What happens after hormonal tx? There goes my safety blanket:(

Options

Hi everyone! I was just wondering....is there anyone out there who is done with their hormonal txs ? If so, what next? I am afraid to give up my safety blanket. Is there any new studies that show it is more beneficial to stay on hormonal s longer than 10 years? I feel like my cancer is just hiding and waiting to come back. Even with all of the side effects.....isn't it better than dealing with cancer again?

«1

Comments

  • momand2kids
    momand2kids Member Posts: 1,508
    edited February 2015

    I am done- have been since June--- my onc did not think keeping me on an AI made sense and the research was not there to support it--- if that changes, she will change her mind--- but I am delighted.... Those are some strong drugs and I was ready to get off.... I feel like femara caused some memory challenges, vaginal dryness, etc. Some of that is still there, but I am glad to be rid of it.... feel great!!!


  • spendygirl
    spendygirl Member Posts: 231
    edited February 2015

    I'm so glad you raised this issue! Just saw my onc and I will finish letrozole on July 31. On one hand I'm soooo excited to be done, lots of side effects (it's been a tough mental battle to keep taking it), on the other hand, it's my security blanket and I'm so afraid to give it up. My onc says the research does not support 10 years and these are strong, relatively new drugs with unknown long term side effects. So....I guess I will stop at the end of July and try to get back to normal a little bit- well, the new normal.

  • flannelette
    flannelette Member Posts: 984
    edited February 2015

    Me too. Done a year ago. I thought there would be some long discussion of pros & cons w my onc but nope - she said no way is there evidence to justify more than 5 years (I was on arimidex). Couldn't have held on even if I'd tried. She said it's more important to concern myself with my bone strength and other things. I was only very weakly estrogen+ so it's not such a big deal for me, I guess. But I certainly understand the fear of loss of the safety blanket. You made it! not all were lucky enough to. Congratulations!

  • proudtospin
    proudtospin Member Posts: 5,972
    edited February 2015

    I am like above, I ended my 5 years in june 08, it was tough ended the med but so glad it is over as my BP is back to where it was before

    think it is all about what your stage was at the start and I was pure DCIS. I have passed the one year with no AL so fine

  • spendygirl
    spendygirl Member Posts: 231
    edited February 2015

    for the ladies who have finished, do you feel different being off the medication? I have pretty much all the side effects, especially osteoporosis now taking Prolia. I'm wondering if you feel better being having finished? Thanks so much for any input.

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited February 2015

    Yes, you will feel better. I felt pretty good on but feel even better now that I'm done. Nothing earthshattering for me, more like a subtle lightening of my mood; I sleep better, am less achy etc. I was kind of scared to be done, but there is (as of now) no research that supports staying on Als longer than 5 years (a friend of mine's oncologist commented to her that research is far enough along so if there was a BIG benefit being shown, it would have been leaked by now). Anyone who is told to stay on right now either has a more advanced cancer (and the doctor is hedging his/her bets) or he/she is (in my opinion) being over zealous, as these are serious drugs with serious potential consequences as well. I was very glad that I was able to be on it for 5 years, but I am also very glad to be DONE!

  • coraleliz
    coraleliz Member Posts: 1,523
    edited February 2015

    I just had this discussion with my MO last week. I have 18months left on the 5yr Tamoxifen plan. I think he might be tired of hearing me complain about side effects. He said the absolute benefit for me would be around 2-3% to continue past the 5yr mark. He wasn't recommending it. 2-3% is a small number to both of us. I'll have to wait & see how I feel when the time comes. I predict I'll go off of all antihormonals. I also might ask for the BCI test closer to the fact.

  • Racy
    Racy Member Posts: 2,651
    edited February 2015

    Hi, if you want to continue treatment, find another doc who will support that. That's what I intend to do.

    wishing y'all well!

  • Naomi12475
    Naomi12475 Member Posts: 253
    edited February 2015

    Thanks for all of the feedback. Glad to here everyone is doing well !!!!


  • beergirl
    beergirl Member Posts: 334
    edited February 2015

    I just had my first Prolia injection Saturday. Sunday morning I woke up very early with lower back pain (very unusual). The same pain Monday and today, although it is not as bad as it was Sunday. Could this be caused by the Prolia? Maybe I just need to buy a new mattress.

    I had osteoporosis before being diagnosed with breast cancer. I have had Aredia, Zometa, and Reclast infusions. I have been taking femara since 2008. My onc said 5 years, then 8, then 10, and now maybe the rest of my life. I have had very little SE's from femara, except it surely has not helped my bones.

  • Naomi12475
    Naomi12475 Member Posts: 253
    edited March 2015

    What did your onc mean by 5, 8 and 10....rest of life.....femara???? :/ ?

  • Tomboy
    Tomboy Member Posts: 3,945
    edited March 2015

    I agree! Especially since it was a lower stage and grade!! Less than a centimeter, and no nodes?! Sounds like over treatment to me.

