Anyone NOT elect to do Hormone Therapy?

Options
13

Comments

  • MagicalBean
    MagicalBean Member Posts: 362
    edited February 2015

    I am post-menopausal, and 100% ER & PR+. My MO gave me the option of taking Tamoxifen or not (she said that would be the most effective RX for my situation so no other meds were discussed). I decided to give it a try-I do not want to repeat these last 4 months. I want as much ammunition in my arsenal as I can have. I'm on week 6 and no SE so far.

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited February 2015

    I did not want to take Tamoxifen. The listed side effects were scary. Then I read through the entire How old were you when diagnosed thread... ran for my bottle of Tamoxifen, esp. since I am not having chemo. I know it is no guarantee either, but we have been given tools that we should at least try. The number of young women with mets with babies was heartbreaking and threw me into a real down state. Please, young women, I hope you will consider taking the hormonals and everything the docs throw at you, as the evidence is right there in black and white that bc in young women is more aggressive.

  • kaza
    kaza Member Posts: 284
    edited February 2015

    I was not offered chemo, Arimidex for 4,5 years, now just started Tamoxifen, no side effects as yet taken it for 10 days

    Side effects from Arimidex were difficult, hoping Tamoxifen will be easier, giving it my best shot.....

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited February 2015

    We all have to pick our poison. Age, size of tumor, stage, number of nodes, etc. all play into the decision. Also, whether we have had chemo and/or rads will make a difference. Some of us do everything the doctors tell us, while others figure out what is best from our own research. There are so many combos of stats and when all is said and done, I hope that each of us ladies makes the right choices so that we never have to deal with this again.

  • katcar0001
    katcar0001 Member Posts: 621
    edited February 2015

    "I hope that each of us ladies makes the right choices so that we never have to deal with this again."

    Amen

  • RaiderGirl
    RaiderGirl Member Posts: 419
    edited February 2015

    emily_the_C

    I am not trying to dissuade you from your decision to forgo hormone therapy but if you want a personal experience here is mine.

    First month of Femara, I felt hot, tired, itchy and bit*chy. Told the onc I couldn't do this and stay sane. He gave me a one month off everything. Then I started on Aromasin. I had very bad hot flashes and sweats. I mean nuclear. He put me on 40 mg of megace daily. All is good now.

    So, conclusion so far I only have some fatigue and nothing else . I haven't so far experienced any of the horrid side effects I was told would happen.

    I know it only been a few months, maybe my hell is just around the corner but so far so good.

    I guess what I am trying to say is that we are all so individual

    I wish all good things your way.

    RG

  • raindeer1217
    raindeer1217 Member Posts: 90
    edited February 2015

    Cancer sucks! I am sick of thinking about it and living with

    I had my third Lupron injection this month and like clock work the side effects are kicking my ass.

    (Not joking here)

    I went through three surgeries hardly missing a beat, shit I flew through dense dose chemo dancing with the red devil and kicked her ass all with a smile on my face. I hardly missed work, didn't get down, was pretty up beat and smily even when my head was buried in the toilet.

    But this "preventative treatment" is kicking my ass. Sick omg! Let the roller coaster begin. Here's a little taste of the side effects: week one- flu/cold symptoms, dry eyes, swollen fingers and belly (like stretch pants needed so swollen), coughing a dry hacking cough that keeps me up and just about cracks my ribs, Week two- hip and teeth pain, I've never had a cavity but holy crap the pain is unreal! I feel like every tooth in my head is throbbing. The hot flashes, for the love of God! I am a sweaty smelly gross wet mess, hot cold hot cold. Lovely insomnia (hello 4am). The mood swings- rage anger, sniffly sadness, and finally a deep depression settles in, it's a deep dark, lonely, scary place, for about one week. Then by the middle of week three.... Poof all SE fade and for one week I get a glimmer of the old Rain.

    Oh and My flipping hair is falling out again! How's that for a cherry on top.

    Ahhhhhh!!!!

    So this the aftermath of cancer. Some people breeze thru treatment only to get beat down in the preventative treatment. Maybe I am just a whiner, but I am pretty sure I've got some tuff skin here, but enough is enough.

    There is no rhyme or reason why some people have a harder time then others the hormone inhibitors?

    I am tired flat out worn out i don't want to burden my friends and family with talking about cancer yet again (I can hear myself as the teacher from peanuts "wah wah wah wah")

    So is the trade off of these drugs worth it? The Dr assures me as my body adjusts to the hormone blockers things will get better.

    But,I don't think I will continue with the treatment, I am leaning towards a final surgery to get my ovaries removed vs being on drugs.

