cells break off the tumor and go into the bloodstream, when the cancer is invasive. Many of these cells do not survive their travel in the bloodstream, but some do. The only method that a cancer cell could go and metastasize in some other part of your body is NOT through the lymph nodes. These cells also enter and travel directly through the bloodstream. A single cell that survives may cause a future metastasis. All systemic therapies target these cells that have escaped the tumor - anti-hormonals, chemo etc. If you have a lumpectomy, the radiation is necessary. If you have a mastectomy, radiation may or may not be necessary depending on your margins and whether or not you have lymph node involvement.
I am so sorry you have found yourself in a place where you have to make all these decisions. I hope your treatment goes very well. Chemo is not as scary or bad as one imagines. After my first infusion of AC, I went out to dinner with friends. The modern anti-nausea medicines are extremely strong and work very very well, as well as all other "support" medicines given during the chemo. I personally hate nausea, and was very happy that the medicines worked so well.
-
shanann - I am curious where the ovarian cancer side effect information came from. I had not heard that previously, although I have read info about ovarian cysts occurring. Uterine thickening is a more documented side effect, and most docs monitor that closely for their patients on Tamoxifen.
-
https://www.breastcancercare.org.uk/breast-cancer-...
It may cause ovarian cancer and/or polyps. I have read that it might also cause Uterine cancer. Both my mother, and her sister had uterine cancer, and my aunt died from the disease (she refused to be treated until it was too late). Since it runs in my family I am greatly concerned.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team