  • aussieched
    aussieched Member Posts: 244
    edited March 2015

    beergirl,

    Yes I would have to agree with the other comments above, with such a low risk breast cancer, I would have to question the oncologist on why the treatment would be extended for so long, it just doesn't seem right.

    Ched

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    My first MO said the said thing--expect to be on Tamox/AI for 10 years if not the rest of your life! Yikes. He mentioned there would be new studies coming out to confirm.

  • Lolis197138
    Lolis197138 Member Posts: 512
    edited March 2015

    My MO mentioned that I will be on tamoxifen for 10 yrs or. 15 or more. If the benefit of these drugs are only 2-3% after the 5 year mark I might stop taking it after 5 years (as long as that 2-3% in not a yearly benefit).

    Not sure if there was a study on the long term effects of AI but tamoxifen effects continued long after a person stops taking it. 

  • rozem
    rozem Member Posts: 1,375
    edited March 2015

    i think it also depends on age. For us pre-menopausal women there is a benefit to staying on for 10 years. Im still not sure if thats a combo if tamox & AI Everyones benefit is different depending on their own reccurence risk.

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    Since the risk for ER/PR + does not go down after 5 years like TNBC and HER-2+, I think that is the rationale. Our chances for a late recurrence are higher than the other types. So, it makes sense to stay on endocrine therapy--but definitely I will do a risk/benefit analysis at appropriate intervals as I age.

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited March 2015

    It does go down every year, but not as drastically as the TN ladies does

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    I've heard that, ruthbru, and then I have heard conflicting stats (how unusual!--my whole bc journey has been nothing but conflicting opinions). Anyway, here is a recent article regarding the European Breast Cancer Conference last year and their findings. This makes the case for longer endocrine therapy treatment:

    http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/EBCC/4...

    If you cannot reach the link, the article is titled "Some Breast Cancers Required Longer Tx" on medpagetoday.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited March 2015
    Thanks for the link, Katcar. I'm only 4 months in but was told that if I responded well (and I do), to expect to be on an AI for at least 5 years and probably 10. My hope is that by that time we'll have another 'security blanket' option. Of course, it probably won't be generic, so will cost the earth...
  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    If they came up with something that was better than what we have now and that could be measured (biomarkers?), then I'd pay be willing to pay the earth! That's great that you are responding well to the AI. I wish I had been given the option for neadjuvant hormone therapy, just so I'd know. I am in the dark completely as to whether I am responding to Tamoxifen or not. Still waiting on results of my CYP2D6 test, which has its own set of controversies. I am really struggling with the relinquishing of control with this disease. I hope it gets better in time. I feel weird not having chemo or radiation--haven't found enough evidence to show me the benefit is worth the risks. I need to make peace with my doctors' and my decisions--just not there yet.

  • Hopeful82014
    Hopeful82014 Member Posts: 3,480
    edited March 2015

    I understand that struggle, Katcar. It's tough. I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to do neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; it would be worthwhile if only for the knowledge of whether I am responsive or not. I think that eventually that may be standard for ER+ cancers - I would hope so, anyway.

    I'm sure that going without either radiation or chemo feels something like stepping off a ziplining platform for the first time; you know it SHOULD be o.k. but still, there's no safety net underneath... All I can say is that I hope tamox. does work out very well for you and that you'll get enough reliable information that you feel you can settle into the regimen and feel comfortable with it. I know that everyone dx with cancer lives with this uncertainty to one degree or another. Breast cancer may be somewhat more so because there are so many aspects to treatment and so many facets to the disease. It definitely adds to the stresses.

    People such as yourself who share so generously help counterbalance that stress. I hope some of that good karma lifts your day and eases the struggle a bit.

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited March 2015

    katcar, it's as clear as mud isn't it? ShockedI have been digging around on the Internet for a couple hours now & opinions are all over the place. I know I read someplace (which, of course, I can't find at the moment, that 10 years would only be a benefit to 2-5% of ladies). I went to the John Hopkins website, where I've gotten good information before from their 'Ask An Expert' section and they are totally non-committal, "The highest risk of recurrence for breast cancer patients is during the first two years following treatment. Your risk of recurrence is never zero; however, as more time passes, your risk goes down. The challenge is for the medical oncologist to determine which patients will need 10 years vs 5 years. There is research happening in that regard too, as only a small portion really need a decade of therapy."


     

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    Good morning lovelies!

    Hopeful, You are so eloquent and have a way with words. You are the one who shares so generously. I don't know how you made so many posts in such a short time. Where do you find the time? I can barely keep up with reading. And somehow, I still missed that one can do neoadjuvant hormone therapy before surgery. I would have explored that option had I known about it. I just read about your cousin and how she did not rads or chemo either, so that makes me very "hopeful." Is she taking an AI or Tamoxifen?