    Well till then I am riding the crazy train.

    Woot woot.

  • Trvler
    Trvler Member Posts: 3,159
    edited February 2015

    Raindeer: I am so sorry you are going through this. I hope you can get it figured out and get some relief. How long has it been since you started it all?


    Please don't beat up on yourself for having physical reactions to this stuff. You sound a little like you are blaming yourself for not being tougher.

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited February 2015

    raindeer, there is a thread you might want to take a look at. It's called Why was I stronger DURING treatment than I a now? There are many supportive ladies on that thread that have been exactly where you are. Unfortunately the whole cancer thing is a progression until we get to the last stages of treatment. I think there are many factors, but it seems that for some of us who are younger, being thrown into menopause with meds or chemo or surgery is just one step too much. Menopause is suppose to be a long drawn out thing where we get some little hot flashes and then perhaps some poor sleep, etc. After cancer, no one tells us that the abrupt menopause will possibly take us down.

    Your stats hint toward you being younger (under 50) and your body and mind have said enough.

  • raindeer1217
    raindeer1217 Member Posts: 90
    edited February 2015

    Hi Trvler - insomnia induced
    ranting i am afraid. (blushing a little) guess I am beating myself up a little.
    I was so strong thru everything only to not be able to endure the last steps of
    this battle. I can't handle the SE of the drugs, I put off any hormone blockers
    for a year, strongly against me Onc. Dr. wishes. My appt In December she
    pressed me to go on the Leuprolide (Lupron) and Exemestane (Aromasin) - she
    assured me the bennies out weight the SE. So I tried it, but I am a mess. My
    husband wants me to continue with the treatments as he wants me to give life a
    fighting chance. I don't understand why I am having such bad SE to hormone
    blockers. I feel like I want to stop but what if I get cancer again and because
    i couldn't see it through. Thinking the biggest culprit of the SE is the Lurpon
    shot, not sure what the Aromasin is causing for SE. My Onc. says per my stats
    grade and age of Dx (36) the risk are higher reoccurrence, as my cancer was
    grade 3 with PR & ER 99% Receptive.



     

    Thinking about just having my
    ovaries out too, or simply just going off the meds and live life to the
    fullest.



     

    Ay thought or insight very much
    welcomed.




     

  • hummingbirdlover
    hummingbirdlover Member Posts: 421
    edited February 2015

    What a great thread!  I have to admit, after stewing for 2 weeks, waiting for the oncotype score to come back and envisioning chemo and worrying about everything that went along with that - that day I was sitting in the MO's office on my birthday in November and he told me oncotype 17 and no chemo, I would have swallowed my shoe if he asked me to.  He prescribed tamoxifen and quite frankly, I was ecstatic!  I didn't even want to know what the potential SEs were.  So, I've been taking it for 3 months.  At first, nothing except for nuclear melt-down hot flashes, but those I can deal with.  The past month or so, I developed something along the lines of a yeast infection that was horrible and would not go away!  I rode it out for a few weeks and under the advice of a BC friend, starting eating yogurt every day (which I hate) and stopped using soap in the nether regions.  I bought some feminine wash and that's all I use and frankly, things have gotten much better.  I never once considered not taking the tamoxifen.  Probably because I didn't have chemo, I felt like tamox was my friend in battle and I would deal with the SEs if they came up.  Well, they are there but I'm trying to live with them.  I do worry about cysts, and uterine lining and all of that and need to follow up with those questions...like, who's monitoring that?  Just like everything else with BC, it's one crappy choice, followed by another crappy choice and we don't know which are the right ones.  I don't think we need to defend our decisions to anyone, but ourselves.  These are not easy choices to make and of course we all want to live long, happy lives.  I hope you all can find peace in whatever path you take.

  • BettyBoo
    BettyBoo Member Posts: 72
    edited February 2015

    I decided against Tamoxifen, 5 years out, I am doing ok. My BS said that it is unlikely that I will have a recurrence now. I hope he is right!

  • Trvler
    Trvler Member Posts: 3,159
    edited February 2015

    Raindeer: Ok I am fairly new to all of this stuff but wouldn't taking your ovaries out possibly have the same effect as the blockers? You are way further along than I am so just ignore that question if I am completely off base here.

    Another thing I don't know is how many of these hormone blocker options are out there. Is there maybe another drug that might be easier to handle? Have you considered another opinion from another doctor. Again, I am just starting all of this so I don't know if these questions are even worth asking.

    But I do know that about 10 people recommended I go to a doctor here locally and I went to him and didn't really agree with his approach and got a second opinion that made him look a little like an idiot, quite honestly.

    Anyway, I wish you the best.

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited February 2015

    Trvler, you are by no means off base. Second opinions are worth their weight in gold. I had a second on my initial pathology. I sort of sent myself into a tizzy over the first pathology report, so I had my slides sent to Johns Hopkins. The report did come back a bit different and helped me in my chemo decision. I had a second MO since the first wanted TACx6 and I felt that was overkill from my research. The second guy said TCx4 would be fine. I went back to the first MO (who was much older and even retired after my last treatment) and I told him the 2nd's opinion. He was okay with it. Being older, he was more likely to overkill his patients on chemo. Funny thing was that his replacement when he retired is very young and hip. He totally gets why I picked the 2nd guys advice, but stuck with the 1st guys office.

  • debiann
    debiann Member Posts: 1,200
    edited February 2015

    After going through 6 harsh rounds of chemo, a year of herceptin plus a bmx I felt like I fired all the "big guns" at this cancer and hormone therapy was just a little pea-shooter for some added protection. But I'm learning I was wrong,  a little pill can play a much more significant roll in staying cancer free. 

    If you scan the stage lV threads you will see that many women with metastatic disease are being stabilized or even having their tumors shrink away with hormone therapy alone.

    For the HER2+ gals like me, yes herceptin and perjeta are amazing drugs, but if you read the stories of women doing neo-adjunctive chemo, many who are ER+ do not get a complete response, some of the tumor still remains, the ER part.  So while we endured chemo to try to rid our bodies of those nasty HER2 cells lurking around, we need to throw something at the ER+ too.

    So I now consider hormone therapy another "big gun" in my arsenal of weapons against cancer's return. 

    Luckily there are choices, so while one form of hormone  therapy may not suit your body, hopefully another will. Just like with chemo, for some, the side effects may outweigh the benefits and therapy may need to be discontinued and that is understandable. But many tolerate it well, so don't brush it off without considering it's power and importance.

  • Trvler
    Trvler Member Posts: 3,159
    edited February 2015

    Rockym. That's really interesting. I guess I kind of figured it made a difference. There are old school and new school approaches as my possible BS has said to me.

    Debiann: Interesting. I haven't had the courage to venture into IV too much yet. I guess I will eventually get over there. I am reading so much other stuff right now and now I am going to have to start reading chemo stuff quickly because I know exactly NOTHING about it yet.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited February 2015

    I will throw in my info.

    Premeno, happily married, dx at age 51 with HER2+++, ER+/PR+, 1.9 cm IDC in 2002 (back when AI's were still only given to those with mets and adjuvant tamoxifen was for all HR+).

    Did chemo followed by rads, and got back to enjoying life in all aspects. Started tamoxifen and 2 weeks later my gender disappeared permanently, along with becoming postmenopausal. Took tamo at full dose for 1 year, then at half-dose for 3/4 year, then quit it.

    My guess is that I may be one of those for whom tamoxifen is highly effective. My mammo after chemo and rads continued to show very dense breasts, but at 3 months after starting tamoxifen my mammo showed all breast density had disappeared. It has stayed that way. My guess is that continuing to take it longer would have been superfluous for me, along with adding the usual tamoxifen hazards and any SEs during that extended time.

    Having had a HR+ tumor and now being 14 years out from tx with no recurrence, I am considered to be at high risk for late recurrence. I use organic diet, weight management, and balancing omega-3's and 6's for recurrence prevention, along with annual MRI recommended by my BS alternating with annual mammo for early detection.

    I suggest you google "Karolinska Institute" (a reputable research entity), "tamoxifen" and "breast density" to learn about their study regarding breast density and tamoxifen, which provides a possible way to gauge whether tamoxifen is having useful effects or is a waste of putting up with SE's (for those who just happen not to get benefit from tamoxifen).

    Mine is just one added anecdote. Best wishes to you all.

  • debiann
    debiann Member Posts: 1,200
    edited February 2015

    AlaskaAngel,

    It is great to see someone HER+ so far out from dx and doing so well and you didn't even have herceptin!

    It reminds be of what my bs said to me, "perhaps surgery is all you need, that alone may totally eliminate the cancer from your body, we don't really know so that's why chemo is being recommened, just in case some cancer cells escaped."

    That's the difficult part of this disease, nothing is 100%. Maybe you need this tx, maybe you don't. Maybe it will come back, maybe it won't. The best you do is be informed and make decisions you can live with.


  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited February 2015

    Also from 2013:

    http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/15/5/R93

    Of course, other factors might also be involved. It is just one effort in trying to narrow down on what persons stand to benefit from taking the drug, based on changes in breast density.