    Ruthbru, I sure what like to find that quote about the 2-5% as I'd like to understand who are the women who benefit. I will try some hunting and pecking myself and see what I come up with and will share if I find it.



  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited March 2015

    Ruthbru, Found this:

    http://www.who.int/selection_medicines/committees/...

    Burstein, H.J. et al., 2014. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol, 32(21), pp.2255–2269.

    Summary: Systematic review of recent trials (Jan 2009 – Jan 2013) and analysis of three historical trials, now recommend that for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, if women have received 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen, offer choice of continuing tamoxifen or switching to AI for 10 years total adjuvant endocrine therapy.

    Davies, C. et al., 2013. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS,a randomised trial. The Lancet, 381(9869), pp.805–816. Summary: Absolute mortality reduction of 2.8% for women who continued on tamoxifen for 10 years compared to those who stopped at 5 years (12.2% vs 15.0% mortality risk) for patients with ER+ breast cancer.

    Cuzick, J. et al., 2010. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. The lancet oncology, 11(12), pp.1135– 1141. Summary: Anastrozole alone improved 3-year disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen (89% vs 87%) or combination (87%) in ER+, post-menopausal patients.

    Goss, P.E. et al., 2003. A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. NEJM. 349(19), pp.1793–1802. Summary: Addition of letrozole 2.5mg (AI) to adjuvant tamoxifen x 5 years improved 4- year disease-free survival by 6% (87 -> 93%) for post-menopausal women.

  • Lilyn
    Lilyn Member Posts: 282
    edited March 2015

    Hi I also finished my five years on Femara. My oncologist here in Toronto also said no research showing additional benefit to stay on longer. I am now 61 and I guess risk of fracture would be greater on meds. Anyway my breast surgeon said best way to stay healthy is exercise, keep good healthy weight. I have read this before and she said it again they have found 25% less recurrence in women who are a healthy weight and exercise. I better get my act together! Started walking on treadmill, walk dog a lot, need to lose 25 pounds (god I have been saying that for 10 years argggg!

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited March 2015

    Come over to the fitness forum & check out the 'Lets Post Our Daily Exercise' thread. A great group of ladies in all stages of treatment and beyond & at all fitness levels too. A good way to keep accountable & have some fun!

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited March 2015

    Okay, I have been looking at clinical trials and extended endocrine therapy all afternoon & now have to get ready for company! The 3-4% benefit for extended use came from an advertisement from a  company that advertises a new test called BCI (Breast Cancer Index.....I don't know anything about it or how useful a tool it might be, maybe someone else does....it is supposed to test your chance of late recurrence).

    What I got from the trials was basically the points I will copy below (the bolding is mine):

    "In pre-menopausal patients, tamoxifen in association with a longer use of LHRH is the gold standard especially for patients that continue to menstruate after chemotherapy, although it is actually not possible to identify subgroups in which the hormonal therapy has a little benefit."

    and

    "In post-menopausal patients we are waiting for more data to identify the better strategy to use AIs, upfront or switching strategy, actually both results valid. We need more data to extended therapy with AIs after 5 years and if we decide to prolong therapy we must outweigh benefit and risk of toxicities. Thus, methods for improving the use of endocrine therapy, such as exploring new classes of agents, dosing, scheduling, combinations, and the addition of targeted agents to reduce the development of resistance, are crucial for the next future."

    and to sum up:

    "Women with estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (BC) are at continuing risk of relapse up to at least 15 years after diagnosis, despite being on adjuvant endocrine therapy for approximately 5 years. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) after 5 years of tamoxifen further reduces the risk of recurrence in postmenopausal women. More recently, continuing tamoxifen for 10 years has also been shown to further reduce the risk of recurrence compared with 5 years. There are no direct comparative data on the relative merits of extended tamoxifen compared with an AI; indirect evidence suggests that an AI may have increased efficacy but a greater adverse effect on quality of life. Results are awaited on the need for continuing front-line adjuvant AIs for more than 5 years. The next challenge is to determine which patients will benefit from this long-term treatment. "

    No kidding!!!!!!!


     

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited March 2015

    I just glanced back & coraleliz was given an absolute benefit of 2-3% for continuing on Tamoxifen for more than 5 years & mentions the BCI test. They need to find out who actually DOES benefit, because if one keeps taking the pills & isn't one of them, then you are risking other health serious problems for nothing. Shocked

  • JudiH
    JudiH Member Posts: 1,184
    edited December 2015

    Lilyn, I'm also from Ontario - north of Toronto. I'm at Sunnybrook. Where is your oncologist. I'm coming up to 5 years in February, 2016 and anxiously awaiting to hear whatever news I'm going to get. Did you go off of Als. I'm on Femara and have handled it well. But, I must say I stepped up my exercise program and diet regime.

Categories