  • allicat1214
    allicat1214 Member Posts: 84
    edited March 2015

    I am on the fence about hormone therapy as well, because of past illnesses and taking medication for long periods of time and major SEs.

    I have Crohn's disease and took prednisone for years, which helped the Crohn's but caused other issues like osteoporosis, weight gain, etc. I also had a complete hysterectomy in June 2011, my gyno prescribed estrogen, vivelle dot in high dosage. I went thru hormone hell for a year after that and finally went to a nurse practitioner who focused on the whole picture as I also have fibromyalgia, systemic yeast infection, hypothyroidism, depression, and adrenal fatigue. She said doc had me on way too much estrogen j(and lab results proved it) and she lowered dose. I finally went off all hormones about 2 years ago.

    Last summer I started seeing an accupunturist/naturopath and since then I'm finally feeling healthy! She has me on a few supplements and encouraged me to change my way of eating! I'm exercising, eating clean (no sugar/dairy/grains and lots of organic fruit & veggies), and have lost about 35 pounds/45 inches since then. In fact, it was because I was out of the cloud of depression and focusing on my health that I went to regular doc in October for first time in 3 years and had complete physical: blood work, mammo, etc. That led to the breast cancer diagnosis. I'm so thankful it was caught so early.

    Anyway, my path reports showed both IDC and DCIS. Initial biopsy report only said IDC. But thankfully no nodes were positive. I have appointments with RO & MO this Thursday. I'm doing homework before I meet with them. I'm going to have the radiation therapy, but because of my history I'm just not sure about hormone therapy.

    My ER is strong positive - 95%, PR weak to moderate - 20%. I know body fat produces estrogen and I'm working hard to lose even more weight to bring my BMI down to normal range. It was 37.1 last summer. It's now 30. I have another 35 pounds to go to get to normal of 25.

    Did anyone request an Oncotype Dx test AFTER initial pathology report? I know it is usually used to determine whether or not to have chemo but what about for determining hormone therapy?

    After taking several prescription medications for years that ended up causing major problems for me without asking questions, I feel its important that I get all the facts before I sign up for a 5 to 10 year commitment to take any drug.

    Thanks in advance for any advice, suggestions, etc., you may have....

    Allison

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited March 2015

    Oncotype test is simply to determine if chemo will reduce your chances of recurrence when combined with anti-hormone therapy. Many women take the test, especially younger women, to know if chemo is worth it. If the Oncotype test is a low number, then sometimes it's best not to put your body through such harsh treatment. Yes, it is done after surgery when the final pathology report is in. When a tumor's stats point toward chemo, the test can be helpful in decision making.

  • Mm68
    Mm68 Member Posts: 64
    edited March 2015

    this thread has been very helpful. I will be halfway with my rads next Tues. and scheduled to start Tamoxifen once I have completed. I too have been on the fence after reading potential side effects. But since my Cancer is 95% ER+, I think I will give it a chance. My onco test was 12 so I did not have chemo. I will still ask MO many questions at my consult

  • Professor50
    Professor50 Member Posts: 220
    edited March 2015

    The information on the Oncotype score assumes the person is ON hormone therapy. Looking at the graphs, they do not give information WITHOUT tamoxifen. Rather the decision is for tamoxifen alone vs. tamoxifen+chemo. (At least that's what I've got). So, the score assumes you're doing hormone therapy...

    Right now, in my third bottle of tamoxifen, I am having trouble separating tam se's from the se's of age. I was complaining yesterday about weight gain and lack of energy but I was doing that before I was ever diagnosed.

  • AlaskaAngel
    AlaskaAngel Member Posts: 1,836
    edited March 2015

    Menopausal status/age at time of dx and tx is a major factor to consider when comparing anecdotal information about each other's situations, yet unfortunately it is not included for privacy reasons (I assume). Because it is absent (invisible), it is harder to keep in mind.

    Also, the silent, hidden aspect involving the standard practice of administering steroids with intensive therapies like chemo when that makes a difference in bodily function post-chemo is another difference among us, between the group who do chemo and those who do not, in terms of challenges we face along with hormonal therapies. For those who do not/cannot maintain normal exercise practices throughout such therapies as chemo, the use of steroids (along with drastically dropping testosterone levels with chemopause/menopause), muscle tissue diminishes significantly -- particularly for older women. It isn't like it can be restored, as post-tx testosterone levels remain lower. So it is more of a struggle to deal with weight gain for those who do chemo if they do become menopausal/postmenopausal.

    Instituting chemo tx at earlier and earlier stages of bc in order to "catch" the few who do benefit from it has very consequential hidden repercussions for the majority of early stage women who are treated.

  • tgtg
    tgtg Member Posts: 266
    edited March 2015

    Allicat--My Oncotype test was ordered 3 weeks after surgery, when I saw an MO, which still would have given me plenty of time to start hormonal therapy if I had been interested in it. The hospital lab just forwards your frozen tissue that they keep in their "freezer files" for subsequent study if needed. The MO knew that I was really opposed to starting hormonal therapy and said she would order the Oncotype test (a) to verify that I wouldn't need chemo (she was really sure I wouldn't) and (b) to give me a better idea of my recurrence odds. So you do want to ask the MO to order the test.

    Professor50, and Allicat--The Oncotype test results do predict recurrence odds based on using tamoxifen, true. But according to my MO, they can also be used to predict recurrence without it. The rule of thumb for recurrence prediction if not on tamoxifen, the MO said, is to about double the percentage, which for instance elevated my 8% chance of recurrence with it to about 15-16% without it,

  • bratscher
    bratscher Member Posts: 17
    edited March 2015

    I haven't officially declined Tamoxifen, but I may as well have.

    I developed really unpleasant side effects just 16 days after starting Tamoxifen - major joint pain, cognitive crap, constipation, spotting, cramps, etc. Although I have been in perimenopause for years, I am pretty healthy (except for the DCIS) and have no history of arthritis or anything like that. The onset of the symptoms came so close on the heels of starting tamoxifen that I can't blame it on anything else. I decided to stop taking Tamoxifen to see if the symptoms subsided. Within two days, they pretty much did.

    I have a full time job in IT, am an avid player of a musical instrument and long distance runner. I need to be alert, and I need all my joints to work. Good sleep and a regular digestive system would be nice too. The DCIS I had was so tiny (2.5mm) that they got it all in the biopsy and found nothing in the subsequent lumpectomy. Both my surgeon and the radiation oncologist recommended against radiation at this time, and I was happy to oblige. Now that I have tried Tamoxifen and seen what it does to me, I can't bear the thought of taking it for 5 days, let alone 5 years.

    I let the medical oncologist's nurse know that I'd "taken a break" from Tamoxifen, and she said she'd tell the doc and we'd discuss it at my next appointment (in May). I feel like the bad kid about to get caught out. But I would rather live with a tiny (6%) chance of recurrence that "live" (ha!) with the 3% that Tamoxifen might give me.


  • Trvler
    Trvler Member Posts: 3,159
    edited March 2015

    As I read a lot about BC and I have read a lot on here, it seems to me that there are quite a few doctors who put aside quality of life issues with these treatments. I guess one can only decide for themselves what therapies to try. But Bratscher, I don't think you should feel like a bad kid.

  • tgtg
    tgtg Member Posts: 266
    edited March 2015

    Bratscher--It's your body, your choice--remember that, and don't apologize for your choice. It would be wonderful if all oncologists would adopt the attitude of the MO I saw for advice; she said, "I'm here to give you my best advice based on data I have at my disposal, but it's not my job to force you to do anything." Sometimes that "force" factor comes in the form of intimidating a woman into accepting therapy, sometimes it is far less subtle. But the choice is yours (and mine), not the oncologist's.

  • Bren58
    Bren58 Member Posts: 1,048
    edited March 2015

    Bratscher, I did decline tamoxifen after my original dx back in 2000. After all the reading I did I was not comfortable with being thrown into immediate menopause and all the other SE's. I was 41 at the time with 2 teenagers. Even though I did have a recurrence, all the MO's that looked at my case said it would not have made a difference if I would have taken the tamoxifen. The ladies on here are right, it is your choice. The best we can do is make the most informed decision we can weighing all the risks and benefits. I think the key is to not look back and second guess your decision. Quality of life is a biggie, and one of the reasons I chose to quit the AI's after 15 months. The depression and anxiety were too much for me. After a month off the drugs, I was back to my normal self and able to enjoy life again.

  • eheinrich
    eheinrich Member Posts: 792
    edited March 2015

    I just got back my Oncotype score of 19. I am trying to decide chemo or not. Both my 1st & 2nd opinion docs say regardless Tamoxifen is a "must", 2nd oinion doc also tossed ovarian ablation into the mix. I have a history of recurrent depression with bipolar features. I've been on/off a variety of meds since 1998. My current cocktail is working. The thought of depression creeping back into my life is unbearable.

    If I don't do the hormone therapy I feel like I would be irresponsible to not do chemo.

    This is all so hard.....

Categories